Bridling the Old Media Beast

Posted by James Bowery on Thursday, 03 January 2008 22:23.

Most of us would be willing to sacrifice our lives in a war if necessary to stop the Old Media’s tyranny over our people’s minds, but few of us can see a clear means of accomplishing this since our people’s minds are driven primarily by our morals and the Old Media controls the morals imprinted on our people far more than any Christian church ever did. We could go around blowing the brains out of news anchors, spreading hypercarcinogens in ventilation systems of Hollywood repaying—in some small part —what their images do to our peoples, mugging editors on the streets then killing them for their pocket change to pay for gas, food and lodging to get to the next serial “spiking”, etc. but it would merely be turned against us by the Old Media running endless “news stories” and making endless streams of “docudramas” portraying us as baby-eating perverts worthy of slow death by torture at best and “therapy” at worst—thereby strengthening the bondage of our people’s minds.

What to do?

Perhaps the Ron Paul grassroots campaign has demonstrated something we can do to bridle the old media beast…

Fox News decided to exclude Ron Paul from its New Hampshire candidates forum just before the New Hampshire primary—so Ron Paul supporters set up a website called skinthefox.com dedicated to boycotting the sponsors of Fox News.

The result?

Fox News’ parent company, News Corp, has experienced a drop of 1% over the last day compared to CNN’s parent company, Time Warner, Inc. This represents more than $600 million dollars loss in comparative market value:

So what happened on January 2?

If you look to the right of the graph, you’ll see a news headline for January 2: “Fox News Corp Stock Taking a Beating for Slighting Ron Paul” because that is when Ron Paul supporters began shorting News Corp stock in preparation for the boycott of Fox News’ sponsors.

It looks like this may have made some money for some Ron Paul supporters by betting on the power, determination and anger from Ron Paul supporters toward Fox News’ insolence. Moreover, a $600 million loss in one day is nothing to sneeze at when the next executive meeting of Fox puts the salaries of its editors up for review. Think about it like this: If your editors just walked up to and demolished your corporate headquarters—a building worth $600 million—would you as CEO be slightly concerned that the minority stockholders might become a little miffed at you for going easy on them just because they held political beliefs similar to yours? This is the kind of loss that—given enough publicity—might make you subject to a lawsuit from your stockholders for breach of fiduciary responsibility if you didn’t reign in your pet beast.

So now, imagine the following scenario:

Giuseppe Furioso reports:

Producer Jerry Bruckheimer says that his stories for such shows as CSI are ‘‘ripped from today’s headlines’‘. What he should add is that in the ripping the races of the principal characters are usually reversed. For example last night I watched an episode of CSI Las Vegas in which the perp, an arsonist dressed up as a fireman as a ruse in order to gain entry to the apartments of young females who he chloroformed and then raped. Sounds like the story of that Jew Braunstein from New York who pulled off a similar crime except that the guy in the show was given the name McQueen. Braunstein’s victim in New York was a white while McQueen’s ‘‘victims’’ were a black girl, an Asian and a white girl.

In another episode a few weeks back they had a white guy hit a black guy while driving drunk. The black guy became lodged in the windshield but was still alive whereupon the white guy parked his car in an abandoned warehouse and left his victim to die a slow and agonizing death. The white guy then reported that his car has been stolen. Sounds like that case in Texas last year.

What’s next? Will they do the ‘‘Wichita Massacre’’ in which a group of anti-abortion white neo-Nazi skinhead holocaust deniers burst into a peaceful gathering of blacks holding a prayer meeting? Maybe instead the victims should be Yeshiva students studying the Talmud or better still Holocaust survivors planning reparations strategy with their lawyer.

Bruckheimer’s shows are viciously libeling the white race and his sponsors should be subjected to a boycott not just from some upstart politician’s angry supporters but a boycott from the white people so libeled.

Now, I know what you’re thinking: White people are mainly just zombies—having been rendered so by the Old Media’s biotoxic “morals” which is the main problem—and besides, the range of libel of the white race is so broad that you would end up asking a bunch of zombies who can’t care anyway to boycott virtually all the businesses they patronize. They might find themselves unable to purchase anything at all!

I understand…

But consider this:

What if there were some sort of environmental judiciary with the mandate of setting penalties for various libels of the white race—penalties based on estimates of how many white children do not exist (never conceived, aborted or otherwise have their own reproductive viability destroyed through biotoxic indoctrination) because of Jerry Bruckheimer’s programming?

Now we have a basis for rational priorities!

Rational priorities are important because it lets us target our limited resources against just a few advertisers supporting the most biotoxic meme-spreading machines destroying our people. Small victories will attract more supporters while progressively freeing the minds of more whites so they can think of themselves as human beings deserving the right of self defense rather than slaves for “victim minorites” to exploit until the “white race is abolished”.

Now, the question becomes, how do we set up such an environmental judiciary?

Tags:

Comments:

Posted by Stan on Fri, 04 Jan 2008 02:47 | #

“Small victories will attract more supporters while progressively freeing the minds of more whites so they can think of themselves as human beings deserving the right of self defense rather than slaves for ‘victim minorites’ to exploit until the ‘white race is abolished’.”

This is one of the most intelligent sentences ever seen on Majority Rights because of its emphasis on “victories” and its willingness to start with “small victories,” something alien to many people with grand social designs but who have never even served on an advisory committee to a local school board. (We’d just add, providing it is done in a Euro-centric way.)

In approaching the topic of an “environmental judiciary,” we see that it seeks to exploit one of the pull tabs (a structural weakness amongst the memes in the matrix). It is best to start small in one locality, focused on one issue, and provide information to others how to also start locally. It would take a while, but issuing a judgment against the vicious Bruckheimer that outlines the indictment and the penalty, and sending copies to all local media outlets would eventually make change.

There are a lot of pull tabs in our society that could reinforce the crumbling of the matrix. A flyer outside grocery stores containing information about how to file a claim with the grocery store for reimbursement of kosher costs (and it’s a lot for meat products) would get attention. If ten people could be persuaded to file a claim thereafter in small claims court, that would convert the court into our court to seek change.

And of course any variation on the theme of defamation sounded by James Bowery above would work. Requesting cash back at grocery stores for unopened products on the ground that the manufacturer supports hate-whitey speech, followed up by claims in small court claims could work wonders.

We specialize in sending punishing email to left-wing racialist writers & editors, mostly locally. But we really are acting in a “judicial” capacity when we awarded the Julius Streicher award to a NYC PR guy who developed the Washington Mutual TV ads showing 20 silly old white guys being herded around a stage, tripped, and insulted by a young African American guy. Then we make sure everyone learns about the award. That’s a kind of judicial process. We also got over 25 depositors to withdraw their CDs and other accounts on the same day from Washington Mutual.

Just never quit punishing the enemy. Make sure the real message is in the Subject Line so they can’t delete it before it connects with their eyeballs. Send dozens of blind copies throughout the institution that employes or entrusts the wicked one. If you think it might be legally libelous, just add “In our opinion” or “In my judgment.” And for goodness’ sake don’t add insults against other groups, just individuals. That’s the tough one, but if you can stay Euro-centric, you can rip up as many pull-tabs as you have time for.

Posted by John S Bolton on Fri, 04 Jan 2008 06:11 | #

If your metric is quantity of quality children born to couples of European origin, disregard the media and distribution systems.
You have to affect academia and female enrollment in colleges, or you’re just playing around at the margins.
The effect on birth rates and family formation is explained by years of female education, not by exposure to advertising or TV programs. This is found throughout the world, therefore no race-specific propaganda can explain it.
Some countries have low birth rates and strategic considerations dictating that they raise them, e.g. Russia.
Do not allow any state-supported subsidy of college and especially not graduate education, for anyone but those who are married with one child additional for each year they remain in school.
If this were done in America, that would mean relatives of single, childless young people come up with $30,000 or more per year for females to study sociology or some other zero-career prospects subject, and no state-guaranteed loans either, students are not creditworthy for such expenses.
Scholarships will always be available for the top percentiles, the others should be starting families as they will not contribute to advancement of learning in any case. Charges for the accomodation of student family formation must be borne by the relatives of the childless students who are rich but not eligible for scholarships given for high merit.
This would turn yesterday’s plunder into tomorrow’s superabundance of smart children, who would be highly adoptable if the student families were sometimes ephemeral.
Actually I don’t think such a program is really necessary, unless it were needed perhaps in Russia for geopolitical reasons, or some countries with Islamic minorities;
but how can you resist the logic of this program,
if your metric is as above: children of a certain kind-
and nothing else?

Posted by skeptical on Fri, 04 Jan 2008 07:14 | #

I’ve also liked the idea of billboard at the roadside of a major commuter artery saying something as simple as, “White man, when are you ready to stand up?” or “What are you ashamed of White man?” or “When will it be your turn White man?” with the open handed invitation of a White male worker (either by himself or alongside his family).

Something as simple and direct as that could help break the anti-White media matrix amongst commuters. All it would require is a little financing.

Posted by James Bowery on Fri, 04 Jan 2008 10:24 | #

John S Bolton, I looked around for ecological correlations available on the standard sources on the internet and found that StateMaster.com doesn’t even list fertility and while Nation Master has total fertility rate, it does not provide (for that variable interestingly but for most others) correlations. (Of course, as you probably are painfully aware, those that fear what data tells them, usually respond with “Correlation doesn’t imply causation.” if not “Ecological correlations are invalid.” rather than looking at them as necessarily partial knowledge facing any empiricist.) I’d be more comfortable with your analysis if I could at least find some competing ecological correlations on the same set of ecologies and see that yours is at least comparable if not more predictive.

Then, of course, we have the problem of which variables are controllable. For instance, it may be that education level is the strongest driver but that indoctrination contributes to education level (by, for instance, showing young women movie after movie about the evils of having children before establishing themselves in a career). If we can boycott sponsors of such biotoxic “docudramas” but we cannot directly control things like scholarships offered to young women, then it may make more sense to go after the “metabolic pathway” we can control.

PS: I find your comments edifying. Thanks for contributing.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 04 Jan 2008 13:13 | #

Skeptical, that’s a great idea on paper but the Jews would have those billboards taken down in five minutes, on grounds they were examples of “hate.” Craig Nelsen‘s experience with billboards is instructive (at his blog at the link, see the entry titled “Three Reasons I Can’t Trust Giuliani on Immigration”).

Posted by ben tillman on Fri, 04 Jan 2008 15:38 | #

Fred, that’s tortious interference with contract, and punitive damages are available for that tort. To support the recovery of punitive damages on a claim for tortious interference, the plaintiff must show the defendant acted with actual malice or “`ill-will, spite, evil motive, or purposing [sic] the injury of another.’” Texas Beef Cattle Co. v. Green, 921 S.W.2d 203, 210 (Tex. 1996) (quoting Clements v. Withers, 437 S.W.2d 818, 822 (Tex. 1969)).

The trick is to find a message to which potential jurors would be sympathetic. Once you do that, it is a very bad idea for a third party to attempt to interfere.

Posted by skeptical on Fri, 04 Jan 2008 18:14 | #

Fred,

Skeptical, that’s a great idea on paper but the Jews would have those billboards taken down in five minutes, on grounds they were examples of “hate.” Craig Nelsen‘s experience with billboards is instructive (at his blog at the link, see the entry titled “Three Reasons I Can’t Trust Giuliani on Immigration”).

Craig Nelsen’s experience with his ProjectUSA immigration billboard was certainly sobering; however, I don’t think New York City is the right kind of place to even attempt such a stunt. A much better location could be found amongst any of the Whiter, less cosmopolitan cities in America.

As an illustration, we’ve had some recent success with anti-immigration billboards here in Tulsa, OK (where I used to work) and then later in Oklahoma City:

The above billboard was successful in raising awareness to help pass Oklahoma’s new set of immigration control laws by catching the eyes of many commuters on their way to work in Tulsa (note the obvious racial undertones). I would like to also add that the above seems much more provocative to me than Craig Nelsen’s billboard and (insofar as I am aware) wasn’t forcibly removed.

So, I would maintain that a pro-White billboard could be successfully pulled off if it was attempted in the right kind of city and with the appropriate legal/financial resources. Perhaps the National Policy Institute could help back such a project.

Posted by stari_momak on Fri, 04 Jan 2008 18:49 | #

That ‘Dov Hikind’ mentioned in Craig Nelsen’s article must be the same one recently mentioned on KMcD’s blog. The man and his wife split their time between Israel—west bank settlements—and the US. Gotta hand it to him for sheer cheek, taking two peoples’ land from them at the same time!

Posted by skeptical on Fri, 04 Jan 2008 19:14 | #

Here’s the billboard I was referring to. Let’s see if the Terry Anersen Show cares enough to remove it:

Posted by James Bowery on Fri, 04 Jan 2008 20:38 | #

Regarding the education suppression of female fertility, here is an interesting paper from India seeming to indicate that it may be less education level than prospect of social advancement via education that suppresses female fertility in that country. This, combined with the extraordinarily high level of female education in Utah—a state with the highest white female fertility rate in the US—is evidence against Bolton’s education hypothesis:

<a href=“http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VC6-46P1P1G-3&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_versi>Returning a Favor: Reciprocity Between Female Education and Fertility in India</a>

P. N. Mari BhatCorresponding Author Contact Information
Institute of Economic Growth, Delhi, India
Accepted 26 March 2002. Available online 4 September 2002.

Abstract

In this paper, an attempt has been made to show that while at the initial stages of demographic transition it is the education of females that exerts significant negative effect on fertility, as the transition progresses, this effect tends to weaken, and the dominant pattern changes to one wherein it is the fertility level that exerts significant negative influence on educational attainment of children, especially of girls. By using crosstabular data from censuses and surveys, it is shown that much of the recent reduction in fertility and the rise in contraceptive levels in India has come, not from more women becoming literate over time, but from the changes in the reproductive behavior of illiterate women themselves. Further, using micro-level data from a national survey, it is shown that illiterate parents, while regulating their fertility, send more of their children to school. The first-born daughter appears to be the greatest beneficiary of the changing emphasis on quality over quantity in reproductive outcomes, as she is released from the burden of attending to younger siblings.

Posted by anothercommenter on Sat, 05 Jan 2008 00:47 | #

James,

Shouldn’t your model by Jim Bob Duggar, Bill Gothard and others who practice or promote quiver full? Those Southern Baptists block out the Old Media because of the antagonism that Old Media shows towards Christianity. The antagonism helps maintain group cohesion. Granted, Southern Baptists do have some problems: 1. rejection of evolution 2. positive attitudes towards Israel 3. Soft-headedness on race relations. But quiver full is demographic warfare…which is what matters most.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sat, 05 Jan 2008 01:53 | #

Greta Van Susteren and Wolf Blitzer comment.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sat, 05 Jan 2008 16:51 | #

A clear-thinking Mexican, who says he was deployed in Iraq, strongly supports Ron Paul and gives the lie to Schmuckabee (and, by implication, to Bush and the neocons), arguing his case in simple but airtight, unanswerable fashion: no one can answer this mestizo because every word out of his mouth is the simple truth.

Posted by David hamilton on Sun, 06 Jan 2008 00:20 | #

There are 3 cases in or due in courts for “hate speech.” In Belgium a priest is being prosecuted; in Canada world-known journalist Mark Steyn is accused of insulting Islam because of his best selling book “America Alone”; and here the one who has the lionheart blog.

Posted by Guessedworker on Sun, 06 Jan 2008 01:16 | #

http://lionheartuk.blogspot.com/

Posted by Proofreader on Sun, 06 Jan 2008 02:12 | #

Thanks for the link, GW! I´ve been reading about Lionheart´s ordeal and I find it truly appalling! Free speech is sadly a thing of the past. But I thought posting on international sites like blogspot made prosecution difficult.
The internet is no longer safe.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 06 Jan 2008 03:29 | #

Regarding the blogger signing as “Lionheart” linked in GW’s comment a couple above, it’s worth reading some of his stuff to see what kind of man the British government is planning to place under arrest and why: here‘s a pretty typical example. Or I’ll post another bit chosen literally at random in scrolling down his home page (for the copious embedded links see the original text):

I am currently out of the country and on my return home to England I am going to be arrested by British detectives on suspicion of “Stirring up Racial Hatred by displaying written material” [in violation of] sections 18(1) and 27(3) of the Public Order Act 1986.

This charge, if one is found guilty, carries a lengthy prison sentence, more than what most paedophiles and rapists receive, and all for writing words of truth about the barbarity that is living in the midst of our children, which threatens the very future of our Country.

The cultural weapon in the hands of the modern Jihad within Great Britain, silencing the opposition using our own laws against us — “the dumb filthy kaffirs” as the Moslem would say to his children behind closed doors.

What has become of my homeland, the land my forefathers fought and died for on the battlefields of the world, when one of their children is forced into the position of facing years in prison for standing up for what is right and just within British society!

At least my words of truth have obviously now reached people’s eyes and ears, with the powers that be now intent on silencing me — Third World Tyranny in a supposed 21st Century democracy!

I wonder if the Moslem peer Lord Ahmed was one of the people behind trying to silence me? I did wonder about why he crashed his car and nearly killed himself over Christmas — let that be a lesson to you: 1 Chronicles 16:22 Saying, “Do not touch My anointed ones, And do My prophets no harm.”

How dare any Moslem try and silence the truth being told by an Englishman about the Islamic enemy in our midst within the British homeland!

Whom have I killed, whom have I threatened to kill? No one. All I have done is written about my reality on a computer screen, and now I face going to prison in my own country for standing up for myself and others.

What has happened to those who threatened my life or who have killed my friends? NOTHING. This is British justice in the 21st Century. Shove your British Labour justice because it is worthless to the Englishmen whose country this is, whose country you have destroyed!

Who blew up trains and buses on 7/7, who tried blowing up cars in London and Glasgow, who is seeking to detonate a dirty bomb upon the streets of Great Britain and who believes that non-Islamic territory is to be viewed as “the house of war and must be converted at all costs”? I dont think you will find it is me but I have no problem with educating others to the threat, the threat that this “Loony Labour Government” is pretending is not real. The former Home Secretary knew what he was talking about.

How dare those power hungry fools seek to silence me or anyone else like me from speaking the truth for the sake of our children, grandchildren and the future of our homeland! Who do they think they are! They are nothing more than mere men like the rest of us, just in positions of power over us that they totally abuse against us! Look at the treason that has happened within Brussels by Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, handing over the sovereignty of our nation into foreign hands! Treason is the only word for it yet no one is arresting them, no, they are arresting me for writing a few words of truth on a blog!

This man won’t be everyone’s cup of tea because he’s a self-described “unapologetic Christian” and an unusually dedicated one (many would say a fanatic), and he’ll be called a mentally unbalanced crank because he believes he’s received a sign from God as to the whereabouts of the little British girl presumed kidnapped while on vacation in Spain. Nevertheless I defy anyone to dispute, after browsing the writings at his blog, that the dangerous ones and the ones who are evil, unspeakably evil, aren’t the man blogging as “Lionheart” but those in government seeking his arrest and the ones who badly need to be put in jail for a very long time are precisely the latter. This blogger is doing no harm whatsoever; quite the contrary, he’s a soldier fighting for the preservation of his country, society, and culture, fighting the good fight, the sacred fight, and all ought to support him and oppose the criminal fiends in the Labour government who seek the annihilation of all that.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 06 Jan 2008 03:37 | #

May God protect Lionheart from the evil, evil men trying to silence and punish him!

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 06 Jan 2008 06:10 | #

Nicholas Stix comments on LOX NEWS excluding Ron Paul from the candidates’ debate.

Posted by JSB on Sun, 06 Jan 2008 07:35 | #

Education and fertility: selected findings from the World Fertility Survey data.
United Nations. Department of International Economic and Social Affairs. [...]
This paper explores the education-fertility relationship using World Fertility Survey data from 38 developing countries. The proportion of women with no schooling ranges from 2% to 98% in these countries, while the proportion of women with 10 or more years of schooling ranges from 0% to 42%. Husbands are usually more educated than wives. On the average, women aged 25-29 years have received about 2 years more of schooling than women aged 45-49. Fertility generally declines with increasing education”
found this searching for ‘fertility years of education’, there are many more results

Posted by James Bowery on Fri, 11 Jan 2008 19:18 | #

John S Bolton, as a 1969 member of ZPG, I’ve been aware for decades now that the general argument explaining “the demographic transition” is female education or economic development or both.

I really don’t see it that way.

While these may be enabling conditions of the demographic transition, the critical component is illustrated by Utah, where both economic development and female education have proceeded with far less impact on total fertility rates. Utah routinely competes with Alaska for the highest total fertility rate within the US. I have an explanation for this that I’ve posted occasionally over the years, and that I most recently posted here at MR under the article Ocean Frontier Fertility: Ecologically Imposed Patriarchy. An excerpt:

As I’ve often pointed out before, there are two big exceptions to the decline of total fertility rates among whites, exemplified in the United States by Utah and Alaska. These two States correspond to the ancient dichotomy between socially imposed monogamy and ecologically imposed monogamy respectively. Utah has socially imposed male authority (via Mormonism which posits a father as priest to his family) and Alaska has ecologically imposed male authority. It is the latter that is the more natural for whites and it is why abandonment of the pursuit of frontiers, as occurred in 1972, is so destructive to white fertility. By frontiers I’m referring to physical, not political, frontiers.

Given that, as I saw in 1982, mass media has inhibited the natural pioneering character of the US, thereby denying us ecologically imposed patriarchy, while also denying us the socially imposed patriarchy that the Mormons have proven is successful in maintaining our fertility in the face of female education and economic development, my conclusion is that corrective action is more probably effective with indoctrination mechanisms.

Posted by Jean West on Sun, 13 Jan 2008 12:25 | #

This thread discusses the possibility of using interactive webcasting as a means of communication between Ron Paul and undecided voters, along with precinct leaders and those already decided. If this is a viable project, it would be important to have the work done by someone we trust.

http://www.dailypaul.com/node/25073

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Mon, 14 Jan 2008 01:37 | #

BrusselsJournal.com blogs on the affair of “Lionheart” the blogger. (See the comments several above this one, by me, GW, and others.)

Comments:

Post a comment:

Existential Issues

DNA Nations

Categories

Contributors

Links

MR Central & News

Comments