Cameron on being turned into another people
After much Hiltonian leaking yesterday Da’ud al-Khamouron, leader of the Prophet Mohammad’s (PBUH) Loyal Opposition, has spoken of his vision for our not very British future. It surpasses the obvious to say that he really is not, not a Conservative. He is a thorough-going Guardianista.
David Cameron has called on the people of Britain to resist extremism, and work flat out to tackle the ‘five barriers’ dividing society and blocking cohesion in the community
And these five pillars of Islamo-British disunity are:-
1. Extremism: Here the Tough-Love Kid gets to conflate Muslims who don’t like Western decadence with the BNP, who don’t like Islam. I bet he enjoyed that poke at “the Far Right” (who simply never read the Guardian and wouldn’t know polenta from that Polish teagirl at the Reform). Of course, David believes that there is a moderate centre hanging around out there, waiting to be fashioned out of Muslims who hanker after a bit of Western decadence and Brits who admire the noble, manly life of the Bedouin and often holiday in the Rub’ al Khali. But does anyone who isn’t a liberal politician believe that?
2. Multiculturalism: David says:-
“multiculturalism has been manipulated to favour a divisive idea - the right to difference”
But that’s just not right. Multiculturalism didn’t need to be manipulated. It was simply never intended to produce a cohesive society. Its supporters didn’t care if the end-result was a train-wreck. The point was to destroy the cultural hegemony of the native English, Scots and Welsh.
David doesn’t see that stopping this process will necessarily provide native hegemony with a certain isostatic recovery. That alone will make it more difficult, not less, for aliens to integrate. Put another way, if multiculturalism required us natives to “celebrate diversity”, ending it will cause us to celebrate ourselves, won’t it?
3. Uncontrolled immigration: David says:-
“We can only live together if there is proper integration. You can’t have proper integration if people are coming into Britain at a faster rate than we can cope with”
But immigration in Britain has always been at a faster rate than we can cope with. That’s why it was called mass immigration. And, then, any genetically-distant mass immigration is by definition impossible to cope with. That’s why it was called Commonwealth immigration, and why all those blacks and browns squeezed together in their own little - now quite big - corners of the country. They did not want to integrate with us, and we did not want to integrate with them. White flight mean anything to you, David? Probably not part of your aristocratic experience.
4. Poverty: Well, the mean IQ of Pakistan is 81. What can one expect? But David, who cannot be unaware that his ideas have all been tested up to and beyond destruction in America, Holland or France, blithely asserts that:-
“the most effective way of beating poverty in the long run is to give people in deprived areas decent schools”
5. Poor educational standards: The mean IQ in Pakistan is 81. What can one expect?
So much for the young hero’s prescription for a less British, more exotic life of colour-blind togetherness. The “extremist” BNP, unwilling to consign us into the tender care of the muezzin, passes it’s judgement on Cameron here. I suppose it won’t be long before we receive a reply from the extremist Muslims.
Posted by Guessedworker on Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:52 | #
I suppose it won’t be long before we receive a reply from the extremist Muslims.
Close.