What would happen to homosexual equality if parents could choose to have a normal child? My thanks to Michael R for the latest on the long-running story of the gay sheep of Oregon:-
So far so good. But then the Times reports the reactions from a famous lesbian who won Wimbledon once or twice, a Professor of bioethics who seems, to judge from his blog, terribly interested in homosexuality (and doesn’t much like Iran), Peter Tatchell of the former Bermondsey bedsit tendency, and a spokesperson - or possibly spokes-sheep, it isn’t clear which - from animal rights group, PETA. For some reason none of these people are advocates of parental rights. Ovine, yes. Homosexual, certainly. Parents? Children? Not a chance. It puts me in mind of a similar “debate” some years ago about a newly discovered and effective means to restore hearing function to certain deaf children. The outrage from professional deafness advocates was very similar to the story here. A hitherto undiscovered richness in deaf culture was noisily evoked. We the public were asked to believe that something profoundly rewarding in signed interaction, something that weighed more heavily in the treasures of the personal life than the very voices of those one loves, would be lost to these children if the treatment was provided. It was obviously untrue. But then as now, nobody wanted to point out the reason for the deception: that it is unbearable for the disadvantaged, having fought perhaps all their lives to erect some semblance of self-respect and equal worth, to have this exposed as nothing by the simple mechanism of parental choice. So unbearable is it, the antis will willingly deny new generations of children a normal life. For such delusion to attend disability is no cause for our political satisfaction. It is human farce upon human tragedy. But it is also not really the point because rights of free speech and free association are taken from the majority not to raise others to some leftist utopia of joyous equality, but to deprive the majority of its healthy and natural cultural hegemony. There is absolutely no morality in this, and no reason why we should hesitate to prick the “rights” balloon out of some newly learned Marxist sensibility. Comments:2
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Thu, 04 Jan 2007 04:06 | #
Very well put. The healthy must defend and care for the sick but it is immoral and a perversion for society to pretend, in a misguided spirit of compassion, that health and sickness are the same. 3
Posted by newmanj on Fri, 05 Jan 2007 01:37 | # Jim Newman here from the university actually conducting the research. In regards to the Sunday Times article which is he source of all these wild conspiracy theories, I am pleased that a writer has thoroughly investigated the article. As he reports, the Sunday Times article is filled with major errors and false claims. His analysis also raises important questions about the timing of the article which comes almost five years after the research was actually conducted. Here’s a link to that analysis that anyone who is interested in this topic should read: A wolf in gay sheep’s clothing: Corruption at the London Times 4
Posted by Guessedworker on Fri, 05 Jan 2007 23:47 | # Jim, Thanks for the info. Very interesting. PETA’s mercenary actions here are fully what one would expect from those hard-left demo thugs who dispersed into the Animal Rights movement after the Soviet Union collapsed. I wish I had known about the DK piece before I posted, not because the cultural left are any less blameless for being duped in this instance but, obviously, because it raises two further issues of substance: the fundamentally criminal nature of politically motivated (ie non-sentimental) animal rights activism, and the ability of two, presumably, professional journalists to pursue wholly personal agendas with no editorial oversight from their Times editor. Post a comment:
Next entry: Bold Hypothesis: Jews Are an Islamic Weapon
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News— CENTRAL— Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. (View) Patriotic Alternative given the black spot by Guessedworker on Thursday, 14 March 2024 17:14. (View) On Spengler and the inevitable by Guessedworker on Wednesday, 21 February 2024 17:33. (View) Twilight for the gods of complacency? by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 02 January 2024 10:22. (View) — NEWS — Moscow’s Bataclan by Guessedworker on Friday, 22 March 2024 22:22. (View) Soren Renner Is Dead by James Bowery on Thursday, 21 March 2024 13:50. (View) Collett sets the record straight by Guessedworker on Thursday, 14 March 2024 17:41. (View) CommentsAl Ross commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 02 May 2024 03:35. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 02 May 2024 03:12. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 25 Apr 2024 15:19. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 25 Apr 2024 11:53. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Wed, 24 Apr 2024 22:36. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Wed, 24 Apr 2024 14:20. (View) |
Posted by Lurker on Thu, 04 Jan 2007 02:45 | #
“richness in deaf culture was noisily evoked”
Superb GW, was that intentional? I had to laugh.