Posted by Paris massacre on Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:48 | #

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2015/01/nick-griffin-on-the-paris-massacre/

“Longer-term, understand this: The shots in Paris will echo around Europe. They mark the real beginning of a Europe-wide Civil War. It cannot now be avoided, because it has already started. By fits and starts it will grow worse and worse, until the horror ends in one of only two possible ways:

“The submission of the West to a new and truly Dark Age, with religious intolerance and slavery and savage slaughter for the indigenous peoples of Europe; or the wholesale deportation not just of the extremists but of every community which sympathises with our harbours them.

“This is now inevitable. The only question that remains is whether, whichever way it ends, the peoples of Europe will, along the way, also settle scores with the elite psychopaths, crooks and anti-white racists who created mass immigration and imported the Muslim Menace in the first place.”

            - Nick Griffin’s take on the Paris massacre

Posted by Ne Pas Blague on Thu, 08 Jan 2015 07:21 | #

....avec l’islam

Murdered for telling jokes

- Francis Carr Begbie, January 7, 2015 |

Two immediate consequences of the Paris massacre are already clear — one is that, as usual our political leaders are completely baffled as to why Muslims would act like Muslims and carry out such a horrific crime in the name of their religion.  Who on earth could have predicted such a thing?

But the second is more interesting. None of the normal evasions and rationalisations trotted out by our leaders on these occasions can do anything to obscure the reality of what has happened.

Twelve people killed in a European capital for the crime of telling jokes. No one can say they were not real Muslims or still pretend that Islam is a religion of peace. It is far too late in the day for that. Nobody can say it was “lone gunmen” with possible mental health issues whose motives were a mystery.

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/

Posted by Steven Mill on Thu, 08 Jan 2015 12:54 | #

Hello Sir.
At you comment-section you recommend to prefix links with anonym.to.
Anonym.to is compromised with malware since a few weeks.
Please use another service like https://anon.click/ which is not compromised an also uses a ssl-certificate

Posted by If this Isn't on Thu, 08 Jan 2015 14:03 | #

“If This Isn’t War . . .”
The Charlie Hebdo Massacre
- Pierre Vial

If this isn’t war, it sure does look like one, as we have said for some time now.

Charlie Hebdo has payed the price for liberty of expression. We don’t think much of the Left-wing media (or the Right-wing media), and the same goes for this journal of caricaturists and satirists who make their living wallowing in filth. The journalists at this rag don’t like us, and the feeling is mutual.

But we must recognize that these guys have balls, unlike most of their fellow bien-pensants. They are practically the only ones to denounce Islamism, which has declared a war unto death against us. They have now paid with it for their lives.  And so today we say “RESPECT” as the “youth” of the ghetto would say.

It is ironic. The PC police have been attacking Eric Zemmour for weeks now because of his book Le Suicide français, and more recently, against Michel Houellebecq for his novel Soumission. Hate against “the other,” islamophobia, Pétainism, nauseating views, redneck attitudes, paranoid delusion, etc. What about the attack on the police commisariat of Joué-lès-Tours, and the cars murderously driven into the Christmas markets (how symbolic) in Dijon and Nantes? The work of “Unstable People” who should be pitied rather than condemned, certainly.

No one can repeat this foolishness with the Charlie Hebdo attackers: they are pros!

We are only beginning to pay the price for this nonsensical policy that brought dozens of millions of North African immigrants (among others) and which has prepared the terrain for Islam.  The responsibility of western elites is enormous: this can only finish in a ethnic-religious war. We have denounced this for decades.

Day after day, more and more, the news reveals how right we have been about this.

For now, we have entered the time of compassion. This will be coming from the President of the Council of French Muslims, Dalil Boubakeur, from the President of the CRIF (the French ADL), Roger Cukierman, who will be followed by all the acolytes of the multi-kult. The strains of the waltz of the hypocrites and incompetents can be heard again. Soon we will see “candle light vigils” in each town of France, uniting the Right and the Left, the Jews and the masons, the Cathos and the atheitards. The muslims however, we will count on both hands. And they will march arm in arm to defend the “Values of the Republic” and “Democracy.”

Disgusting!

Once the tears have dried, we can count on our directors of conscience to assure us they will work to “bring us together”...

See full article at Counter-Currents: http://www.counter-currents.com/2015/01/if-this-isnt-war-the-charlie-hebdo-massacre/

Posted by Derbyshire Defender on Thu, 08 Jan 2015 14:52 | #

I’m a 14 words English nationalist and racialist. I want every Negroid, Subcon, and other non-European out of Europe, by force. Just so you know where I’m coming from.

It seems to me that if I can figure out that forcing racial aliens onto us will inevitably lead to race war, then so can the people forcing them onto us. I’ve thought for a while that the YKWs might intend to wait until the invaders’ fighting strength matches ours, then ring the bell.

If there is to be a kinetic race war, then obviously the sooner it gets going properly, the better for us.

All that said, there are a few things about this Charlie Hebdo thing that bother me. “Well trained terrorists” don’t leave their ID card in the getaway car, and they don’t hold up petrol stations in the hours after the attack.

Even now in the threads I’m promoting Griffin’s take, as above. But I wonder if we’re being played somehow.

Posted by TheSuspects/TheFrench on Thu, 08 Jan 2015 16:07 | #

The Suspects:

Mulattoes are not French

French authorities on Wednesday night released mugshots of two of the suspects in the deadly attack on a French satirical magazine in Paris: Cherif Kouachi, left, Said Kouachi, right (Judicial Police, Paris)

The French

Posted by Guessedworker on Fri, 09 Jan 2015 01:08 | #

Aside from its initial, electric impact and the continuing drama of the chase, I don’t have much interest - that is to say, political interest - in this affair.  It will not turn out to be decisive as Nick Griffin supposes.  It will fade in the public memory, and the seemingly inexhaustible capacity of Europeans to absorb more and more of this kind of hurt will be proven once again.  Nothing will really change.  The politicians will continue their pursuit of The Globality on Europe’s soil.  The Moslems will be in the future exactly what they are today.  The counter-jihadists will try to make use of the whole thing so they can recover a little more of the credibility they lost with Breivik.  Real nationalism will not find in any of it an opportunity to expand its audience.  Public opinion will harden, certainly.  There will be a degree more outspokenness, but the media will throttle it off if possible.  More people will make the mistake of thinking it’s just about Islam.

I am reminded of the character and stolid determination of Bomber Harris who, during the RAF’s heavy bomber campaign in WW2, steadfastly refused to entertain the endless flood of bright ideas and urgent demands for Bomber Command’s attentions.  Panaceas, he called them.  The Paris massacre is no political panacea for Europe’s excluded nationalists, just as Breivik was not a fatal blow.  Ours is a long war, and it is a cold war; a war of ideological attrition with the liberal Weltanschauung, with Jewish power, the Establishment’s deception and control, etc.  It may be ten more years before we have a clear assessment of where we really stand and how it is all going.

Posted by probably right but on Fri, 09 Jan 2015 06:32 | #

I’m afraid you are probably right, GW, but I didn’t want to treat this as insignificant as it can potentially add a few salient glints to the tide of change and spark a few minds…c’est la querre is a description of what our people are up against in a pervasive sense, not a cry against a traumatic episode.

We have not paid a great deal of attention to the Islamic issue, and that is why I let other issues be subdued in the subtitle of this article (“or Jewish Interests, International Banksters, Neoliberals, Christian idiots, right-wing idiots, Negroes, mudsharks, La Razza”); nevertheless, this became an occasion to observe jihad in manifest form, as unmistakably other, knowing all the while that we will not get diverted into doing the bidding of those who view Islam as their chief concern, that we will not lose sight of the broader picture of our people’s health, behavior, the array of our antagonists and their works.

MR is beyond getting diverted into anti-Jihad myopia…. and for a more provocative matter, we are beyond resignation as well.

A minority of awakened can effect the bias of the majority.

Posted by Russell on Fri, 09 Jan 2015 12:01 | #

Russell White on the Paris Killings

The outrage over the killings of the French journalists is understandable, but further investigation shows that they were cultural Marxists trying to not only oppose Islam, but ALL traditionalist modes of thinking.

The Magazine: Charlie Hebdo (French pronunciation: ​[ʃaʁli ɛbdo]; French for Charlie Weekly) is a French satirical weekly newspaper, featuring cartoons, reports, polemics and jokes. Irreverent and stridently non-conformist in tone, the publication is strongly antireligious and left-wing, publishing articles on the extreme right, Catholicism, Islam, Judaism, politics, and culture, among other issues.

The Dead:

Charb: He was a long time supporter of the French Communist Party and the Left Front…  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charb

Cabu: “His popular characters include Le Grand Duduche and adjudant Kronenbourg, and especially Mon Beauf. So spot-on was this caricature of an average, racist, sexist, vulgar, ordinary Frenchman that the word ‘beauf’ (short for “beau-frère” i.e. brother-in-law) has slipped into ordinary use” .http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cabu

Georges Wolinski: “After discontinuing his architecture studies in Paris, Georges Wolinski began cartooning in 1960, contributing political and erotic cartoons and comic strips to the satirical monthly Hara-Kiri.[4]

During the student revolts of May 1968, Wolinski co-founded the satirical magazine L’Enragé with Siné”. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Wolinski

——These were all typical examples of those who are trying to destroy Western Civilisation and died as a result of insulting Islam. That’s not a justification for the attack, as it could in theory happen to “right-wing” opponents of Islamicism/religion, but I ask the question - who poses the greater threat to the West? The Islamics or the Cultural Marxists who have been chipping away at Western Civilisation for decades? And if the attack had been on the Front National, would the mass media response have been the same or would they say “they brought it upon themselves”? I think there would be little sympathy, as evidenced by the impartial reporting following the murder of Anti-Islam Dutch politician Pym Fortuyn…

And here’s another point. “Hebdo” was not dissimilar in its attitude to Islam as Der Sturmer was towards Jewry. Yet because Hebdo was left-wing it became a cause celebre.

I also suggest that Britain First, the BNP, Liberty GB and Veritas (and the Dutch Freedom Party) are all missing the point. The point being that if the Islamicists are waging war upon the Liberal-Left they WILL win in a war of attrition. All WE need to do is step aside and watch it happen. Meanwhile we build and concentrate on the task of building a movement which emphasises opposition to liberalism, globalist America and the Rothschild bankers, rather than doing the Zionist Left’s bidding in opposing Islam as a threat to “our liberal values” (not my values)....

In fact the Islamics may even applaud our opposition to liberalism of the Left (PC Cultural Marxism) or the Right (libertarians) and see us as part of a traditionalist backlash and therefore see it in their interests to leave us alone….

Regards,

Russell

Posted by Telle est la génétique on Fri, 09 Jan 2015 13:21 | #

For me, the interesting matter was not the politics of the killers or the politics of most of the assassins targets, but their genetics.

I literally knew nothing of them until this event wherein these Marxist and liberal cartoonist were killed (provides another illustration of how this White Leftist was never a Red Leftist).

Of course the neo-liberal right has much to do with this migrant phenomenon in what is probably a puppetted alliance with the Marxist “left” manipulated by the powers that be.

You may say that the cartoonists were not us in their liberalness. It is true that politically, the cartoonists were mostly antagonistic - not our friends, more like good friends of Femen perhaps and about as “deep” and interesting.

Though frankly I do value the capacity to be honest about what I really think of Islam and of the wish of some that I not be able to say anything about it. This is our place to say what goes, not theirs (or the Jews’ place!).

I don’t think all that highly of Christianity either, but rather as a Trojan horse of Jewish interests (including Zionism, of course) into European culture; nevertheless, criticizing it or mocking it in the last couple hundred years does not subject one to the death penalty. And liberals and Jewish interests have indulged so heavily in criticizing Christianity, and some indulge so sadistically in mocking earnest, if not naive, attempts to invoke a moral order, that I do not relish criticizing it and do so only as much as necessary. Telle est la génétique

I have to be a bit careful here as I neither know, nor am inclined to know a great deal of the cartoonists. I have already gathered that they are liberals, their politics are not good for us; that is not my point but I am not trying to say that people should not criticize their politics, just the opposite, that is part of the post as informative.

Even so, at bottom, neither politics nor free speech was the reason for the post, but the vividness of this expression of the war that is, and the unmistakable otherness of these people (unless you want to say that we are sufficiently aligned with their politics - I don’t see that).

Whereas Jay from Stormfront radio says that he has “no sympathy for the French” (typically disgusting remark from him - but isn’t it so great that he came up with the name “storm trooper”, I mean “storm front”); mine is a more generalized sympathy for the French, as Europeans, and my concern is for a teachable moment as it were, especially as it was aimed at the largely traitorous amongst us, to illustrate that these immigrants are not us (as the liberals, such as the cartoonists, might say they are down deep), they are not European, they are not French. Just because they are against some of the things we are against does not mean they are us. Telle est la génétique

Thus, I can agree that we should not jump in there and start fighting a war for Jews and corporations against Islam per se - that is not what I mean by c’est la guerre, it was rather in agreement that this was a didactically illuminating event of the war that is, that is and has been, going on against us.

Posted by Arcidus on Fri, 09 Jan 2015 16:13 | #

I would question first whether this publication was engaged in “telling truth about Islam”, or simply tasteless provocation/taunting all the while expecting the protection of the State.

Something approaching “truth” would require asking why Islamic foreigners—who have been at war with the West for 1400 years—are finding themselves in European lands in great numbers? But no, that might unravel the whole house of cards.

I do laugh at the civil war comments. The only group even remotely capable of justifying a war against Islam in Europe would be the trad-Christian sects (who are largely asleep) and to be frank… are hated/feared more by their own liberalized populous. The only thing the current West is capable of fighting is the rotten apples (Islamic extremists) who are one in a thousand.

Posted by Je ne suis pas Charlie on Fri, 09 Jan 2015 19:39 | #

“Je ne suis pas Charlie”

Christopher Pankhurst

http://www.counter-currents.com/2015/01/je-ne-suis-pas-charlie/

I cannot join in the clamor to claim “je suis Charlie” because I think that such a position is schizophrenic. The supporters of free speech support that right for those who advocate multiculturalism, but they support jail and censorship for those who oppose it. And in pursuit of this faux freedom of speech we are all expected to support the puerile rudeness aimed at those whose integration within multiculturalism is proving to be most difficult. It is as though the multiculturalists do not really, deep down, believe in their own rhetoric, and wish to undermine their own project through a petulant, yet repressed, act of childish provocation. It is literally insane. Je ne suis pas Charlie.

Posted by Je Suis Charlie Martel on Fri, 09 Jan 2015 22:08 | #

Je Suis Charlie Martel

Posted by charlie don't surf on Sat, 10 Jan 2015 05:39 | #

“je suis Charlie”

Posted by Sacrebleu! on Sat, 10 Jan 2015 06:38 | #

Yes, the right has its distorted, tasteless and unfunny satire too; and similar as the Marxist liberals, the persecution of a narrow in-group of self proclaimed “elite vanguard of truth” is all that matters to them.

By elite vanguard of truth, they mean whatever facts are convenient to them. They didn’t do nothin’ either - yawn.

Posted by Mike on Sat, 10 Jan 2015 06:46 | #

“Real nationalism will not find in any of it an opportunity to expand its audience.”

A little pessimistic. Certainly it’s unlikely that anything dramatic will happen, but the nationalist right is bound to get some benefit from it. Also it’s not an isolated incident there have been a number of smaller, less dramatic incidents going on which haven’t been widely reported in the international media.

Any Islamic attack on the left or the liberal establishment helps the nationalist cause to a modest extent. The thing nationalists need to be wary of is becoming a target for muslim bombers themselves, as the nationalist right currently have no means of defending itself, and will only be blamed by the establishment for stirring up trouble.

Posted by Je ne suis pas Dieudonne on Sat, 10 Jan 2015 07:08 | #

Because some Mulatto with a White French mother (and White French girlfriend, Noémie Montagne) intimates a stiff arm salute and right wing revisionism he is one of us? I think not.

The right is so stupid.

And they don’t wonder why Atzmon thinks Dieudonne is wonderful?

      Je ne suis pas Dieudonne

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aLGnmE3IWSo

Posted by Pegida's hand on Sat, 10 Jan 2015 15:32 | #

http://www.euractiv.com/sections/justice-home-affairs/germanys-right-wing-populists-join-hands-anti-islamist-pegida-311134

Pegida joins hands against immigration:

After a joint meeting between representatives from the Eurosceptic Alternative for Germany (AfD) and the anti-Islamist Pegida movement, the two groups seem to have found common ground. EurActiv Germany reports.

“We have determined that apparently there is content-related overlap,” explained Frauke Petry, a spokesperson for the right-wing populist Alternative for Germany (AfD). Petry spoke on Thursday (8 January) after she met with representatives from the anti-Islamist “Patriotic Europeans against the Islamisation of the Occident” (Pegida) alliance in Dresden.

The AfD had apparently hoped to join together with Pegida in making policy. Petry said the “overlap” represented the bulk of the results from the meeting with seven members of the Pegida movement.

In a statement released later that evening, Pegida itself said the organisation saw potential for shared policies with the AfD on many issues, including immigration and asylum policy.

“We both agree that there is considerable room for improvement with regard to domestic security,” a representative from Pegida was quoted as saying in the press release. “An immigration law that is up-to-date would do great things for Germany,” she added.

Speaking after Thursday’s meeting, Petry again rejected the view of most parties, that Pegida stands for racism and xenophobia. “We consider that to be false,” she stated.

Pegida has announced that it considers the Wednesday (7 January) attack on the Paris-based satirical magazine “ Charlie Hebdo” as proof that Islamists do not fit in a democratic society. Instead, the alliance argues Islamists rely on violence and death as solutions.

Posted by Hugo on Sat, 10 Jan 2015 16:49 | #

I’m french and very happy of what happened. Charlie Hebdo was a fucking leftist, anti-white, pro-immigration, pro-gay, well a shit. All nationalists open a beer when hear about this attack. For once, al-qaida choose a good target !

Posted by DanielS on Sat, 10 Jan 2015 17:33 | #

It’s some hypocrisy to make this a free speech issue, isn’t it Hugo?

Can you imagine us being able to parade the slogan,

“We are French, it’s our land not yours (get out)” ?

Posted by faut pas se moquer on Sat, 10 Jan 2015 18:50 | #

Posted by Farage on Sat, 10 Jan 2015 18:59 | #

Nigel Farage’s take, “we’ve invited a fifth column”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0XT9m6f7RCo#t=213

...but most of them are really fine.

Very poor, Nigel.

Nigel spells death.

Posted by Dude on Sat, 10 Jan 2015 23:17 | #

Hugo, I wryly saw a Facebook post today of someone who said “the Charlie Hebdo cartoonists are dead and the offended Muslims are dead. Is it just me that thinks this is a win-win situation”

That’s true. What’s not a win win is the precedent of Muslims taking AK47s onto the streets of French towns to commit brutal murder, unless you believe the after-shocks are likely to be to the advantage of Europeans desperate for their countrymen to see the coming dangers. That’s a possible, almost persuasive position. Everyone considered it possible after the London train bombings, after the beheading of Lee Rigby and yet..

Posted by race mixing for kids on Sun, 11 Jan 2015 01:44 | #

http://whitegenocideproject.com/french-sex-ed-book-for-kids-ferociously-pushes-mixed-race-couples/

French sex-ed book for kids ferociously pushes mixed-race couples

by Steve Goode, January 8, 2015

“Love and Babies”, is a French-language sexual education book aimed at young children.

In the book, you can see the publisher’s true intentions

The publishers would likely say that they are promoting “diversity”, but since this “diversity” agenda is going on almost exclusively in majority White countries, and the fact that it’s always directed at White people, means that this book is just part of a larger program of White genocide.

Posted by Cartoonists, that's serious on Sun, 11 Jan 2015 02:11 | #

“This Comment Has Been Removed”: Charlie Hebdo, The Guardian and Free Speech -

Tobias Langdon

Liberalism is not so much an ideology as a psychiatric condition, at least for Whites. How many ordinary Whites have been murdered, raped or injured for life by Third World immigrants in the past fifty years? Who knows? Who cares? Certainly not the Guardian. But dead left-wing cartoonists – now that is serious. In response to the massacre in Paris, the Guardian sternly and resolutely organized a conference of its finest windbags. This was the line-up:

  At the We are Charlie event, organised in response to the attack in Paris that left 12 people dead, a panel of writers discussed why the French magazine had been targeted and how other publications should respond. Chaired by Guardian columnist the Rev Giles Fraser, it featured former Le Monde editor and Guardian leader writer Natalie Nougayrède, Observer columnists Nick Cohen and Henry Porter, cartoonists Steve Bell and Martin Rowson and Guardian writers Sunny Hundal and Shahidha Bari. (We are Charlie: ‘freedom of speech needs to be strongly defended’, The Guardian, 9th January 2015)

I count two non-Whites and at least two Jews, Giles Fraser and Nick Cohen. So the panel was chaired and numerically dominated by people from groups that don’t identify with or care about native White Europeans. When Cohen wrote about the Charlie Hebdo massacre in the London Spectator, he didn’t mention mass immigration once. But he did mention “white racists” and note that a “religion is not a race.” Plainly, then, he supports Britain’s “hate-speech” laws and doesn’t believe in free speech.

.....

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2015/01/this-comment-has-been-removed-charlie-hebdo-the-guardian-and-free-speech/

Posted by Mass French rallies on Sun, 11 Jan 2015 13:12 | #

http://www.skynews.com.au/news/top-stories/2015/01/11/700-000-people-rally-in-france.html

More than 700,000 people have defiantly rallied throughout France in solidarity with victims of this week’s Islamist attacks, on the eve of a march in Paris expected to dwarf that figure.

The massive rallies on Saturday are in tribute to the 17 victims of the three-day killing spree, and security forces were mapping out a major deployment aimed at preventing fresh violence.

Posted by anon on Sun, 11 Jan 2015 17:22 | #

All that said, there are a few things about this Charlie Hebdo thing that bother me. “Well trained terrorists” don’t leave their ID card in the getaway car, and they don’t hold up petrol stations in the hours after the attack.

They weren’t well trained terrorists imo. They were guys who’d spent some time in Syria learning how to street fight with AKs.

.

The big difference with this attack is they targeted them for the first time. It’s not soldiers or working class girls trapped in the banlieue or even Wall Streeters - it was the 68ers being targeted directly.

Posted by Benoist on Mon, 12 Jan 2015 02:15 | #

“Unlike its predecessor Hara Kiri, Charlie Hebdo, the liberal-libertarian newspaper, has become one of the organs of the dominant ideology. They can recognize their own.”

                                                                        - Alain de Benoist

Posted by Sweet Revenge on Mon, 12 Jan 2015 05:22 | #

Sweet Revenge

Posted by military strategy on Mon, 12 Jan 2015 10:42 | #

Sir Hew Strachan on coordinating military strategy appropriate to circumstances:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHWyffZn5-c

Combat motivation - humanitarianism, national ideals and booty
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82chEH9gZvc

Posted by Jack London on Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:42 | #

Remembering Jack London January 12, 1876–November 22, 1916

Greg Johnson

Jack London was born John Griffith Chaney in San Francisco on January 12, 1876. An adventurer and Jack of all trades in his youth, London achieved fame and fortune as a fiction writer and journalist. But he never forgot his working class roots and remained a life-long advocate of workers’ rights, unionism, and revolutionary socialism. (See his essay “What Life Means to Me.”)

....those who hope for the re-emergence of a racially conscious left.

http://www.counter-currents.com/2015/01/remembering-jack-london-4/

“Unlike its predecessor Hara Kiri, Charlie Hebdo, the liberal-libertarian newspaper, has become one of the organs of the dominant ideology. They can recognize their own.”      - Alain de Benoist

Posted by Jay's ill disposition on Tue, 13 Jan 2015 05:13 | #

...to the French

To note, Stormfront radio, Jay in particular, is saying “France” and “The French” are trying to make this an issue of free speech. If the attack had occurred in his favored European country, wouldn’t he cite the powers that be as responsible for this meme?

Why does he suppose that “all French” hypocritically see this as a “free speech issue” rather than the likelihood that among millions there are many with racial motivations?

Posted by 100,000 on Tue, 13 Jan 2015 14:36 | #

French Prime Minister: If Jews Flee, the Republic Will Be a Failure

Manuel Valls: “If 100,000 Jews leave, France will no longer be France.”

The massacre at a kosher supermarket in Paris on Friday reinforced a fear, expressed openly and with distressing frequency by many in France’s half-million-strong Jewish community, that Islamist violence is compelling large numbers of Jews to flee. Already, several thousand have left over the past few years. But it is not merely the physical safety of France’s Jews that is imperiled by anti-Semitic violence, the country’s prime minister, Manuel Valls, argues, but the very idea of the French Republic itself. In an interview conducted before the Charlie Hebdo and kosher supermarket massacres, Valls told me that if French Jews were to flee in large numbers, the soul of the French Republic would be at risk.

“The choice was made by the French Revolution in 1789 to recognize Jews as full citizens,” Valls told me. “To understand what the idea of the republic is about, you have to understand the central role played by the emancipation of the Jews. It is a founding principle.”
“There is a new anti-Semitism in France.”

Valls, a Socialist who is the son of Spanish immigrants, describes the threat of a Jewish exodus from France this way: “If 100,000 French people of Spanish origin were to leave, I would never say that France is not France anymore. But if 100,000 Jews leave, France will no longer be France. The French Republic will be judged a failure.”

Posted by leaving France on Tue, 13 Jan 2015 17:34 | #

7,000 Jews moved from France to Israel last year - many not feeling safe in France - that is twice as many as the prior year. 

There are about a half a million Jews in France.

Posted by 25,000 Pegidans on Tue, 13 Jan 2015 17:37 | #

Record number for Pegida in Dresden - 25,000, numbers increasing in response to the events in France.

Posted by voznich on Thu, 15 Jan 2015 14:32 | #

GW@7

Ours is a long war, and it is a cold war; a war of ideological attrition with the liberal Weltanschauung, with Jewish power, the Establishment’s deception and control, etc.  It may be ten more years before we have a clear assessment of where we really stand and how it is all going.

You had better hurry up, per Raspail. The NUMBERS are killing you. Ideological attrition is ridiculous in the face of demographic invasions.

Posted by le Pen on Mon, 19 Jan 2015 13:07 | #

http://www.radixjournal.com/journal/2015/1/17/jean-marie-le-pen-from-paris-to-vladivostok

Jean-Marie Le Pen: We Need a United Europe from Paris to Vladivostok. Otherwise, We Will Become a U.S. Colony

Interviewed by Daria Aslamova

Why did Charlie Hebdo constantly offend Muslims and Christians, but practically avoided the Jews?

Because the Jews can defend themselves. Take Femen, for instance. They can run around naked in front of the Pope, take off their clothes in the Notre Dame, but they have never dared to enter a synagogue.

Europe mourns the dead cartoonists, but ignores the deaths of Russian journalists in Donbass.

Because these are true journalists rather than Trotskyists and anarchists from Charlie. Even if their colleagues from another French newspaper were the ones murdered, Charlie Hebdo would have enjoyed “making fun” of others’ deaths.

As a result of this tragedy, the previously unpopular president Hollande is rapidly gaining ground in France. How well does your daughter, Marine Le Pen, fare in the next presidential election?

Yes, she might win, but I’m afraid that she’ll inherit this country in ruins. Economically, France is inexorably heading into the abyss.

Posted by Hate speech in Age of Treason on Wed, 21 Jan 2015 05:50 | #

Age of Treason Radio - Decoding Jew-Worship and Blasphemy

20 January 2015 Tanstaafl

http://age-of-treason.com/2015/01/20/decoding-jew-worship-and-blasphemy/

Picking up where we left off last week’s discussion of the attack on Charlie Hebdo.

That discussion was specifically focused on jews getting on their jewsmedia soapboxes to pontificate and moralize about the virtues of “free speech”, while at the same distinguishing and arguing in favor of punishing “hate speech”, with jews literally and figuratively defining what “hate” means, cloaking their concern for their own particularist interests in disingenuous universalist language.

“We’ve” got to ban “hate” because that’s what’s best for “us”.

It’s a sleight of words, a moral and linguistic fraud. Like many frauds, it’s not complicated once you see the trick.

What jews want said they label “free speech”. What jews don’t want said they label “hate speech”. It’s that simple.

Jews use their power, their money, their media, their positions of authority in politics, academia and in law, to foist their collective views, values, and interests on everyone else. When doing this they claim a right to “free speech”. But when they hear or see something they don’t like, they argue instead that it is “hate speech” and should be banned.

Some jews are more harsh, some more loose in making their argument either way. But the general consensus on what jews don’t like most of all is telling. The most common element of so-called “hate speech” is race. The hatiest hate of all hateful things is “racism”. And the most hateful kind of “racism” is “anti-semitism”.

As the saying goes, anti-”racism” is a code word for anti-White. There are other code words. Words like “diversity”, “discrimination”, “intolerance”. Calling it “code” is simpler than describing the specific trick that’s being played, the particularism-disguised-as-universalism fraud. But you can see who’s behind it, who’s driving it, in the close, peculiar relationship between the terms “racism” and “anti-semitism”.

This report was published a week before the Hebdo attack. French president vows to fight racism and anti-Semitism:

  French President Francois Hollande has used his New Year’s Eve television speech to say that the fight against racism and anti-Semitism will be his national cause for 2015.

The president of France’s New Year’s resolution was not to protect the French, but the jews and muslims, the alien interlopers in France. Protect them from who? From the native French.

This is just one timely reminder of the general rule about “racism” and “anti-semitism”. On the one hand, Whites merely speaking in defense of Whites, even without mentioning any other group, is regarded as “racism”. On the other hand, jews speaking in defense of jews is not regarded as “racism”. They’re just combatting “anti-semitism”.

Even when jews explicitly criticize Whites, as a race, it isn’t called “racism”, it’s called “whiteness studies”.

Jews are “white”, we’re told, because saying they’re not is worse than “racist”, it’s “anti-semitic”.

This power jews have over the meanings of words is almost magical. Substitute White for jew in some form of political expression and “satire” instantly transmutes into “hate”.

But this isn’t magic. It’s money. It’s media. It’s politicking. It’s also the knock-on effect of jew-worship, a consequence of jews not just being simply unopposed, but of actually being aided and abetted by others, the non-jew jew-worshippers who police and punish heretics on the jews’ behalf, expressly in their defense.

I’m using the word worship in a looser sense than usual, but not lightly.

Recognition and encouragement of this jew-worship was evident in the free speech/hate speech heebdo I talked about last time. Blasphemy was a recurring theme in that heebdo. Beside defining “hate”, jews define what is or isn’t blasphemy. The epitome of “hate speech” is blasphemy against jews.

Many others chattered about blasphemy, agreeing, as Chait put it, that “the right to blaspheme religion” is elemental. But if that’s true, why is it the subject of so much debate? What is all the arguing really about?

flippityfloppity, commenting at my blog, took a stab at making sense of it:

  so blasphemy is an attack on religion which is ok and protected by free speech. antisemitism is hate speech which is an attack on persons so its not ok, not protected and should not be tolerated.

My argument is that the arguing is about the meaning of blasphemy. It’s word games. Again. Empirically, irreverence for the jews is the only thing the jewsmedia and the current governments of Western countries actually regard as blasphemy. Blasphemy against anyone or anything else can be seen as either “free speech” or “hate speech”, depending on what consensus the jews come to about whether it’s good or bad for the jews.

.....

Many others chattered about blasphemy, agreeing, as Chait put it, that “the right to blaspheme religion” is elemental. But if that’s true, why is it the subject of so much debate? What is all the arguing really about?

flippityfloppity, commenting at my blog, took a stab at making sense of it:

  so blasphemy is an attack on religion which is ok and protected by free speech. antisemitism is hate speech which is an attack on persons so its not ok, not protected and should not be tolerated.

My argument is that the arguing is about the meaning of blasphemy. It’s word games. Again. Empirically, irreverence for the jews is the only thing the jewsmedia and the current governments of Western countries actually regard as blasphemy. Blasphemy against anyone or anything else can be seen as either “free speech” or “hate speech”, depending on what consensus the jews come to about whether it’s good or bad for the jews.

charlie hebdospeech

WTF

A pro-White perspective on jewish influence and the tendency toward treason it inspires.

Stop immigration. Eject the invaders. Hang the traitors.

The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. – Marcus Aurelius

Live not by lies. – Alexander Solzhenitsyn

Po-White perspective on jewish influence and the tendency toward treason it inspires.

Stop immigration. Eject the invaders. Hang the traitors.

Posted by AOT - Rockwell on Wed, 21 Jan 2015 06:09 | #

http://age-of-treason.com/2015/01/17/george-lincoln-rockwell-speaking-at-ucla-5161967/

In this relatively high-quality recording of George Lincoln Rockwell speaking at UCLA 5/16/1967 he covers many topics: How a jew editor distorted his Playboy interview (he did not live to answer Alex Haley’s jewed theatrical vision); losing Vietnam; how he was “almost a liberal” before he saw through the lies, e.g. Churchill’s 1920 article Zionism versus Bolshevism; how jews disguise their actions by putting non-jews on top and out front; the jewishness-as-religion fraud; the kosher tax; free speech and how jews stifle opposition by keeping others from reading/hearing what they hate (e.g. Rockwell, or Madison Grant’s Conquest of a Continent); on FDR whipping up hate during WWII; the name game, and more.

I wanted to put this speech on TFeed but I couldn’t find an audio file, so I downloaded the “video” from YouTube, transcoded it to mp3, and am making it available here for educational (i.e. fair use) purposes.

“FDR whipping up hate”

Fine to note but Hitler and the Nazis also whipped up hate against other Europeans.

Posted by Guillaume on Fri, 23 Jan 2015 05:18 | #

This is Just the Beginning

Jihadist Carnage in Paris, Part 1

Guillaume Faye

Translated by Greg Johnson (this is the first part of the full post at Counter Currents)

The carnage at Charlie Hebdo and the kosher food shop in Montrouge are just the beginning, a harbinger. In all, 17 people, including 10 journalists, four shoppers, and three police officers died, and 30 were wounded. This is the beginning of an ethnic civil war in France under the banner of Islam. Nothing can stop it except a victory for one side or the other, because war never ends without winners and losers.

Worse than September 11?

The killings follow the murderous attacks by “lone wolves,” shouting “Allah Akbar!” driving cars into crowds or slashing with knives (in Joue-les-Tours, Nantes, Dijon). This act of war is part of an all-out offensive (thought of as a counter-offensive and vengeance) of Islam against the West, and specifically against France, which it intends to conquer. This war, this terrorism is only the visible part of the iceberg; the submerged part is Islamization; the growing offensive throughout the country, including intimidation by terrorism is only one aspect. After the Merah and Nemmouche killings, the bloody saga continues. And the angels cry: “There is no clash of civilizations!” Mind you, from a certain point of view, they are right, because, in fact, it is the war of civilization against barbarism.

Paradoxically, in their symbolism, these attacks are more significant than those of September 11, 2001 in New York City, which were far more deadly (3,000 deaths). Then, there was no such mobilization, with giant demonstrations that drew 50 heads of state and government. Indeed, the attacks in Paris, from the interior, were military commando strikes against the mind. These raids, these rezzous, can be repeated indefinitely, while the September 11 attacks, like those in Madrid and London, required extensive logistics. This is the logic of the guerrilla, far more agonizing and unstoppable than regular terrorism.

Islam and Barbarism

Everywhere Islamic barbarism is growing: Boko Haram in Nigeria, Syria, Iraq, Algeria, etc. with its procession of beheadings, massacres of civilians, rape, slavery, recruited killers of children, spoliation, persecution, hostage taking, looting, summary executions, etc. None of it is new. When will we decide to open our eyes? They do not even hide. Unlike the Nazis and communists (Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, etc.), they do not even disguise their crimes. They are proud of them; they film and broadcast them in the name of Allah. If such abominations were committed in the name of Christianity, would we not raise questions about its nature? Why not do it when it comes to Islam, which has become untouchable in France? Untouchable (the sin of “Islamophobia”) quite simply because of fear.

You Said “Freedom of Expression”?

People demonstrated in the name of freedom of thought and expression to defend Charlie Hebdo. It’s pretty hypocritical of a state and a dominant ideology that also suppress freedom of expression when it comes from those who do not subscribe to this ideology. I was sentenced to a heavy fine by a French court in 2000 for my book The Colonization of Europe: True Discourse Against Immigration and Islam (L’Aencre) which, however, did not include any offensive caricatures but rather an argument against immigration and Islamization. Cause of the sentence: Islamophobia. Eric Zemmour, after further legal troubles, was axed by i>Télé for his book Le suicide français. Where is the “freedom of expression”? A double standard. Charlie Hebdo, being Leftist (and not at all subversive) enjoyed a sort of judicial immunity. In reality, the French state, Left- and Right-wing, prepared the way for Islamic intolerance by criminalizing “Islamophobia.” By pandering to an electorate to buy civil peace. It failed. In the name of tolerance, one is punished for criticizing Muslim intolerance! There’s no point in hypocritically claiming Voltaire! Don’t forget that his (otherwise mediocre) play Muhammad was banned in Geneva almost immediately.

The Strategy of Intimidation

The murders of the Charlie Hebdo journalists are part of a strategy of intimidation that plays on fear. This is to discourage criticism of totalitarian Islam. This deterrence can work. By some strange coincidence, the attack against Charlie Hebdo happened the same day as the release of the sadly prophetic novel by Michel Houellebecq, Submission, which described the takeover of Islam in France in 2022, due to the cowardice and collaboration of the elite, which is quite apparent. But the author decided, following recent events, to cancel promoting his novel, a sort of self-censorship.

It is understandable why Michel Houellebecq is afraid: in 2004, Theo Van Gogh, the filmmaker who directed the film Submission (exactly the same title as his novel, a translation for “Islam”) with the brave Somali Ayaan Hirsi Ali on the oppression of women in Islam and which featured Allah, was murdered by a Moroccan Muslim. Houellebecq does not dare go into the trenches and expose himself to promote his novel. It is one of the first examples of the intimidation process.

Immigration as Efficient Cause

In any process, fact, or event, Aristotle (in Metaphysics, Book I) distinguished four distinct kinds of causes that bring them about. The most important is the efficient cause, the “engine” without which nothing would have been possible.

Criticizing the “national unity” to which Hollande appealed, Jean-Marie Le Pen said something quite correct: “I do not want to support impotent and inconsistent government action regarding a problem [Muslim terrorism] which of course is very closely related to the massive immigration experienced by our country for forty years.” Because the heart of the problem is: France is overwhelmed with an immigration invasion, the vast majority of which is Muslim and highly fertile. And we do not tackle this real cause, due to the cosmopolitan and antiracist ideology.

Posted by Czolgosz and McKinley on Sun, 25 Jan 2015 13:51 | #

The type of man who commits the crime of assassination is usually emotionally brittle and intellectually limited, an unfitting vessel for the higher ideals and notions of honour with which he associates himself, but yet proof that such things exist.

“Colin Liddell knows how to hurt a fella” - Czolgosz, pronounced ‘Chugosh’

http://alternative-right.blogspot.com/2015/01/the-tragic-decline-of-great-american.html#more

Posted by james on Sun, 25 Jan 2015 21:25 | #

Good interviews for future MR Radio would be Norman Lowell and John DeNugent.

John DeNugent you could ask him for

home decorating advice

and how much black lives matter

http://compulsorydiversitynews.blogspot.com/search/label/Anti-White Propaganda

Posted by Power Terror Circuit on Thu, 29 Jan 2015 13:34 | #

Patrick Le Brun analyses the circuitry of Islamic terror, Israeli and Western power interests through the Charlie Hebdo massacre

http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2015/01/RIR-150126.php

Le Brun and Johnson discuss Le Pen, Faye, etc.

http://cdn.counter-currents.com/radio/JohnsonLeBrunLePenFaye.mp3

Posted by Le Brun and Greg Johnson discussing on Sun, 01 Feb 2015 02:33 | #

Le Brun and Greg Johnson discussing Le Pen and Faye’s positions:

http://cdn.counter-currents.com/radio/JohnsonLeBrunLePenFaye.mp3

Posted by Lindtner on H religion on Wed, 11 Feb 2015 18:41 | #

Christian Lindtner distinguishes “The Final Solution” as factual vs. Holocostianity, a new religion.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-ieNfu97qo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FX-72TfMNuY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B_5mTW43_OU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kaDBJDid1q4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OM6E04ERxIU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_g0oCI04EE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYTry9Xt7CM

Posted by Hellstorm preview on Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:14 | #

Preview of “Hellstorm”

<iframe width=“560” height=“315” src=”//www.youtube.com/embed/tU5u7aoSxFQ” frameborder=“0” allowfullscreen></iframe>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tU5u7aoSxFQ

Posted by Slaughterhouse 5 on Sat, 14 Feb 2015 06:45 | #

Slaughterhouse 5

https://vimeo.com/119470928

Posted by Turning Point - DeBenoist on Sun, 22 Feb 2015 12:47 | #

The Turning Point?

February 21, 2015 — Alain DeBenoist

Translated from the French by Tom Sunic

Centuries never immediately acquire a character that can reward them with a right spot in history. Thus the 20th century did not really start until 1914. Will the 21st century be labeled as “the 2015 century”? Without wishing to predict the future, which remains by definition unpredictable, we can try to look at today’s events, which in turn, can help us sketch the general framework of the future. One thing remains certain though: never has the world been so uncertain, never have we witnessed such across -the -board upheavals. In each domain decks of cards are being shuffled and reshuffled. With the old issues disappearing, new ones keep popping up on the horizon. Which are these main driving forces?

Complete article at TOO: http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2015/02/the-turning-point/#more-26789

Posted by Tom Raymond on Wed, 04 Mar 2015 14:56 | #

It’s sad how these terrorists ignore the most basic human decency—but it was frankly encouraging to see that the magazine, and the French people, wouldn’t just lie down and die.

One of the best tools against these arrogant people is humiliating their pompous self-importance:

A large group of ISIS fighters in Iraq are moving down a road when they hear a voice call from behind a sand dune: “One Marine is better than ten ISIS fighters”.

The ISIS commander quickly orders 10 of his best men over the dune where a gun-battle breaks out and continues for a few minutes, then silence.

The voice once again calls out: “One Marine is better than one hundred ISIS “S.O.B.s”.

Furious, the ISIS commander sends his next best 100 troops over the dune and instantly a huge gun fight commences. After 10 minutes of battle, again silence.

The voice calls out again: “One Marine is better than a thousand ISIS fighters.”
The enraged ISIS commander musters 1000 fighters and sends them to the other side of the dune. Rifle fire, machine guns, grenades, rockets and cannon fire ring out as a terrible battle is fought …. Then silence.

Eventually one badly wounded ISIS fighter crawls back over the dune and with his dying words tells his commander,

“Don’t send any more men… it’s a trap.
There’s two of them.”

Read more: http://bestcleanfunnyjokes.com/one-marine-better-ten-isis-fighters/#ixzz3TQf7ZRNF

Posted by Let the Jews fight Isis on Wed, 04 Mar 2015 15:08 | #

Let the Jews fight Isis. It’s their creation.

Posted by Atlantic lets Muslims off hook on Mon, 23 Mar 2015 08:52 | #

The Atlantic blames Whites for spikes in anti-Semitism in Europe (but not Muslim immigration)

http://www.radixjournal.com/blog/2015/3/18/is-it-time-for-the-jews-to-nuke-europe