|
|
|
Debunking Hitler/Nazi redemptionism, rejecting association in service of WN et al. ethnonationalism
Debunking and rejecting association with Hitler/Nazi redemptionism in service of coordinating White and other ethno-nationalisms. At the suggestion of our friend, Per, from Sweden, we are setting out to provide a resource to debunk and reject Hitler/Nazi redemptionism as it is not representative of White and other ethnonationalisms, but also as its association is severely detrimental to the coordination thereof. Per suggested that we provide a resource to remove this pejorative association once and for all. Perhaps because I am older and more experienced, I observed (and Per agreed) that we probably would not be able to be rid of this association once and for all for all people - not only because there will be some recalcitrant reactionary Whites, but also because our enemies can be served by this association. Therefore, what we need to do is to establish an open ended and indefinite series to provide a resource for ethnonationalists of good will to draw upon as need be, for new episodes to be summoned to meet the challenge of claims that there is a necessary association of White Nationalism with Nazi/Hitler redemption.
That’s not to say that we cannot nail-down the greater essence as to why the redemptionist project and its association should be rejected by WN - and we will endeavor to set forth as much in these first discussions - but such an enormous project is bound to be confronted with novices and dilettantes cultivated in demographics and internet bubbles susceptible to misguidance by charlatans and misinforming reactionaries of prior generations, thus bringing new angles for the foreseeable future to challenge true ethnonationalism. In light of recent events it is necessary to move this project along, the need to be rid of this association is set in high relief. In addition to findings from my own and Per’s inquiries, we will be drawing upon the critiques of McCulloch, Lindtner, Kelso and more. The audio and corresponding text of this first installment is now on line. Text of Part 1 This is DanielS from Majorityrights Radio, an advocate of White ethnonationalism from America, and I’m going to be setting out a podcast series with the help of my colleague, Per, a fellow White ethnonationalist advocate from Sweden. This series will provide resource to distinguish and separate White ethno-nationalism from Nazi and Hitler advocacy. In podcasts to come, we will expose the false claims being made today by the Hitler and Nazi redemptionists. Claims that they make about the origins of the second world war - that Hitler only wanted peace and had no responsibility for the outbreak of World War II and other related lies. We will discuss people’s rude awaking to the fact of hostile interests acting against Whites, their sometimes falling into a false either/or - it’s either Hitler or the YKW… something Per’s seen in his native Sweden, but its true of White Nationalism generally, that there has been a susceptibility to this reaction. There will be some who will not be able to get beyond this reaction. But others may be helped to an ethnonatnionalist, as opposed to a supremacist position, by fleshing out more awareness of the fact that much ethonanationalism that found itself opposed to Hitler in the war, did in fact have a a good sense that the YKW belonged to another nation, that their interests were quite different from those of European nations, including those on the other side of the Axis powers. But in any case, it’s history. Nobody alive is guilty of any of it and should not be subject to retroactive, collective punishment and violation of their right to survive as peoples - against UN charters. We are not against Germans, we are for German nationalism as all European Nationalism in alliance against those who would deprive us our ethnonational homelands. We especially do not want fighting between European nations as we need eachother to cooperate in common interests as ethnonationalists against those disregarding and antagonistic to European peoples on the whole; but we do not want to fight any nations, of course, where at all possible, where they are not attacking us. It’s history. But if we are to go into the history between world wars one and two, the most important fact to underscore is that basically all nations situated between Germany and Russia were against the Soviets; and replete with anti-YKW sentiments - there was large understanding that the YKW were other, that they should not be considered fellow European nationals. These nations knew the situation well enough, but especially, were more than ready to fight AGAINST the Soviets. Furthermore, German nationhood was under no credible threat, especially if it did not antagonize and actively fight against its neighbors, but was willing to deal in the territorial terms that the Versailles Treaty and Treaty of Saint Germain had established with historic and logistic justification - a Germany, by the way, that was huge, including most of what is now western Poland and Kaliningrad.  A German population, speaking of lebensraum, which is the largest European diaspora by far of any White demographic in America - though we are getting ahead of ourselves a bit; that is a factor in the intransigent appeal to Hitler redemption among American WN; and why we are confronted with this situation of having to address egregiously dishonest propaganda that is being used to pander to this, among other White demographics susceptible thus and in particular as they suffer under the destruction of anti-White political correctness. As we must go into the history then, it is important to address Hitler’s territorial bones of contention and how they were overstated in his mindset - a Frederick the Great 2.0 - that led the Allies to not trust him, especially when he proved to be untrustworthy. And as we must go into the history then, we need to address a great false either/or that is being presented to ethnonationalsts, between the Soviet and Nazi regimes - when in fact, both were imperialists, and both were terrible regimes largely responsible for massive destruction of property and treasure, the death of tens of millions…  Part 7...but also setting forth a chain of association with their horrible misdeeds, lending to overwhelming propaganda to this day for those antagonistic to our ethnonational well being, against necessary ethno national and corresponding socially, ethno-nationally conscientious programs in general. Infact, that is a large reason why, in this podcast series, we will use the term Nazi to refer to Hitler’s regime. Not to guilt trip people, but to separate a rogue, imperialist and supremacist regime from the benign aspects of nationalism and corresponding social accountability. And so, in days to come, we will unfold a series to redress fundamental points, inaccuracies and dishonesty put out by the Hitler/Nazi redemptionists.  No, the Hitler redemptionists, in their claim to be after the truth of history, tend to begin history at or about World War I. And of course, Germany was a sheer victim of the rest of the world, from the Schiff’s backing of the Trotskies, to the Balfour Declaration, to the Treaty of Versailles.
..... Part 2 Audio, Hitler was NOT White or any kind of ethnonationalist - and text:
To commence, we will indicate some of the issues, adding to these issues in the series to come where issues emerge relevant beyond mere detail to be fleshed out and given argumentative support. That is to say, we anticipate an ongoing corrective process. As we must go into the history, the other side, the side which is subject to a right wing political correctness of its own, needs to be addressed - this quote, alternative media, that sees a niche market in the largest by far White demographics of America - German/Irish - and panders to the fact that they are going to be more susceptible to positive spins on Hitler and Nazi Germany. It is to counter this pandering, that it is necessary to take a corrective postion from an ethnonational standpoint, that does not look upon Hitler and the Nazis as innocent and only acting in accordance to what they should be rightfully entitled. The map drawn by Versailles and the contentions raised by Hitler are central issues to redress thereupon. Hermeneutic, that is to say, additional historical perspective is necessary to assess the situation and related contentions over the borders set by The Treaty of Versailles and maintained by The Treaty of Saint Germain in the case of the Sudetenland.. And why should the Allies trust the Nazis, why should they sympathize with their claims and why should they not be aggrieved with what happened in WWI? and in prior Prussian / Austrian expansion? Contra Allied grievances, Hitler’s mindset of Friedrich The Great 2.0 is key. Ostensibly justifying excuses were used for his imperial aspirations as such, chief among others, an epistemic blunder failing to assess socially corrective human nature in praxis, taking rather a sheer might makes right naturalistic fallacy, that humans are bound sheerly to struggle in nature’s way; a will to power set in motion in this case by false allegations of mass persecution of German civilians and false threat to the German nation to provide pretext for Imperialist and supremacist expansion Eastward. His defenders frequently lob the straw man that he was being accused of wanting to take over the whole world, when in fact, he did want Europe eastward up to the Urals, which is way more than bad enough considering he was using the guise of his sheer necessity to fight communism; and when, in fact, all nations between Russia and Germany were anti-Soviet. Of course these nations weren’t perfect either and yes, the Nazis had a number of things correct, in the quote, N/S idea; and it’s nevertheless understandable how people could get wrapped up and go for broke; but it didn’t work and there was much fundamentally wrong about it, it wasn’t just that the Allies were corrupt, that defending Nazi Germany is bad optics for the “normies”, nothing fundamentally wrong other than that the “normies” are not ready to quote, “understand” - nevertheless, it’s history now, and we can learn from it. It might also be said of some people on the Allied side, that they can learn too - for example, like many of us since those times, we’ve projected our own reasonableness onto the YKW as a group - we thought, as our Allied forebears might have thought, that the YKW would be ok if we were ok to them - they’d be fair and deserved a chance. How many of you grew up aware of the J.Q.? Well, now the YKW have had their chance and we are aware that we need to be in separate governance. WN has a pretty good feel of that now, but not so much representation of views apart from what is for it, a politically correct Nazi sympathetic perspective and the false either or thereof YKW or Hitler 88.
As we already mentioned, We will be taking a look at historical events which have been distorted by Nazi propaganda. Events such as the Bromberg “quote bloody Sunday” incident, the Polish/ Slovak border train station take-over by the Poles, the false so called “peace offers” from Hitler to Britain and Poland and why it was valid for the Allies to reject them. The claim that Hitler only wanted peace with the neighboring Slavic countries, and only wished to get back lands taken from Germany, where a majority of Germans where then living under non-German governments. And so on. We will also debunk the claims that Hitler and the Nazis were ok with the Slavic peoples and did not see them as subhumans with less right to life. We will address the Nazi ideology of imperialism, immoral racism and the concept of “might is right” contra healthy nationalism, ethnopluralistic morality and what we view as the right kind of racism. (Richard McCullochs racial compact and moral racism: http://www.racialcompact.com/ ) We will address the issue of who has had a worse influence in promoting a false, positive idea of the Nazi regime to Americans after the war - George Lincoln Rockwell or William Luther Pierce? And a great deal more.
Hitler and Nazism were Not White Nationalism, Part 3Thus we have established a first principle of this discourse, a positive tautology that the World Wars are history, the people of today are not to blame and should not be subject to the collective punishment of losing their peoplehood and corresponding nations. There is a second principle that we will invoke at this point, one which the internet has provided for in spades, but which White Nationalism has not utilized to anything like its full potential. That is correctability, the correctability of ideas and understanding through interactive participation, whether through comments or speaking directly to people and engaging correction. To date, what has been imposed as if correction, has largely been World War II revisionism - which tends to be dishonest excuses and apologetics for Nazi imperialism where not outright recitation of Nazi propaganda that could be falsified rather easily if they cared to do it.  Graudenz, Kulm, Thorn and Bromberg, a would-be occlusive salient. To the south of those cities, Poznan and Gniezno are the cradle of Polish nationhood.Misrepresentation and omissions of important facts can remain if would-be interlocutors are not of good faith, don’t really want to pursue the truth, such as Nazi apologetics usually claim as their mission. On the other hand, taking interactive correctability for granted and expecting the voices of correction to chime-in has left me susceptible to allow oversights to linger, because many would-be WN, who’ve accepted the rightist identity and its own political correctness will not say “boo” and alert me to oversights, especially when calling attention to these matters will call negative attention and shoot holes in their pro-Hitler/Nazi position. There is a third and ancillary tautology to be invoked which is that for whatever grievances that either side had of the times, they were more than made up for. We will apply this as a third tautological principle then, after ‘it’s history and nobody had anything to do with it’, and after correctability, that is, the tautology that for whatever complaints of the time, “they more than made up for it in retaliation.” We will take a critical perspective on grievances and injustices alleged by the Nazi apologists, such as allegations made against Polish nationals and partisans, since those allegations have tended to go uncorrected within the philoNazistic PC of so called White Nationalism. But we need to circle back to our second principle at this point, which is interactive correctability and the fact that so called WN has not been acting in good faith to call matters to attention, especially when they would reflect badly on Nazi Germany. In previous discussions of Hitler’s complaints over where Versailles borders were drawn, I have made the claim that there were really only three cities of significance lost by Germany - Poznan, Bromberg and Thorn and one made neutral, Danzig (made neutral, not Polish, as in something the Poles could unilaterally return to Germany as misinformed Hitler apologists often claim they should have); and there were some village areas in the corridor and near the Versailles established border where Germans were caught in Polish territory, and we must add that there were Poles caught in German territory. But though Danzig was at the time occupied by Germans, it was a historically disputed city and a strategic city for all concerned, thus justifiably deemed neutral by Versailles. Cities to the south of the corridor, such as Poznan, Gniezno and Leszno, should not have been considered anything remotely but Polish. While it is true that in previous discussions of this issue I had neglected to mention two cities of significance in the Polish corridor which were inhabited by Germans, Graudenz and Kulm , known in Polish as Grudziądz and Chelmno, it does not change the thesis. First of all, circling to principle three (mis-spoke; it is “principle two”, correctability that is invoked here) again, that the comment section has been open and feedback of good will is expected to correct oversights such as that.  More fundamentally, these cities being under German political jurisdiction would only extend the salient that would be formed by Bromberg and Torun to obstruct and potentially occlude crucial strategic and economic sea access for Poland. In addition, Graudenz and Klum were formed of brutal Teutonic and Prussian imperialism on cities that were originally Polish. Finally, it is a history that only provides more examples of the enormous toll that the Nazis took against impositions of Polish patriotism in these areas; invoking principle three, that they more than made up for it. Thus, it is no wonder that the Hitler redemptionists didn’t particularly care to take me up on my open offer to correct whatever prior oversights of mine… ..... .. Part 4
..... .. Hitler was Not White Nationalist Part 5
..... .. Hitler was Not White Nationalist Part 6
..... .. Hitler was Not White Nationalist Part 7
In five minutes, Professor Margaret MacMillan destroys Pat Buchanan and David Duke’s claim that Hitler was bargaining in good faith, and that he only wanted what was “unjustifiably” taken from Germany by Versailles, that he didn’t have imperial supremacist war in mind all along, irrespective of its potential and real destruction to European peoples, including his own, German. ..... .. Comments:4
Posted by Ward Kendall on Tue, 06 Nov 2018 14:34 | # I addressed this very issue in my non-fiction book, Beyond This Horizon - A White Nationalist Blueprint For Tomorrow, in the hope that the white nationalist/alt-right movement might shed this detrimental connection to the Third Reich. It’s a connection that’s long been promoted on Stormfront Forum, as well as elsewhere on the Internet. And I say this even though Adolf Hitler had many positive qualities, as I showcased in my novel, Eternity Beach, evidence that I am not an indiscriminate Hitler basher. That said, it all comes down to our quest for political power in this country, and how to achieve it. And though we certainly had a conspicuous hand in getting a nationalist like Trump elected, which even The New York Times recently acknowledged in an article profiling my novel, Hold Back This Day, and how it helped Trump, alongside other white nationalist novels. So we have succeeded in making our presence indelible, and yet…we are still being held back by the echoes of a 75 year old war. By all rights, we as white nationalists should’ve established a national headquarters years ago, with a paid staff, not unlike the SPLC but one promoting our ideas. That future could’ve been, but as Beyond This Horizon points out, we squandered that opportunity - and repeatedly. In the end, we simply cannot win using the icons, symbols, flags, and talking points of a defeated World War II adversary. That won’t fly here in America, or anywhere else in the Anglo-sphere - which, let’s face it, makes up the US, Canada, the UK, Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa. All those countries fought the Nazis, and they are not about to embrace that which they defeated decades ago. But…they might embrace the idea that the white majority in all those countries are worth defending against invading non-white hordes, as I have long proposed in my novels - and as Trump is somewhat imperfectly trying to do as well. In our stubborn adherence to Neo-Nazism, we have wasted a lot of intellectual talent, such as the recent passing of Harold Covington - a smart man steeped in serving the failed idea of a “Fourth Reich” in the Pacific Northwest, as well as the current remnants of the National Alliance, among others. Finally, I believe we can do better - much better. We have some good minds on our side, but, like scattered buckshot, they are not concentrated into one striking force like a high-powered sniper bullet. That’s because we have too many “leaders” meandering along their own dead-end paths. Instead, we need to unite - and streamlining our Cause under one banner and one goal is the right idea - even Adolf Hitler saw that. But here in the 21st century we must forge our own, unique quest under new banners and new symbols, united by a common plan of action. 5
Posted by Per Nordin on Wed, 07 Nov 2018 16:24 | # Great Daniel. I´m looking forward to talking with you soon about this important subject. 6
Posted by Audio & Text of Part 3 now on line on Tue, 13 Nov 2018 00:05 | # Now on line: Audio of Part 3; and Text
7
Posted by DanielS on Tue, 13 Nov 2018 08:10 | # At 3:45, I mis-spoke. It is “principle two”, of correctability that is being invoked here. 10
Posted by Behind Poznan's Cathedral on Tue, 20 Nov 2018 21:38 | #
A view to the backside of Poland’s cathedral. The cylindrical section closest to the viewer is actually where the first kings of Poland are entombed. I’m afraid my friend Maciej was a bit intoxicated ...we had fun. P.S., it is not a Malcolm X hat that he has on, even though it may look that way in the cursory glance afforded.
11
Posted by Mieszko I on Tue, 20 Nov 2018 21:52 | #
12
Posted by "Frederick The Great" on Wed, 21 Nov 2018 07:16 | #
First Partition of Poland Frederick The Great had despised Polish people since his youth, and numerous statements are known in which he expressed anti-Polish prejudice, calling Polish society “stupid” and stating that “all these people with surnames ending with -ski, deserve only contempt”. He passionately hated everything associated with Poland, while justifying his hatred and territorial expansion with ideas of the Enlightenment. He described Poles as “slovenly Polish trash”; referring to them in a letter from 1735 as “dirty” and “vile apes”, and compared the Polish peasants to American Indians. Frederick undertook the conquest of Polish territory under the pretext of an enlightened and civilizing mission, particularly given his negative perceptions about Poland and the traditions of its ruling elite, all of which merely provided a convenient path for the “sanguine ameliorism” of the Enlightenment and heightened assurance in the “distinctive merits of the ‘Prussian way’”. He prepared the ground for the partition of Poland-Lithuania in 1752 at the latest, hoping to gain territorial bridge between Pomerania, Brandenburg and East Prussian provinces. Frederick was himself partly responsible for the weakness of the Polish government, having inflated its currency with Polish coin dies obtained during the conquest of Saxony in 1756. The profits exceeded twice the peacetime national budget of Prussia. He opposed attempts of political reform in Poland, and his troops bombarded customs ports on the Vistula, thwarting Polish efforts to create a modern fiscal system. As early as 1731 Frederick had suggested that the country would be well-served by annexing Polish Prussia in order to join the separated territories of the Kingdom of Prussia. According to Scott, Frederick was eager to exploit Poland economically as part of his wider aim of increasing Prussia’s wealth. Scott views this as a continuation of his previous violations of Polish territory in 1759 and 1761 and raids within Greater Poland until 1765. After acquiring dies from which the currency of Poland was struck Prussia issued debased Polish coins, which drove money out of Poland into Hohenzollern territory – this resulted in 25 million thalers in profit, while causing considerable monetary problems for Poland. Lewitter says: “The conflict over the rights of religious dissenters [in Poland] had led to civil war and foreign intervention.” Out of 11 to 12 million people in Poland, 200,000 were Protestants and 600,000 Eastern Orthodox. The Protestant dissidents were still free to practice their religion, although their schools were shut down. All dissidents could own property, but Poland increasingly reduced their civic rights after a period of considerable religious and political freedoms. They were allowed to serve in the army and vote in elections, but were barred from public offices and the Polish Parliament the Sejm, and during the 1760s their importance became out of proportion compared to their numbers. Frederick exploited this conflict as means to keep Poland weak and divided. Empress Catherine II of Russia was staunchly opposed to Prussia. At the same time Frederick opposed Russia, whose troops had been allowed to freely cross the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth during the Seven Years’ War of 1756–63. Despite their personal hostility, Frederick and Catherine signed a defensive alliance in 1764 that guaranteed Prussian control of Silesia in return for Prussian support for Russia against Austria or the Ottoman Empire. Catherine’s candidate for the Polish throne, Stanisław August Poniatowski, was then elected King of Poland in September of that year, and she controlled Polish politics. Frederick became concerned, however, after Russia gained significant influence over Poland in the Repnin Sejm of 1767, a position which also threatened Austria and the Ottoman Turks. In the ensuing Russo-Turkish War (1768–74), Frederick supported Catherine with a subsidy of 300,000 rubles, albeit with reluctance as he did not want Russia to become even stronger through acquisitions of Ottoman territory. The Prussian king achieved a rapprochement with Emperor Joseph and the Austrian chancellor Kaunitz. Frederick The Great‘s representative in St. Petersburg, his brother Prince Henry, convinced Frederick and Maria Theresa (after Russia occupied the Danubian Principalities in 1769–70), that the balance of power would be maintained by a tripartite division of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth instead of Russia taking land from the Ottomans. They agreed to the First Partition of Poland in 1772, which took place without a war. Frederick claimed most of the Polish province of Royal Prussia. Prussia annexed 20,000 square miles (52,000 km2) and 600,000 inhabitants, the least of the partitioning powers. However, Prussia’s Polish territory was also the best-developed economically. The newly created province of West Prussia connected East Prussia and Farther Pomerania and granted Prussia control of the mouth of the Vistula River. Frederick also invited German immigrants to the province, hoping they would displace the Poles. Maria Theresa only reluctantly agreed to the partition, to which Frederick sarcastically commented, “she cries, but she takes”. Frederick himself, tried further propaganda to justify the Partition, portraying the acquired provinces as underdeveloped and improved by Prussian rule. According to Karin Friedrich these claims were accepted for a long time in German historiography and sometimes still reflected in modern works. Frederick did not justify his conquests on an ethnic basis, however, unlike later nationalists, 19th-century German historians. Dismissive of contemporary German culture, Frederick instead pursued an IMPERIALIST policy, acting on the security interests of his state. Frederick II settled 300,000 colonists in territories he had conquered, and enforced Germanization. After the first partition Frederick engaged in plunder of Polish property, confiscating Polish estates and monasteries to support German colonization, and in 1786 he ordered forced buy-outs of Polish holdings. The new strict tax system and bureaucracy was particularly disliked among the Polish population, as was the compulsory military service in the army, which didn’t exist previously in Poland.[86] Frederick abolished the gentry’s freedom from taxation and restricted its power. Royal estates formerly belonging to the Polish Crown were redistributed to German landowners, reinforcing Germanization. Both Protestant and Roman Catholic teachers (mostly Jesuits) taught in West Prussia, and teachers and administrators were encouraged to be able to speak both German and Polish. Economic exploitation of Poland, especially by Prussia and Austria, followed the territorial seizures. Frederick looked upon many of his new Polish citizens with scorn, but carefully concealed that scorn when actually dealing with them. Frederick’s long-term goal was to remove all Polish people from his territories, both peasants and nobility. He sought to expel the nobles through an oppressive tax system and the peasantry by eradicating the Polish national character of the rural population by mixing them with Germans invited in their thousands by promises of free land. By such means, Frederick boasted he would “gradually…get rid of all Poles”. 13
Posted by Frederick the Great Queen of Prussia on Wed, 21 Nov 2018 19:20 | #
14
Posted by Dance of national coordination on Thu, 22 Nov 2018 08:17 | # 16
Posted by Margaret MacMillan part 7 Hitler wasn't WN on Wed, 05 Dec 2018 21:26 | # Hitler was Not White Nationalist Part 7
In five minutes, Professor Margaret MacMillan destroys Pat Buchanan and David Duke’s claim that Hitler was bargaining in good faith, and that he only wanted what was “unjustifiably” taken from Germany by Versailles, that he didn’t have imperial supremacist war in mind all along, irrespective of its potential and real destruction to European peoples, including his own, German. 18
Posted by Myles Power on Thu, 03 Jan 2019 17:41 | # Debunking (Tobin’s) gassing denial 20
Posted by debunking debunker videos on Fri, 04 Jan 2019 01:26 | # Thanks, Mancinblack. Here are what should be the working links. Debunking (Tobin’s) gassing denial https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ycsHUrCM9Q0 Part 1)
I don’t mind these kinds of videos because I don’t see the denial stuff as necessary and it doesn’t help (to say the least). 21
Posted by mancinblack on Fri, 04 Jan 2019 16:23 | # Here’s a link to a blog run by the guy who made the “Bromberg Blutsonntag debunked” video He addresses all the claims made by Deniers and debunks them. Debunks them good.
22
Posted by DanielS on Sat, 05 Jan 2019 17:10 | # Thanks, Mancinblack. Here’s another thread that discusses the matter with sanity https://forums.civfanatics.com/threads/polish-atrocities-before-the-war.510574/ It’s baffling that any WN have gone along with the Nazi propaganda on the Bromberg events. It’s important to get this episode understood correctly as its vast misrepresentation, distortion and propagandization performed massive psuedo-justification for the Nazi invasion. 23
Posted by mancinblack on Fri, 11 Jan 2019 18:05 | # In this C4 interview Rachel Riley relates how Corbyn and Holocaust denial have given her a stronger Jewish identity, which I suppose is the inevitable consequence of much online dialogue these days. Riley says a number of things, particularly in the second part of the interview, which I would personally agree with and overall I found her surprisingly impressive. So when she dismissed the suggestion that she might consider a career in politics, I was somewhat relieved. 24
Posted by Germany 1928-29 on Fri, 25 Jan 2019 15:05 | # Footage of Germany from 1928-29 0:08 - The Graf Zeppelin passes over Berlin (Aug 15, 1929) 25
Posted by dancing on the edge of a volcano on Fri, 25 Jan 2019 23:07 | # I’m afraid the link isn’t working, Daniel. 26
Posted by Thanks for the heads-up on Sat, 26 Jan 2019 00:06 | # Thanks for the heads-up This should work: 27
Posted by Frederick's middle-men on Sun, 19 May 2019 07:13 | # While Polish aristocracy was culpable in the mid 1650’s of deploying Jewry as middle-mean to exploit peasants, the Fredericks were not immune to this kind of practice either….
28
Posted by Frederick's Jewish policy Part 2 on Sun, 19 May 2019 07:40 | #
29
Posted by Silesia 1740 on Sun, 19 May 2019 21:04 | #
30
Posted by Katyusha salute on Memorial Day on Mon, 25 May 2020 06:34 | # It is a tricky thing, as one certainly does not like to show appreciation really, for anything coming from the The Soviet Army, the most primitive army, representing a nightmare ideology in practice beyond imagination…. Yet to some of us, the sound of Katyusha rockets (sometimes referred to as “Stalin’s organs”) raining down on the Nazi invaders (representing another nightmare ideology in practice beyond imagination) is strangely soothing and comforting. Katyusha Rocket Artillery mancinblack posted a music video by a group called Rome, which incorporates the sound of Katyusha rockets: Who Only Europe Know - It seems they understand the sound aright, what it means to us, who only Europe know. And if the sound of Katyshusha is understood as coming from something deeper than the Soviet Union, but from those fighting in defense of a European kind, mother Russia (the motive of most of their fighters, where motivated at all, i.e., not compelled to fight), it is a strangely comforting sound, a relentless sound overwhelming the Nazi invasion and its own ruthless, would-be tyranny. But while I have grudging appreciating for the sound, on this day, which is appreciated in the sense of the European element of Russia wailing through its depths in the fight against Hitler, I want to express my deep appreciation of course, not to the Soviet rapists/Bolshevik monsters, but to the Western Side of the Allies which served and sacrificed to kick Hitler’s ass. And the more I hear so called White Nationalists trying to redeem him and the Nazi regime, the more I hear them blame and denigrate other European peoples who do not feel allegiance to Hitler, the more they lie and make up excuses, the more I hear them whine ONLY about the suffering of those under Nazi auspices during the war, the more they ignore if not spit on the graves of those European peoples Hitler murdered, the more I am glad that Hitler was destroyed. Thank you from the bottom of my heart for those fighting men who served and sacrificed to defeat Hitler. Indeed, it was an unnecessary war; Hitler was a war monger and he should never have started the war. All Nations between Germany and Russia were anti Soviet and anti Semitic (anti Semitic, thus willing to work on deportation plans; and even many Russians would be anti Soviet and anti Semitic). Moreover, there is no way that England and The United States would allow The Soviet Union to overtake Germany and the rest of Western Europe. Therefore, the war was unnecessary and happened because Hitler was a supremacist, imperialist war monger. Katyusha Rocket Artillery
Post a comment:
Next entry: Part 6 Hitler was Not WN: Corrections Occasion Discussion of Hermeneutics’ Corrective Process
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News— CENTRAL— An Ancient Race In The Myths Of Time by James Bowery on Wednesday, 21 August 2024 15:26. (View) Slaying The Dragon by James Bowery on Monday, 05 August 2024 15:32. (View) The legacy of Southport by Guessedworker on Friday, 02 August 2024 07:34. (View) Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. (View) — NEWS — Farage only goes down on one knee. by Guessedworker on Saturday, 29 June 2024 06:55. (View) |
Posted by Part 1 Audio on Sat, 03 Nov 2018 21:10 | #
Part 1 Audio