Posted by Viridovix on Sat, 09 Jun 2007 20:16 | #

Mr. Bush is just another conductor temporarily in office, whether voted out, term is up or impeached. You can replace conductors endlessly but the orchestra will keep playing the same score, even if the public insists the sound needs adjustment.

Posted by James Bowery on Sat, 09 Jun 2007 20:53 | #

Yes.  That’s why the time is not yet for the revolt of the plebs according to Machiavelli’s Rule.

As I described in the discussion of Machiavelli’s Rule, this is an explosive situation.  I suspect the detonation will occur about the time the rulers attempt to abide by Machiavelli’s rule for this situation:

...let no one ... defer in gaming the people over to himself until the time of danger, for it will not succeed for him ... for the people in general will judge not to have gotten that benefit from you, but from your adversaries, and becoming afraid that once the necessity is past, you would take back from them that which by force you gave them, they will have no obligation to you.

Basically, “the orchestra” as well as “the conductor” have put themselves in a no-win situation since if they try to please the plebs now, the plebs will see the “racist” “vigilantes” as the source of their benefit—and if they try to follow Machiavelli’s rule and continue tightening the thumbscrews of race replacement, they will find they do not possess, even with Chertoff’s prison camps, the power to suppress a revolt of the plebs.

What will they do to top 9/11/2001 to get the plebs in line again?

Their essential miscalculation is the military vulnerability of the cities, and not just from the threat of weapons of mass destruction, which they at least have a prayer of containing.

Posted by Al Ross on Sat, 09 Jun 2007 23:40 | #

Perhaps Bush should emulate his ‘bete noir’, Iranian President, Ahmedinejad and do something positive for the electorate.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/6705329.htm

Posted by Al Ross on Sat, 09 Jun 2007 23:44 | #

Sorry, the link is unclickable - works when typed though.

Posted by Wunderhund on Mon, 11 Jun 2007 03:42 | #

Here is a rousing example of resistance to the multicultural pc hydra:

http://www.patriot.nu/film/nationaldag_2007.wmv

Posted by Wunderhund on Mon, 11 Jun 2007 03:55 | #

and notice, no Nazi symbols, brownshirts, swastikas….

Posted by Wunderhund on Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:33 | #

there is now an alternative to wikipedia.

http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Metapedia:Mission_statement

Metapedia:Mission statement
Being able to present one’s own definitions of concepts as well as interpretations of various phenomena and historical events is a vital part of every metapolitical and cultural struggle. This is more important than ever in these modern times, where many concepts have been distorted and lost their original meaning – which can be regarded as a result of our political opponents’ successful cultural struggle.
The possibility to influence the language is vital if you want to shape people’s world view. The Frankfurt School and their ideological heirs are good examples in this regard, and have been very successful in stigmatizing previously natural and sound values and attitudes and making them seem pathological by inventing and popularizing concepts such as “xenophobia” and the like. This clearly illustrates the power of language and words, and it is therefore important that we start re-conquering our languages.
Another important purpose of Metapedia is to become a web resource for pro-European activists. Metapedia makes it easy for our cadres to expand their knowledge on various important subjects, and also functions as a searchable reference.
Furthermore Metapedia gives us the opportunity to present a more balanced and fair image of the pro-European struggle for the general public as well as for academics, who until now have been dependant on strongly biased and hostile “researchers” like Searchlight, Anti-Defamation League, Southern Poverty Law Center, Simon Wiesenthal Centre, and such.

Posted by James Bowery on Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:26 | #

First, did you intend this notice to be a response to GW’s lexicon?

Second, what are the legal restrictions on “hate” speech in Sweden, where the site is based?

Posted by Wunderhund on Tue, 12 Jun 2007 01:16 | #

James Bowery:

This post would have been better as a reply to GW’s lexicon.  Shall I re-post it there?

I don’t know about any legal restrictions on ‘hate’ speech in Sweden.

These links were emailed to me by a Danish activist.