Fred Thompson and Old Media vs New Media and Me

Posted by James Bowery on Wednesday, 11 July 2007 19:47.

Just an anecdote:

I was over at the house of some acquaintances last night when the hostess turned on the TV show “Law and Order”. I don’t have a TV hookup so I’ve never seen Fred Thompson in action. The show was basically about a preacher who “had many children to compensate for his repressed homosexuality” and then murdered a homosexual prostitute or something. Your typical Freudian PC sermon, and Fred Thompson was right there doing his “duty for God and Country” on the boob tube. It was almost a parody of what I see him as really being: A tool of the corrupt elite. Problem: It wasn’t a parody. It was real.

So after I had satisfied myself that my “prejudice” against Thompson was justified, I went over to the New Media station and looked up the video of my wife singing “The Audition Aria” from “De Fledermaus”. I interrupted Fred Thompson’s preaching about the evils of closet homosexual preacher murderers with many children, and told people to “Watch this!”. It was rude of me, of course, but I did it anyway. Everyone was happy to see it, as my wife was there in person, and Fred wasn’t. Conversation continued for a while until someone turned up Fred Thompson’s PC sermon again. Then I went to another website and showed this video of some grease monkey motor heads who have done on $3M what NASA and its contractors haven’t been able to do with $500M, which was, again, rude of me but so be it. Finally, after someone turned up Fred on the Old Media again, I interrupted again showing this clip of Giuliani and other tools like Fred Thompson, repeatedly saying “9/11” and “terrorism” to the mindlessly enthusiastic applause of animated characters. Am I incorrigible or what? Well, not nearly as incorrigible as some Old Media tool like Fred Thompson posing as an alternative to Ron Paul, who has many children and who many of Thompson’s masters would, I’m sure, love to portray as a murderous “repressed” homosexual, with Fred as the “father figure”.
PS: Guess who the chick is with Wolfowitz? Hint: It’s not his secretary.

Tags:

Comments:

Posted by Guessedworker on Thu, 12 Jul 2007 00:13 | #

Life at the top is just one big, happy club.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 29 Jul 2007 17:03 | #

Patrick Cleburne predicts the hiring by Thompson of open-borders-obsessed pro-race-replacement extremist Spencer Abraham to run his campaign no less will prove lethal to the campaign (as damn well it should). I agree: I believe Thompson’s campaign can now be considered, like McCain’s, “a dead campaign walking.”

Imagine the power of the race-replacement forces that they could get Thompson to hire one of the worst open-borders fanatics in the country to run his campaign just weeks after everyone on the planet witnessed the instant death of McCain’s hopes precisely for supporting Bush’s race-replacement bill. In fact I don’t think that’s what happened: no mere lobby is powerful enough to convince a candidate to politically slit his own throat in that way. What this tells us is the people giving Thompson his marching orders aren’t mere lobbyists but his owners-and-puppeteers: the whole Thompson phenomenon has been a pro-race-replacement ruse from the get-go, cobbled together by Jewish money-and-operatives and pushing to the fore a malleable, fundamentally unprincipled Southerner (Thompson, who speaks with just a hint of a Southern accent, was born and raised in Alabama) in the hope of repeating the success these same behind-the-scenes organizers had with Bill Clinton: “Win the South with a Southerner and the rest of the country with what seems, to the naïve, a ‘middle-American’ moderate, and once he’s in, we who created him pull all his strings and get what we want as surely as if it were Noël Ignatiev in the presidency with Leon Trotsky as Vice-President.”

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 29 Jul 2007 17:10 | #

Sorry, I gave the wrong link: let’s try this one. If it still doesn’t work, go here: the Cleburne entry will be at the top but only temporarily.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 29 Jul 2007 18:09 | #

It’s about race and has been about race since the 1880s in Russia, Austria-Hungary, and New York. In the past there were religious wars and colonialism wars that were fought on-and-off for centuries using guns. Since the closing decades of the nineteenth century there’s been a series of race wars fought with guns, and fought also with peacetime propaganda easily imposed by the side enjoying near monopoly-control of the mass media. What was the race component in New York in the 1880s? Jews fighting against limits on racially-incompatible immigration, limits Euros finally imposed in 1924 and Jews managed to get lifted in 1965. It was all one war and we’re still fighting that war. What was the racial component in Central Europe in the 1880s? Jews agitating to stir up the Poles against the Germans in the German Empire and to stir up the various Slavic peoples against the Austrian Germans in the Austro-Hungarian Empire. What was the racial component in Russia in the 1880s? Jews agitating for Marxism which included abolition of the Russian nationality — abolition of the Russian race. It’s a war but nobody calls it one because observers don’t recognize it as one. Its war aim is the elimination of the ethnic enemy by systematically race-replacing him, the whole undertaking cycling through hot-war phases and peacetime phases, never slackening but always continuing whether by means of bullets during the hot-war phases or unrelenting mass-media propaganda during the peacetime phases. This war, which is continually prosecuted literally without let-up, should be identified as what it is, and labeled a modern war.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 29 Jul 2007 18:12 | #

Scimitar has done exactly that, calling it the modern Hundred Years’ War. It’s nothing less.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 29 Jul 2007 19:09 | #

If for some economic reason open borders are desirable to facilitate the smoothening out of relative unevennesses in respective countries’ labor demands at any given time, they should be limited to closely kindred races, as here. Imposition of open borders between human populations of different species or drastically different race amounts to an overt attack having no other possible goal than race-replacement.

Posted by Scipio Americanus on Fri, 24 Aug 2007 09:35 | #

Fred Scrooby: Great commentary! I agree with everything you have written point for point. This is indeed a race war and it’s refreshing to come across someone who has the guts to call a spade a spade. Congratulations! Sadly, it’s a race war that is being waged against us by “our” own government! The question for us now is how long will it take for the American sheeple to wake up to this reality? I’m afraid nothing will change so long as the “bread and circuses” continue unabated. Relative prosperity does have the effect of mitigating people’s anger about these things, ya’ know. However, once the economic good times come to an end, all bets are off. This is especially true given the increasing level of animosity and unappeasable hatred for us by our sacrosanct minority races which is becoming much more difficult for the Judeo-plutocracy in the District of Corruption to suppress.

Who can forget the millions of scurvy Mexicans in our streets last year flying Mexican flags and sporting placards demanding that we go home, back to Europe. “This is our land”, they proclaimed. Honestly, there will come a time when the proverbial sh!t hits the fan. The sooner, the better! Unfortunately, the lords in Washington understand this reality all too well and are preparing for this contigency. When it does occur, look for Marshal Law to be declared and say “bye-bye” to the Constitution. After all, do you think Yahweh’s Own are going to relinquish control of their North American plantation without a fight? With the North American Union on fast track, this showdown could very well be the proverbial straw that breaks the camel’s back. Let’s hope so because if things do not change soon, the owners of this site should consider changing the name to “Minority Rights.”

Lou Dobbs on the SPP (North American Union):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T74VA3xU0EA

CNBC’s coverage of The Amero - North American Currency:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6hiPrsc9g98&mode=related&search;=

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:36 | #

Thanks, Scipio.