|
|
|
Going Home Again By The Narrator As impossible as it may seem, there are White people who have been so conditioned towards hating their own race, that they recoil over the assertion that a White Culture (let alone race) exists. Black culture? No Problem. Hispanic Culture? Why, of course. Asian Culture? Visible and obvious. White Culture? What? What’s that? ... Never existed!!!!!! Why? Maybe because White culture has been so overwhelmingly dominant for the past 3,000 years, that its existence casts too bright a light on the lesser contributions of the other races. Maybe because, for the most part, people today take Western Civilization for granted as Civilization period. Colored peoples’ cultures are viewed as kind of like food chains with franchise rights or a monopoly on a slogan or symbol. So what is White Culture? It is Western Culture and Civilization, which is to say, European Culture and Civilization, whether it be found in Europe or her colonies around the world. It is our way of thinking and acting or re-acting. It is the way we gather in groups and produce our rule-of-law to reflect our desire for our notions of a harmonious society. It is in the way we express ourselves in our music, which tends towards the melodic rather than the rhythmic. In music we seek the divine and the glorious. Non-Whites make music that aims for the hips, while Whites make music that aims for the Heavens. It is the way we express ourselves in our art, which seeks out the thoughtful and reflective, rather than the opportunism of self/collective adulation that infests so much of non-White art. And in our literature, in which we are inspired (rather than reviled) by the honorable and idealistic, even when tragic, rather then the self-serving and opportunistic. It is our ability to look beyond our most immediate wants and needs and see ourselves, both individually and collectively, as part of an as yet unfinished tapestry of a history to which we ourselves are but a small part. It is our innate ability to ponder and reflect in both melancholy and joy, the “what-if’s” and the “might have been” and the “what is yet to be”. It is in our wondering what is over the next hill, and finding out. It is in our ability to behold nature, filled with both sorrow and delight at beauty for beauty’s sake. “Acting White” is what Whites do by nature, by being astute, inquisitive, polite and dignified. Perfection is unattainable, but the pursuit in the belief of it is what most distinguishes Whites from the other races who are more ready to simply accept the corrupt, the ugly and the broken as being “all that there need be”. White Culture is first and foremost what non-Whites so endlessly envy, even as they hate us for it. It is what they want more than anything in the world, willing to steal and kill to get close to it, feeling as if they deserve to have it, yet can never possess it. As soon as they move in, Whites move out. And with the Whites goes their culture, their progress and their civilization. Whether it’s a city like Detroit or a state like California, non-Whites can be gifted the physical territory, yet the intellectual and the “spiritual” (as in innate) qualities and aspects of White Culture, with its progress, relative stability and societal riches, escapes them. White culture is, for instance…. William Shakespeare, Michelangelo, Alexander ‘the Great’, Mozart, Henry Ford, Thomas Edison, Julius Caesar, Beowulf and King Arthur, Cicero, Herodotus, Paris, London, The Eiffel Tower, The Parthenon, Leonidas and his 300 Spartans, Socrates and Aristotle, Plato and Raphael, Columbus, George Washington, Napoleon, Electricity, Railroads, Gutenberg and his Printing Press, Tales of Hector and Achilles, Odin and Thor, The Nibelungenlied and the Norse Sagas, The Magna Carta, The Airplane, Representative Government, Archeology, Individualism and Monogamy, TheVikings and The Pilgrims, Knights and Chivalry, The Nuclear Family, Steam Ships and Space Shuttles, White Picket Fences and Shires, Automobiles and Computers, Charlemagne and Beethoven and the list goes ever on ... As an addendum to the above I would add the following. On the causes of decline in the ability of Whites to recognize their own culture, one thing that never seems to get factored into the equation much is the modern ease/necessity of mobility at a time when the attacks upon our history is increasing as fast as the rate of foreigners pouring into out lands. By that I mean the ability/desire/necessity of moving from town to town -across state- out of state- back and forth- and so on. It’s rare in modern America to have the same neighbors for more than a few years. And as a consequence a loss of physical, geographical, well-rooted identity has become epidemic. Strange faces are strange faces. If you are new to an area, having no long term ties to that community and find it already multi-culted and its inhabitants socially atomized due to “diversity”, then you are more likely to except it as is; as being what it has always been and therefore feel no great inclination to defend it (It’s not really yours after all and nobody else seems to care). It was not always like this. Western man used to have, not a home, but a Home. There was a time when you would grow up, live, marry, age and die in the same general area your father, grand-father and great grandfather lived out their lives before you. You would walk the same streets, drive the same roads, hunt in the same woods, shop in the same stores, etc that your kin who came before you did. Not only that, but the people around you, the friends you grew up with, had the same sense of blood-tied roots to the land and its monuments, whether they be a town tree or favorite fishing pond, that you did. The people you lived and worked with had, for the most part, the same names and surnames as those your grandfather and his fathers before him would recognize. The hills, the rivers, the meadows and even the sky above you were the shelter of your people for countless generations. There was a familiarity in them that was almost primal. The very soil itself had been nurtured and stained with the blood, sweat and tears of your forbearers. Every town (though they may be little more than five miles apart) had its own post office, fire department, school, mayor, etc. And each town had its own personality, mood and reputation. They were, for all intents and purposes, the whole world to their inhabitants. It wasn’t just a residence, it was a place of spiritual fortitude of the soul. A place of deep conscience and unconscious memory shared by those around you. It was yours! In that world every stranger was immediately noticeable as “out of place”. That is not to say we didn’t recognize our own kind. We certainly did. But we categorized our fellow-travelers within concentric circles of likeness; the same accent, the same language, the same denomination, the same faith, the same politics, etc. But despite the nuances in differences those concentric circles always held the same center, (White) Western Civilization. What we see today is a loss of that center in the loss of geo-cultural identity. And as foreigners move in and alter a place’s local culture and personality, Whites are set even more adrift with out either an anchor to hold position or hope of a safe harbor in the future. Home is not where you hang your hat. Home is where you were born and where YOUR people Live (with a capital L). It is that place you come back to after you have explored the distant horizons to find comfort in the familiar. In short, most White people have no sense of a true Home today. They cannot define themselves because they cannot define their civilization/Home. And men fight for Home, and all it stands for (wife, children, parents, grandparents, familiar roads, favorite ponds, well trodden woods, childhood memories by a brook, football games in the autumn, old barns barely of use and the very dirt upon which it all stands.) For Home, Western man has stood firm and fought victoriously time and again over the long ages against countless foreign hordes. For Home, Western man will meet each stranger (friendly or not) with the fierce protective spirit of Lioness guarding her young and an expression that says, tread carefully, for you walk now upon all that I hold dear! Without Home there is no Us. Without Home there is no way to define your own people as apart from strangers. And without the ability or willingness to differentiate between the two, you are vulnerable prey to those who can, and very much will, tell you apart from their own. As Mr. Kipling so aptly put it:-
Comments:2
Posted by torgrim on Sat, 14 Mar 2009 18:22 | # Well done! I shall keep this essay, as it would make a great founding document for an intentional community. Those that are old enough to remember what is described in the essay, are fortunate, those young and understand what Home means, are fortunate, indeed! 3
Posted by Old Raven on Sat, 14 Mar 2009 18:26 | # Unlike Soren, I don’t view Narrator’s excellent essay as “carrying coals to Newcastle”. Rather, I view it as a load of excellent coal dropped off at a depot for redistribution to those who need it ... even if they don’t realize their “need” yet. I come to Majority Rights for a variety of reasons. I’m here for the excellent “entertainment value” of the prose, from the terse “scientific” discourse of Bowery to the impassioned “vernacular” of Scrooby. It’s some of the best there is. I’m here to learn. The intellectual adventures provided by “leads” presented here are not countable. But most importantly, I’m here to find “wake up memes”, those gritty little psychological things which, when inserted into a sleeping oyster, will yield the pearls of consciousness change we all seem to be seeking in “Our People”. No amount of political action will be successful without a change in the way we look at the world. Narrator’s essay above is a perfect “fit” as a “wake up meme”: it doesn’t “offend”, it’s positive, and once under-the-skin, it nags and worries a person into thinking on a different level. My mother made a needlework sampler which hangs in her home. A picture of a house and a garden, with the words “Grow Where You Are Planted”. I think that mirror’s Narrator’s ideas exactly, and amplifies the salience of the problem caused by our easy mobility, both physical and “virtual” via the net. How can we “grow where we’re planted” if we’re never in the same place for more than a short time??? As a 5th generation Californian (via one part of my lineage), I feel that a certain section of this state IS my HOME. As I drive from the Central Coast down to Southern California, I pass places where my ancestors farmed, and towns where their gravestones are the oldest ones in the cemetery. Thus I lay claim to these places, not as my “property”, but as my heritage. We won’t discuss what’s happened to what’s left of “California” ... too depressing. Narrator’s essay highlights “The Problem” : How ... in the uprooted Liberal Post-Modern Zeitgeist we seem to be condemned to, do we regain this sense of “Home”, even while moving about and not “Growing Where We Are Planted”? How, under these conditions, do we establish “Com-Unity” with our Folk, especially those who are submersed in “modern culture” and are not even aware that they are a part of “Us”? Narrator: your work is much appreciated, and will not be confined to Newcastle! 4
Posted by Gudmund on Sat, 14 Mar 2009 18:58 | # @ Narrator, What is your blog’s name again? I’d like to check it out. 5
Posted by Gudmund on Sat, 14 Mar 2009 18:59 | # My mistake, I found it on another thread. You can delete these if you want… 6
Posted by torgrim on Sat, 14 Mar 2009 19:02 | # @ Narrator, “I shall keep this essay, as it would make a great founding document for an intentional community.”>torgrim That is with your permission? 7
Posted by torgrim on Sat, 14 Mar 2009 19:30 | # “As a 5th generation (via one part of my lineage), I feel that a certain section of this state IS my HOME.”>Old Raven I understand exactly what you are ‘saying’. I am only a first generation Californian, but I grew up next to the grandson of a ‘49er from Yorkshire. A man with an oral history of the pioneers of California, with stories that thankfully were collected by the local college’s historian. The man transferred his feeling of Home to me, a young boy, listening to stories of old California. I go back now and then, as I was forced to leave….One place that I visit, strange as it seems is a sycamore tree, 70+ feet tall with a huge hollow, from fire, was all by itself, years ago, now today homes and traffic surround it, but it has ‘seen’, the mules, and wagons of Catholic priests, spanish soldiers, 49ers, farmers and, yes… yuppies. Many today pass by…the old tree, not realizing the history just beneath their feet. “We won’t discuss what’s happened to what’s left of “California”...too depressing.”> Old Raven I was forced to leave, and I won’t discuss why, not today, just too depressing. But I do, now, live in a part of California where Whites, still are the majority. 8
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 15 Mar 2009 04:26 | # One of the best things about Vdare.com is its willingness to be explicit about the central issue, namely preserving race: http://www.vdare.com/sterling/090314_tancredo.htm . The Jews will call our side racists and anti-Semites no matter what, so we might as well dive in head first and get our money’s worth. Certainly, we lose nothing. In fact we gain everything, most of all a winning position and the only winning position: fleeing from race is a losing strategy each and every time because unless you’re explicit about race the other side can easily overcome every argument you come up with and will have you race-replaced quicker than you can say <strike>Jack Robinson</strike> Jake Rabinowitz. The ONLY argument the other side can’t overcome is, you guessed it, race. Anticipating this decades ago, the Jews started simply denying race, but that’s their only recourse and it’s an extremely vulnerable one, already more or less confined to Jews among academics and laughed at by everyone else, academic and layperson alike. Race denial is an argument the Jews cannot in the long run win with. So, explicitness about race forces them to resort to race-denial, their weakest position of all but their only alternative, and makes them ultimately lose. 9
Posted by Old Raven on Sun, 15 Mar 2009 05:27 | # Like I said, Scrooby is one of the reasons I come to MR. You rock Scroob! 10
Posted by the Narrator... on Sun, 15 Mar 2009 12:42 | #
That’s certainly fine with me.
Perhaps. However, it can also allow us to fall into the trap that the wise old Steward, Denethor, fell into. He was strong and wise enough to gaze into the Palintir(internet) and not be deceived or corrupted by the lies and deceptions of the enemy. Thus Denethor, wise and strong as he was to resist the enemies lies, fell into despair and hopelessness at the seeming certainty of the enemies victory. That can certainly happen to us with the internet. Occasionally, every now and then, we need hope. We need to be reminded that our demise is far from certain. That victory is still within our grasp. And we don’t need (only) rallying cries or clever polemic to to do that. It’s not enough to know what we fight against, but we need to be often reminded of what it is we fight for! _______ ... 11
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 15 Mar 2009 14:11 | #
It is rather we who thank you, comrade, for your inspiring, truth-telling, strength-giving words! 12
Posted by Templar on Sun, 15 Mar 2009 16:23 | #
That’s an excellent analogy. I never quite thought about it that way before but it fits the positive and negative aspects of our modern seeing stones perfectly. 13
Posted by Fr. John on Sun, 15 Mar 2009 17:39 | # ” place of spiritual fortitude of the soul.” Gee, like, maybe, one of the ineradicable parts of Western Civilization is the CHURCH and Christianity? This was the ONLY thing missing directly, but alluded to everywhere. One cannot be White without being Christian. One cannot have a Western Civilization, without it first and foremost, being a Christian one. And no, I am not talking what passes for ‘modern ‘evan-jelly-goo’ ‘Xianity, but a strong, virile, manly sort of Peasant, Yeoman-like faith. Liturgy, surely. Music, definitely. Liturgical language, most obviously. And a social service that truly does what the Gospel intends…to help one’s NEIGHBOR. Not the Paki or the Darkie who don’t belong here. But only THOSE LIKE US. For ‘Who is my neighbor’ is as easy to answer as asking “Who looks like me?” All others need not apply. Otherwise, a very good article. What was the most scintillating of the sentences written, though, was this: “Maybe because White culture has been so overwhelmingly dominant for the past 3,000 years, that its existence casts too bright a light on the lesser contributions of the other races. “ As Pope Gregory said when seeing English/Anglish children, ‘Non sed Anglii, sed Angeli.’ Why else are Angels shown with blond hair and blue eyes, and fair skin? THERE IS A REASON- for both. 14
Posted by Al Ross on Sun, 15 Mar 2009 22:20 | # It is theologically fascinating to note that when the Christian apparition of the erstwhile pregnant virgin Mary (who,we are invited to believe, gave birth to a detached section of Yahweh) appears in public, she never materialises before a well-educated adult. This terminally shy goddess prefers illiterate, adolescent peasant girls as her audience when she decides to put in an unscheduled appearance and this is, of course, how it should be. Adults with even a smidgeon of education might ask the levitating Jewess some awkward questions which might adversely affect the future financial returns of the Vatican Corporation’s Holy Grotto subsidiary. Some people might be forgiven for thinking that it’s no coincidence that the USA is home to the highest per capita percentage of Jew-invented religious claptrap believers (and their natural, equality-seeking liberal subset) and also to the steepest decline in White racial influence. 15
Posted by John on Sun, 15 Mar 2009 23:12 | # Fr. John:
You must be a heretic, Galatians 3:28 “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.” Christianity is an expansionist, “Borg” religion. 17
Posted by q on Sun, 15 Mar 2009 23:52 | # Al Ross, look up the word pride in the dictionary - read it carefully. 18
Posted by exPF on Mon, 16 Mar 2009 02:32 | #
Christianity is a Jewish religion. 19
Posted by Templar on Mon, 16 Mar 2009 05:22 | #
A Jewish religion, by any reasonable definition, would be a religion limited to Jews. 20
Posted by Armor on Mon, 16 Mar 2009 05:57 | #
Our real home is partly in the past. It is natural for anyone who had a normal childhood in a natural, preserved, traditional, civilized European environment to have a longing for former times and the people he’s lost. I think it was true one thousand years ago. It is much truer today, with the quick destruction of our culture, race, and environment. It has now become difficult to have a feeling of belonging to any place. I especially hate the way government and the media are able to influence relationships between individuals, to add distance between similar people, to change the way we talk, and even the way we think, and to make us understand that we no longer own the place. I would feel more at home among my people if there was more local freedom and less brainwashing. Even so, I agree that “home is where your people live”. For some of us, it is natural to have a fondness for the landscapes of our childhood. But eventually, family and race are more important than any particular territory. As a consequence, the journalist theory that an African whose parents were born in Europe has a right to remain in Europe and receive a redistributed part of our income is absurd. Immigrants have no real claim on our territory, they have a claim on white people because we allow them to live comfortably. But an African can never belong to a white nation. If he was born in a white country, he may have some sentimental attachment to the landscapes and even to European people, but he is entitled to nothing from us and we are not breaking any deep sense of belonging by shipping him back to Africa. Our European nature and the way we interact with each other is what makes life so good for immigrants, but they cannot be part of it. They can only use us as a consumer commodity and destroy us in the process. (By the way, the administration tries to encourage that same attitude among white people.) 21
Posted by Al Ross on Mon, 16 Mar 2009 06:10 | # Islam is an Arab religion, that is to say, it was concocted by an Arab (admittedly influenced by both pre-Islamic Babylonian cults and the monotheism of Jews and Christians) and the majority of that Semitic race were early converts and remain close adherents. However,although there are far more non-Arab Muslims than there are Arab Muslims, Islam remains an Arab religion, not least by the definition of those non- Arabic speaking Koran-reading competition winners who, amazingly, memorize the Arabic text of entire holy book without being able to understand a word of the Prophet’s mother tongue. Christianity is, in its morbid etiology, as Jewish as Jesus in Palm Beach and its raison d’etre is the pacification of the Goyim so that the Jews’ Noahide Laws may be properly observed and the Chosen People placed in permanent overlordship of the suitably cowed Gentiles. 22
Posted by torgrim on Mon, 16 Mar 2009 06:46 | # @Thunder, Just putting things together, planning, waiting, timing is not right, yet,..a lot of small changes may create a dramatic change,...and people may wake to the fact that family/kin/community are advantagous to survival. We will see. If there are communities that exist or are in the planning stages, it would not be advantageous at this time to say where they are located. 23
Posted by Al Ross on Mon, 16 Mar 2009 07:52 | # Apologies, q, but I do feel that I am significantly overqualified to deal with the philological matter which you raised. 24
Posted by Templar on Mon, 16 Mar 2009 15:45 | #
Yes, just like the raison d’etre of a firefighter is to burn down buildings. 25
Posted by Frank on Tue, 17 Mar 2009 03:00 | # Jews persecuted Christians at first, and have never liked them. 26
Posted by SM on Tue, 17 Mar 2009 04:35 | # Templar et al… You lack big picture ability. The salient feature of chrisendum is not that it is European. Europeans were already there. Nor is it that it was in specifics sometimes anti jewish-cloisters. The salient feature is that christianity is effete compared to the “heroic” cultures it displaced (eg the Graeco Roman and northern Euro outback ones). That ‘effeteness’ has snowballed over the centuries as a “hellotization” pressure (dysgenic, sheepifying), breeding Euros down the path of meekish types (by getting rid of the better males from childhood / chiefs—ultimately leaving the step-n-fetch-it braves). The end result is… Further it is interesting to postulate the historically documented jewish creative roll (be it unwitting or purposeful) in what ultimately is hellotization pressures (christianity and marxism) directed at hosting Europeans. ——————- Note civilization in general—including Greco Roman—is self hellotizing too even without specfic revolutions migrating in [jewish cults— Modus Operandi: christianty/marxism]. Indeed this self destructive dysgenic tendency of civilizations is why they fall; ...why the old man naturally grows and dies (spreading his dust as seeds to the fertile wind, so the cycle can begin again [...as Jackie Gleason would say “how sweet it is”]). So this implies that jew migrants are a type of _sympton_ that contributes to the disease. (And “barbarians” pushing in the gates are the final sympton—but not the cause as pre Gibbons scholars believed.) This lets jew acute culpablity off the hook a bit. But that isn’t as much fun. And it doesn’t let them off the hook for their trouble-making in pre war Euro/Germany. [jewish cults— Modus Operandi: christianty/marxism] What is Man to do?... The meek shall inherit the earth. But the audacious en-neo cortex’d will inherit the sky… (...As Jackie Gleason would say “how sweet it is”.) 27
Posted by Templar on Tue, 17 Mar 2009 05:09 | # SM, I think it might be fairer to say that you lack for a perspective on the big picture. Your comprehension of historical events is blinkered by an anti-Christian filter, the end result being that, like Al Ross, you essentially function as yet another small component of the Jewish culture of critique, rather than being the free western man you wish to be. 28
Posted by SM on Tue, 17 Mar 2009 05:27 | #
You’re going to have to give more details if I am to accurately diagnose your condition…
29
Posted by Templar on Tue, 17 Mar 2009 05:54 | #
You’ve got it all wrong, SM. I’m diagnosing you. 30
Posted by Judaeo-Christianity: The Religion of Slaves on Tue, 17 Mar 2009 07:05 | # Nietzsche’s The Anti-Christ: The fact that the strong races of northern Europe did not repudiate this —- Christianity aims at mastering beasts of prey; —- Not every one may be a Christian: one is not “converted” to Christianity—one must first be sick enough for it. 31
Posted by Fr. John on Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:27 | # Nietzsche is dead. And the term ‘Judeo-Christianity’ is a non sequiter.
32
Posted by Fr. John on Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:32 | # John -” You must be a heretic, Galatians 3:28 “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.” Christianity is an expansionist, “Borg” religion.”
Read my post on Galatians 3:28. And yes, I’d rather be a heretic to the modern multicultural Antichrist gospel, than one of her willing dupes. Like Rome, apparently. 33
Posted by Fr. John on Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:36 | # “the Christian apparition of the erstwhile pregnant virgin Mary (who,we are invited to believe, gave birth to a detached section of Yahweh) appears in public, she never materialises before a well-educated adult.” - Al ross Al, you confuse the heretical cult of Roman ‘Catholi-schism’ with the Church. http://www.orthodoxinfo.com/ecumenism/prot_rc_heresy.aspx But the Orthodox monks of Mt. Athos, and the number of Orthodox who have had LEGITIMATE visions of the Theotokos, would beg to differ with you. Trouble is, they are all dead, and cannot speak for themselves. WHich gives a false legitimacy to an otherwise useless opinion. 34
Posted by Fr. John on Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:38 | # “Christianity is a Jewish religion.” - exPF Hardly. A Jew wrote on this over fifty years ago. 35
Posted by Desmond Jones on Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:07 | # Being all one in Christ Jesus is different than “being all one”. A point that Williamson made in a link, Fred provided, if memory serves. Colossians 3
There is clearly a different connotation from “being all one” and “being all one in Christ”. It’s easy to see how atheistic Marxists (also known as Stalin’s Jews), constructed ‘a critique’ to further a particular ethnic interest by denying Christ. After all denying Christ is a natural position for this particular ethnic group. Rules for Christian Households
It appears quite clear that slaves are not led to believe, by Christian doctrine, that they are the equal of their masters, except in Christ (which furthers the point that there is little commonality in ‘Greek and Jew’ except in Christ). In order to avoid a Haitian style revolt, where the slave acting under the secular revolutionary doctrine of liberty, equality and fraternity cuts his master’s throat, a doctrine of liberty, equality and fraternity in Christ is much preferable and considerably more adaptive. 36
Posted by Desmond Jones on Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:10 | # Apologies for the screwed up use the bold feature. 37
Posted by Al Ross on Wed, 18 Mar 2009 02:23 | # In 1938, the ‘capo di tutti capi’ of the Vatican mob, Pope Pius XI proclaimed : “Through Christ and in Christ we descend spiritually from Abraham…..Christians are spiritually Semites”. Of course, any opinion on contemporary morality uttered by a Pope, eg Benedict’s recent flatulent nonsense about Africans and condom use, must be viewed warily. However, on the history of their power-crazed racket, Popes may be on firmer terrain. The Jewish sect of Christianity separated from Judaism, not through the teachings of Jesus, but from doctrines defined and promulgated by Paul and the Church fathers. 40
Posted by q on Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:33 | # Al Ross: eg Benedict’s recent flatulent nonsense about Africans and condom use Let’s try and keep his [the Pope’s] message in correct context, sir. What the Pope was trying to convey to the Africans was this: Using condoms is not a moral, and more importantly, a foolproof-barrier to HIV transmission; rather, premarital sexual abstinence and marital-fidelity is the proper course of action. Who could argue with that logic? 41
Posted by Al Ross on Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:47 | # Who could argue, sir, with the Papal logic of the lunatic asylum which states, “God, for whom I am Spokesman, has gifted you sexual desire but if you employ my gift you will be punished by hellfire”? Meanwhile, those marvellous Christian clergymen who provide moral leadership continue to amaze: 42
Posted by Lord Jebus on Thu, 19 Mar 2009 01:16 | # It is the will of my Father in Heaven that My Negroid children multiply, as they so ably do, and then go forth to the lands of My white children who have fallen from the Faith. Only by loving My Negroid children in true Christian fashion can the faith of My white children be renewed. 43
Posted by q on Thu, 19 Mar 2009 01:44 | # Al, I’ve never said the forces of Satan weren’t firmly entrenched in the highest (and lowest) of places of the Church. We both know they are! That is if you beleive there is a ‘being’ such as Satan? Which I beleive you do ... since you behave like him 44
Posted by Al Ross on Thu, 19 Mar 2009 02:08 | # Those MR supporters,who, like myself, have frequented the comments sections of political blogs in Third World countries, might well have noticed the plethora of references to the Supernatural which form an integral part of normal discourse among citizens of low average IQ countries. What people like q and his ilk bring to MR is nothing less than the Thirdworldisation of the Western blogosphere and this, in my not so humble opinion, detracts from the overall intellectual standing of any blog unfortunate enough to be afflicted by the baneful process. 45
Posted by q on Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:13 | # One last thing, Al. Unlike the demographic problem post-Christian Europe faces, those low IQ people in Third World countries whose discussions center around their religion—or the “Supernatural” as you put it—don’t have a problem with their fertility rate or race-replacement. Furthermore, those Muslims that have been injected into European countries are out-reproducing native Euros at a ratio of 7:1. Their intent is to impose sharia law over the whole of Europe; Briton is the foremost prize on their list. Once they get the upper hand, it’s covert or die! That brings us to this crucial question: Are anti-Christian-atheist-academics/intellectuals the appropriate type to represent and deliver the White-preservationist message? 46
Posted by torgrim on Fri, 20 Mar 2009 20:39 | # @Thunder, Please excuse the delay in responding to you, I travel now for work and am without a cyber connection for up to a week at times. I am very concerned as are the majority at MR about our future as a living, breathing, seperate part of humanity. My immediate family and kin are in peril, in my opinion. Many of ‘us’ are seperated by huge distances, and a hostile media/government, complex. With that said, buying rural land, links with like minded people, building a new basis of employment/wealth, outside of the control freaks, via Internet networking, ie., starting the new economy, would be first steps. I hope this is an adequate response, for now? 47
Posted by Thunder on Mon, 19 Oct 2009 07:34 | # Yes and thank you. I only stumbled upon your reply on the relink by GW celebrating the fifth anniversary of MR. Cheers. Post a comment:
Next entry: The Mysterious Influence on the US of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News— CENTRAL— Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. (View) Patriotic Alternative given the black spot by Guessedworker on Thursday, 14 March 2024 17:14. (View) On Spengler and the inevitable by Guessedworker on Wednesday, 21 February 2024 17:33. (View) Twilight for the gods of complacency? by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 02 January 2024 10:22. (View) — NEWS — Moscow’s Bataclan by Guessedworker on Friday, 22 March 2024 22:22. (View) Soren Renner Is Dead by James Bowery on Thursday, 21 March 2024 13:50. (View) Collett sets the record straight by Guessedworker on Thursday, 14 March 2024 17:41. (View) CommentsThorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sat, 13 Apr 2024 18:22. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sat, 13 Apr 2024 15:33. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 13 Apr 2024 07:06. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 13 Apr 2024 05:28. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 13 Apr 2024 05:12. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 13 Apr 2024 05:09. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Fri, 12 Apr 2024 13:15. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Thu, 11 Apr 2024 14:13. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Thu, 11 Apr 2024 14:05. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Thu, 11 Apr 2024 12:28. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:48. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Tue, 09 Apr 2024 10:46. (View) Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Tue, 09 Apr 2024 09:27. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Mon, 08 Apr 2024 05:48. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Mon, 08 Apr 2024 05:01. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Mon, 08 Apr 2024 04:50. (View) Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sun, 07 Apr 2024 17:49. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sun, 07 Apr 2024 17:15. (View) Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sun, 07 Apr 2024 15:27. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sun, 07 Apr 2024 10:43. (View) Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 06 Apr 2024 23:38. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 06 Apr 2024 13:01. (View) Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 06 Apr 2024 11:56. (View) Guessedworker commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sat, 06 Apr 2024 11:54. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Fri, 05 Apr 2024 22:58. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Fri, 05 Apr 2024 22:27. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Fri, 05 Apr 2024 20:02. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Fri, 05 Apr 2024 13:22. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 04 Apr 2024 23:37. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 04 Apr 2024 13:41. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Thu, 04 Apr 2024 11:16. (View) |
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:44 | #
As Friedrich Braun said recently of this blogger, “The Narrator is a brilliant man.” Here he’s written a brilliant essay.