Fan Mail: Many Jews hate Zionism. Failure to report that makes you a racist, you racist filth.

Posted by DanielS on Tuesday, 16 May 2017 12:58.

Quoting Gary Anderson, who wrote to MR: “There are many Jews that hate Zionism. The fact that you fail to report that makes you a racist. You probably are a Zionist because you undermine the antiZionist movement with your racist filth.”

I’m fully aware that there are many Jews who hate Zionism. Israel Shamir and Gilad Atzmon are well known examples among WN circles. I never duck that fact and do not need to. Nor am I a Zionist, as you conjecture. Nevertheless, whether Jews are anti-Zionist or Zionist, I do not consider them a part of our advocacy group, but as a different people from Europeans and more or less antagonistic to us - much more antagonistic for the most part, while the rest are a part of the pattern nevertheless and cannot be trusted. I do not hesitate to categorize them as such for three very fundamental reasons to begin A) They are the most ethnocentric people in the world overall, including non-Zionist members - whose ouliers tend to be liberal at best (not something Europeans need more of). Jews look after themselves while prescribing liberalism to others - Europeans by contrast, are not very ethnocentric, not good at looking after their group interests; and thus need to discriminate against Jews especially; because Jewish identity, negative though Jewish identity is for Whites, is not very clearly distinguishable to Whites, as being different from Whites, but tends rather to be hidden in crypsis - the natural “camouflage”, viz., appearance of being White - Jewish identity thus needs in particular to be distinguished and separated from. This crypsis is a part of their systemic process, wherein their liberal elements serve a function of mixing with (in this case Whites) to weaken any coherence and potential antagonism that might be directed at Jews from White groups. B) Jewish antagonism and destruction of Whites is easily documented; along with its stemming from disproportionate Jewish influence from seven power niches: 1) Religion 2) Money and Finance 3) Academia 4) Media 5) Politics 6) Law and Courts 7) Business, Investment and Industry - and with all of this, US Military (and other military) as well. C) I am a separatist, not a supremacist looking to exploit or kill them. Therefore, even if I achieve my goal of separatism, I have not pronounced a death sentence in naming Jews as an outside group. If I am mistaken about something that I attribute to them, it is not irrevocable and can be corrected.

I am not “racist filth” but there is something very wrong with you that you would try to deny the most elemental function of biological nature, to discriminate for the purpose of survival of one’s self and one’s kind - and to identify and classify kinds not only for defensive purposes, but for the purpose of human ecology, accountability to that and legacy of human capital. By contrast, your prohibition of discrimination and said accountability is a prescription for the exploitation of that human capital and of genocide. That is evil. You are the one prescribing the filthy thing that would destroy people. Shame on you Gary Anderson (Ramirez).

Comments:

Posted by Nameless straw men on Wed, 17 May 2017 08:06 | #

In his “nameless podcast”, named “Seth Rich and The Jewish Question”, Andy Nowicki assumes his usual role in the Regnery circus of defending the Jewish friendly, Jewish entryist tents.

Andy sets forth a number of straw men that need to be cleared away. For example:

1) That for those “anti-Semites” who see Jews as playing both sides, “Jews being on both the ‘left and the right,” that is, to Andy’s conception, “a tautological impossibility.”

This straw men depends upon a one dimensional misconception of the terms. E.g., there are “good Jews who help us on the right.”

2) People who do not want to include Jews in their advocacy group think that all Jews are bad to the core, can do no good, and can never be of help.

Moreover, that if you don’t take each Jew one at a time and treat them as individuals instead of observing patterns, that you are “not thinking.”

That isn’t quite accurate.

3) The Alt-Right is characteristically puritanical as such about the J.Q.

The Alt-Right is a tentosphere which is anything but puritanical about the J.Q. In fact, Andy is a sort of go to guy (goyim ring master of sorts) for its Jewish friendly, Jewish entryist tent.

4) Seth Rich was doing something good for goyim, a martyr for them in fact, if he was, indeed, the man behind the Hillary leaks. *

I’ll (DanielS) come back to critique this podcast in detail later, just wanted to sketch it for now.

* Update: It turns out that the theory is not looking good. His parents (who would stand to gain enormously if true) even filed a cease and desist order to stop promotion of the theory.

Posted by Gary's problems on Wed, 17 May 2017 08:57 | #

He is a Jewish Christ-tard. He, Gary Anderson (Ramirez), said:

Gary Anderson (Ramirez)

Thanks for responding.

I see a couple of serious problems with your separatism, which is of course an extreme Rothbardian form of libertarianism.

1. Christ said the wheat and the tares would live TOGETHER. You are already violating a commandment of the New Law of Christ.

2. Romans 11 clearly says that at the very end of time, the Gentiles will be hardened and the elect Jews, based on DNA, not on religion, will start believing in Christ. Out of 1200 relatives, cousins, on 23 and me, 90 are Ashkenazi and many, many more are Sephardic, and Sephardic Jews are far from ethnocentric. You know how I know? They have very few Y matches. I only match people on my 12 marker, and I took the 111 marker test! So, only one line of Jews, Ashkenazi, (who mingled some with Sephardic) are ethnocentric. And even that is being washed away in America by Jews not caring about Israel. The apostle Paul understood blood relationships, 2000 years before the science of DNA was invented.

3. Separatism is racism. You can paint lipstick on it, but it is still racism.

4. You will turn away Jewish people who hate Judaism. Thet is plain stupid.

5. Your racism weakens the argument that the Zionists are in the wrong. You really need to get a handle on that.

6. All mankind, by DNA proof, came from one man.

By the way, if you know David Duke, you need to get him to take a DNA test. David Duke is a classic Jewish name.

You are screwing up the movement against Zionism. Congratulations. Not.

Gary Anderson (Ramirez) Nevada

DanielS: There is not much need for me (DanielS) to respond to this man in detail. He’s obviously wholly unfamiliar with my position, in this statement:

Believing that I am libertarian from the Rothbard school or any kind of libertarian, for that matter.

For thinking that if he calls me a “racist” that is a game clinching negative charge.

For thinking that I recognize Christianity as authoritative over the advocacy of my people and my allies.

For thinking that I would believe that his coming clean as a Jew - one who is a part of its component that mixes and gene hijacks from other races with a theoretical goal to bring them under the Noahide law of Christianity (i.e., to bring the “gentiles” under control) - should somehow evoke sympathy from my point of view.

He has done us a favor, however, in boldly illustrating the obvious - how much Christianity, its “New Testament” and Book of “Revelation” is very much a part of a Jewish playbook. To subvert gentile power, to bring the goyim to heal, by scaring them, confusing them, mixing them among themselves, mixing them with liberal Jews who are disloyal to the Jewish core anyway (and therefore “may as well be of some use to Jews” by weakening coherent opposition) - by means such as this, Christianity mitigates and brings-down Gentile power and brings it under control. At the same time, their more orthodox kin are at a different end of the system, railed at by the liberal Jews as “bad people” (sometimes sincerely, the Jews may not always be aware of the full system of which the are a part*) for their illiberal puritanism, while the less loyal Jews are pushed further away into mixing - the system functions to weaken any potential ethnocentric coherence among gentiles, mixing it up, while purifying the ethnocentric element among Jews in its coherent goal as overlord of the gentiles under Noahide law: whether Judaism, Christianity or Islam.

* They would also have a sincere concern, as Jews at the other end of the Jewish biological/ideological system, to be against hard core Zionism and didactically ethnocentric Jews - because the more hard core and Zionist Jews are putting Jews at risk by putting all their eggs in one basket and, in a very demonstrative, provocative way, demarcating themselves as an antagonistic other against the gentiles.

Quoting myself from the main post:

A) They are the most ethnocentric people in the world overall, including non-Zionist members - whose ouliers tend to be liberal at best (not something Europeans need more of).

I should add a further clarification, that while Jews will go along with Neo and Paleoconservatism - they will be conservative that is, of Judeo-Christianity (which is liberalism for gentiles) and acknowledge the “scientific facts” of race differences - as a very strong rule they will not promote conservation of racial differences and separatism for distinct gentile kinds.

Where they have thrown that bone lately, it is only in the context of a Zionist quid pro quo.

Posted by Guessedworker on Wed, 17 May 2017 12:27 | #

If these Jews want to help us why don’t they protest Jewish activisms from within Jewry itself? Is it because “perfecting the gentile for the Age of Moshiach” is just too difficult to kick? How self-aware are they in that respect, actually?

Posted by Sam J. on Thu, 18 May 2017 00:34 | #

There’s no difference between the secular Jews, the Zionist and the Orthodox Jews. They all wish to destroy us. Even if a few don’t then what do they have to offer? Nothing. They don’t like what’s going on then they need to take it up with the Jews, leave us out of it.

As for the Judistans, as opposed to Christians, didn’t they listen to what Jesus said about the Jews.

JESUS CHRIST, speaking to the Jews in the Gospel of St. John, 8:44 “Ye are of your father the devil, and the lust of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is not truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar and the father of it. – then answered the Jews — ” (which makes it clear that Christ was addressing the Jews.)

The old testament is just the ranting of Jews possessed by demons and satan.

Posted by DanielS on Thu, 18 May 2017 03:52 | #

Jesus could not have said that Sam, because Jesus did not exist.

Early Christians were one sect of Jews trying to convince other Jews that they were the real deal. They were not successful in convincing other Jews and resented it; they also tried to sell themselves as the true representatives of the “messiah” (still a Jew) to the gentiles to make their way in the gentile world and had more success. It has tricked people like you. Jews like Gary Anderson (Ramirez) hope that still more people would be tricked into swallowing the Judeo/Christian narrative overall. Ultimately, they want that because it is a way of controlling the gentiles by getting them to believe that they are the better, more pure Jews, while Jews have been led astray and need to be redeemed to their true form by becoming Christian converts like Gary and his Jewish family from Spain.

Posted by DanielS on Fri, 19 May 2017 09:03 | #

A) They are the most ethnocentric people in the world overall, including non-Zionist members - whose ouliers tend to be liberal at best (not something Europeans need more of). Jews look after themselves while prescribing liberalism to others - Europeans by contrast, are not very ethnocentric, not good at looking after their group interests; and thus need to discriminate against Jews especially; and especially because Jewish identity, negative though Jewish identity is for Whites, is not very clearly distinguishable to Whites, as being different from Whites, but tends rather to be hidden in crypsis - the natural “camouflage”, viz., appearance of being White - it, Jewish identity thus, needs to be distinguished and separated from; this crypsis is a part of their systemic process, wherein their liberal elements serve a function of mixing with (in this case Whites) to weaken any coherence and potential antagonism that might be directed at Jews from White groups.

Adding this part making use of MacDonald’s analysis of Jewish group evolutionary strategy.

It is commonplace to take some of the most important features of an argument for granted and because of that, fail to include them in initial drafts as I had.

Posted by Guessedworker on Fri, 19 May 2017 12:53 | #

The Pauline mission was to evangelise a way for Greeks and Romans, but mostly Romans, to propel themselves into the role of the lesser, non-Chosen beings of the Age of Moshiach. Accordingly, it demanded a giving up of their natural identity and relation to the world and to themselves in return for a relationship with the Jewish deity who, in turn, held out the promise to the newly deracinated believers, by His grace alone, of an eternal life in Heaven. Once they are dead and gone, of course. It is a transparently typical if not exactly cheap trick, and stands as an embarrassing testimony to the gullibility of the European mind.

Posted by Free the eagle of this cross on Fri, 19 May 2017 18:39 | #

UWOLNIĆ ORŁA !!! - Free the (Polish) Eagle from this cross it bears

Posted by Captainchaos on Sat, 20 May 2017 01:19 | #

“the gullibility of the European mind.”

GW, what do you suppose is the right tack to take in keeping an English girl in her late teens, early twenties from spreading for a nigger? I mean besides from her parents being middle-class and telling her she’ll be cut off if she does.

Posted by Guessedworker on Sat, 20 May 2017 05:18 | #

Ethnocentrism + segregation + race-realism + social stigma ought to do it.

How about you finally getting the message and cease using words that are illegal in my country? It’s not as if you haven’t been asked often enough. It’s not as if you are too stupid to know any different. This is MR. Treat it with respect. Thank you.

Posted by Captainchaos on Sat, 20 May 2017 06:49 | #

Oh…okay. I see. I am a dumb as a bag of hammers Kraut from the state of Michigan. I hate filthy, subhuman niggers breeding with human, Nordic women like I hate the infestation of a human house with cockroaches. I am a retrogressive type of (sub)human “being” that the utterly progressive British establishment should not even trouble itself with. It was a good thing that Churchill, Great Britain’s first queer Prime Minister, fought against the forces of darkness like idiots like me. Heil transgenderism, death to sexual normalcy!

Posted by Captainchaos on Sat, 20 May 2017 08:55 | #

There are communities in Michigan named “Brighton” and “Hastings”, both of which are demographically over 90% White. Michigan is one of the top five racially segregated states in America, if high school student enrollment is to be used an indication. As of 2011, 65% of the children under the age of 1 are White in the state of Michigan. Yet GW apparently thinks Michigan should not be included in a North American White ethnostate. Go figure.

Posted by Captainchaos on Sat, 20 May 2017 09:26 | #

John de Nugent resides in Michigan. I reside in Michigan. Pastor Robert Miles resided in Michigan. Father Coughlin resided in Michigan. We will never give it up.

Posted by Guessedworker on Sat, 20 May 2017 09:46 | #

Wherever you draw the eastern border it has to be:

(a) Realisable. The first goal is to make the process of racial assortation suitably thorough with the minimum use of physical persuasion (assuming that a violent process is not the first option). There would always be some white communities outside the line, and they would have to be brought inside if possible - the extreme likelihood, of course, is that they would be driven inside by attacks from the non-white Other.

(b) Defensible. Particularly at the beginning the borders will be tested. The most persuasive borders poetically and practically tend to follow natural features where possible.

In the longer term the project would almost certainly become expansive and seek to re-acquire useful economic assets such as Chicago. There is no particular reason why expansiveness should not continue, given the economic disparity which will develop either side of the line.

Posted by DanielS on Sat, 20 May 2017 09:54 | #

Posted by Captainchaos on Sat, 20 May 2017 10:26 | #

John de Nugent resides in Michigan. I reside in Michigan. Pastor Robert Miles resided in Michigan. Father Coughlin resided in Michigan. We will never give it up.

Delaney and wife are busy populating the northern peninsula.

Posted by Vincent Law's idiotic, dangerous advice on Mon, 22 May 2017 15:39 | #

Vincent Law gives the idiotic and dangerous advice that DNA tests and the curation of our kinds thereupon should be avoided by White advocacy.

His argument is idiotic because it presumes that we are unreasonable, that we expect 100% purity and would necessarily ostracize people for small fractions of mixture such as 1 - 3 %.

Even if he made the better argument that you should not be too trusting of the testing firms, especially a bracketed outfit like “23 and Me”, it would be incorrect advice and dangerous - particularly given Jewish crypsis.

Vincent Law says:

On an episode of Red Ice, Jim Goad said that when he was in prison his skin color was a permanent tattoo and the only one that mattered. No one, I’m sure, asked him for a DNA sample. That should be true in general for American Whites as well. If the people present as White, are culturally White, and fight for White causes they are absolutely 100% White. Why should it matter if their 23andMe results only read 97% European?

It shouldn’t matter but in a few cases that someone is “only” 97% European. But it should matter to everyone that Vincent Law is citing Jim Goad, a stalwart apologist for Jewish inclusion ...not to mention having a questionable stance with regard to blacks.

Vincent Law

My recommendation to AltRight people is to stay away from these DNA tests altogether. I know many people are dumbfounded by that statement, but here is why. If you present White, look White, and all the antecedents in your family that you can trace are White, why find out that you are 96% White, with a smattering of African and East Asian DNA from 30+ generations ago. The people that hate us are always looking for divide and conquer strategies. Why give them any ammunition to marginalize us even more? What if you do find out that somewhere in your DNA that you have 1% Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry as many Whites have? Are you going to run out and buy a Yarmulke and start spinning dreidels?

Not if you’re 1%. That’s what I mean. It’s as stupid argument. If he wanted to be challenging, he would start questioning at a half (50%) - still not much of a challenge to call that a Jew ...it gets more challenging and interesting (in that Jewishness seems to hold up) at a quarter (25%) and lesser percentage.

...or is it that Vincent is concerned that quite a few Jews might crawl out from underneath the rocks around him if they are lifted up?

Posted by DanielS on Sat, 03 Jun 2017 05:28 | #

As suggested, Gilad Atzmon tries to make the argument against “The Left” ...and on behalf of liberalism by contrast. ...worse, he does this by pandering to the right wing ..so that Whites can have ‘dialectic’ (read: War) amongst themselves.

‘The problem isn’t Jews, its a mindset of Jerusalem.’ vs “a mindset of Athens”

E.g., Theresa May is a ‘Jerusalem thinker’ (because she would limit immigration?)

Jeremy Corbyn (whom he prefers to win) is not a Jerusalem thinker, he’s an ‘Athens thinker’ (he would bring a disaster of open immigration upon Britain)

...as I was saying, Jews (such as Atzmon) who are against Zionism, tend promote liberalism.

Posted by New Israeli internet trolling/propaganda program on Mon, 12 Jun 2017 10:21 | #

Diversity Macht Frei, “Israeli government rolls out new propaganda program to suppress free speech and pollute the internet with fake comments”, 12 June 2017:

“Welcome to BDS News! Where we pretend to care about Palestinians, but really just want to see Israel disappear!”

Thus opens one of the videos the Israeli government hopes will go viral in what is billed as a new large-scale “cyber second strike” campaign. Supported and spearheaded by the Ministry of Strategic Affairs, the campaign enlists Israel’s supporters as foot soldiers against online efforts to “demonize” and “undermine” the country’s legitimacy.

The campaign, branded as 4il.org under the slogan “Stop the Hate,” is being paired with a mobile application developed by a trio of organizations in the U.S. and Israel. Two of them – the Israeli-American Council and the Maccabee Task Force – are nearly solely funded by American Jewish billionaire and casino magnate Sheldon Adelson, who is also Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s buddy. The third partner is the Interdisciplinary Center in Herziliya, to which Adelson is a major donor.

The app – geared to digitally-aware millennials – turns Israel advocacy into a competitive game in which young defenders perform “missions” on various social media platforms, earning points and badges. The missions include sharing and retweeting positive news about Israel, reporting and complaining about designated YouTube and Facebook posts to the platform’s companies, signing online petitions and even emailing UNESCO’s director general to ask that her organization “stop their bias towards Israel.”

The initiative was unveiled with fanfare last week in New York City at the Salute to Israel Parade by Minister of Strategic Affairs Gilad Erdan, who promoted the project as being an “Iron Dome of Truth.”

While this is not the first time the Israeli government is involved in online advocacy, the new effort has more aggressive messaging than in the past – promoting positive messages about Israel, but also strongly encouraging people to post negative comments against posts determined to be “lies” and “fake news,” and to lobby platforms like Facebook and YouTube to take down material deemed damaging to Israel’s image.

On the act.il app’s instructional video, a perky blonde blogger named Stephanie explains that there are “many groups that try to delegitimize Israel online.” Icons for various pro-Palestinian groups then pop up in the background. “The key to counter their efforts in the palm of your hand,” Stephanie says. She then explains how to “complete the missions” on the app, promising that each time one is done, the user will be “rewarded with points that get you cool prizes.”

The targets of the “missions” are widespread. One involves going on a website called Lifezette and commenting on an article headlined “Courtney Love Calls Out Pro-Palestinian ‘Feminist.’” The app actively cheers and coaches users on how to complete their mission: “Courtney Love-Cobain called out Linda Sarsour for her false ‘feminist’ agenda. Leave a comment to show some support for Courtney!” and continues, “Get Creative! It is always best to say your opinion in your own words. Try to come up with something nice for Courtney Love-Cobain for uncovering Linda Sarsour’s janus-faced character.”

“The State of Israel is under constant attack by de-legitimizers working to demonize Israel online and undermine our legitimacy as the nation-state of the Jewish People,” Erdan said in his statement announcing the project, calling it an “international effort to unite Israel’s supporters around the globe” in what he called a game-changer in defending Israel online and around the world.

...The central video promoting the campaign stars former Miss Israel Titi Aynaw and Israeli actress Ariel Mortman. Scantily clad in a series of tight outfits, the two women stalk a young man throughout his day and whisper seductively in his hear that “you know the truth about Israel” and that he must “tell the whole world the truth” about the “false and biased coverage online and in the media.”

...The project is the latest initiative of a ministry described in an in-depth report in Haaretz as a place whose “internal terminology comes from the world of espionage and security; its leading figures appear to see themselves as the heads of a public affairs commando unit engaged in multiple fronts, gathering and disseminating information about people they define as ‘supporters of the delegitimization of Israel.’”

source

Posted by Abby Martin on Israel & JUSA on Wed, 11 Oct 2017 19:27 | #

They discuss an especially vulgar protest (lower right inset) in which Israelis are objecting to the nominal sentence given an Israeli who executed a defenseless Palestinian.