Anti-Racism is a Jewish Construct

Posted by DanielS on Thursday, 21 May 2015 09:46.

Anti-Racism is a Jewish Construct.

Anti-Racism is Cartesian.
It is Not innocent.
It is prejudiced,
It is hurting and
It is killing people.

These are both sound aphorisms: either could be a “mantra”, with a caveat regarding mantras - that for best effect they will have to be used with discretion, changed sometimes and crafted on account of context and audience. Such is the judgement and deft rhetoric required of Praxis as opposed to the plodding imperviousness of scientism.

The two aphorisms can go well together:

Anti-racism is Cartesian, it is Not innocent, it is prejudice, it is hurting and it is killing people. Anti-racism is a Jewish construct.

The essential abstract of “race” is taxonomic classification of peoples. Locke’s Cartesian notion of civil individual rights took issue with discrimination based on social classifications. For their ethnocentric reasons, Jews weaponized this anti-classification and anti-discrimination by Whites on the basis of social classifications as “anti-racism.”

That is what it is in essence. It is true that the Jews have associated “racism” with supremacism, exploitation and genocide; but even taking away those elements, the common denominator of prohibition of discrimination based on social classifications, however benign, remains - as “racism.” Thus, David Duke is wrong (theory is not his strong suit) to campaign against “racism.” While that will gain popularity with the disingenuous and puerile, in so doing, he is reconstructing the liberal hegemony and its stigmatization of social classification for genetically conservative and discriminatory purposes. Moreover, classifications will happen whether they are acknowledged, deliberate or not, but we are much better-off rendering them consciously - as these classifications are essential to accountability and human ecological management.

Other Mantras - -

Fat boy’s mantra is good too:
“If we had our own country this would not be happening.”
Optional - “If White people had their own country this would not be happening.”

Whitaker’s, “Anti-racism” is a code-word for anti-White” will be effective in many instances, but in other cases will run into complications: in some cases, it will come across as a dead-ringer for subjective concern; a request for a definition of “White” can ruin the effect; it has also been criticized for having liberal underpinnings in its long form, which is true. Still, a good one if it takes into account context and audience.

Sometimes it is best to avoid the consternation of the J.Q. but rather undermine (as Cartesian disingenuousness) the underlying coup de grâce of “racism” and “anti-racism” by itself. At times, this will be even more problematic for Jews to contend with (why do you think I am so unpopular?).

Tanstaafl’s proposition of naming it a Jewish construct is important too and good to do where the audience is only slightly less primed. Because active anti-racism, as opposed to the mere “prejudice against prejudice” is, indeed, a Jewish construct. No argument.

Here are two more aphorisms/mantras that I have found to work well over the years:

You wouldn’t want to cut-down a rain forest would you? Then why would you want to cut-down ancient peoples of Europe?

This next one is somewhat harder to sell, but it has been a relief to me as a personal mantra and probably would be for other men as well:

To men, miscegenating women are as rapists are to women. They should be ostracized as a minimum punishment and in no way should their mixed offspring be able to participate in the resources of European men - as it makes our men servants to the worst betrayers of our 41,000 years of genetic evolution.

Adding:

Anti-Racism is Genocide of Whites

...that’s a good one too.

Tags: Activism, Anti-racism, Cultural Marxism, Free Speech, Journalism, Linguistics, Media, Political Philosophy, Popular Culture, That Question Again, White Nationalism

Comments:

Posted by jrackell on Thu, 21 May 2015 22:33 | #

“I like Michelle Obama because she’s a racial nationalist.”

“You haven’t been triggered. You went off half-cocked.”

Posted by Seek to prevent Asians from discriminating on Fri, 22 May 2015 14:46 | #

- had a long interesting chat with Rei, which I hope to cultivate into a post.

She was telling me that the Powers That Be are heavy at work in Asia now - vilifying Koreans, for example, for racial discrimination against blacks, trying to disrupt the ability of Asians to maintain their native populations.

She has many interesting observations about these native species of people, some of them naiive to the perils of invasive species and the stealth of the YKW who promote invasion.

Posted by Erf Lankley on Sat, 23 May 2015 01:27 | #

“After reading this I am reminded of the movie Blazing Saddles”

Erf is obviously Jewish. Here he is referring to a movie by tribe member Mel Brooks.

Posted by Thorn on Sat, 23 May 2015 01:34 | #

Anti-Racism is Cartesian.

“Ain’t gonna work, Danny. It’s just too esoteric.”

If Thorn doesn’t like it that’s a good sign.

Of course he completely ignores what I say explicitly in the post - that you must change and craft a “manta” for your audience.

Thus, if you are talking-to an “uneducated” audience, obviously you would leave-out the “Cartesian ” part.

Posted by DanielS on Sat, 23 May 2015 06:59 | #

Anti-Racism is Cartesian.

“Ain’t gonna work, Danny. It’s just too esoteric.”

If Thorn doesn’t like it that’s a good sign.

Of course he completely ignores what I say explicitly in the post - that you must change and craft a “manta” for your audience.

Thus, if you are talking-to an “uneducated” audience, obviously you would leave-out the “Cartesian” part.

Posted by genocide/suicide informative but false either/or on Mon, 25 May 2015 06:02 | #

genocide/suicide informative discussion but.. its a false either/or in the sense that it is not a distinction that I am making and I don’t think MacDonald is either.

Tanstaafl argues for genocide of Whites as opposed to White suicide

http://blogtalk.vo.llnwd.net/o23/show/7/641/show_7641145_2015_05_25_04_37_05.mp3

Tan quotes:

Le CRIF and La France LICRAtisée (literally “Licratized France”) are extremely rigorous works and, as well shall see, their conclusions are highly compatible with The Culture of Critique. In short, these Jewish groups have spearheaded efforts to delegitimize French ethnic identity and indeed the French nation itself, to destroy majority self-confidence with references to “racism,” colonialism and the Vichy Regime, to aggressively promote Afro-Muslim immigration and “multiculturalism,” to marginalize the Front National from any participation in politics, to censor speech found threatening to perceived Jewish interests, and raise the Holocaust as the supreme crime above all crimes that legitimizes their activism by placing Jews as the supreme victims. This activism, plainly, is based on ethnically-motivated hypocrisy and selfishness, evident in the LICRA and CRIF’s simultaneous support for Israel as an explicitly Jewish ethno-state.

“That’s not suicide”

While it is good to unfold the matter of genocide vs. suicide, I don’t think that MacDonald is letting the Jews of the hook while attempting to examine why our people are not responding better to obvious impositions.

I was at a fare yesterday, thousands of people, 99 percent White, probably a few Jews mixed in, a few middle easterners and one interracial couple. Lovely, elegant blonde with a special kind of blue eyes, with a Negro in no way handsome or even somehow impressive as a physical specimen.

I used as strategy of walking near them and speaking loudly while not looking at them directly, saying sarcastically, “very good! 41,000 years of evolution destroyed, giving it to an ape!

The important point I want to make is that is that nobody of this White crowd even noticed or was the least perturbed by this sickening interracial spectacle.

It is legitimate to ask why a visceral response is not there. It would be paranoid to suggest that MacDonald and I are trying to deny or distract from the Jewish influence.

I even hear Tanstaafl referring to my idea that our inclination to objectivism leaves us susceptible.

Objectivism, which has appeal by providing powerful moral warrant and innocence of subjective concern, leaves our people susceptible to be non-discriminatory perhaps especially of the obvious - because one can “prove” their objectivity by not noticing and making judgments on such and obvious differences.

As GW would advocate with his ontology project, we have got to understand our own nature as well.

....................

This is not making excuses for Jews and letting them off the hook in any way shape or form.

I haven’t heard MacDonald talk of “suicide”, I know that I do not talk of suicide.

I do know that Tanstaafl has overreacted when I, and others, cited liberalism as a problem, as if we were trying to distract from the J.Q. when discussing liberalism or other causes for peoples being under threat.

Posted by DanielS on Mon, 25 May 2015 06:05 | #

Genocide vs suicide - an informative discussion but a false either/or in the sense that it is not a distinction that I’m making and I don’t think MacDonald is either.

Tanstaafl argues for genocide of Whites as opposed to White suicide

http://blogtalk.vo.llnwd.net/o23/show/7/641/show_7641145_2015_05_25_04_37_05.mp3

Tan quotes:

Le CRIF and La France LICRAtisée (literally “Licratized France”) are extremely rigorous works and, as well shall see, their conclusions are highly compatible with The Culture of Critique. In short, these Jewish groups have spearheaded efforts to delegitimize French ethnic identity and indeed the French nation itself, to destroy majority self-confidence with references to “racism,” colonialism and the Vichy Regime, to aggressively promote Afro-Muslim immigration and “multiculturalism,” to marginalize the Front National from any participation in politics, to censor speech found threatening to perceived Jewish interests, and raise the Holocaust as the supreme crime above all crimes that legitimizes their activism by placing Jews as the supreme victims. This activism, plainly, is based on ethnically-motivated hypocrisy and selfishness, evident in the LICRA and CRIF’s simultaneous support for Israel as an explicitly Jewish ethno-state.

“That’s not suicide”

While it is helpful to unfold the matter of genocide vs. suicide, I don’t think that MacDonald is letting the Jews off the hook while attempting to examine why our people are not responding better to obvious impositions.

I was at a fare yesterday, thousands of people, 99 percent White, probably a few Jews mixed in, a few middle easterners and one interracial couple - lovely, elegant blonde with a special kind of blue eyes and a Negro in no way handsome or even somehow impressive as a physical specimen.

I used as strategy of walking near them and speaking loudly while not looking at them directly, saying sarcastically, “very good! 41,000 years of evolution destroyed, giving it to an ape!”

The important point I want to make is that nobody of this White crowd even noticed or was the least perturbed by this sickening interracial spectacle.

It is legitimate to ask why a visceral response isn’t forthcoming. It would be paranoid to suggest that KM and I are trying to deny or distract from the Jewish influence.

I even hear Tan referring to my idea that our inclination to objectivism leaves us susceptible.

Objectivism, which has appeal by providing powerful moral warrant and innocence from subjective concern, leaves our people susceptible to be non-discriminatory - perhaps especially of the obvious - because one can “prove” their objectivity by not noticing and making judgments on even such obvious differences.

That’s called “radional blindness” and it is a requirement in quest of pure objectivism.

As GW would advocate with his ontology project, we have got to understand our own nature as well.

....................

This is not making excuses for Jews and letting them off the hook in any way shape or form.

I haven’t heard MacDonald talk of “suicide”, I know that I do not talk of suicide.

In this podcast I hear Tan accurately criticizing the Jews for transforming World War II into “the Holocaust” and elevating themselves as the special victims. All true and foul.

But he doesn’t see how the Nazis and his sympathy for them are having him mirror the Jews, to where Nazis are the special and only important victims, they didn’t do anything (it’s all a “hoax”), their victimization pure and removed from cause and interactive conflict.

Posted by Lindtner and Humphreys to appear on Mon, 25 May 2015 06:27 | #

Lindtner + Humphreys

Christian Lindtner and Kenneth Humphreys to appear in international conference:

FYI: There will be an important international conference on the New Testament in Roskilde, Denmark on June 21-24, 2015

Gospel Interpretation and Q-Hypothesis.

Posted by melvin polatnick on Wed, 27 May 2015 16:14 | #

We all live in a Capitalist reality with little change in the rules. Parents hope their children will be shrewd enough to rise to the top of the wolf pack and have a prosperous future. But there are those with a slight advantage, the Ashkenazim. They have an innate shrewdness not because of training but because of some kind of evolutionary enablement. Out of innocence the Ashkenazim are given great expectations and have no choice but to follow its bidding. It is never evil to be Mother Natures chosen profiteer and accumulate great fortunes, in spite of being badmouthed by the less fortunate.

Posted by Melvin take ur nepotism, usury, gene hijacking and on Wed, 27 May 2015 17:00 | #

Melvin, thanks for your slow pitch. I might even suspect you are a troll, on the side of Whites actually, throwing me a fat pitch to knock out of the park.

Take your nepotistically acquired advantages, your usury, the evil mechanism of your illicit power and apply it to your own folks, along with whatever natural abilities that Ashkenazi stole by gene hijacking Europeans (because the orthodox and natives of Israel certainly don’t have such a high i.q.), go to Israel and stay there.

Posted by melvin polatnick on Fri, 29 May 2015 13:14 | #

Sex between a highly talented single goyish male and a religious Ashkenazim married woman is perfect.
The child will inherit genes of the goy combined with genetics of the woman`s tribe.
The secret of the adulterous affair will be kept from her husband and the child will become a member of the local synagogue.
Financial success can almost be guaranteed with this biological advantage. The story has been generated millions of times and responsible for the evolution of the Ashkenazim tribe.

Posted by Anti-Racism is Genocide of Whites on Fri, 05 Jun 2015 00:07 | #

Anti-Racism is Genocide of Whites

...that’s a good one too.