The Indian/Chinese IQ puzzle continued for comments after 1000

Posted by DanielS on Tuesday, 27 December 2016 03:30.

Details of painting of the meeting of Manjusri and Vimalakirti.

Originally Published Dec `2004 by John Jay, who said:

Both India and China are countries that have had the sort of moderate contact with the rest of Eurasia that their position at two extremities of Asia would lead one to expect.  Both India and China have had their own sophisticated civilizations for at least two thousand years.  The Chinese invented such things as gunpowder and printing.  The Indians invented the so-called “Arabic” numerals that we use to this day and one of their religions (Buddhism) has been enormously influential outside their own borders.  Both Indians and Chinese do extremely well economically outside their home countries.  To me this is a picture of two generally intelligent populations.  Yet the average IQ score for the two differs markedly.  Chinese score somewhat above the Western norm and Indians score markedly below it.  How come?

The comments have not been displaying after number 1000 - Sunny Mittal on Sat, 31 Aug 2013 14:41 | #, 1000 - therefore, I will include below the subsequent comments that were attempted since; and those who wish to comment on this thread may continue to do so hereafter.

 

anonymous 2014-08-24 11:09 AM said:

You should continue this subject in another page from the 1001st post

 


Ok, as we said, there were a few dozen comments which didn’t register after number 1000. The ones that did not appear span from 31 Aug 2013 to 27 Dec 2016 and are being displayed here, under the fold; the thread is continued anew and comments may resume.

 

Posted by Sunny Mittal on Sat, 31 Aug 2013 14:41 | # 1000

I think I have got still unfinished business with this Muslim street dogs.

1st, I don’t have to send money because our family can buy your entire Palestine country if they want.

Yes we can finish Muslim if we want but India is a democratic country.


In 2002 we finished only few of them and we can do it again.It was a blunder by Gandhi who allowed all you street dogs back in India in 1947.

Muslim have less than 65% literacy in most part of India while Hindu Indian have average literacy 75-80%.So Indian Hindu will have 15 points higher average IQ than Muslim .

No they can finish us but we can finish Bangladesh,Pakistan at any day if we want.

As I said earlier America has already finished Taliban,Iraq,Iran or European have started to do it in their countries;guess what we will start it very soon but only problem is our stupid ,greedy politician who have allowed you creatures over last 66 years.

Good bye Pedophile bare naked Prophet’s daughter.



Comments:


1

Posted by longlake on Sun, 01 Sep 2013 14:36 | #

Sonny:
You are gay! hahaha…


2

Posted by India Wins! on Sun, 01 Sep 2013 17:55 | #

India Wins because India posted comment #1000.
Enemy loses, India wins.
Case closed.


3

Posted by Benefits on Thu, 05 Sep 2013 02:56 | #

I think this is the difference between a boy dismissed from High School in the western countries and a boy dismissed from High School in India.
Your mittal is the 41st in the lis
http://manfaattumbuhanbuah.blogspot.com


4

Posted by 毛泽东 on Fri, 06 Sep 2013 10:24 | #

这些回帖的中国人都他妈是愤青熊孩子吧,没事跑来瞎鸡巴留什么言


5

Posted by Mao on Fri, 06 Sep 2013 10:26 | #

那些回帖的中国人瞎鸡巴凑什么热闹


6

Posted by SAMPAN CHAKRABORTY on Wed, 11 Sep 2013 09:23 | #

I think I would finish the rest of the 10% debate which we left last time while discussing about radio and who should be regarded as pioneers in this field.

Recently I talked with IEEE expert and came to know that in 2011 Marconi was also honored with a plaque for his work on wireless and radio.2012 they honored Bose which exclusively proves that IEEE has declared both these persons as inventor of radio and wireless.Remember they have not honored Tesla with any such award.

Now for details you can visit Wikipedia page of of Marconi and bottom of that page you will find a topic

See also-J.C Bose(No mention about Tesla).


When it comes to Strategy all I can say that you have not corrected anything instead you have made more number of fatal errors but as a good guy I would give you the opportunity to clear your mistakes(incredible number of careless mistakes) in all your comments or post because I did not even bother to read anyone of those but others have definitely read and told me to inform you.

But you are definitely very obedient to my words because I asked you to prevaricate the topic and you changed it from Bengali Brahmin to Bangladesh,a country where Brahmin population is less than 100k.

Speaking of Brahmins you should know less than 2 million Brahmins of West Bengal have achieved more than those 4.3% Indian Brahmin in their home.

FYI:India has not produced any J.C Bose or have not won any Nobel prize from their home(I’m not including Kolkata,the capital of West Bengal in that list),but 4 of them have won with foreign Citizenship or working in other land,so you should do a proper research about it before bringing brahmin topics in this discussion.We missed two genuine Nobel laureates(S.N Bose/S.Mukherjee) because of their untimely death or tragedy but J.C Bose should be blamed for his own mistakes for not patenting any of his inventions but now he is going to more popular than all those Indian science laureates added together who won with American citizenship.

But I must appreciate you for telling the truth here that apart from Brahmin there is certainly no intelligent group of people here in India on average.

——————————————————————————————————-
For this discussion I must finish it with so far the best research carried by Bangladeshi American Razib Khan who did a research on genetics of various groups of south Asian people.


I saw the genetic distribution of Bengali Brahmin,Bengali Baidya and Tamil Brahmin and found that both Bengali Brahmin and Baidya samples have almost similar genetic distributions while Tamil Brahmins have shown lesser amount of Caucasian blood among their gene compared to their Bengali counterpart.


So that proves Bengali Brahmin and Baidya are same but later got engaged in medicine research and made a different caste for themselves.

Razib Khan has not done any research on Bengali Kayastha(til 2011-12)probably because any of those legendary Boses did not win Nobel prize during their lifetime but he should do it now because they are now being proved far superior than any of our south Asian Nobel laureates(I know Tagore and Yunus are super genius)!Also in Bengal many Brahmin used to do the job of kayastha which may explain why they are so damn smart and our most scientific names came from this community although in recent times Brahmin of Bengal are doing best in abroad followed by Tamil Brahmin.


Razib khan’s research exclusively proves that caste was created based on people’s genetics,it had nothing to do with any discrimination with other people who had different genetics.

Just because we speak a same language does not mean we are from same genetic pool and same is true with Brahmin.A Punjabi or a Marathi Brahmin are coming from different gene pool just like an Assamese or a Bihari Brahmin have lots of dissimilarities among their gene.

For example within a particular ethnic group a Brahmin and a Vaishya have huge difference and a Brahmin or a Sc/St may have 40-50 points IQ difference.


So what someone said earlier that Brahmin or other upper caste should keep their community intact had some sort of scientific observation rather than just an obnoxious claim as we should do as directed by our ancestors.


FYI: For my dear brothers of WB,specially if you are Brahmin or any intelligent dude of any caste who has the passion to do something creative then don’t waste your time back in home because it’s impossible to produce a Faraday or even a J.C Bose today working in Kolkata.

And although Sambit said that Brahmin women have not done much in science but in recent times I have heard few of them(such as Manda Banerjee who was lead author of large black hole discovery at Cambridge and few others may be here and there) have done some path breaking discoveries.So irrespective of GENDER if you have curiousity to do any creative work then it’s better to get rid of your home because with 10,000 population it’s impossible to produce big names such as Faraday or Turing.As I said earlier Bengali Brahmins are doing best here in US in terms of our population than any other community but we are just too small.Same is true with Baidya and kayastha community.


7

Posted by ppc on Tue, 24 Sep 2013 18:34 | #

This is such a shallow discussion that I don’t even want to get into a debate. I am publishing some of the facts here that’s it. Readers can make their own intelligent decision. First of all it is hard to compute the IQ of a nation of a billion people so any studies on India or Chinese IQ lose their credibility since their inception. Second I do not believe Indians have a low IQ compared to other Asian or indeed Europeans. The current state of India has nothing to do with IQ of population but everything to do with history of colonization. World’s first research universities were established in India called Nalanda and Takshashila. Indians do not brag about their glorious past which does not negate the facts.

E=Mc2 was invented by Einstein who was a German Jew but America offered him a citizenship. He said: “We owe a lot to the Indians, who taught us how to count, without which no worthwhile scientific discovery could have been made.” Pi concept was refined by an Indian mathematician Aryabhatta which has been mentioned in Indian texts since 600 BC. Concept of atom and the atomic model was first proposed by an Indian sage Kanad rishi. World’s first plastic surgery was performed by Sushrut in India two thousand years ago. Jagadish Chandra Bose, an Indian, invented Crescograph. Dr. CV Raman invented the Raman effect for which he won Nobel prize in Physics. Hargobind Khorana (January 9, 1922 – November 9, 2011) was a biochemist who shared the 1968 Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine, he later became an American citizen. Ramanujan the greatest mathematician ever was an Indian too. A lot of other inventions can not be mentioned here due to lack of space. Get educated. It’s good for your health.


8

Posted by ding dong on Sun, 29 Sep 2013 18:37 | #

Why is it not posting?


9

Posted by Generals 2 beta on Tue, 15 Oct 2013 17:34 | #

In the near future, world leaders are mere seconds from signing a global treaty and bringing an end to war as we know it when a devastating terrorist attack rips through the peace conference, killing all in attendance. In a world left with no politicians, diplomats, or activists, only the Generals remain. It’s up to you to assume their roles, command their forces, and put an end to global terrorism once and for all in Command & Conquer: Generals 2.


10

Posted by gmcconnell on Wed, 16 Oct 2013 09:35 | #

Regarding court I can ask the same question why Tesla,Lodge and Stone went to US Supreme court in 1943 when Marconi was declared father of solid state physics in 1901.  Why Tesla did not challenge Marconi at that time.What others were doing at that time?  Why US supreme court cancelled Tesla’s initial appeal in the year 1909 when Nobel prize was conferred upon Braun and Marconi?  Why Us supreme court at that time did not reverse the decision in favor of Tesla?  Then why they they void some of the patents of Marconi in name of Lodge,stone or Tesla 34 years later in 1943?  Do you have any answers to these questions?  Good Luck!!


11

Posted by Keith on Sun, 20 Oct 2013 11:43 | #

Wow!! It took me a month to read all the comments. Very interesting though:)


12

Posted by middleearth on Wed, 23 Oct 2013 21:18 | #

The 25 Countries With The Most Brainpower

Neither China or India is included in the ranking. China’s position is somewhat vague, reason for China’s absence is given, yet not given. However, there is no mention of India, that’s strange.

http://www.businessinsider.com/countries-with-the-most-brainpower-2013-10


13

Posted by Vicktarius on Thu, 24 Oct 2013 09:50 | #

Im based out of India and have lived through an evolution of people, development and migrations. My take of IQ in India is as follows:

1) 30% Population, Rural and Indigenous: 40-50 IQ
2) 20% Rural, farmers and labourer: 50 to 70 IQ
3) 30% Semi Urban, Low income group: 60 to 80 IQ
4) 10% Upper Income Group, Urban: 80 to 90 IQ
5) 05% Higher and Rich, Urban: 100 to 120 IQ
6) 05% Scientists, Urban, R&D, Corporation: 120 to 150 IQ

Most Indian Urban Women @ 80-100 IQ
Most European Urban Women @ 90 to 115 IQ

It is an irritant to everyday go through the daily grind cos I have to address 2 & 3 through public, 3 & 4 in daily work - which exasperates me totally.

Connecting with 5 as well isnt inspiring at all, mildly dumb. I rarely get the joy of any experience living in the country.

The good part is I tend to make more money than most and have a financially rewarding career.


14

Posted by Penerjemah Indonesia on Thu, 31 Oct 2013 05:03 | #

I love my country Indonesia. Even my country seems not well, but I love Indonesia. smile


15

Posted by Chris on Mon, 11 Nov 2013 18:20 | #

Certainly a very active discussion here. Do ratio’s change when looking at hyderabad?


16

Posted by Sue on Sun, 17 Nov 2013 00:12 | #

Getting a bit too much. Im back to hyderabad mensa enclave


17

Posted by Bryn Braughton on Mon, 18 Nov 2013 23:49 | #

this is awesome


18

Posted by kingh on Mon, 02 Dec 2013 21:51 | #

but I think you should


19

Posted by qertony on Mon, 09 Dec 2013 12:40 | #

Josh
I have been into several Fijian Native indian houses in my moves and, as you appropriately say, their success is comparative.  The houses involved were congested shacks by european requirements.  And outside Suva, the places are very much like Native indian ones.  It does seem that expatriate Indians are extremely restricted by the inhabitants they stay among—which is not amazing.  But just about 100% of Fiji’s entrepreneurs and experts are Indians.
http://vacations.yolasite.com/


20

Posted by Murad Ali on Thu, 30 Jan 2014 02:13 | #

No discussion of propaganda and persuasion would be complete without mention of the much misunderstood technique called “brainwashing” (Schein, 1957). This procedure was employed on soldier captured by the Red Chinese during the Korean War. This enemy effort had two phases, physical and psychological. Source page http://behaviouralsciences.net


21

Posted by Murad Ali on Thu, 30 Jan 2014 02:18 | #

Brainwashing is still practiced in Chinese prisons and, as described by Western civilians subjected to it at a later date than the Korean War, includes a strong emotional assault during the interrogations following arrest. Cellmates exert pressure upon the prisoner to “confess.” When he is at the breaking point, calculated kindness is employed in an effort to bring a quicker confession of crimes as seen from “the people’s standpoint” (Lifton, 1956). If the prisoner does give in, he is subjected to intensive “reeducation” before finally being released.


22

Posted by anonymous on Wed, 09 Apr 2014 12:01 | #

Is the forum closed?


23

Posted by Curious Indian on Wed, 09 Apr 2014 12:06 | #

Hello, I got bored and returned back.))


24

Posted by Thomas Johnson on Sat, 12 Jul 2014 04:16 | #

Why is it that so many of the brightest young Indian and Chinese students want to leave their homelands behind and go off to North America or Western Europe to obtain their graduate educations and their first professional jobs?  Then many of these same students end up living the rest of their lives in what are essentially the world’s main European-founded and influenced nations and cultures, in many cases gradually loosing touch with their own nations and cultures?  The native lands giving up so many of their best young minds year after year have long been calling this widespread process the 3rd World “Brain Drain”.


25

Posted by Chinese man on Sun, 10 Aug 2014 08:14 | #

作为一名路过的中国人,不明白印度哪里出来的优越感!这难道就是传说中的  缺什么秀什么 grin


26

Posted by anonymous on Sun, 24 Aug 2014 11:09 | #

you should continue this subject in another page from the 1001st post


27

Posted by rahul on Mon, 15 Sep 2014 08:32 | #

What is Morrie law


28

Posted by Lol on Sun, 28 Dec 2014 05:01 | #

To Sunny Mittal: u said there is no asian in the inventor’shall. here you are:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Y._Cho

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dawon_Kahng

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Wang

could have more.


29

Posted by Lol on Sun, 28 Dec 2014 14:21 | #

to Sunny Mittal: you said there is none east asian in the inventors’ hall list.

actually there are three of them.


30

Posted by Sampan Chakraborty on Tue, 13 Oct 2015 03:05 | #

In 2013 I wrote(in post no 981) that Bengali Brahmins living in USA have over 200 patents,but actually our family have over 200 patents.In total Bengali Brahmins have over 1200 patents and this number is increasing in everyday.I’m posting few names who will cross 200 patents.

Arpan Chakraborty(currently 106 US patents).
Amit Chakraborty(currently 75 patents).
Soma Chakraborty(60 patents).

And 2-3 more names with> 50 patents.

This stat is best in the world and communities like white and Jewish are lagging behind Bengali Brahmins by miles.


31

Posted by michellemabelle on Mon, 25 Apr 2016 09:44 | #

my family was requiring a form a few weeks ago and was informed of a website that has a lot of sample forms . If people are requiring it too , here’s a https://goo.gl/Ay6dLZ


32

Posted by Indiboy on Thu, 19 May 2016 21:55 | #

‘But still 10% Indian Hindu upper caste have produced 10 times more genius than what your 25-30% Muslim worldwide have done.’

Dear sonny whichever upper caste of India you belong to - thakur, brahmin, rajput or bania, I can tell you one thing. You can never have high iq. Caste and religion supremacists like you are always low iq.

India has not produced any genius in last 75 years,  so upper caste producing more geniuses than lower caste or others doesn’t stand. If you think 15% upper caste have genius level iq, where is upper caste equivalent of Marie curie, linus paling,  Jean Paul sarre, Steven spielBerg or Albert Einstein.

The only thing in which upper castes excel is crimes against poor and women . Check any of 25 states of India , most of top 10 criminals are from upper castes with a few muslims though upper castes have only 15% population.


33

Posted by Edie Deegan on Mon, 13 Jun 2016 21:31 | #

Invaluable analysis . I am thankful for the info , Does someone know where my assistant could possibly get a fillable a form document to fill in ?


34

Posted by Arvind on Tue, 27 Dec 2016 02:49 | #

I wouldn’t be surprised if India’s average IQ is 82. Being an Indian myself, I can clearly see that the current average IQ isn’t very great compared to whites and east asians, simply because of how Indians do not abide with civic order that’s seen anywhere else. Perhaps that’s just cultural, since Indian IQ is on par with white IQ of the 1950’s, and I’m pretty sure they had more civic sense compared to modern Indians. Perhaps Indians lack altruism as group? I wouldn’t be surprised if that was the case. Perhaps it happened because the country has been subjected to depredation by foreign misrule for the past few centuries. Indians in the past have made remarkable achievements, totally indicative of a high IQ given the right environment - right from astronomy, incredible metallurgy (rust-free iron sthumba from 2000 years back), architecture (tanjore temple is a marvel considering how the rooftops were built with no base structure while not creating shadows at any time),  chemistry (gunpowder was actually created in Assam around 600-800, passed to China via Pegu), mathematics, etc. A lot of Indian inventions known in the west are credited to other civilizations because they received the info from other cultures.

However, I still am somehow optimistic about India’s future, in that our genetic potential appears to be higher than is currently recorded based on evidence obtained from Indians working abroad. I’ve also met a lot of smart individuals in academia and the industry that would possibly not be possible with our average. There are certain groups with high IQ’s already in India that allows the country to compete with the rest of the world while certain others that are still lagging behind. I don’t expect an African country to have nuclear weapons or send probes to Mars anytime. These are achievements indicative of the presence of groups of high IQ. Not many know that Indians are basically the same genetically (yes there are minor variations between groups) but I believe culture, environment and nutrition do play a part causing average Indian IQ to lag behind others. It will be interesting to see the results of prosperity and more urbanization on the average IQ of this country. It may still lag behind the Sinosphere and the west for a while, but there’s a decent probability we’ll see India catch up to around the 90-ish mark by 2050. (yes I know IQ is relative, so that would probably be 100 of our generation)


35

Posted by Aron on Fri, 30 Dec 2016 10:27 | #

Stupid whites bending down to East Asians. How many times do the world needs to tell that Lynn’s IQ samples are wrong.

Low IQ data on china:-

Wang, 2001 (Average IQ of 76-81)
Source: http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/wang-2001.pdf
Shandong province, china.


Hong, 2001 (Average IQ of 65-82)
Source: http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/hong-2001.pdf
Shandong province, china.


Li, 1995 (Average IQ of 79-89)
Source: http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/li-1995.pdf
Guizhou province, china.


Yang, 1994 (Average IQ of 76,81)
Source: http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/yang-1994.pdf
Jinan, China.


An, 1992 (Average IQ of 76,84)
Source: http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/an-1992.pdf
Guyang county, inner Mongolia.


Guo, 1991 (Average IQ of 76,81)
Source: http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/guo-1991.pdf
Hunan province, china.


Fan, 2007 (Average IQ of 96, 98)
http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/fan-2007.pdf
Pucheng County, Shaanxi Province, China


Li, 2003 (Average IQ of 92)
http://www.fluorideresearch.org/412/files/FJ2008_v41_n2_p161-164.pdf
Baotou, Inner Mongolia, China


Zhang, 1998 (Average IQ of 80,85,87)
http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/zhang-1998.pdf
Kuitun region, Urumqi, China


Yao, 1997 (Average IQ of 92-100)
http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/yao-1997.pdf
Chaoyang City, Liaoning Province, China


Yao, 1996 (Average IQ of 92-98)
http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/yao-1996.pdf
Chaoyang City, Liaoning Province, China


Duan, 1995 (Average IQ of 71-99)
http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/duan-1995.pdf
Guiyang, Guizhou Province, China


Xu, 1994 (Average IQ of 69-83)
http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/xu-1994.pdf
Shandong Province, China


Sun, 1991 (Average IQ of 69-85)
http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/sun-1991.pdf
Guizhou Province, China

Ren, 1989 (Average IQ of 75-85 appx.)
http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/ren-1989.pdf
Shandong Province, China

Lin, 1991 (Average IQ of 71, 77, 79, 96)
http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/lin-1991.pdf
Hetian prefecture, Xinjiang, China


14 more IQ studies showing low average IQ on China:-
Qian, 2009 (14 IQ studies showing 81-90 average IQ)

http://000do4q.myregisteredwp.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/1836/2016/05/china-iodine-study.pdf

Overall IQ result:- Iodine sufficient (optimum conditions):-
84.7, 86.9, 87.2, 75.1, 75.1, 88.34, 85.15, 86.9, 88.65, 90.89, 87.56, 87.31, 97.8, 81.44

High IQ data on India:-


Web
more
Primary
(no subject)
A
Aron Deon
to me
8 hours agoDetails
OK. I have been working on IQ of India. And have identified 45 IQ research articles or studies with average or median score being 91. Most importantly, IQ has increased in past 30 years.

Most of the doubts on IQ of india is because the region has been poorly studied. Because of lack of Western interest and interest of psychometric in India.

First let me clarify that there are no IQ differences between Indian castes. Here is a book which covers the same:-

https://books.google.co.in/books?id=9tZ4AgAAQBAJ&pg=PA16&lpg=PA16&dq=chopra+iq+difference+between+castes&source=bl&ots=mUJt4iGaiY&sig=K5__8u3gFJA4AG6yXxjnwnzm4Xk&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjUm83W_MbQAhUEQI8KHW—DpEQ6AEIOjAC#v=onepage&q=chopra iq difference between castes&f=false

Page 16

There is no major differences between Indian castes. As per IQ tests done.

On non-verbal IQ tests (Raven’s Progressive Matrices), there are no significant differences among Indian castes.

As it is observed via IQ testing that Vaishyas have higher non-verbal IQ than Kshatriya who have higher non-verbal IQ than Brahmins followed by SCs.

Rather the difference between Vaishyas and Brahmins on non-verbal IQ tests (as per IQ research) is same as the difference between Brahmins and Scheduled Castes.

 

Secondly, the differences among Indian castes is estimated to be less than 3 IQ points on non-verbal IQ tests.

However on verbal IQ tests, the difference is 11 IQ points.

This is confirmed by young lives study on India where test scores don’t show IQ gap. And is only related to socio-economic status.

So, it’s better if India is treated as an IQ statistical distribution and not caste based.

TBC in next post

IQ samples on India:-

IQ of Chennai, Tamil Nadu:-

Study 1:-

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3018494/

IQ of 107 as a community sample. 4 zones in Chennai and 12 schools were selected randomly. Sample size of 717. 606 children belonged to families with less than 6500 INR monthly income. And 130 had illiterate mothers. If anything, the selection bias towards socio-economic status is downward.

Study 2:-

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1179/oeh.2005.11.2.138

IQ of children was found to be 102. And 95 for those having high lead in blood level.
——————————————————————
IQ in Chandigarh, Punjab:-

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3767262/

Average IQ is 99. 5 private schools and 5 government schools were randomly selected out of 37 schools. And sample size is 2400.

——————————————————————————
IQ in 2 rural and 2 urban areas of Punjab:-

http://www.ijres.org/papers/Volume 4/v4-i7/Version-2/G4724854.pdf

IQ in 2 rural areas is 96.2, 90.4. And 2 urban areas is 102, 106. IQ grades are available (0 to 10th percentile, etc.) and online statistical tool is required to read.

Rural areas are in Dera Bassi and Tehsil Kharar. Urban areas is in Fatehgarh Saheb. And Tehsil Kharar.

IQ of Delhi:-

Study 1:-
http://heapol.oxfordjournals.org/content/17/4/420.full.pdf+html

IQ of kids of slum dwellers in New Delhi living in plot area is 92.4. And shanty houses/homeless is 89.4.

IQ of kids who have attended schools is 96.7 (plot area) and 93.2 (shady houses)

IQ in West Bengal:-

Study 1 (rural):-

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/297722925_Dental_fluorosis_and_urinary_fluoride_concentration_as_a_reflection_of_fluoride_exposure_and_its_impact_on_IQ_level_and_BMI_of_children_of_Laxmisagar_Simlapal_Block_of_Bankura_District_WB_India?_sg=OxEw86Y9iI6rPYqTlpXNxf3sHxsD4oLarEkZXw_AKdiC1SmLw9IzIsEDusa540LU

IQ in Villages in Laxmisagar Village was 108.3 in normal regions and 85–92 in fluoride contaminated areas.

Study 1 (rural):

http://www.jcdr.net/article_fulltext.asp?issn=0973-709x&year=2015&month=November&volume=9&issue=11&page=ZC10&id=6726

IQ of 110 in village Tiwariganj, Lucknow and 85–92 in village, Unnao district of UP.

85-92 is in high fluoride region.

Study 2(urban):

http://hrcak.srce.hr/file/44025

IQ of Muslims in Aligarh city, Uttar Pradesh (Average IQ of 107)

Source: “Badaruddoza. Inbreeding effects on metrical phenotypes among North Indian Children. Collegicum Antropologicum 28(Suppl. 2): 311-318. (ISSN No. 0350-6134.”

 

—————————————————————————————————

IQ of Gujarat rural:-

http://fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/trivedi-20124.pdf

http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/trivedi-2007.pdf

IQ in 6 villages of Gujarat is 97 (optimum environment) and 92 (un-optimum conditions).

IQ of villages near Ahmedabad is 104.

—————————————————————————————————

IQ in Maharashtra (Pune):-

http://www.indianpediatrics.net/feb2004/feb-121-128.htm

86.1 for low birth weight, 92.1 for medium birth weight and 97.2 for normal birth weight.

https://www.indianpediatrics.net/july1999/july-669-676.htm

IQ of control group was 101.38. And LBW was 94.

Based on these many IQ samples, I conclude that average for India is 100. China is 86.

And I have cited more research articles than Lynn. Is it sufficient research data to disprove his work and make sure whites don’t bow down to East Asians on internet due to 10 IQ samples, despising Indians ?

IQ in Chennai is as high as Shanghai (cited above). Same with Indians in USA and other places.

 


36

Posted by K on Tue, 10 Jan 2017 03:05 | #

Sunny Mittal, i dont like the language you are using. I am a hindu too. Dont you remember that hinduism teaches us to respect all regions and peoples. It also says the whole world is one family.


37

Posted by Aron - Why is India far superior than China - IQ on Tue, 17 Jan 2017 05:51 | #

Let me compare the IQ data on India and China. IQ of Indians in Singapore/USA/UK/Ireland/Scotland/Australia/NZL/Hong Kong v/s Chinese living in all these places.

And it is quite clear that Indians in India have higher average IQ than Chinese in China.

I will compare the IQ data on 8 Indian states with 8 Chinese states with environmental conditions as a variable . Fair enough:-

Zhejiang (urban+rural) vs Karnataka rural:-

IQ in Bellary, Karnataka:-

http://web.inflibnet.ac.in/ojs/index.php/IJFS/article/view/3461/2722

IQ of 102 with 106 IQ for healthy group.

WISC III was administered for testing.

To make sure that I am not citing high scoring district, I have attached district wise reading and maths score in Karnataka:-

http://img.asercentre.org/docs/Publications/ASER Reports/ASER 2014/District Estimates/karnataka.pdf

Average reading and maths score in Karnataka is higher than Bellary.

Average IQ in Karnataka, if anything would be higher than 102.

Average IQ in Zhejiang:-

http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/21223663

103 non verbal and 97 verbal.

This is confirmed with Chinese IQ map:-

http://www.targetmap.com/viewer.aspx?reportId=7195

IQ in Karnataka is much higher at-least on verbal scores.

Jiangsu vs UP average IQ (rural):-

In Jiangsu, average IQ is 92 with 2.47 ppm fluoride. And 100.4 with 0.36 ppm fluoride.

IQ data:-

Xiang, 2003 (Average IQ of 92-100)

http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/xiang-2003a.pdf

Average IQ in rural UP: 110 with 0.19 ppm, 96.76 with 2 ppm.

IQ data:-

http://www.jcdr.net/article_fulltext.asp?issn=0973-709x&year=2015&month=November&volume=9&issue=11&page=ZC10&id=6726

Average IQ is quite high in India.

Even though the data is comparable between Jiangsu and UP. But it is only measuring non-verbal IQ.

Verbal IQ in Jiangsu will be 8 points below it’s non-verbal IQ.

So, IQ in UP will be much higher on verbal scales, and comparable on non-verbal scale even with worse environmental conditions.

Gujarat vs Liaoning rural:-

Average IQ in villages near Chaoyang is:-

95 in 2 ppm, and 99 with 0.4 ppm.

IQ data:-

Yao, 1997 (Average IQ of 92-100)
http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/yao-1997.pdf
Chaoyang City, Liaoning Province, China

In Gujarat there are 2 IQ samples:-

One shows average IQ of 97 with 0.84 ppm and 92.5 with 2.3 ppm.

Another is average IQ is 91.7 with 5.5 ppm concentration. 104 with 2 ppm fluoride.

http://fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/trivedi-20124.pdf
http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/trivedi-2007.pdf

Again, IQ is much higher in India.

Shaanxi vs West Bengal rural:-

In Shaanxi, average IQ is 96 with 2.89 ppm urinary fluoride. And 98.4 with 1.14 ppm.

Average IQ is 101 with 1.96 ppm fluoride,102 with 0.81 fluoride and 107 with 0.54 ppm fluoride.

IQ data:-

Fan, 2007 (Average IQ of 96, 98)
http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/fan-2007.pdf
Pucheng County, Shaanxi Province, China

http://fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/bai-2014.chinese.pdf

Bai, 2014 (Average IQ of 101, 102, 107)

In WB, average IQ is 100.5 with 2.73 ppm urinary fluoride. And 107 with 2.5 ppm fluoride.

IQ data:-

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/297722925_Dental_fluorosis_and_urinary_fluoride_concentration_as_a_reflection_of_fluoride_exposure_and_its_impact_on_IQ_level_and_BMI_of_children_of_Laxmisagar_Simlapal_Block_of_Bankura_District_WB_India?_sg=OxEw86Y9iI6rPYqTlpXNxf3sHxsD4oLarEkZXw_AKdiC1SmLw9IzIsEDusa540LU

Again, average IQ is much higher in India. even in worse enviornmental conditions.
Now, lets compare low scoring Indian states. As per Richard Lynn’s work:-

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3c4TxciNeJZQlIxM3EwSXg4REk/view

Average IQ is higher in UP, Gujarat and West Bengal v/s other Indian states. So, these are high scoring Indian states.

The lowest scoring Indian states are: Of course the states bordering China where Tibetans live.

But among Indian states, the absolute lowest scoring states are: Jammu and Kashmir, Bihar, Delhi, Rajasthan and Andhra Pradesh.

As IQ samples on Bihar don’t exist, I will leave it for comparison.

Let’s compare with low scoring states of China:- Inner Mongolia, Hunan, Guizhou and Shandong.

Rajasthan vs Shandong rural:-

Average IQ in Rajasthan is 93.31 with 1 ppm fluoride. And 85 with 6 ppm fluoride.

IQ data:-
http://fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/singh-2013.pdf

No village in Shandong province scores above 85 even with optimum conditions.

IQ data:-

Wang, 2001 (Average IQ of 76-81)
Source: http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/wang-2001.pdf
Shandong province, china.

Hong, 2001 (Average IQ of 65-82)
Source: http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/hong-2001.pdf
Shandong province, china.

Ren, 1989 (Average IQ of 65,85 appx.)
http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/ren-1989.pdf
Shandong Province, China.

Xu, 1994 (Average IQ of 69-83)
http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/xu-1994.pdf
Shandong Province, China

Yang, 1994 (Average IQ of 76,81)
Source: http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/yang-1994.pdf
Shandong province, China.

So, there is simply no comparison at all. IQ in Rajasthan in 6 ppm fluoride conditions is higher than optimum conditions IQ in Shandong.

Inner Mongolia vs Andhra Pradesh:-

IQ is 89 in 0.5 ppm, 84 in 1.2 ppm, 80 in 5 ppm.

“Effect of fluoride exposure on Intelligence Quotient {IQ) among 13-15 year old school children of known endemic area of fluorosis, Nalgonda District, Andhra Pradesh.” KM Sudhir, Journal of Indian Association of Public Health Dentistry Year : 2009 | Volume : 7 | Issue : 13 | Page : 88-94

http://www.jiaphd.org/showBackIssue.asp?issn=2319-5932;year=2009;volume=7;issue=13;month=January-June

That’s among the lowest scoring Indian states as shown by Richard Lynn (cited above).

IQ in Inner Mongolia is 84 with 0.8 ppm, 76 in 2.6 ppm.

IQ data:-

An, 1992 (Average IQ of 76,84)
Source: http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/an-1992.pdf
Guyang county, inner Mongolia.

Again there is no comparison of IQ scores. And Indians are much more intelligent.

Madhya Pradesh v/s Guizhou:-

Average IQ in villages in Mandhya Pradesh is:

98.5 with 2.25 ppm urinary fluoride
91.6 with 3.28 ppm urinary fluoride.
83.6 with 7 ppm urinary fluoride.
87 with 4.85 ppm urinary fluoride.

If you read district wise reading and maths scores:-

http://img.asercentre.org/docs/Publications/ASER Reports/ASER 2014/District Estimates/madhyapradesh.pdf

Average score in Shivpuri and Bhopal is same as average for MP. So, they are well representative of average IQ in rural MP.

http://www.ruralneuropractice.com/article.asp?issn=0976-3147&year=2012&volume=3&issue=2&spage=144&epage=149&aulast=Saxena

Low scoring areas in Guizhou:-


IQ in Guizhou is 89 in optimum conditions in villages.

Li, 1995 (Average IQ of 79-89)
Source: http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/li-1995.pdf
Guizhou province, china.

High scoring areas of Guizhou:-

Wei, 2014

http://fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/wei-2014.pdf

Average IQ is 111 with 1.3 ppm urinary fluoride.

95 with 2.33 ppm urinary fluoride.

93 with 3.03 ppm urinary fluoride.

Again, IQ is higher in India. Even high scoring areas of Guizhou show lower IQ than somewhat average scoring villages in MP.

Although the data between high scoring areas of Guizhou and average scoring areas of MP is comparable, the result will be much lower on verbal IQ. As verbal IQ is 8 points lower in China. And it is not the case with India.

Jammu and Kashmir vs Xinjiang:-

J&K is among the lowest scoring Indian state as per Lynn. That’s the lowest in India.

IQ is 96.5 in villages in J&K in normal conditions.

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0109585

Average IQ in villages in Xinjiang is 80, 85 and 87 with 0.8 ppm fluoride.

IQ data:-

http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/zhang-1998.pdf

Again there is no comparison.

*****************************************************************

Last but not the least,

Other environmental factors if any, strongly suit China.

http://wcd.nic.in/Schemes/research/nti1947/7.11.3 Iodine deficiency pr 8.2 new.pdf
http://www.ign.org/scorecard.htm

% of people facing iodine deficiency:-

India: 30%, China: 4%.

“a third of all children born with IDD-related mental damage live in India.”

Mal-nourishment:-

China: 4%, India: 44%

So, despite much worse environmental conditions. India has higher IQ than China.

*************************************************

IQ of overseas Indians and overseas Chinese:-

Lets see how Indians in China are doing and how Chinese in India are faring.

If china has higher IQ, Indians should fail in China and Chinese should succeed in India.

The reality:-

Indians have been living in Singapore and Hong Kong for generations.

Both places are known to possess smartest Chinese population.

Indians migrated to Singapore as peasants in British empire. And they were bodyguards to white men in Hong Kong.

Hong Kong:-

Indians are the richest ethnic group.
Income difference:-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indians_in_Hong_Kong

90 percentile for Chinese living in Hong Kong barely earn at par with 75 percentile of Indians in HK.

Indian median income being much higher.

Singapore:

Income status of Indians in Singapore:-

Household income in Singapore (2010):-

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Singapore

Chinese: 7330, Indians: 7664, Malays: 4575

2. Education:-

https://www.singstat.gov.sg/docs/default-source/default-document-library/publications/publications_and_papers/cop2010/census_2010_release1/cop2010sr1.pdf

Page 24-Table 1

Below Secondary:- Chinese: 33.8, Malays: 37.0, Indians: 22.5

Secondary:- Chinese: 18.2, Malays: 27.1, Indians: 17.2

Post-Secondary (Non-Tertiary):- Chinese: 9.9, Malays: 19.2, Indians: 11.2

Diploma & Professional Qualification:- Chinese: 15.5, Malays: 11.6, Indians: 14.1

University:- Chinese: 22.6, Malays: 5.1, Indians: 35.0

Indians outperform Chinese and Malays in Singapore on education and schools since 1965.

As per Singaporean government’s published data. Not anyone’s opinion.

Conclusion:-

One can easily conclude that Indians are much smarter than Chinese in Singapore and Hong Kong.

4. Chinese living in India:-

Chinese and Tibetans are living in India in significant numbers.

Kolkata:-

http://www.atimes.com/article/kolkatas-chinese-live-in-stateless-sorrow/

“They were shoe-makers, tanners, restaurateurs, hair-dressers or dry-cleaners.”

Chinese migration to India:-

http://www.livemint.com/Politics/VhMy2MGaVx1TEatRsQpnON/Chinese-immigrants—A-shrinking-community.html

“Most of these settlers came from Canton (or Guangdong), while people belonging to the Hubei community, who were dentists by profession, came from the eponymous neighbouring province.”

South West Chinese in India:-

http://www.telegraphindia.com/1160616/jsp/northeast/story_91472.jsp#.WD64M7J97cc

45 students of ethnic Chinese ancestry (North East Indians) made it to IITs in 2016.

Out of 20,000 candidates that were selected.

Population size of North East Indians: 60 million (5 percent of India).

What’s worse. Out of 100,000 candidates; only 100 odd were from North East.

So, it is quite clear that Indians thrive in China and Singapore and outperform locals. While Chinese (Cantonese and Tibetans) struggle in India and under-perform locals. And is constant with the fact that low IQ races struggle in high IQ society and high IQ races thrive in low IQ societies.

USA:-

http://humanvarieties.org/2015/10/30/asian-american-subgroup-sat-performance

Note: Sample size is extremely large and is representative of entire 3.45 million Indian American population. And 4 million Chinese American population.

Indians born in USA have the highest genotypic IQ, higher than Jews and East Asians. At 114 IQ (0.92 Standard deviation above whites).

Chinese born in USA have a geno-typic IQ of 110.


Rest of Anglo sphere (UK, Australia, Ireland, Scotland, New Zealand):-

https://humanvarietiesfiles.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/2006-levels-immigrant-pisa.pdf

Indians in Australia score 576 on maths and 566 on reading in PISA.

Indians in New Zealand score 529 reading and 534 on maths in PISA.

Indians in Scotland score 504 reading and 525 on maths in PISA.

Indians in Ireland score 496 reading and 496 on maths in PISA.

As a comparison,

Chinese in Australia score 569 on maths and 541 on reading in PISA.

Chinese in New Zealand score 506 reading and 555 on maths in PISA.

Chinese in Scotland score 498 reading and 555 on maths in PISA.

Chinese in Ireland score 430 reading and 475 on maths in PISA.

Mean scores of Chinese and Indians living in Anglo-sphere:-

Chinese: 563 maths, 526 reading.

Indians: 561 maths, 552 reading.

So you have consistency of test or IQ scores all over Anglo sphere ranging from UK, USA, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, Scotland.

That Indians have same non verbal IQ as East Asians while a higher verbal IQ than East Asians.


38

Posted by K on Mon, 15 May 2017 13:10 | #

@Sampan

‘‘In 2013 I wrote(in post no 981) that Bengali Brahmins living in USA have over 200 patents,but actually our family have over 200 patents.In total Bengali Brahmins have over 1200 patents and this number is increasing in everyday.I’m posting few names who will cross 200 patents.

Arpan Chakraborty(currently 106 US patents).
Amit Chakraborty(currently 75 patents).
Soma Chakraborty(60 patents).

And 2-3 more names with> 50 patents.

In 2013 I wrote(in post no 981) that Bengali Brahmins living in USA have over 200 patents,but actually our family have over 200 patents.In total Bengali Brahmins have over 1200 patents and this number is increasing in everyday.I’m posting few names who will cross 200 patents.

Arpan Chakraborty(currently 106 US patents).
Amit Chakraborty(currently 75 patents).
Soma Chakraborty(60 patents).

And 2-3 more names with> 50 patents. ‘’

Congrats to you and your family. Having so many patents to your name is truly great. You and your family is truly great.I sincerely hope your family will receive many more patents, Bengal too. But people from other parts of india have received many patents too. One guy got more than 400 and he is not bengali brahmin. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ravi_Arimilli

Dont say Bengal:::: better, India ::::waste. why? You are an indian first. You are not bengali first. And when somebody is criticising your india, you have to defend india. You are defending only and only bengal and to rub salt into the wounds of the rest of indians….........you too are criticicising india!!!!


@Sampan, rec1man, Talking highly about your caste/state/religion/language/gender while saying others’ are bad…..will be seen by others as parochial and as narrowmindedness and extremely immature, and also traitorly (because you denigrated your own country)

If you and rec1man continue to talk like this, people will think….these indians are so caste/region minded that when somebody attacks their country they are defending only their caste but not their country. They only care about their caste and not thier country. So please stop this immaturity.

You need to talk maturely when dealing with these kind of dicusssions. For example: When somebody criticises your country….talk about the situations facing india…like malnutrition, intracaste/cousin marriages which lead to IQ depression, flouride in many drinking waters in india, improper education system with a lack of teachers, labs etc. Top central syllabus schools have teachers in top citities but dont have a lab culture. They sent kids once or twice only to the lab.

And tell the world how india is trying to rectify these problems. People will feel happy that indians are actually doing something to develop india. They will feel happy because part of the reason people write these indian bashing artricles is because they are frustrated that india isnt rising fast enough.


39

Posted by Indian Strategy on Mon, 12 Jun 2017 13:49 | #

Hello, curious Indian, I liked your returning back as our discussion wasn’t finished. You can check it on the internet. In the Head Start program they spend more than 7 billion dollars every year to improve the IQs of the children before the primary school and the IQ gap diminishes to less than 5 points at the adulthood. They have been doing this since 1965. The experiment has been done on more than 30 million children. It is your idiocy to say that the children LOST (!) their interest. First the IQ tests don’t measure INTEREST. So your explanation is not scientific. Second, once you accept that it measures interest you have no way of proving the improvement of IQ. In any case of improvement of the scores one can easily say that only the interest of the children increased, not their IQs. If there is an increase in the scores you say that IQ increased, not interest. But if there is no increase you say that interest has decreased, not IQ. Your double standard proves you are bastard son of a bitch! Second, if it is all about the interest you should show a group of children which haven’t LOST (!) their interest. Only a bastard son of a bitch claims that more than 30 million of students lost their interest in the IQ tests at the adulthood. That is exactly what you are! And, yes James Watson said that the blacks were genetically less intelligent. See the links below.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/revealed-scientist-who-sparked-racism-row-has-black-genes-764104.html
http://adultaddstrengths.com/2007/12/10/white-scientist-who-said-blacks-are-less-intelligent-has-black-genes/
Now, it is your turn to prove that Einstein said (!) that IQ was environmental. He never ever said anything like that. You are a bastard LIAR like a typical Indian. And if the Chinese alphabet improved (!) the IQ of the Chinese the Arabic speaking people all over the world would have very high IQ (especially spatial) as it has been proved that the writing system requires high perception.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/08/100831102621.htm
Yet, even the oil wealthy people of Qatar, Bahrain or UAE have very low IQ. In Sub-Saharan countries like Sudan many people learn Arabic because of religion. You need to explain why they have low IQ if the alphabet increases IQ. Maybe you can say they have lost their interest (!) in the IQ tests as you are bastard son of a bitch!
As to Sampan, you need to show references for your claims. You can ask Lynn. He says that in 1966 (Chopra) the Brahmins, Kshatriyas and Vaisyas scored 87, 89 and 92 respectively. So even the high castes of your stupid country aren’t that smart. Maybe if you find idiots like yourself you can persuade them the Bengali Brahmins are the smartest.


40

Posted by Bong genes on Wed, 23 Aug 2017 12:17 | #

The one group that supposedly has the highest IQ in the world is the Ashkenazi Levitian Jew group.
The dominant haplogroup for this group is R1a1.
Guess which group has the highest R1a1 percentage in the world?
It is the Bengali Brahmins.
R1a1 was once regarded as the aryan marker, although the Aryan Invasion theory has been discredited.

R1a1 is also very common among Sindhis(both hindus and muslims) and Konkani Brahmins.
In Europe, outside of Jews, it is very common among Serbians and Belarusians.

Bengali Brahmins also have high genetic similarity with Tamil Brahmins- both Iyers and Iyengars.

Similarity with Iyengars is probably not that surprising. Iyengars are generally more accepting of outsiders.
Also,many Iyengars have family stories which state that they arrived from Bengal during the Vaishnav movements of 14th, 15th and 16th centuries.

What is surprising is that Bengali Brahmins tend to be at least as similar to Iyers, who generally don’t tend to marry outside their group. Which suggests that the link between the 2 groups is even older.

UP Brahmins are another group with close similiarity to Bengali Brahmins.

Sri Lankans also have genetic similarity to Bengalis in general.


41

Posted by SAMPAN CHAKRABORTY on Sun, 26 Nov 2017 05:16 | #

@K

I don’t understand from your post where I made derogatory remarks about other Indians.You must be a low IQ inferior group of people who don’t seem to to understand the superior MASTERY of Bengali Kulin Brahmins.

In my posts(from 800-981) where ever I commented,I posted mostly on intellectual achievements.If other Indians had similar heritage then I would have spoken about them too,but unfortunately they don’t have.

You are showing me wikipedia page of Ravi Arimelli,but I give you names of many more Indian who have currently 200 or higher granted patents.

Gurtej Sandhu-History’s 5th/6th most prolific inventor with 1200+ granted patents.
Devendra K Sadana-Who has 400+ granted patents.
Ajith K Kumar-Who has currently 314 granted patents.
Kulvir S Bhogal-Who is inching closer to 300 granted patents.
Rajiv Joshi-Who has 230+ granted patents.

But there is a man from Kolkata(Bengali) too who has made 203 patents in just 5 years-Sarbajit K Rakshit and will become IBM’s greatest inventor of all time in future.

Speaking of my family of Kulin Brahmins(we all hail from Kolkata),Dr Arpan Chakraborty,Dr Dwip.N.Banerjee and Dr.Nilanjan Mukherjee will all have more than 200 granted patents and if I live for 80-85 years,then I will also bring a Nobel prize in physics.

One White very recently posted in this forum about 3rd world brain drain and why so many Indian and Chinese students are migrating in USA or western Europe for their studies.The answer is India is a 3rd world shitload where you simply can’t do anything.

But still Bengali Kulin Brahmins of Kolkata are doing better than New York’s Jews in terms of Nobel breakthroughs.In 2012 Israel times wrote an article that New York’s Jews won’t stop winning Nobel prizes.Here it goes.

New York Jews population:1.6 Million
Bengali Kulin Brahmin population in Kolkata:50,000.

New York’s Jews have won 37 Nobel prizes,Bengali Kulin Brahmins have made 2 Nobel breakthroughs in literature and medicine.Also Sir U.N.Bramhachari who saved several millions of lives with his discovery of Urea Stibamine did not receive Nobel prize in medicine in the year 1942 although he had maximum nominations of 5 in that year because no Nobel prize was awarded in the year 1942 in medicine during second world war.Otherwise it should be 3.

So do the math:In terms of population we have 3 Nobel candidates with 50K and NY Jews have 37 with 1.6M people.So Kulin Brahmins of Kolkata are ahead of NY Jews even in Nobel prize

When Anirban Banerjee(who won 2007 Nobel laureates plaque award in Chemistry) and I will win our Nobel prizes,then Kolkata’s Kulin Brahmins will have even better record.

So how Bengali Kulin Brahmins(or our families as Kulin Brahmins were originally 5 families) achieved so much while rest of you Indians can’t achieve even after migrating in USA?Do you have any answer dumbo?


42

Posted by SAMPAN CHAKRABORTY on Sun, 26 Nov 2017 05:43 | #

@Idiot strategy.

I kicked your ass in 2013 and here I can kick your ass again.Bengali Kulin Brahmins have highest IQ in the world with variance of 115-122.Ashkenaji Jews have 113-117.

I am no Chopra(aka idiot) or Khatriyas or Baishya.I am Kulin Brahmin.In USA we have 5000+ population and we have 1000+ inventors which means in every 5 persons we produce 1 inventor.No other community in the world can boast of such high rate of inventors.Even Silicon valley’s youngest inventor entrepreneur Subham Banerjee is a Bengali Kulin Brahmin.

There are many famous Ashkenaji Jews follow me on twitter including Nobel laureates who have also accepted the fact that our Bengali Kulin Brahmins are world’s smartest.Ashkenaji Jews are also pretty damn smart,but they will come at second place.

And whites are not even foot note compared to us.For example in USA only 36% Christians have college degree,73% Jews have college degree(Read New York times article about it),while in Bengal 100% Kulin Brahmins have college degree.That’s why white IQ is only 94-100 while Bengali Kulin Brahmins are 115-122 IQ group of people.


43

Posted by Indian Strategy on Tue, 12 Dec 2017 21:31 | #

Idiot Sampan,I kicked your ass in 2013 and in many other forums. Your text was full of grammar mistakes showing how much idiot you were. As you couldn’t reply to me you had to escape. Chopra was the name of the researcher who gave tests to the Indian high castes. You can’t give any references (as I have been calling for you many times) because they are all JUST LIES! Verbal and math correlate much more with income and academic success than the general IQ. The Raven test which has the highest g loading gives an average of verbal and spatial. The American Jews (though they never took a Raven test) score about 107-108 in verbal and 91 in spatial giving the same average with the whites. They are far ahead of the whites and E Asians in verbal and math but millions of Jews take SAT. When their percentiles are converted they score less than 110 both in verbal and math. Idiot, stop giving stupid averages for the Jews and your stupid Brahmins. The Indians in the US compete with the Jews in SAT but more than 90 percent are from the high and dominant castes. You can read the book which says that they are VERY HIGHLY selected in the US.
https://books.google.com.au/books?id=aQ81DQAAQBAJ&pg=PA68&dq;=“over+90+percent+of+Indians”&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwijt-vsxvTUAhWGKJoKHUR2BXQQ6AEIJjAA#v=onepage&q=“over 90 percent of Indians”&f=false
As you are a stupid liar you forget that you gave the bottom limit as 110 for your stupid race in http://www.aei.org/publication/the-ashkenazim-of-india/.


44

Posted by SAMPAN CHAKRABORTY on Thu, 14 Dec 2017 10:18 | #

@Idiot strategy

You can not kick my ass because if you try,then I will rip you apart.

>You came to argue with me that who invented wireless telegraphy and see after my post in this forum became global,even Google honored Sir J.C Bose with their doodle in 2016 in his 158 birthday for his invention of wireless communication and for his contributions to microwave optics and solid state physics.You said it was Nikola Tesla who invented radio-I kicked your ass here.

>>If you think my posts are filled with grammar errors then show me.Last time when I posted in this forum,I was only 22-23 years of age and just completed my engineering study.Now I’m doing PhD in condensed matter physics/semiconductor physics under a Nobel laureate of 2014.

>>>Now you bring the topic of SAT & Verbal and math IQ.First of all I don’t give a damn about your SAT exam(I have given GRE and I scored 170/170 in GRE Quantitative section).I also don’t care what are the percentile of American Jews in SAT math or verbal section.What I care about is how many patents you are filing per capita population.In that sense we Bengali Kulin Brahmins are doing best in the world in USA.Even every inventive Japanese or South korean living in USA are nowhere near to us Bengali kulin Brahmins in patents filing,so forget about your American Jews.

>>>>Next thing I care about is how many ground breaking discoveries you are making per capita population.Even in this context Kulin Brahmins of Kolkata are doing best in the world even beating Jews of New York city.So you can see who kicks whose ass here.


45

Posted by SAMPAN CHAKRABORTY on Thu, 14 Dec 2017 10:48 | #

@Strategy As I posted earlier,we have 1000+ inventors in USA with only 5k population.The name of these inventors are all available in internet.Bengali Kulin Brahmins have specific surnames and you can search by those specific surnames.

Surnames are:Chakraborty/Chakravarty/Chakrabarty/Chakrabarti
              Mukherjee/Mukherji/Mookherjee/Mukhopadhyay
              Banerjee/Banerji/Bannerjee/Bannerji/Bandyopadhyay
              Chatterjee/Chatterji/Chattopadhyay.
              Ganguly/Ganguli/Gangopadhyay.
              Bhattacharya/Bhattacharjee.

If you have google then you can search in this way:

Chakraborty CA patent-A google page will come where you will find all inventors with surname Chakraborty living in California.
Similarly, Chakraborty NJ patent-A google page will come where you will find all inventors with surname Chakraborty living in New Jersey.
In this way you can search all cities in USA using all surnames which I have provided.

For example my cousin inventor Dr.Arpan Chakraborty livis in San Francisco and works in Apple.His name can be found in Chakraborty CA patent.

Similarly my uncle inventor Amit Chakraborty and inventor Soma Chakraborty can be found in Chakraborty NJ patent list.

Among all these inventors we will produce 4 prolific inventors with 200 or higher granted patents each.They are-

Arpan Chakraborty
Dwip.N.Banerjee
Nilanjan Mukherjee
Soma Chakraborty

Jews population in USA are more than 7 millions and among them Ashkenaji Jews are over 6 millions.How many prolific inventors with 200 or higher granted patents Ashkenaji Jews are producing in USA with such high population?Bengali Kulin Brahmins have 4 with just 5000 population.

So you see who are the superior people here.


46

Posted by Indian Strategy on Thu, 14 Dec 2017 15:29 | #

Idiot liar Sampan, I showed your grammar mistakes in post 983 in https://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/the_indian_chinese_iq_puzzle which then proved your idiocy. I also replied you in posts 974, 978, 980, 985, 994, 969. I won’t repeat the same things here. You couldn’t honestly give a link which is about the STATISTICS OF THE SO CALLED INDIAN INVENTORS! Instead count many names. There are no statistics on the internet because you are just a stupid liar. Again you can’t even get a score of 115 honestly as you have a low IQ.
Lynn made a HOAX! He used the Jewish verbal IQ as if it was their general IQ. There is a trade-off between verbal and spatial. That means if you lose spatial you will gain verbal or vice versa while the g is CONSTANT. If g = verbal then mathematically it is IMPOSSIBLE that there can be a TRADE-OFF.
https://books.google.com.au/books?id=4cgQmKMMBVgC&pg=PA292&lpg=PA292&dq=spearman’s+g+“a+people+that+shall+dwell”&source=bl&ots=O5maz9K1G6&sig=Eyo3w4cNMhepiQYuKEQKf3jyxks&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwio07ac9ezVAhXFO5oKHUPFAQkQ6AEIJjAA#v=onepage&q=spearman’s g “a people that shall dwell”&f=false
Both spatial and verbal have the highest g loading and require the most energy in the cortex as the biological data correlate most with these. So it is not a coincidence that the Raven test has the highest g loading and gives an average of verbal and spatial which are the 2 most g-loaded subjects. But spatial is related with relationship of the objects with each other in a 3 DIMENSIONAL space. That is why the Jews produced many scientists but no INVENTORS during the industrial revolution because they sacrificed their spatial to improve their verbal.
https://books.google.com.au/books?id=4cgQmKMMBVgC&pg=PA291&dq=jews+were+not+innovators&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiGga7TiOfSAhWjdpoKHTCtCPQQ6AEIGzAA#v=onepage&q=jews were not innovators&f=false
Today the inventions don’t require spatial as the production of the machines is over. Today we need verbal and math. That is the correct measure, not general IQ. The g loading is important only to understand the mechanism. I expect the verbal and math average of the E Asians to be about 103.5 and the Jews to be about 108.5 at most. In America millions of High School graduates take SAT so there is no chance that it can’t be representative. Most people do the estimations as if the personality traits have zero effect in income. It is claimed that C and O correlate positively with income while N correlates negatively (or emotional stability correlates positively). The Jews have better personality traits than the whites who in turn have better personality traits then the E Asians (both mean and variance). It is true that the Jews have an advantage in abilities versus the E Asians and the whites but the advantage is only in verbal and math, not general IQ. Even their math and verbal scores are ALWAYS below 110 EVERY YEAR. The so called Jewish average IQ 115 or 118 is only the claim of idiots or liars. And only idiots like you take those ridiculous scores into account.


47

Posted by SAMPAN CHAKRABORTY on Thu, 14 Dec 2017 23:57 | #

@Idiot liar strategy,

Yes there were few errors in my grammar last time when I posted in this forum.But at the same time you had also some errors in your post too.

You are such a pathetic idiot that you can not even make a google search.I have not enough time to post the names of all 1000+ inventors.I have given you 4-5 names who are world renowned such as my family members and Silicon Valley’s youngest inventor entrepreneur Subham Banerjee.In case you want to know all those names,then visit my twitter account:Sampan Chakraborty @cultofcreations and then click on the likes.Once you click on the likes you will find tweets where I have shown the links of all Bengali Kulin Brahmin inventors in USA.Even an idiot can search my twitter account and view the likes tweets.

“Jews produced many scientists,but no inventors during industrial revolution era”.-Strategy
No even today Jews have lot higher rate of producing inventors than whites.But east Asians like south korean and Japanese are leading in the world in global intellectual property.It’s because people of far east countries have a traditional culture of making manufacturing goods with very high level of technology.But it was not the case 200-300 years ago.300 years ago Japan or Korea were no where near to Europe in inventions.But now they are leading in the world.How it has become possible?In fact in 21st century Japan have produced 2nd highest number of science Nobel laureates after USA.So Japan is doing great not only inventions,but even in basic science they are now one of the top 5 in the world.

My cousin Arpan did his PhD under Shuji Nakamura.Nakamura is the only science Nobel laureate in history who has 315 granted patents.There is no other Nobel laureate in the world who has 200 or higher granted patents,only Japanese Nakamura has.This is why I think Japan is far superior than USA/Europe today when it comes to produce inventions as well as science Nobel breakthroughs.

Speaking of Ashkenaji Jews,your people are great because in every science department Jews have won 22%-26% Nobel with only 0.2% population of the world.In economics Jewish Nobel laureates are over 40%.But I don’t think Jews are very inventive like our Bengali kulin Brahmins or south Korean or Japanese people.You can only call yourself best if you are doing equally good in both departments of basic science as well as inventions.

For example Jews have very high rate of Nobel laureates,but Israel with 6.3 million Jews population have won only 5 Nobel prizes(excluding peace prize).Bengali Kulin brahmins with less than 1 million population in Bangladesh and India have produced 2 Nobel breakthroughs as well as Sir U.N.Bramhachari who missed out a genuine Nobel in 1942.So in terms of population we are much ahead than Israeli Jews.That’s what I posted last time in post number 981 in 2013.


48

Posted by Indian Strategy on Fri, 15 Dec 2017 15:07 | #

First, just show me my grammar errors. Let’s see if you can find. Secondly, I didn’t ask you to give all the names of the inventors. You should give a link which claims that the Bengali Brahmins (or whatever…) have … numbers of inventors and their population is … millions. This has nothing to do with searching all the names. UK has won 20 Science Nobel laureates; Japan has just 17 in the 21st century (excluding Economics). 7 E Asian countries (North & South Korea, Japan, China, Hong Kong, Taiwan and Singapore) have similar IQ profiles (not only general IQ but types of IQ) and personality traits. Japan or S Korea was an ordinary country 100 years ago as they couldn’t get the scientific information easily and quickly. Possibly China will follow them. Science requires curiosity and risk taking which the E Asians don’t have. Doing all the research alone 100 years ago is not the same with learning quickly what has been done up to now.
The inventions today require math as they are not anymore related with the machines. The Jews couldn’t invent any machine (except gramophone/Emile Berliner) during the industrial revolution as they have significantly low spatial IQ. Spatial is a non-school subject. The math or physics teacher can’t understand if the student has a high spatial talent. Only the tests can measure but as the production of the machines is over there is no need to measure it anymore. By the way I am not a Jew but I wouldn’t hesitate to tell the truth even if I was.


49

Posted by SAMPAN CHAKRABORTY on Sat, 16 Dec 2017 01:43 | #

No,UK has not won 20 Nobel in science in 21st century.They have won 15 Nobel in science in 21st century.Japan in 21st century have won 17 Nobel in science.So Japan is in 2nd place.I am trying to mean that there are 15 UK born science Nobel laureates in 21st century,while there are 17 Japan born science Nobel laureates.

Speaking of Bengali Kulin Brahmin we have around 5000 population in USA.According to last census total Bengali Hindu population in USA is 47,600.(If you click my name,you will find the wikipedia page of Bengali Hindu diaspora & there you will find that Bengali hindu population in USA is 47,600.).

Kulin Brahmins are just a small minority in Bengal.Our population is less than 1% of West Bengal and Bangladesh.Also now these days 80% of Bengali Brahmins are marrying outside their caste.So in that tradition within next 50 years there will be no real 100% Brahmin in Bengal.So we will not produce any future Nobel laureate or any prolific inventors in future.Our generation is probably last which will produce Nobel laureates or producing famous inventors.

Also last time when we discussed in 2012-13 you said that you were an Ashkenaji,now you say you are not a Jew.Then who you really are?Certainly someone with full of inferiority complex who can’t even bring her identity.Whatever it might be the case I have full praise for Ashkenaji Jews men because they are really winning Nobel prize,Field medal,Turing prize at a very high rate.But our Bengali kulin Brahmin men working in a 3rd world country have done pretty well.


50

Posted by SAMPAN CHAKRABORTY on Sat, 16 Dec 2017 02:00 | #

No,UK has not won 20 Nobel in science in 21st century.There are 15 UK born science Nobel laureates in 21st century.There are 17 Japan born science Nobel laureates in 21st century.So Japan is next to US in 21st century while producing science Nobel laureates.

Speaking of Bengali Kulin Brahmin we have around 5000 population in USA.According to last census total Bengali Hindu population in USA is 47,600.If you click my name in this post,you will find the wikipedia page of Bengali Hindu diaspora and eventually our population in USA.

Kulin Brahmins are just a small minority in Bengal with less than 1% population in West Bengal and Bangladesh.Also now these days 80% Kulin Brahmins are marrying outside their caste and community.So with this trend there will be no real Brahmin in Bengal within next 50 years.Hence in future there will be no Nobel laureate or prolific inventor from our community.Probably we are the last generation which will produce Nobel laureates or famous prolific inventors.

Also last time when we discussed in 2012-13,you said you are an Ashkenaji.But now you say you are not Jew.The whole world thought at that time who were reading this forum that you were a Jew.Whatever it might be the case you are certainly someone with full of inferiority complex who can’t even bring her identity.By the way I have full praise for Ashkenaji Jewish men because they are really winning Field medal,Nobel prize,Turing prize at a very high rate.But our Bengali kulin Brahmin men working in a 3rd world country have also done pretty well.


51

Posted by SAMPAN CHAKRABORTY on Sat, 16 Dec 2017 02:21 | #

My earlier post was not published due to security reason or javascript problem.


52

Posted by SAMPAN CHAKRABORTY on Sat, 16 Dec 2017 02:35 | #

My last post in detail was not published due to javascript error.


53

Posted by Indian Strategy on Sat, 16 Dec 2017 18:32 | #

First I said that UK had won 20 Science Nobel Laureates. I don’t care about where they were born. Secondly to make a fair comparison you should look at ‘per capita’.
Third I never said that I was Jewish. Give the number of the post. Your idiot friend Sunny Mittal claimed that I was Jewish but I objected. Speaking of inferiority complex in fact you are playing the role of a person who has inferiority complex. There are no statistics about the patents in these links.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bengali_Hindu_diaspora
http://www.wikizero.org/index.php?q=aHR0cHM6Ly9lbi53aWtpcGVkaWEub3JnL3dpa2kvQmVuZ2FsaV9IaW5kdV9kaWFzcG9yYQ
When I search as ‘Bengali kulin Brahmins’ there are only 750 results. In almost every forum you try to prove that your race is the smartest. I find ridiculous because I can’t find any statistics about your race. If I had any kind of inferiority complex (be sure I don’t) I would like to prove my talent, not of my race.
I have great respect for the Jews. However it is not true that they have a very high GENERAL IQ as their low spatial IQ pulls the average down. In the future the genetic engineering won’t try to improve the general IQ but it will improve verbal (especially reading) and math (not geometry) for 2 reasons. First the g loading is directly proportional with the energy used and complexity of the brain. The highly g loaded brain will have to steal the energy used for the other organs and it will cause health issues. Second math has a very low g loading but it is a very important subject as it provides high income and success in science. But it will be very difficult to find the genes related with math as it requires much less energy (low g loading) in the brain. Possibly in the future first they will analyze the brains of the Jews. In fact in terms of complexity the E Asians’ brains are definitely more complex but inefficient as their spatial is unnecessarily much better than even their math.
It is the idiocy of the people to ignore the personality traits like Conscientiousness, Openness (curiosity and risk taking) and Neuroticism (opposite of emotional stability) in science. In https://www.brookings.edu/research/redefining-global-cities/
you can see the cities which had venture capital per capita between 2006-2015 if you bring the cursor on the cities. San Jose had 3084 cents, San Francisco had 1918, Tokyo had 2, Seoul had 5 and Shanghai had 23 cents. Or in https://www.bloomberg.com/billionaires/
you can sort the billionaires by country. Japan and S Korea have 7 billionaires each. Sweden has 13 even with less than 10 m people. Sweden also has a lower gini index which means the income is distributed better. So it should be more difficult for Sweden to produce billionaires but that is not the case. The E Asians will always lag behind not because they are not smart enough but because they don’t have good personality traits. They don’t take risks, don’t do any investments.


54

Posted by SAMPAN CHAKRABORTY on Sun, 17 Dec 2017 04:06 | #

You are such a pathetic clown liar that you say Sunny Mittal claimed you are a Jewish.In your post you said Daniel.M.Kane is your son who is a Jewish.So Sunny said then you must be Janet or Jonathan M Kane(i.e Daniel’s parents).Then you made a post “Ignore the others” where you said Israel is publishing highest number of research papers per capita population and you also said that to multiply that number by 2.5 since Ashkenaji Jews are only 40% of Israeli population.There is no such data available in internet which proves Ashkenaji Jews are 40% of Israel’s population.I find from internet that 79% of israel’s population are Jews.There is no mention of Ashkenaji Jews or other Jews.That proves you are a liar.

Also Nobel prizes are counted based on birth of their country.If you go to official website of Nobelprize.org,then you will see they have counted Nobel laureates based on the birth of their country.On that basis UK has produced 15 science Nobel laureates in 21st century.Japan has 17.

You also asked in your previous post to show me the Bengali Kulin Brahmin population in USA.That’s why I’m giving the link of Bengali Hindu diaspora in USA.We have 47,600 population in USA according to last census.Among them Kulin Brahmins are only 5000.That’s what I provided.

Speaking of names of inventors,I gave you my twitter link in previous post and told you to visit the likes.There you will find approximately 400-500 names.If you ask me rest of the names then I can post those links in my twitter account.Also Kulin Brahmins are less than a million in Bangladesh & west Bengal and by end of 21st century there will no Kulin Brahmin because more than 80% people of our community are going for inter caste marriage,hence there will be no future Nobel laureates or famous inventors after 2 generations.


55

Posted by SAMPAN CHAKRABORTY on Sun, 17 Dec 2017 04:28 | #

You are such a pathetic clown liar that you say Sunny Mittal claimed you are a Jewish.In your post you said Daniel.M.Kane is your son who is a Jewish.So Sunny said you must be Janet or Jonathan M Kane(i.e Daniel’s parents).Then you made a post “Ignore the others” where you said Israel is publishing highest number of research papers per capita population and you also said that to multiply that number by 2.5 since Ashkenaji Jews are only 40% of Israeli population.There is no such data available in internet which proves Ashkenaji Jews are 40% of Israel’s population.I find from internet that 79% of israel’s population are Jews.There is no mention of Ashkenaji Jews or other Jews.That proves you are a liar.

Also Nobel prizes are counted based on birth of their country.If you go to official website of Nobelprize.org,then you will see they have counted Nobel laureates based on the birth of their country.On that basis UK has produced 15 science Nobel laureates in 21st century.Japan has 17.

You also asked in your previous post to show me the Bengali Kulin Brahmin population in USA.That’s why I’m giving the link of Bengali Hindu diaspora in USA.We have 47,600 population in USA according to last census.Among them Kulin Brahmins are only 5000.That’s what I provided.

Speaking of names of inventors,I gave you my twitter link in previous post and told you to visit the likes.There you will find approximately 400-500 names.If you ask me rest of the names then I can post those links in my twitter account.Also Kulin Brahmins are less than a million in Bangladesh & west Bengal and by end of 21st century there will no Kulin Brahmin because more than 80% people of our community are going for inter caste marriage,hence there will be no future Nobel laureates or famous inventors after 2 generations.


56

Posted by SAMPAN CHAKRABORTY on Sun, 17 Dec 2017 07:28 | #

@Dear moderator,

I am posting comments,but it’s not published.After preview,I am clicking post comment but then it’s showing error.Your comment is spam/your comment can not be published at this moment are being shown.What can be done?


57

Posted by SAMPAN CHAKRABORTY on Sun, 17 Dec 2017 07:45 | #

@strategy,

You are such a pathetic clown liar that you twist facts every time.You posted in 2012 that Jew Daniel.M.Kane is your son.That’s why Sunny Mittal thought you are either his mother/dad.You also posted with title “Ignore others” where you showed that Israel has highest number of research paper per capita population.You also said that Ashkenaji Jews are only 40% population of Israel,so multiply every statistics of Israel by 2.5 because non Ashkenaji Jews and Arabs living there are not doing anything.But nowhere in internet I found that Ashkenaji Jews are 40% of Israel.Internet is showing me 79% Israeli are Jews.

Speaking of Nobel prize,you can visit official website Nobelprize.org where you will find that Nobel laureates are counted based on their birth country.On that basis UK has 15 Nobel laureates in science in 21st century and Japan has 17.

Speaking of our kulin Brahmin population,I gave you wikipedia page of Bengali Hindu diaspora in USA-according to last census 47,600 Bengali Hindus are living in USA and among them kulin Brahmins are just a small percentage:~5k.

Speaking of inventors of our community,I told you to visit my twitter account and see the likes.There are several links shown where you will find more than 400-500 inventors name.If you want to know other names,then I can post link of other names in my twitter account too.

Also Japan is 2nd best in inventions after south Korea and they are regularly winning Nobel in 21st century.That’s why I think they are lot better than whites,Chinese,Indian(including Brahmins).Only Bengali Kulin brahmins have very high superior rate of inventions,other Indian Brahmin don’t have such achievements.Tamil Brahmins have won 2 Nobel with foreign citizenship working in USA/UK and C.V Raman worked in Bengal.Bengali Kulin Brahmins have produced Nobel laureates working in Kolkata(capital of west Bengal),not in USA/UK.


58

Posted by DanielS on Sun, 17 Dec 2017 07:56 | #

Posted by SAMPAN CHAKRABORTY on Sun, 17 Dec 2017 07:28 | #53

@Dear moderator,

I am posting comments,but it’s not published. After preview, I am clicking post comment but then it’s showing error. Your comment is spam/ your comment can not be published at this moment are being shown.  What can be done?

Sometimes comments automatically go to moderation first. When I see them, provided they are reasonable, or not sheerly redundant, I will open them to the public. It usually doesn’t take a long time before I notice that a comment is pending - minutes, hours maybe, but not days.


59

Posted by Indian Strategy on Sun, 17 Dec 2017 15:25 | #

You are the liar Sampan. In post 926 I explained that it was Janet Mertz’ mail to me. Go and read it once more. I don’t know any of those Putnam fellows on the list but Janet Mertz knows all of them because of her son. Second, prove that it was I who sent the title with ‘ignore others’. That was also Mittal’s claim with no proof. Wikipedia says that the Mizrahi Jews are half of the Jews.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mizrahi_Jews_in_Israel
‘Mizrahi Jews in Israel constitute one of the largest Jewish ethnic divisions among Israeli Jews [1] numbering about half of Israeli Jews[2] The other dominant sub-group are the Israeli Ashkenazi Jews and Sephardic Jews.’
You still play the dirty game. I didn’t ask you the names of the inventors. There is no page on the internet which gives a summary of the statistics about the ‘inventor per capita’ or ‘patent per capita’ of your race. You just can’t show it.


60

Posted by SAMPAN CHAKRABORTY on Mon, 18 Dec 2017 03:32 | #

@Strategy,

You are the one who is bloody liar and play dirty game.When you posted with the handle “Ignore others”,it was me who caught your cheating.After I said that,you never complained because you knew you were doing the cheating.Read my comment number 887(Feb 1,2013).

You are also extremely poor in math.I am telling you again and again that we have more than 1000+ inventors(the name of these inventors are available in internet from where I posted it in my twitter account) with about ~5000 population,which means more than 20% of our population in USA are inventors.Also the number of women inventors are less than 15%.Which means Bengali kulin brahmin males have very high rate of producing inventors.For example our family currently has total about 900-910 patents filing(i.e filed patents) which will cross 2500 within next 30 years.And if I win Nobel in Physics(I will have to live 80-85 years for that),then our family will have lot better legacy than Curie family who won total 4 Nobel prizes.


61

Posted by Indian Strategy on Mon, 18 Dec 2017 12:13 | #

First, I denied that I was ‘ignore others’. Read the following mails carefully. I don’t care whether you believe or not but at least it is not true that I didn’t complain.

Next, no one has the time to check name by name of your inventors and to be sure that they really invented something. Again there is no supportive evidence of your inventors on the internet as you can’t show even one single page. Your chance of winning Nobel Prize is only laughable. Do you even know how to do a Google search? It took me just a few minutes to find the information about the Mizrahi Jews that they make half of the Jews in Israel. As to your post 887 the co-founder of Google, Sergey Brin is a Russian Jewish immigrant. The page rank system requires math IQ, not spatial. That is why the Jews have recently begun to produce inventors today.


62

Posted by SAMPAN CHAKRABORTY on Tue, 19 Dec 2017 04:08 | #

I understand when I’m dealing with a first class idiot,I have to teach her from 1st grade which even a 5 year old can understand.

>Sergey Brin is co founder of google,he has 47 patents filing.I just checked his inventions from Justia patents.He is not a prolific inventor.My cousin Arpan has 217 patents filing at age of 37 only.When he will become 70 year old,he will have more than 500 patents.My uncle Dwip.N.Banerjee has 282 patents filing at age of 49.He will also have 500+ patents in future.

>>I have also given the link of all inventors with surname Chakraborty in California.You can check it by clicking on my name here.Using google you can search of all Inventors with surname Chakraborty in New York,New Jersy,Texas,Florida,Cambridge(Massachusets)and all cities of America.You can do the search in google by simply using surname and using name of the city.If you can’t then visit my twitter account likes,and there you will find some names(about 400) of inventors of our community.If you want then I can post the links again.


63

Posted by SAMPAN CHAKRABORTY on Tue, 19 Dec 2017 11:07 | #

@Dear moderator Daniel S:

Today I posted a comment with a link of name of inventors with surname Chakraborty in California,but that comment hasn’t been published.Please moderate that comment.


64

Posted by SAMPAN CHAKRABORTY on Tue, 19 Dec 2017 13:56 | #

My comment was not published,hence I’m posting the link of inventors again.Even a 1st class idiot like 70 IQ strategy will understand now.
Also this bastard liar strategy said Japan and Korea has 7 billion dollar persons.Actually they have 38 each.This is my final reply to this moron called strategy.


65

Posted by SAMPAN CHAKRABORTY on Tue, 19 Dec 2017 14:05 | #

Here is another link of inventors with surname Chakraborty in some US cities.After reading this,that bastard strategy would say she could not read it as it was not written in her language.Actually it’s written in English..but when you are dealing with a bastard..you can imagine what reply to come next.So I won’t bother to reply this bloody liar anymore.

Speaking of Nobel prize,I have already made 5 patents at age of 27 which 95% Nobel laureates of physics don’t have…so who is who will tell our statistics.The only people who can be compared with us Kulin Brahmins are Japanese and some extent Ashkenaji Jews…rest are not even foot note compared to us.


66

Posted by Indian Strategy on Tue, 19 Dec 2017 15:08 | #

Idiot liar Sampan, first I have given the list of the top 500 billionaires in the link http://www.bloomberg.com/billionaires/ The l.ast one on the list has 4.06 b $. Japan and S Korea have 7 billionaires ON THAT LIST. I didn’t mean the ones who have over 1 b $.  I have given the list only for COMPARISON! The list ranks the billionaires up 500 persons. It could have ranked them up to 1000 or even to 10000 persons. That is not the point. You couldn’t even understand why I have given the list as you are an IDIOT!
You haven’t given any link up to now. There is no proof that you have any patents.


67

Posted by Indian Strategy on Tue, 19 Dec 2017 15:55 | #

It seems that I have to explain everything sentence by sentence. If the list contained top 1000 billionaires I would have to find how many Japanese and Koreans entered that list each. The point is not how many billionaires do the Japanese and the Koreans have but how many of them entered the top 500 list.



69

Posted by Indian Strategy on Thu, 21 Dec 2017 14:44 | #

Idiot Sampan, what do you want me to do with these links? First, I don’t know the Indian surnames as I am not an Indian man. Second, let’s say that I can identify them what is the proof that they are Bengali Brahmins and Kulin Bengali Brahmins? Third, if you click any of the patent applications you see that there are many other inventors of that patent. So what is the point here? There is no information about your population (Bengali Brahmins or Bengali Kulin Brahmins, whatever…) in America. There is no information about the number of the patents your race has invented and more important no info about how much they are worth. The quality of the patents is certainly much more important than the quantity of them. The page rank system of Google is one of the most important inventions. When I click the top 100 inventors in the page there is no one from India. Maybe there are some Indians from America but I can’t identify them from their surnames. In every forum (quora is one of them) you repeat the same stupid messages again and again. You have 2 Nobel Prize winners with only a population of 50 K though they worked (!) in West Bengal. Idiot, you say Tagore won in literature. What would differ if he stayed in Calcutta or LA? He was just a writer, poet, not a rocket scientist. Secondly, in Wikipedia there is no information about the population of the Kulin Brahmins. There isn’t any information about the population of the Kulin Brahmins in America and the number of their inventions either. As your memory isn’t also good you give different numbers in different web sites like 5k or 10 k for your population in America and +1k or +1100 or +1200 patents and 173 or 190 for your math IQ and 110 or 115 for the down limit of your race. As you are a stupid liar about everything you claim that Rushton and Lynn predicted the average IQ of the Brahmins as 110 in quora. Show the research on line. You can’t because you are a bastard idiot liar! You can ask Lynn. The high castes of India just scored about 90 in a SPM test made by Chopra in 1966 and about 100 in a visual reasoning test made by Lall in 1944 which means that their verbal must be definitely below 85 to balance the trade-off between verbal and spatial. There was no IQ research for the Bengali Brahmins or Bengali Kulin Brahmins. They are all your lies. Even lying requires minimum levels of some kind of talent and honor. Your lies are extremely stupid and easy to prove because you just give different numbers in different web sites. A person has replied to you in his site http://www.sabhlokcity.com/2016/03/the-brahmin-hero-parag-chakraborty-my-my-what-a-great-man/
https://www.sabhlokcity.com/2013/08/how-can-we-explain-the-superior-on-average-intellectual-performance-of-the-brahmin-caste/
You are exactly what he says. You really deserve all what he says. You still couldn’t prove anything about your population and inventions of your race in America. Even if you did it wouldn’t prove any IQ score. The Indians in America were very highly selected but they can only compete with the Jews in verbal and math in SAT which I think is a much better of talent compared to a full scale IQ test. They can compete but can’t beat the Jews and their score is not higher than even 108.5 in SAT.


70

Posted by @Bastard liar Indian strategy on Fri, 22 Dec 2017 07:09 | #

I have got your identity form Quora,although you will deny it,but it’s true.The link is here,if you click @Bastard liar Indian strategy.

As a matter of fact surnames of Bengali Kulin Brahmins are already given by me in my previous post.If anyone has doubt,he or she can check with wikipedia page of Kulin Brahmins.


71

Posted by SAMPAN CHAKRABORTY on Fri, 22 Dec 2017 07:30 | #

My math IQ is 173.But my verbal IQ is low.

Next I said population of Bengali Brahmin is less than 10K in my previous posts.I never said population of kulin Brahmin is 10K.Kulin Brahmins are a part among Bengali Brahmins,just like Ashkenaji Jews are a part among Jews.In Bengal there are non kulin Brahmins as well as Baidya Brahmins.Nobel laureate Amartya sen,fundamental physics prize winner Ashoke Sen etc are Baidya Brahmins.

So population of kulin Brahmins are ~5000 in USA.And number of inventors>1000 in USA.This is a reply to common audience of this forum.Not to that bastard liar Indian strategy.

Next is Tagore.yes he was a musician,poet,philosopher,novelist polymath who worked in Kolkata.But medical dictionary of the world have included 2 other Bengali kulin Brahmin of kolkata in their best researchers category.Among then Sir Upendranath Bramhachari did not win Nobel prize although he saved several millions of lives with his discovery of Eurea stibamine.

But in future 2 other Nobel prize will come if everything goes accordingly from Kulin Brahmins of Kolkata.Anirban Banerjee in chemistry who is also from Kolkata,but now lives in New York & me in physics,although I currently live in Japan and will again move in UK in future.


72

Posted by Indian Strategy on Fri, 22 Dec 2017 10:58 | #

I didn’t click it and don’t care if it is true or not.
Idiot, in https://www.sabhlokcity.com/2013/08/how-can-we-explain-the-superior-on-average-intellectual-performance-of-the-brahmin-caste/ you say that Sampan is your nick name (!) but your name is Parag. The 2 fotos in these links are different.
http://www.sabhlokcity.com/2016/03/the-brahmin-hero-parag-chakraborty-my-my-what-a-great-man/
https://www.f6s.com/paragchakraborty
You are definitely not Parag and not an inventor of anything. Like I said before you are a stupid boy who has an inferiority complex. In post 983, I corrected many of your grammar mistakes. You are regularly making very simple mistakes which prove that you indeed have a low IQ. A smart person would hardly make a few mistakes.
You answered none of my questions because you are a stupid liar of everything. Speaking of IQ I appreciate every successful person regardless of whatever his/her race is. Yes, there are IQ and personality traits differences among races but the researches about these subjects should be made only to understand the missing points of the races for success, not to insult each other.
Speaking of the IQ scores first learn the difference between ratio-IQ and deviation-IQ. Some of the scores you are talking about are ratio-IQs and some of them are deviation-IQs. The scores higher than 4 sigma (160 in sd=15 or 185 ratio-IQ) have no scientific value. That is approximately one person among 30K. On the other hand instead of general IQ reading and math should be measured. Only idiots like you pay attention to the stupid ridiculous scores like 250-300 (Sidis) or Terrence Tao (230). A smart person would never take those magazine style scores into consideration.


73

Posted by @Bastard liar Indian strategy on Fri, 22 Dec 2017 19:19 | #

In the previous link I gave your name from Quora.Your name is Rosie Hill.You are an Economist.But Quora has banned your account,because you were sharing nude photos in Quora.

My photo is given in my twitter,linkedin and Quora account.That’s not same as the photo you are showing in Sabhlokcity.I don’t know any idiot named Sanjeev Sabhlok,and I never commented in his blog.

I comment in front of global audience in my twitter account or any international forum.I don’t comment on any cheap Indian blogger’s blog.

More inventors from our Bengali Kulin Brahmin community in USA.Also I did say that population of Bengali Brahmin in USA is about 10,000.But population of Kulin Brahmin is about only 5000.If I include other Bengali Brahmin inventors then,number of inventors would cross 2000.For example Baidya Brahmin(not Kulin Brahmin) Nobel laureate Amartya Sen lives in USA.

http://www.patentsencyclopedia.com/inventor/chakraborty-nj-3/

http://www.patentsencyclopedia.com/inventor/mukherjee-us-5/


74

Posted by Indian Strategy on Sat, 23 Dec 2017 02:58 | #

First, you are wrong again. I am not her, furthermore I am not a woman either. Second, how did you know she had nude photos though you couldn’t see her account? Is it because you are lying? As to the fotos, you are definitely using another person’s name, Parag. Your sentences are always the same everywhere on the internet. It is impossible not to recognize your style, it is definitely you, the same stupid words. I am sure he would be ashamed of you if he knew that you were writing on behalf of him with his name.
As to the names, I checked one of them, ‘Anup Kishore Mukherjee’. There are only 6 Google results which none of them refers to Wikipedia or any other source that we can identify his race. Instead of giving meaningless names you should give a link that it gives any info about the number of patents per capita or inventors per capita but you can do neither of them as it is only a lie.


75

Posted by @Bastard liar Indian strategy on Sat, 23 Dec 2017 08:11 | #

I kicked your ass in 2013,and I’m kicking your ass again and again in 2017.If you had any shame delusional fool,then you would have stopped commenting long time ago.Last time it was invention of radio and Bose & now patents-I have kicked your ass again and again.

As I said in previous post,I don’t comment on some cheap Indian blogger’s blog.I have my twitter account followed by global audience including your President Trump..I comment on my twitter account along with my family members who are prolific inventors of the world.

In one previous post you were talking about Sweden-Sweden has produced only 1 prolific inventor with more than 200 patents with 9.9M population.Our family will produce 3 or 4 prolific inventors with more than 200 granted patents.That shows who are really superior Master.Similarly we Bengali kulin Brahmin are much ahead of Sweden in Nobel breakthroughs per capita,although it’s Sweden who give Nobel prize to their citizens.So even in their own game we are ahead of them.


76

Posted by SAMPAN CHAKRABORTY on Sat, 23 Dec 2017 08:47 | #

This strategy is such a delusional fool and clown that she asks for race of an inventor.Idiot,can you show me one single inventor of the world whose race is written in his invention profile such as white,Jewish,east Asian,brown etc?I have provided you surnames of Bengali Kulin Brahmins and you can easily verify all these names because of surnames.There is no other race of people in the world who have surnames Banerjee,Mukherjee,Chatterjee,Chakraborty,Bhattacharya,Ganguly except Bengali kulin Brahmin.

Here is the wiki link:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Kulin_Brahmin_surnames


77

Posted by Omega fraternity on Sat, 23 Dec 2017 11:41 | #

It’s a joke fellas, so don’t take it too seriously, the level of your concern is appreciated. Nevertheless, the population of the comments section by your debates - rather tangential to MR Central - does remind me a little bit of how the snob right wing sell outs to the YKW, e.g. Richard Spencer, Greg Johnson and Millennial Woes, are represented by these composite characters from Animal House, the elitist fraternity brother snobs who would haze and then try to direct potential recruits to our platform to marginal communities instead. lol


“You’ll have lots to talk about”


I (DanielS) do, in fact, have empathy and appreciation for the people, abilities and cultures of your parts (India). This short documentary of the train line through Sri Lanka is the latest example of what I might appreciate - the train line takes one through several estimable industrial, cultural and topographical vistas.


It might be a good idea for you all to open up a thread in the Forum…

 


78

Posted by mancinblack on Sat, 23 Dec 2017 12:17 | #

That may have been the wrong example to use, Daniel. Sri Lankan railways are not only loss making, they are racist too

(lol)

http://www.sundaytimes.lk/170205/news/passengers-hold-their-noses-at-racist-incompetent-railway-227286.html

No prizes for guessing who established the railway in Ceylon either.


79

Posted by Indian Strategy on Sun, 24 Dec 2017 06:07 | #

İdiot Sampan, I kicked your ass. As you couldn’t give a response about your grammar mistakes you had to escape. You can kick only your own ass. The people make fun of your stupidity everywhere like Sabhlok. As to Bose you couldn’t prove that he invented radio. The court gives the decision about who the real inventor is, not your stupid institution IEEE. If Tesla didn’t apply for the court Marconi would be the inventor though he wasn’t. Only the Supreme Court has the legal authority, not any other institution and the judge doesn’t need to know anything about physics to give the final decision. In forums in order to prove that Bose invented the radio you are CRYING for absolutely NONSENSE which makes you look like even more stupid and ridiculous. The entire world has heard nothing about your Bose and other so called famous (!) inventors.
As to the surnames they are always problematic. There are also Jewish surnames but many times they use the surnames of the whites. After migrating to America many Jews changed their surnames. In tests only the self-reported Jews are said to have scored about 107 to 109 in verbal and math. I don’t know the situation about the Brahmins or Kulins but don’t need to know either as you don’t have any worldwide famous inventors or scientists.
I don’t care about the Nobel laureates because they are given in specific subjects and are highly political. Lynn’s mail address is here, in http://www.iapsych.com/iqmr/fe/LinkedDocuments/lynn2008.pdf Ask h.im the research about the high castes of India including the Brahmins which I mention above. Your claim was that he found the average IQ of Brahmins as 110! His response will prove what kind of a bastard idiot you are. I am DONE with you as you couldn’t answer any of my questions. Give a link about the inventor per capita or patents per capita about your race. As you can’t I don’t need to waste my time with an idiot like you.


80

Posted by SAMPAN CHAKRABORTY on Sun, 24 Dec 2017 16:32 | #

Einstein said two things are infinite-space and human stupidity.After witnessing this strategy,Einstein would have definitely said"Indeed,human stupidity is infinite”.

What Bose invented would be said by IEEE,Goggle doodle or The Royal society.Not some of your cheap court.In fact no court has ever said that Bose didn’t invent wireless telegraphy.

Yes the inventors I’m showing here are not heard by world,but then world has not heard about any inventors of current world today.Have you heard about world’s most prolific inventors Shunpei Yamazaki or Kia Silverbrook idiot?No,you haven’t heard anything about them.That’s why you and most people like you are idiots.They don’t know who invented radio,they don’t know the names of inventors.

I know all these things,that’s why people like Tim Berners Lee,Vinton G Cerf,Several dozens of Nobel laureates in science follow me in twitter.As far as grammar goes,you idiot can not show a single mistake now,that’s why you are shouting.If I would have got you face to face,then I would have kicked your monkey ass so hard,that you would not have shown the audacity to to talk with me anymore.


81

Posted by Indian Strategy on Mon, 25 Dec 2017 16:56 | #

Bastard idiot liar Sampan, I didn’t hear about Yamazaki or Silverbrook but they were the 4th and the 3rd on the list of the top inventors measured by the number (!) of the patents. However no one needs to know them. In economics the value of the patents isn’t measured by the number but everyone knows that the page rank system of the Google was invented by Larry and Sergey Brin. That is not anything you can understand with your little IQ. Secondly, no one is following you in Twitter because you are a simple bastard liar. You said the same lie in Sabhlok’s site and he kicked your ass. Can you sit on a chair? That was also definitely you. As you are embarrassed you are denying that you weren’t him. I also looked at some of your comments in quora. They are very simple, stupid and childish. Anyone who reads some of those comments understands easily that you have a low IQ and an inferiority complex. In the other forum I said that I wasn’t Janet Mertz. As your memory is also as weak as your IQ you tried to prove that I was her. But now here you are saying that I never complained that I wasn’t her. Read those messages again. Only IDIOTS AND LIARS might follow you in Twitter, not any scientists or inventors. That is exactly where you belong. You are in fact very lucky that you never met me in the real life otherwise I would break your head. Then maybe you would understand if I am a man or woman. You still answered none of my questions above. Where is the research about the Brahmins? But your lying is not the point. What is more important is that your lies are extremely simple to prove which give clues about your low IQ. If they were difficult to prove I would appreciate them. And finally yes, you still have grammar mistakes. Though this time your message was very short and much better than your old posts (especially the one I corrected) you make wrong sentences. Example:
- Not ANY of your cheap courtS. (2 mistakes here)
- If I HAD got you face to face,then I would have kicked ... (1 mistake her)
Your tenses are wrong. Also in the first sentence either you should have put in the brackets like Einstein said ‘.....’ or Einstein said that 2 things WERE ....
In English in indirect speech the tense changes in the past, in French or German it doesn’t. Don’t ask me again for your mistakes, do you understand IDIOT?


82

Posted by @Bastard liar Indian strategy on Tue, 26 Dec 2017 11:55 | #

You filthy shameless pathetic monkey can not even talk about your own race because you are living with full of inferiority complex and can not tell about your own race.

I am damn proud who I am and I am damn proud about me genetics group of people;that’s why we are the best in the world in inventions and also in scientific discoveries per capita population.

Also Shunpei Yamazaki is world’s most prolific inventor with nearly 5000 granted patents followed by Silverbrook.They are not not 3rd/4th as you bastard liar has mentioned.

No Sabhlok or any filthy idiot low IQ Indian can not kick my ass.If they try I will humiliate and destroy them at bese as possible.

As far as my twitter readers go,you better go and ask Sir Tim Berners Lee,Donald Trump,NASA,International space station,Vinton G Cerf or several other science and economics Nobel laureates such as frank wilczek,Brian Schmist,Paul krugman etc who use twitter.Go and ask them my name,my family’s prolific inventor’s names-they will tell you bastard liar.


83

Posted by SAMPAN CHAKRABORTY on Tue, 26 Dec 2017 12:16 | #

Few errors in last post while typing very fast:

....I will humiliate and destroy them at best as possible.

Next Nobel laureate in physics is Brian Schmidt(not schmist).Other laureates who follow me are Robert J Shiller,Richard H Thaler,Gererd T’Hooft,Peter Doherty,Fraser Stoddart etc.

Also you are repetedly taking the name of Russian Jewish inventor Sergey Grin.He has only 47 filed patents.My cousin Arpan has 217 filed patents at age of 37.So Sergey Grin is not even a foot note compared to Arpan Chakraborty.I have more respect for Vinton G Cerf or Bob Kahn who invented internet and Tim Berners Lee,who invented word wide web & didn’t even patent for it just like Sir J.C.Bose.


84

Posted by SAMPAN CHAKRABORTY on Tue, 26 Dec 2017 12:18 | #

@Daniel S:

My last comment has not been published.Please post that.It will be my final reply to this strategy.


85

Posted by SriTrain on Wed, 27 Dec 2017 11:54 | #

It’s open now…


86

Posted by SriTrainMore on Wed, 27 Dec 2017 13:53 | #



Post a comment:


Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Note: You should copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting it, so that it will not be lost if the session times out.

Remember me


Next entry: Shakespeare’s Mother
Previous entry: Only The US Remains in Support, Israel’s Illegal Settlements Rest on the Alt-Right’s Trump

image of the day

Existential Issues

DNA Nations

Establishment Problem

Categories

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Immigration

Islamist Threat

Anti-white Media Networks

Audio/Video

Crime

Economics

Education

General

Historical Re-Evaluation

Controlled Opposition

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Europeans in Africa

Of Note

Comments

Taken For Granted commented in entry 'WHITE WOMEN FOR SALE!' on Mon, 19 Feb 2018 02:42. (View)

Commercials: "resistance is futile" commented in entry 'WHITE WOMEN FOR SALE!' on Mon, 19 Feb 2018 01:10. (View)

The Mountain Between Us commented in entry 'WHITE WOMEN FOR SALE!' on Sun, 18 Feb 2018 23:27. (View)

Kristy Boden commented in entry 'Two more London attacks' on Sun, 18 Feb 2018 15:54. (View)

JF interviews Todd Lewis commented in entry 'Corrected: After sorting confused language: check points of hermeneutic of racial stasis/homeostasis' on Sun, 18 Feb 2018 11:26. (View)

The Rooster commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Sun, 18 Feb 2018 11:06. (View)

Uncomfortable Bear commented in entry '4 things we learned from the indictment of 13 Russians in the Mueller investigation' on Sun, 18 Feb 2018 09:23. (View)

Nikolas Cruz commented in entry '"What We Don't Know - Motive." Likely: revenge against societal incoherence, lack of accountability' on Sun, 18 Feb 2018 02:09. (View)

Maccabees commented in entry 'The alternative right's big tent, already too inclusive - includes Jews as well' on Sun, 18 Feb 2018 00:57. (View)

Max Musson article mapped commented in entry 'Dark Side of Self Actualization & Incommensurate GenderAgendas' on Sun, 18 Feb 2018 00:14. (View)

8,606 fake refugees so far in 2018 commented in entry 'More Than A Thousand Illegal Immigrants Reach Europe In First Week Of 2018' on Sat, 17 Feb 2018 18:52. (View)

Orson commented in entry 'Serial killer white-out' on Sat, 17 Feb 2018 15:58. (View)

Toba commented in entry 'Euro-DNA Nation' on Sat, 17 Feb 2018 11:02. (View)

Allman, Wetton, Coryell, Holdsworth commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Sat, 17 Feb 2018 10:14. (View)

Invisible men commented in entry 'Dark Side of Self Actualization & Incommensurate GenderAgendas' on Sat, 17 Feb 2018 08:28. (View)

Uncomfortable Bear commented in entry '4 things we learned from the indictment of 13 Russians in the Mueller investigation' on Sat, 17 Feb 2018 07:23. (View)

Twins, one black, one White commented in entry 'Euro-DNA Nation' on Sat, 17 Feb 2018 02:02. (View)

Distributist vs JF commented in entry 'Corrected: After sorting confused language: check points of hermeneutic of racial stasis/homeostasis' on Sat, 17 Feb 2018 00:22. (View)

Reactionary Expat commented in entry 'The New Religion Exclusively for Those of Indigenous European Extraction' on Fri, 16 Feb 2018 18:54. (View)

On the Obama portrait artist commented in entry 'Obama portrait artist's past work depicted black women decapitating white women' on Fri, 16 Feb 2018 17:39. (View)

KM on proprietory modules of mentation commented in entry 'Corrected: After sorting confused language: check points of hermeneutic of racial stasis/homeostasis' on Fri, 16 Feb 2018 07:32. (View)

Andrew Torba at RI commented in entry 'FCC doubles down on dead-wrong definition of how internet works' on Fri, 16 Feb 2018 01:26. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Corrected: After sorting confused language: check points of hermeneutic of racial stasis/homeostasis' on Thu, 15 Feb 2018 18:15. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Next-level TRS: Michael ‘Enoch’ Peinovich is actually Michael ‘Enoch’ ENOCKSON Peinovich-Sippel.' on Thu, 15 Feb 2018 18:04. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Corrected: After sorting confused language: check points of hermeneutic of racial stasis/homeostasis' on Thu, 15 Feb 2018 18:03. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Corrected: After sorting confused language: check points of hermeneutic of racial stasis/homeostasis' on Thu, 15 Feb 2018 17:15. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Corrected: After sorting confused language: check points of hermeneutic of racial stasis/homeostasis' on Thu, 15 Feb 2018 17:10. (View)

Captainchaos commented in entry 'Corrected: After sorting confused language: check points of hermeneutic of racial stasis/homeostasis' on Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:17. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Corrected: After sorting confused language: check points of hermeneutic of racial stasis/homeostasis' on Thu, 15 Feb 2018 15:38. (View)

Dinaroid commented in entry 'Next-level TRS: Michael ‘Enoch’ Peinovich is actually Michael ‘Enoch’ ENOCKSON Peinovich-Sippel.' on Thu, 15 Feb 2018 14:25. (View)

Matt Parrott commented in entry 'Corrected: After sorting confused language: check points of hermeneutic of racial stasis/homeostasis' on Thu, 15 Feb 2018 12:54. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Next-level TRS: Michael ‘Enoch’ Peinovich is actually Michael ‘Enoch’ ENOCKSON Peinovich-Sippel.' on Thu, 15 Feb 2018 09:12. (View)

The most dangerous job in the world commented in entry 'Suidlanders Reach out to Americans to Stop South African White Genocide' on Thu, 15 Feb 2018 08:47. (View)

Dinaroid commented in entry 'Next-level TRS: Michael ‘Enoch’ Peinovich is actually Michael ‘Enoch’ ENOCKSON Peinovich-Sippel.' on Thu, 15 Feb 2018 08:42. (View)

Sandy commented in entry 'White Privilege Under a Bridge' on Thu, 15 Feb 2018 00:03. (View)

affection-tone