A small investigation into hypocritic oafs A few days ago it was suggested here that in British medical practise there is a suspiciously high corollation of roving hands to medicos of Indian extraction. Well, today the story of the breast-mad Dr Kayode Falodun made it into the press and he, it seems, is a Nigerian. So I thought I would check out how well-behaved these desperately needed saviours of the nation’s health really are, and roughly what proportion of miscreants are (a) foreign, (b) Indian. Accordingly and without much hope of success, I visited the website of the General Medical Council, the doctor’s trade union and self-regulating authority. The first thing I saw on the front page was a face-pic of a black woman with the suggestion of a doctor’s white coat at her neck. She decorates the headline, “Diversity and Equal Opportunities Guides”. Here we go again, I thought. You can’t get away from it. But no, this virtual paragon of virtuous practise is there not to tell the world of the GMC’s respec’ but to gently gull us. The Diversity Guides she is publicising serve an entirely different purpose from the one you might expect. They are there to put the doctor “in control”, ie to stop him being caught unawares by unprincipled money-grubbers, race lawyers and what-have-you. It all seemed strangely, unexpectedly sane. And then I remembered the pervasive fear of litigation that afflicts all doctors in the Western world, and how caution in diagnosis and treatment weights the intervention process, oftimes negatively, as a result. The modern medical profession practises behind a stockade, and the most jealously guarded wall of that stockade is self-regulation. The familiar pieties of our Marxist modernity simply cannot be permitted within, for they would corrode the regulatory mechanism and, with it, public trust. Without the trust of the public the profession would be regulated from without in very short order, and that it most assuredly does not want. So the doctor from tropical climes gets to be judged by the same standard as the natives. If he is caught bringing the profession into disrepute he cannot be extended special consideration for the dusky hue of his epidermis. The stakes are too high to excuse incompetence or other professional shortcoming, regardless of the long shadow of white racism - be it unwitting, institutional or, to be blunt, entirely imaginary. In other words, the judging process is fair. Equipped with this bracing perspective, I delved down into the GMC Press Area and found the March Events Calendar which, oh joy, lists Fitness to Practise Hearings. Here we encounter Golak Prasad Jena who:-
... and Dr Azhir Manzur Sarfraz who:-
... and Dr Mohamed Bahgat Shar, of whom it is alleged:-
... and Dr Ratnasabapathy Rajakumar of whom:-
... Dr Said Arzhangi who, though he may not be a Sub-Continental, nevertheless is alleged to have:-
A small sample, maybe. But a sample which outweighs oversexed Africans (2) and Middle-Easterners (1). Of native Brits there are none. In toto, over 60% of the cases current in the GMC’s disciplinary process are non-natives, and that ought to tell us something. About 30% of NHS doctors are non-natives. So non-natives are between three and four times more likely to commit an (alleged) offence against the CMG’s code of practise. There may be one or two half-sound excuses for such a rate of non-native miscreance. A difficulty in adapting to a strange and demanding medical culture in this country may perhaps be one. But difficulty in keeping your disinfected digits off the ladies really isn’t a cultural problem, is it? It’s a trouser problem. UPDATE - 01.04.06 I note that the above link to the GMC’s Fitness to Practise Hearings has moved on to April. But it doesn’t change things much. The incidence of non-native names in the list, most of them new, is rock-solid at 60%. Comments:2
Posted by Calvin on Sun, 02 Apr 2006 02:13 | # The last time I looked Africa and India had medical problems that make Europe look like a bastion of robust well being. Isn’t it a pity that most of their doctors are race traitors more interested in money grubbing in Europe than in tending to their own people? What a nauseating bunch of hypocrites. 3
Posted by Phil on Sun, 02 Apr 2006 17:09 | # The last time I looked Africa and India had medical problems that make Europe look like a bastion of robust well being. But Europe is a bastion of robust well being…......... Post a comment:
Next entry: Teaching diversity
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News— CENTRAL— An Ancient Race In The Myths Of Time by James Bowery on Wednesday, 21 August 2024 15:26. (View) Slaying The Dragon by James Bowery on Monday, 05 August 2024 15:32. (View) The legacy of Southport by Guessedworker on Friday, 02 August 2024 07:34. (View) Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. (View) — NEWS — Farage only goes down on one knee. by Guessedworker on Saturday, 29 June 2024 06:55. (View) |
Posted by Andrew on Sat, 01 Apr 2006 20:27 | #
It would be that International Umbilical chord: If it exists here, it exists in the UK USA, EUROPE- also.
Bureaucrat’s equal opportunity and that dreaded Ethnic opportunity exploits of compulsory placement in Government perpetuated Jobs, so now we have Ethnic elitism at your expense.
The Irony of it is, at least in the medical field, White Anglo Graduates, and of a higher IQ and qualifications do not get the opportunity, so positions are made for the ethic’s, even where their qualifications and standard are 30% less than that of the standard of Anglo Doctrine- so the Agitprop reigns supreme once again, and the further slide into the abyss of dumb and dumber.
But if some of the Anglo graduates actually had done their doctorates in the third world, then comparatively speaking, they would be god like intelligence and be 30% greater in comprehension.
I suppose, like the Chinese Panda bear- It is Cute and cuddly, but when you get close enough, it will literally rip and tare you to shreds. Sounds familiar.