|
|
|
A window onto a world of Russo-Chinese hegemony A rules-based order or the rule of mafia states? Not really a difficult choice, is it? The analyst Jason Smart on Russia and the fate of unlucky elites: Chapters: Comments:2
Posted by Guessedworker on Wed, 09 Jul 2025 11:05 | # A further thought. If Trump means what he says about peace and does now decide for clarity, he can’t go forward with half-measures. He has to acknowledge that Moscow will never be turned into an ally against Beijing, which is only the truth. His strategy for continuing American hegemony, which he is pursuing on the trade front (for example with the latest attack on BRICS), has to be re-centred on the west and on the rules-based order. He must find another solution to the extortionate costs of transiting the Panama Canal, if he has not already done so. He must forget about Canada completely and, probably, Greenland in the short term. The MAGA project will survive but the programme will necessarily change. His political base will have to adapt. So, full measures means operating from a clear intention to help Ukraine not just defend itself but to sap the Russian Army’s combat capacity by destroying its military-industrial base. This is the only realistic means by which an invaded people can win an otherwise attritional war against an invader with four times the population and no care for the life of its people. Now is a propitious moment, with Israel secure, Iran back in its box, Syria stable, Xi Jinping coming under internal pressure, the Europeans agreeing to increase their defence budgets, and so forth. If clarity is to prevail it has to be now. Does the mercurial Trump himself possess a steadfast enough will to get the job done? 3
Posted by Thorn on Wed, 09 Jul 2025 22:23 | # “and no care for the life of its people.” Either probably or possibly true but the real wild card is that they have 6,000 nuclear weapons and the capability to target them anywhere on the planet. This conflict could take turns that no one has imagined yet. Negotiations is the only sane way out of this potential nuclear conflagration. IMHO. Ukraine must give up land for peace. Future generations can reshape the outcome of that. 4
Posted by Guessedworker on Thu, 10 Jul 2025 06:14 | # Moscow cannot launch nuclear weapons at Kiev or London or Washington, or anywhere else. The MAD doctrine still applies, and the Siloviki do not wish their families to be turned to ash. Further, Russia itself has rules regarding the use of nuclear weapons. Under those rules they cannot be deployed in a war of aggression. What you are really saying is that you are the nuclear blackmailer Medvedev’s willing victim, and you will happily give Putin whatever he demands so long Medvedev is talking scarily. Really, Thorn, what comes next after the nation with 6,000 nuclear weapons is rewarded in this way? 6
Posted by Thorn on Thu, 10 Jul 2025 10:42 | # “What you are really saying is that you are the nuclear blackmailer Medvedev’s willing victim, and you will happily give Putin whatever he demands so long Medvedev is talking scarily.” Considering human nature, it’s easy to understand how situations could escalate to the point where nuclear powers resort to using nuclear weapons. This applies to any nuclear power, not just Russia. 7
Posted by Thorn on Thu, 10 Jul 2025 12:28 | # Starmer and Macron will join forces on nuclear deterrents in cases of ‘extreme threats’ to Europe Archie Mitchell Britain and France will join together to use nuclear weapons against any “extreme threats” towards Europe, Sir Keir Starmer and Emmanuel Macron have declared. [...] https://www.aol.com/news/starmer-macron-join-forces-nuclear-225308389.html 8
Posted by Guessedworker on Fri, 11 Jul 2025 07:15 | # Trump: “I’m disappointed in Russia … a major statement to make on Russia on Monday.” So it seems that clarity has won, and the obscuring “right-wing” chatter of the last three years, much of it pure Moscow propaganda, is done with. It was always necessary for the collective west, be it the Establishment and its politicians or the people, be it those on the left or right, to journey towards truth. The human capacity to discover and cleave to truth cannot be outstripped indefinitely, and the good in Man, and thus in history, must eventually prevail. 9
Posted by Thorn on Fri, 11 Jul 2025 10:51 | # If there’s anything we’ve learned about Trump, it’s that his stance can turn on a dime. That and he’s apparently under the influence of the Israel lobby, the CIA, the neocons and the military industrial complex. Disappointing but not surprising. As the saying goes: “No matter who you vote for as President, you always end up with John McCain.” That saying seems to be holding true. 10
Posted by Guessedworker on Fri, 11 Jul 2025 11:56 | # The choices are: the western rules-based order or the eastern order of force. That is the framework which underpins the global power contest itself, and has probably been such since the Great Game of the mid-19th century. It remains the primary consideration for elites of all levels and for whole peoples, from which our objects and interests are not at all excluded. It might be possible, at least intellectually, to take it back to the natural antimony of the northern hemisphere races, so between the sociobiological individuality of racial Europe and the sociobiological authoritarianism of the Asiatic world. Muscovy is sufficiently Asianised to belong, fatefully, to the east, and does not seem capable of reproducing the western socio-political model. We are all bound to find our nature more properly expressed in the western order. It’s just who and what we are. Trump has tried to “make America great again” by offending against that fundamental principle and moving to a Great Powers model of global organisation which is necessarily eastern in character. Hence the Panama thing, the Canada thing, the Greenland thing. Hence the attack on Ukraine and the turning away - for a time - from the mother continent. The implacable nature of Putin’s authoritarianism is now unavoidable to the Trump White House. It cannot be unseen. We will see a return to clarity, or some clarity. Depending on the degree of that, MAGA may or may not survive in its present form. 11
Posted by Thorn on Fri, 11 Jul 2025 12:36 | # Demographics is destiny and native-Europeans are fast being race-replaced. At this point, debating the western rules-based order vs the eastern order of force is irrelevant - it’s superfluous. People of European ancestry are facing a deliberate extinction, and the ongoing war between Ukraine and Russia is accelerating this process. As and aside, I remember reading an article on the Western Spring website where the author argued convincingly that the Earth would eventually become a Negro planet. If the UN’s most recent population projections are accurate, the author’s thesis over at Western Spring should not be dismissed but rather taken seriously. 12
Posted by Guessedworker on Fri, 11 Jul 2025 13:15 | # You have missed the point entirely, my friend. How do you expect European peoples to overturn the Judaic capture of our thought-world, as it is expressed in the Christ cult and as that expression has worked itself out in our social, political, and cultural lives? From where would the freedom to think and speak, campaign and vote come but from our Nature ... that Nature which is by its own being in profound opposition to everything of the western historical dictate (very much including Christianity)? There might be a way, if we can replace enough of the formative elements. That is what MR has always been about. But ... how are we to achieve that if we are all placed under a technocratic eastern hegemonic order of force? What kind of elites will rule in the west then? Appealing to a latent nationalism in us, which is what we all do, is also appealing for the grace of the western order at its sociobiological root, for that is Nature. Our nature is individuality. I speak as an Anglo-Saxon whose tribe’s history from 1066 until 1689 was peppered by unsuccessful Saxon rebellions, most treated to terrible vengeance from an oft unjust and absolute monarchical power. The rules-based order of today is not to be taken lightly. It is not simply a project of some 20th century international lawyers. It is much more ... a lifeline which my forefathers lacked, and fought to bring into being, and upon which we depend. 13
Posted by Thorn on Fri, 11 Jul 2025 15:06 | # “What kind of elites will rule in the west then?” Well, in England, Christianity has been replaced by secularism, and it is now rapidly transitioning into a predominantly Muslim country. To address your question more directly, Islamic elites are expected to govern the UK. If it’s not Islamic rule, it will likely turn into an iron-fisted home-grown authoritarian rule; the kind Murray and Herrnstein described and predicted in The Bell Curve. In either case, it will be due to the effects of your own government’s immigration policies allowing massive numbers of ungovernable uncivilizable low-IQ non-white third-worlders into your country. Hence, eventually, the quest for ethnic nationalism will become irrelevant, as Anglo-Saxons will have become a small and shrinking minority in their own country. That’s where it’s headed. 14
Posted by Guessedworker on Sat, 12 Jul 2025 09:43 | # Thorn, I have pointed out a few times that a question about the moral qualities of person A is not answered by a remark about the moral qualities of person B. I did not ask about the moral qualities of person B. We are not discussing them. If you choose to answer the question you should restrict yourself accordingly, otherwise your answer is really not an answer at all but a deflection technique. We see dishonest lefties seek to deflect from questions about the abominations of so-called Muslim grooming gangs (actually child prostitution gangs). Instead of addressing the issue at hand, lefties will shift on to historical cases of white paedophilia such as the crimes of Jimmy Saville, as if the existence of the native abomination normalises the alien one. It’s a sick form of relativism and apologism for a truly terrible thing. Worse, it shapes the ground so that the just men and women who condemn that terrible thing are only doing so because the perps are non-white. Which, of course, is waycism. Game, set, and match to the mentally ill left. You are not acting that malevolently. That’s for sure. But you still end up as an apologist for Putin and his imperialism by missiling civilians. It’s still a deflection from the real question, which is solely about the Russo-Chinese global hegemony - the rule of force, not law - which will mechanically follow the return of war in Europe, Muscovite empire, and the resiling of Trump’s America from western engagement. One does not mess around with this. One must be a serious human being. For the record, then, the race-treachery of the western elites does not relativise Russo-Chinese global hegemony into something even remotely tolerable. The urgent need for change to the already disastrous racial composition of my ancestral home does not read across in that way at all. On the contrary, it works the other way round. The only chance we have to storm the bastions of power is if a global order of force - a necessarily socialist force - is not effected. The Ukraine War has demonstrated the wild indiscipline and suggestibility of our political constituency, and I mean not just nationalists but dissenters who have not yet made it to nationalism. I have heard too much Putin apologism to remember all the variations. But I’ve been treated to the “ethnic Russians” narrative, obviously, and that of “Russia’s historic land”, that of “the bulwark against the corrupt west” ... that of “Christian Russia, the salvation of Europe”. I have been lectured on how Putin has no interest in empire, and on Putin’s just desire to protect Russians from “NATO expansion” and “the CIA”. And throughout it all there was the bleating that Putin was provoked by Biden, Nuland, et al. Etcetera, etcetera. Ad infinitum. It was all the work of Russian propagandists. There was no truth in any of it, and every last bit of it was royally falsified by the three-decade long imposition of the satrap Lukashenko on the people of Belarus, and by the fervent desire of free Estonians, Lithuanians, Latvians, Poles, Moldovans, Romanians, Croatians ... you name it ... never to live for one day more under Moscow’s dominion. I have read the Kiev media and seen the difference between Ukrainian transparency and Russian fakery. I have been told, when instancing it, that I am wrong and propagandised myself. I have seen the vilest hatred whipped up against Zelensky and his wife, too. But I know the difference between truth and lies, morality and immorality, a just war and an unjust one, and I have to say that our political constituency has lost sight of that completely. But now the truth is coming home. The Putin apologists are falling strangely silent. Their aggressive demeanour is vitiating. The confidence in their assertions is waning. The Russian reality is too much at odds with their received “wisdom”. It was pride of sorts, I suppose, but now it is all vanity. 15
Posted by Thorn on Sat, 12 Jul 2025 11:03 | # GW, putting straw man arguments aside, let’s assume your stance on Putin is entirely correct. Now, imagine Putin admits his grave mistake, withdraws his military promptly, and begins paying reparations. Russia’s imperialism is back in check, nuclear war is avoided—what a relief. But what would that mean for the native citizens of the U.K.? Don’t they still face the reality of their own rulers replacing them demographically? In my opinion, that’s the most critical issue for ethnic nationalists. As long as the ruling class prioritizes growing the GDP over preserving and protecting the native population, the trend of race-replacement will continue. Is there a worker shortage? The solution is importing millions of foreign workers. Will the native population push back? Not in any significant way, as repressive laws effectively prevent them from even voicing concerns. Let’s not kid ourselves; Western leaders can be just as ruthless and oppressive as those in Asia—maybe even more so. 16
Posted by Guessedworker on Sat, 12 Jul 2025 18:16 | # What strawman arguments? There aren’t any. I explained that answering a different question to the one asked does not satisfy the basics of productive conversation. You are trying to slide out sideways from the evident and unstoppable disintegration of your pro-Putin talking points. All across the west hundreds of thousands of hitherto willingly gulled and propagandised right-wingers will have to come to terms with Trump’s hard-won clarity. Their toxic mindset will no longer mesh with his change of focus (how big an initial change we will find out on Monday). Either they will disavow Trump or they will quietly relinquish their prior certainties. How far Trump will have to go to finally force Putin and his cohort to the table remains to be seen. But he will wind it up and watch for weakness, not hit it hard from the off expecting any sudden results. In other words, he is embarking upon a process of accelerating support for Kiev, beginning with defensive measures but moving to offensive measures as the situation requires. It will take into next year. The MAGA base will be able to repent at leisure. There is one other interesting aspect we should look out for. How will Trump’s Yarvinist imperialism, which powered the initial turn to pro-Moscow politics, survive the turn to Kiev and the re-turn to NATO and Europe? 17
Posted by Thorn on Sat, 12 Jul 2025 22:05 | # What strawman arguments? GW, I thought you were referring to straw man arguments in your first paragraph @14. Anyway, I believe Trump’s so-called “hard-won clarity” is simply him being offended at the suggestion that Putin has outmaneuvered him. Trump prides himself on being the master of the art of the deal, and he likely thought he could convince Putin to stop the carnage and negotiate a reasonable resolution at the negotiation table. Instead, Putin intensified the attacks, showing he won’t back down until all his demands are met. So far, Trump has stated he plans to sell “defensive weapons” to European countries, allowing them to transfer these weapons to Ukraine. At the moment, it seems Trump wants to distance the U.S. from the conflict and place the responsibility for supporting Ukraine on European countries. His stance should become clearer on Monday. 18
Posted by Guessedworker on Sun, 13 Jul 2025 13:35 | # Thorn:
Well, you never know with Donald Flipflop, but it seems to have already gone beyond that:
They are already anticipating the next moves from Washington:
In these matters the pendulum swings a long way once it has reached the point of return. The infamous White House meeting was the limit of MAGA delusion and dishonesty. Clarity on Putin’s imperial aims inevitably followed, and now the pendulum will swing and swing all the way to the breaking of Russia, of Putin, of eurasianism. It’s that historic. None of that will be apparent from Trump’s statement tomorrow. But the logic will work itself out, not least because Trump’s real aim of containing China in the Pacific requires the containment of Russia in the Black Sea and the Baltic. It just doesn’t work the other way round. MAGA just didn’t work in the Great Powers form in which it was being pursued, because it was built on the illusion that Moscow’s alliance with Beijing was without ideological and strategic necessities. Which Trump will now finally understand. We are in a new game. Or, to be precise, Game. Which I would characterise as forcing Russia into the west by breaking Moscow, and thus isolating Beijing. 19
Posted by Thorn on Sun, 13 Jul 2025 22:19 | # “MAGA just didn’t work in the Great Powers form in which it was being pursued, because it was built on the illusion that Moscow’s alliance with Beijing was without ideological and strategic necessities.” I recently read an article emphasizing that China’s position is that it cannot afford to let Russia lose its conflict with Ukraine because if Russia were to lose, China might be next to fall. That seems correct. 20
Posted by Guessedworker on Mon, 14 Jul 2025 17:02 | # So it’s “make peace in 50 days or China and India will face (only) 100% tariffs on exports to America”. Plus the European members of NATO will buy American weapons for Ukraine. Early reports indicate offensive as well as defensive, but that remains to be seen. Moscow won’t give up that easily. They will look for some way to stretch things out. So talks but never anything solid. Besides, Trump has already put 100% on China, and chickened out. Putin will bet the house on the chicken. Meanwhile, according to reports yesterday, he has let Trump know that the damp squib that was the Russian Army’s summer offensive is going to be followed in two months by a renewed large-scale attack. So mid-September appears to be when everything will happen. 21
Posted by Thorn on Mon, 14 Jul 2025 23:08 | # Interesting. Nothing has changed, it seems.
22
Posted by Thorn on Wed, 23 Jul 2025 00:10 | # Monday, July 21, 2025 “Never Forgotten. And yes, forgiving was a mistake. It was, in the end, Germany’s and Germans’ choice, not Russia’s. It is a powerful speech by Maria. I suggest you endure it to the end. NATO’s military doctrine and US Army’s views have been written and shaped by Wehrmacht generals. Russians remain untermenschen for huge swaths of German society and Germans want revenge.” “Germany is lost and Russians know what is coming, listen attentively to what Zakharova says. It is chilling in its inevitability and it is speech with no hope in it for Germany.” https://smoothiex12.blogspot.com/2025/07/never-forgotten.html 23
Posted by Thorn on Wed, 23 Jul 2025 00:11 | # NATO Plans to Send 250K Troops Into Russia; WW3 is Coming ft. Martin Armstrong 24
Posted by Guessedworker on Wed, 23 Jul 2025 13:29 | # Thorn, it pays to be discriminating when so much Russian apologism is in the air. This is from the Indy, but the date is Thursday 21 February 2002.
There may still be such a plan. But it’s not there to send soldiers into Russia, and that sort of over-heated diatribe should be very firmly ignored. 25
Posted by Thorn on Wed, 23 Jul 2025 16:04 | # GW, I’m well aware that the headline “NATO Plans to Send 250K Troops Into Russia” sounds implausible, even absurd, but considering the direction the Russia-Ukraine conflict is heading, the idea doesn’t seem entirely out of the realm of possibility. We’ll find out much more soon given “Trump’s 50-day deadline.” Personally, I have concerns that the war will escalate. Moreover, I suspect the NATO countries want the situation to escalate. NATO seems to believe it can win a war with Russia and has expressed this on more than one occasion. 26
Posted by Guessedworker on Wed, 23 Jul 2025 23:10 | # One of the reasons, Thorn, that I am hostile to Christianity is its default of the eternal damnation of the unbelieving soul. Although damnation itself was quietly dropped from the Anglican catechism during the Great War because of the sheer offense it gave to grieving relatives of the fallen, the assumption both for original sin and for the existential inferiority of the non-believer still thrive in the religious mind. I guess it is in the warp and weft of western culture and cannot easily be got out. In the absence of a Christian expression, of course, it devolves into a secular form, namely a projection on to a political something outside the self. Thus the target of anti-racists is normal white people. The target of leftists generally is the non-leftist or the leftist with less power. The whole point is that blame can be dredged up from the bitter place of religious guilt and directed upon some poor, unsuspecting bastard. By contrast, the target of rightists is not anti-racists or even leftists. It is those with markedly more power than themselves. Whereas the leftist craves power because he personally is nothing, and seeks it via aggressive displays of moral superiority, the rightist (who is also nothing) craves power through displays of intellectual superiority in the form of the possession of a supposed higher standard of judgement and/or the possession of special knowledge. If we look at your comment @ 25 we can see that. You don’t have any evidence at all that “NATO countries want the situation to escalate”. You are just setting yourself up as someone with a higher standard of judgement. But it is not higher. It is all of a piece with the other learned opinions that the right endlessly retails. You know ... “the west”, “Biden”, “Obama”, “NATO”, “Davos”, “Azov”, “the CIA”, “globalists”, “Nuland”, “Zelensky”, “Boris Johnson” et alia. My sense of it is that the rightist, while not actually mad like his leftist counterpart, and while not wholly wrong about the nature of power in this world, is too needy to see the absurdity of his behaviour and face the reality of his own person. Well, men strive for status and significance, even religious ones ... even religious ones without any religion. 27
Posted by Thorn on Thu, 24 Jul 2025 00:58 | # GW, the economic system in Western countries relies heavily on debt, and it’s unsustainable. It functions as long as people are willing to purchase the debt, but there are signs that the number of buyers is decreasing at an alarming pace. Without individuals willing to invest in the debt, the system will be forced to make drastic adjustments, a prospect that terrifies Western elites. No “special knowledge” is needed to grasp this. That’s what many economists have been warning about for many decades now, and it’s what Armstrong has been emphasizing my link @ 23. Furthermore, some western elites argue that the only way to avoid economic collapse in their nations is to wage and win a war against Russia, enforce a regime change in Moscow, and exploit the natural resources of Russia and Ukraine. At least, that’s how this theory goes. In any event, we will have a better understanding which direction this war goes come late September. IMHO, the sanest course forward is to halt the killing and bloodshed in Ukraine by meeting Moscow’s reasonable demands. 28
Posted by Thorn on Sun, 27 Jul 2025 19:56 | #
Watch https://rumble.com/v6wn1s8-britain-commits-suicide.html?e9s=src_v1_clr,src_v1_upp_a 29
Posted by Thorn on Mon, 28 Jul 2025 11:00 | # One from Jared Taylor https://www.amren.com/videos/2025/07/britain-commits-suicide/ 30
Posted by Thorn on Tue, 12 Aug 2025 11:25 | # German Chancellor Merz Organizes Emergency EU Summit to Strategize How to Keep War Going if Putin/Trump Reach Peace Agreement
more…. best comment:
31
Posted by Thorn on Tue, 21 Oct 2025 11:47 | # #demographics is destiny
RTWT https://gatesofvienna.net/2025/10/is-the-future-of-russia-islamic/#more-59812 32
Posted by Thorn on Tue, 25 Nov 2025 15:53 | # Prof. Jeffrey Sachs : US Still Woefully Ignorant of Russia. ~ 2 million Ukrainian casualties thus far. 33
Posted by Thorn on Wed, 10 Dec 2025 21:04 | # A quick recap or reminder of something most of us are already well aware of.
Watch: 34
Posted by Thorn on Thu, 11 Dec 2025 01:27 | # As complicated as you might want to present it, it is quite simple: it is radical feminism that is destroying the white race. Who are the main characters who pushed radical feminism on Western civ? And why do white gentile women adopt it? From an evolutionary perspective, is Islam superior to Western civilization? What are the current trends? Just wondering ... not really. I know the F’ing answers. 35
Posted by Guessedworker on Thu, 11 Dec 2025 10:08 | # Neither feminism nor Islam is the weapon destroying us. They are contingent factors, highly so in the latter case. Better to look to the individualisation and universalisation implicit to your religious faith ... look to the liberal project which is America ....look to liberalism, of course. Just don’t get caught up on near things; which is the lot of mere reactionaries. Reaction is not enough. Blaming power, blaming Davos, blaming (((cultural marxists))) et al is not enough. Black Pigeon needs an education in abstract thinking, because that’s probably the only way out. As for the idea that the Ukrainian people must be genocided to put a stop to all the diseases of “the west”, it is self-evident idiocy. And it is a symptom of another disease. I have said before that this disease is the mirror of the left’s anti-racism disease. They are the same, and their real name is Projected Racial Self-Contempt. The symptoms come out differently, that is all. One habitually condemns the actions of power because it wants power in our people, the other habitually condemns the actions of our people because it wants power in itself. One internalises, the other externalises. As for my analysis, which is geopolitical and global in focus, when I explain something of it to a sufferer, the response tends to be aggressive and disbelieving. That is because a nerve has been touched, and the sufferer feels he has to reinforce his beliefs by preventing new knowledge from entering his little world of on-line “learning”. But when I do so to a professional Russian troll there is no further conversation ... no denial, no contestation, nothing. That is because the game has been exposed, and the troll can’t go on with it. 36
Posted by Thorn on Thu, 11 Dec 2025 13:09 | # As for the idea that the Ukrainian people must be genocided to put a stop to all the diseases of “the west”, it is self-evident idiocy. I think what Black Pigeon is getting at aligns with what I’ve been saying since the start of Russia’s special military operation. The powers that be in the West provoked Russia into a war, and its unintended consequences are leading to a quasi-genocide of the Ukrainian population, after which the country will be flooded with non-white immigrants. That’s why Black Pigeon suggested (paraphrasing) that Ukrainian fighters don’t realize the future Ukraine they’re fighting for— I.e., one that will be racially replaced and transformed into a multicultural nation whose population will eventually resemble that of London, England. The native Ukrainians will be a minority in their own country. Neither feminism nor Islam is the weapon destroying us. They are contingent factors, highly so in the latter case. Better to look to the individualisation and universalisation implicit to your religious faith ... look to the liberal project which is America ....look to liberalism, of course. It seems it all got its start with The Enlightenment which led to liberalism and individualism which eventually led to modern feminism. Modernity + high-tech+ individualism+ modern feminism + women in the workplace = lower than replacement birthrates. (By the way, Christian universalism doesn’t mean you have to reject race-realism; it simply means the Christian faith is open to everyone in the world.) Of course, Muslims reject the values The Enlightenment brought to the West; they reject individualism and feminism thus, for the obvious reasons, their birthrates are above the replacement level. 37
Posted by Thorn on Thu, 11 Dec 2025 20:39 | # Eve The Destroyer: The Survival Of The White Races Comes Down To This Explainer
*********************
https://www.unz.com/proberts/the-camp-of-the-saints-in-its-modern-form/ 38
Posted by Thorn on Thu, 11 Dec 2025 22:01 | # The book *Slouching Towards Gomorrah* by Robert Bork was published in 1996; I read it about 20 years ago. In it, Bork explores in detail the issues he believes are plaguing the West, focusing on modern liberalism—how it emerged and how it, in his view, is destroying every aspect of Western civilization. The book pdf can be found in archives.org. I strongly encourage you to at least read the 13-page Introduction. 39
Posted by Guessedworker on Thu, 11 Dec 2025 23:59 | # 1. None of the former Soviet bloc nations now in the west have been multiracialised. BP’s thesis is false. 2. What does Putin have to do to make you question the proxy war trope? The reading I have been putting forward accords with the geopolitics. It is not unique. Iain Davis got there before I did. There is obviously something about it that completely eludes the herd thinkers of the reactionary right. Perhaps they just can’t be bothered with anything that is outside their bag of beliefs. Perhaps they think they are “better” than “the left” and actually believe in their own powers of analysis and critique. Perhaps they get too much pleasure from bias confirmation. Perhaps it is just too important to them to have something to which they can belong. I wish I knew. 3. Putting the Jewish paradigm aside for one moment, and looking only at our own social structure ... The principle, and the principal, of power always wars on the principle of tribe. The motive is either economic (for example, the ruling class of Rome replaced having to employ Romans for their service with slave-owning) or it is political. For example, Constantine betrayed the Roman world in two moves thirty years apart, first granting religious freedom then, on his deathbed, converting to the Christ cult. In the latter case, Europe’s elites followed Constantine’s lead, imposing upon their peoples this religion of dislocation and estrangement. The Salterian explanation for this behaviour is that the genetic investment in family is greater than the genetic investment in tribe. One might read English history from the Conqueror onward accordingly, finding in the nine-hundred year search for democracy and freedom an unquenchable Anglo-Saxon determination to contain the Norman will (albeit the Normans have morphed into a politico-financial-corporate class, and - unless and until nationalism is seeded - the Anglo-Saxons are pimped by socialists and other revolutionaries). Christianity, liberalism and the Marxisms have been enabled by elites for their own rapine purposes, just as today the Davos class enables the Climate Change and multiracialism tropes. It seems to be in the nature of the beast that is elitism. In Germany and in parts of south-east Europe Islam has been enabled in the same way. 40
Posted by Thorn on Fri, 12 Dec 2025 00:40 | # None of the former Soviet bloc nations now in the west have been multiracialised. BP’s thesis is false. Not yet, but if you think it isn’t gonna happen, you are naive as F-ck! The West is going to make it happen! Do you not recognize patterns?!? 41
Posted by Thorn on Fri, 12 Dec 2025 03:04 | # GW, what do you think the consequences will be if the Dems win the midterms in 2026 then go on to win the presidency in 2028? I’m pretty sure that’s going to happen. The fat that demographics and cultural transformation are leaning to the left will almost guarantee those results. Are you aware of the demographic stats in the U.S. in the year of 2017? Let me clue you in: In the age group of 15 AND UNDER, WHITES MADE UP ONLY 47% OF THE POPULATION. CAN YOU EXPRAPOLATE WHAT THAT MEANS GOING FORWARD FIFTY YEARS FROM NOW? I’M PRESTTY SURE YOU CAN. 42
Posted by Thorn on Fri, 12 Dec 2025 09:12 | # @39 Read Robert Bork. Get your head screwed on straight. 43
Posted by Thorn on Fri, 12 Dec 2025 23:58 | # Not trying to demean your intelligence, GW, but I equate people who deny that the Ukraine war is not a proxy war between the USA and Russia as the same as those who deny Israel is not committing genocide against the defenseless Gazan Palestinians. Same type of ignorant stupidity. 44
Posted by Thorn on Sat, 13 Dec 2025 22:47 | # Excellent rant by young Nick Fuentes https://rumble.com/v72xj5m-chuck-schumer-introduces-resolution-to-condemn-me.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp_a 45
Posted by Thorn on Sat, 13 Dec 2025 23:31 | # 2. What does Putin have to do to make you question the proxy war trope? The reading I have been putting forward accords with the geopolitics. It is not unique. Iain Davis got there before I did. There is obviously something about it that completely eludes the herd thinkers of the reactionary right. Perhaps they just can’t be bothered with anything that is outside their bag of beliefs. Perhaps they think they are “better” than “the left” and actually believe in their own powers of analysis and critique. Perhaps they get too much pleasure from bias confirmation. Perhaps it is just too important to them to have something to which they can belong. I wish I knew. If Ukraine was invaded by an unprovoked hostile Russia bent on imperial ambitions and Ukraine was simply fighting for their own survival, then your premise would be correct. I know that’s your premise (or “informed” opinion) and you’re sticking to it. Good luck with convincing others that that’s correct. 46
Posted by Manc on Sun, 14 Dec 2025 19:22 | # @45 47
Posted by Thorn on Sun, 14 Dec 2025 20:38 | # Now, I have a question for you. Given your recent comments, the question is “are you promoting a post Anglin version of White Sharia” or even thinking of going down that path? LOL ..... I never heard of this guy Anglin and “White Sharia” sounds pretty authoritarian to me, so I reject it. I’ll leave concepts like “White Sharia” to folks like you to play around with.
48
Posted by Thorn on Sun, 14 Dec 2025 23:14 | # EU Not Included in New G5 COMMENT: Your peace proposal has become a must-read here. It is said that you set the ball in motion that the EU is the enemy, not Russia. Trump is backing away from the EU, even forming a new G5 with the EU omitted. You have far more influence than you let on.
REPLY: Of course, I am use to being blamed for everything. The EU is the enemy because it is imploding economically. They reject peace because they need war as a distraction. Kill the messenger as always. Zelensky is pushing the EU off a cliff – not me. This is why the EU is becoming so authoritarian. The migration policy is a disaster. But they will never admit a mistake. In the UK, they equate Islamophobia with Antisemitism. But they are different. Islam is a religion, not a race. Antisemitism is not about religion, it is a race. That’s why Soros and Zelensky both pretended to be Christian to escape the Nazis. [...] Kallas is Lyndsey Graham in drag. She should not be allowed anywhere close to power. She personally hates the Russian people blaming them for Stalin but nobody blames the German people for Hitler’s actions. Kallas has openly stabbed Trump in the back every chance she gets. She has openly called for the break up of Russia and has vowed that Russia will never be allowed to return to the G8.
If you do not talk to an enemy, there will never be peace. NATO has convinced all the EU leaders not to talk with Putin. They constantly claim Putin wants to invade Europe. They are applying the Khrushchev days to Putin. Every word out of Kallas’ mouth is so biased and full of hatred there is no point of even pretending to negotiate with here – IMPOSSIBLE! She pretends to care about civilians but rejects any possible peace deal because of her deep seated bias.
Once upon a time, we had leaders who were not just honest, but rational. Winston Churchill insisted that he should accompany the Allied invasion fleet across the English Channel on D-Day (June 6, 1944). I would love to see Kallas handed a gun and sent to the front lines in Ukraine that she refuses to seek peace. Churchill only backed down when King George VI personally intervened. He told Churchill that if the Prime Minister, as a commoner, had the right to go, then the King, as head of the armed forces, had an even greater right and would join him. Knowing this was an untenable risk for the monarch, Churchill finally relented and agreed to stay ashore. There is no such courage amount the leaders of Europe. [...] According to an article published in the British newspaper, The Guardian, former UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson received a $1 million dollars the year he left office from a man who had a strong financial incentive to keep the war going in Ukraine. The Trump administration has identified Austria, Hungary, Italy, and Poland as priority partners and that Washington should pull away from the European Union. There is talk of now forming a new five-power forum with China and Russia, according to Defense One and other outlets. The EU is self-destructing. If the people demand that Brussels reverse its policies, then perhaps the EU can be saved. But that seems unlikely. The EU will break up and perhaps that will unfold because of war. The various member states need economic reform badly. The same Marxist policies that took down Russia and China are alive in the EU and has undermined their economy dramatically. Youth Unemployment in the EU is outrageous and they have ignored that and allowed a wholesale migration that is indeed turning into a cultural erasure. Spain: 27.5% Greece: 25.6% (Q4 2023 data) (recent data may be as high as 55%) Sweden: 22.2% Italy: 20.3% Lowest Rates (March 2024): Germany: 5.6% Czechia: 7.6% Netherlands: 8.6% Bulgaria: 9.2% 49
Posted by Thorn on Mon, 15 Dec 2025 23:27 | # Russian state radio makes rare admission: War is driving Russians into poverty Story by Kathrine Frich Key takeaways Russian state radio acknowledged that the war in Ukraine is driving ordinary citizens into poverty, with low wages and staff shortages in essential public services. 50
Posted by Thorn on Tue, 16 Dec 2025 00:34 | # This stupid bitch cu-t doesn’t know who’s she’s F’ing with. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/donbas-is-not-putin-s-endgame-kallas-warns/ar-AA1SnwOe?uxmode=ruby&ocid=edgntpruby&pc=HCTS&cvid=6940a71fc0d34f298a6b7978574f947e&ei=22 51
Posted by Thorn on Thu, 18 Dec 2025 12:46 | # I’ve been witnessing in horror the Russia China alliance in the making for at least 12 years now. Now Tucker Carlson sees it too. He warns that the West’s foolish/incompetent/reckless aggressive actions against Russia will ultimately pave the way for China’s authoritarian control over Europe’s governance. Watch: Tucker Carlson : War, Peace, Trump, and the Constitution.
52
Posted by Thorn on Thu, 18 Dec 2025 23:06 | # GW, you’ll probably dismiss the content of this interview as typical pro-Russian propaganda; but at the very least, you can thank me for treating you to the stunningly gorgeous Lara Logan ... she’s incredibly smart, too. PUTIN’S QUIET DIPLOMAT: Kirill Dmitriev on US-Russia Dialogue | EP 41 | Going Rogue w Lara Logan https://youtu.be/FJNVJgirmCU?list=PLqa3ixeybN6Ep9xNduVc9LLskcrAX7Zlm 53
Posted by Thorn on Sat, 20 Dec 2025 15:25 | # We all knew: Guest stuns Joe Rogan by exposing who Zelenskyy really is. From the usual suspects department: Kolomoyskyi played a central role in orchestrating the installation of Zelinski. We all knew that many years ago, long before the Joe Rogan interview. 54
Posted by Thorn on Sat, 20 Dec 2025 23:33 | # HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Russia sends Briton it says fought for Ukraine to prison camp Dumb ass 55
Posted by Thorn on Wed, 24 Dec 2025 22:58 | # The Absolute State of Christmas in 2025 56
Posted by Guessedworker on Fri, 26 Dec 2025 10:53 | # Putin’s missile firers killed five civilians and maimed fourteen last night. Not Zelensky. Putin. But, hey, just an average night of Kremlin terror. Yet you, Thorne, and all those willing victims of Moscow propaganda happily replace moral process with Kremlin-philia, and couldn’t care less about the reality of this war. As for geopolitics and the struggle for hegemony and the globalism of the future, well, say it often, say it loud ... “Biden”, “Zelensky”, “the west”, “NATO”, “provoked”, yada, yada. Let’s all embrace Beijing’s authoritarianism. As if that will help. As if that will move us towards a nationalist world. I do not understand why you or anyone, frankly, would consider such intellectual weakness and moral self-mutilation to be “justified” cuz of what “we all know”, etc, etc. You know what you have been told. Of your own thinking, your own moral calculation, there is nothing. How to get you to think and feel in some way that isn’t guided and doesn’t exploit and abuse your native reactionary tendency? 57
Posted by Thorn on Fri, 26 Dec 2025 12:22 | # GW, both you and I are working with limited information, and from that, we have to rely on our own common sense to extrapolate and form a partial understanding of what’s really going on. I think the U.S. aims for regime change in Moscow, with the 2014 regime change in Ukraine—instigated in large part by U.S.-funded NGOs—being a major step toward that goal. This is the provocation Russia is responding to. Occam’s razor and all…. 58
Posted by Thorn on Sat, 27 Dec 2025 17:06 | # Didn’t Lord Richard Dannatt get the memo stating that the UK is destined to be ruled by Muslims and not the Russians? In any event:
SMH…. At this point, I don’t know whether to be frightened by, or just laugh at the foolishness exhibited by Western leadership.
59
Posted by Thorn on Sun, 28 Dec 2025 13:39 | # THIS: https://rumble.com/v73j7yo-we-must-demand-more-from-the-gop-in-2026.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp_a 60
Posted by Thorn on Sun, 28 Dec 2025 18:10 | #
https://theworldwatch.com/videos/1608533/youtube-censors-eva-vlaardingerbroek-s-viral-speech/ 61
Posted by Thorn on Wed, 31 Dec 2025 00:37 | # COL. Douglas Macgregor : 2025 Year End Review + 2026 Forecast 62
Posted by Thorn on Wed, 31 Dec 2025 11:48 | #
RTWT 63
Posted by Thorn on Fri, 02 Jan 2026 01:18 | # Anonymous U.S. Officials Say Ukraine Didn’t Target Putin with Drone Attack – Russian Officials Say They Have Drone Flight Plan From Navigation Unit
[...] 64
Posted by Guessedworker on Fri, 02 Jan 2026 23:36 | # As I recall, Moscow faked evidence with Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17. It’s their preferred method to lie. The Ukrainians have to deal with it all the time. This is what they are saying now about the Valdai claim. 65
Posted by Thorn on Sat, 03 Jan 2026 13:24 | # GW, it doesn’t matter which side is lying about the drone attack. What matters is that white people are being killed on a large scale. Gonzalo Lira was right in his assessment of what caused the war. Essentially, it’s what Fred Scrooby used to tell us over and over. (Paraphrasing) There’s been a war between Euro-Christians and Jews for 2,000 years, and what’s happening in Ukraine is just the latest chapter in that conflict.Of all people, you should be the one to recognize the pattern. 66
Posted by Manc on Tue, 06 Jan 2026 09:12 | # “I don’t believe that strike happened” - Trump on alleged drone attack. https://thehill.com/policy/international/5672895-trump-denies-russia-ukraine-attack/ 67
Posted by Guessedworker on Tue, 06 Jan 2026 18:15 | # Thorn, 1. How did Jews make Putin and his inner circle into imperialists and Eurasianists who ally with Beijing, found BRIC, and concoct a fake history to justify a 12 year war of aggression against a neighbour for rising up and throwing out his satraps twice? 2. How did Jews make Putin keep the dictator Lukashenko in power in Belarus (for nearly three decades now!) against the will of the people? 3. How did Jews also make Putin war for control of Russia’s neighbours to the south? 4. How did the Ukrainian Chief Rabbi’s son come to be killed on the front line last year? All this and much more argues for Moscow’s agency. Where is Brother Occam when you need him? 68
Posted by Guessedworker on Tue, 06 Jan 2026 18:18 | # So, Manc, this evening the Americans agreed to back European forces keeping the peace in the east of Ukraine should a ceasefire be agreed. Would that have happened if Putin had not lied? No prior sign of it. 69
Posted by Thorn on Tue, 06 Jan 2026 19:02 | # @67 As per usual, they were at the center of funding and supplied the ideological wherewithal and backing for the anti-Russian NGOs and GFNGOS (e.g. The National Endowment For Democracy) in Ukraine, which ultimately resulted in sparking the 2014 Maidan coup. Of course, the leaders of, and planners within, these NGOs/GFNGOs knew full well how Russia would react to such an event. In other words, they knowingly and deliberately pitted the revolutionary anti-Yanukovych forces against Russia—and here we are today. Just a reminder: Before 2014, Ukraine was roughly split 50/50 between pro-Russia and anti-Russia sentiment, as clearly demonstrated in the 2010 presidential election.
70
Posted by Manc on Tue, 06 Jan 2026 19:23 | # @68, It seems Trump finally understands that Putin can’t be trusted. It’s just a little too early to say that there was no prior to his decision. I suspect that perhaps he secretly reads Sun Tzu. Time will tell. Post a comment:
Next entry: Principles, parts, processes of ethnic nationalism, Part 1: inflection?
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News— CENTRAL— Gemini - not an identical twin to ChatGTP by Guessedworker on Friday, 06 February 2026 16:58. (View) ChatGPT redux by Guessedworker on Thursday, 29 January 2026 01:11. (View) Into the authoritarian world redux by Guessedworker on Saturday, 03 January 2026 17:56. (View) — NEWS — Toast à la Little Saint James by Guessedworker on Wednesday, 04 February 2026 23:48. (View) |
Posted by Guessedworker on Wed, 09 Jul 2025 07:12 | #
Professor Darin Gerdes and Greg Terry discuss John Mearsheimer’s 180° turn away from his prior Realist School position of the NATO provocation thesis, the inevitability of Russian military victory, and the need for Kiev to accept defeat and seek peace:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ljWl94ok1A&t=968s
Mearsheimer’s turn happens just as Donald Trump is exhibiting some welcome clarity of understanding, observing that ““We get a lot of bullshit thrown at us by Putin, if you want to know the truth. He’s very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless.”
A radical change of course in the White House now seems not just possible but likely. Likely, too, that it will involve some form of punitive sanctions against Russia’s trading partners, given that Senator Lindsey Graham’s bill will be introduced in Congress today.
I just don’t know how MTG, her boyfriend and the MAGA provocation crowd will cope. Not to mention the humiliated Pete Hegseth. And then there’s Tucker and Joe. Will they now have to experience clarity along with the president? Who’s going to hold Jeffrey Sachs’ hand then?