Posted by Fred Scrooby on Thu, 23 Nov 2006 01:18 | #

Look at this obnoxious in-your-face letter to Vdare.com by a California Jewish guy supplying us with the Jewish view of the race-replacement crisis, a crisis Jews have played a predominant role in forcing into existence:

It’s comical to peruse your pathetic website with all of the hunkered-down, very obviously scared xenophobes, including the illustrious bigot Patrick J. Buchanan — a man with more brains than morals.

Your website embodies the very much minority view that the great current danger to America is work-seeking people streaming across our southern border.

However, the many articles Guzzardi has contributed to VDARE.COM have convinced me that just as Buchanan does, he too believes that immigrants represent a great and immediate mortal danger unless we can assimilate them as Americans ASAP.

Where you guys are completely nuts is that you don’t realize the white European-descended population is shrinking.

The influx of people from elsewhere in the world will dramatically change America forever into something you might not recognize. But, facing facts, the “Ozzie and Harriet” days are long since over.

If folks such as you could somehow treat Mexicans as friends and equal human beings, they would become allies and form the nucleus and majority of a “new,” and just as good America, for the second half of this century. Otherwise, as Buchanan wrote several years ago, America will certainly die along with the rest of the West.

The Earth, however, will keep spinning and humankind will continue on.

Any bets on how quickly this guy would start yelling “Anti-Semite!  Anti-Semite!  Anti-Semite!” if someone posted the exact same letter with only enough words changed to make it refer to the prospect of Israel being innundated by Palestinians instead of the U.S. by Mexicans?

The Jews play a major role in underhandedly forcing genocidal race-replacement on the United States, then they play a major role in rubbing our (temporary) defeat and impending genocide in our noses, the way this Euro-hating creep is doing. 

With friends like some of these foaming-at-the-mouth Euro-hating Jews, who needs enemies?

Notice this guy hates Europeans, rejoices at their impending doom through forced race-replacement immigration, and clearly doesn’t think of himself as a European whatsoever. 

Jews don’t want to be European, a realization which surprised me when it first dawned on me a few months ago.  They bitterly, bitterly resent Europeans, hate them with a passion (and, as is obvious, want them genocided).  You sense all that in the above letter strongly.  What Jews apparently want to be nowadays, rather than European, is Semitic:  they’re trying to return to their Semitic roots and expunge their European part — trying to get as far away from Europeanness as they can.  They don’t want to look like Europeans, act like them, retain any of their cultural influences, be friends with them, associate with them.  They want to re-immerse themselves wholly in their near-Eastern Semitic heritage, sloughing off every influence picked up from their sojourn in Europe these two thousand years, a sojourn which they spit on and remember as being two thousand years of pure unrelieved pain. 

There was a time when Jews envied Europeans their Europeanness.  No longer, it seems.  What they want now is to be pure-blooded Semites and leave everything European behind them.

So, their enmity toward Europeans as a race is now full-bore.

Posted by Bo Sears on Thu, 23 Nov 2006 04:02 | #

Fred says, “They want to re-immerse themselves wholly in their near-Eastern Semitic heritage, sloughing off every influence picked up from their sojourn in Europe these two thousand years, a sojourn which they spit on and remember as being two thousand years of pure unrelieved pain.”

While this is not accurate for every non-Arabic Semite from Southwest Asia, I think Fred is correct in general.

And furthermore, the same thing is true of the non-Judeo Semites from the other Semitic nations in Southwest Asia.

I don’t see how either side of the warring Semitic nations can possibly call on us for assistance or claim the right to direct our development. Their differences (for the most part), right down to circumcision, kosher food or its hallal, supremacy mind-set, verbal bafflegab, and passive-aggressive whining are nonexistent. (Although there is something to be said for the Muslim banking system.) They are both founded on their claim for us to submit.

We are seeing in the USA a massive mirroring development with the non-Judeo Semites on one side and the non-Arabic Semites on the other side. The North American continent may be slated for a high intensity war fought among the great Semitic nations living here for dominance in the future.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Thu, 23 Nov 2006 04:41 | #

“While this is not accurate for every non-Arabic Semite from Southwest Asia, I think Fred is correct in general.”  (—Bo)

What are we again?  Euros, I mean.  We’re the non-Hispanic non-Hebrew whites?  Is that it?  The non-Hispanic non-something-or-other whites?  I can’t remember the other “non” in there, what it was exactly.  It was “non-Hispanic non-something else,” that much I remember.  Non-native-American?  Non-Pacific-Islander?  Something like that.  I can’t recall.  Anyway it’s nice to subject the Jews to a little of this treatment, they being always without fail the first and foremost to invent, adopt, and insist on this doublespeak, they’re always the loudest, the most ubiquitous, the most aggressive in fobbing it off, in pushing it, and the most threatening, explicitly or implicitly, toward any who resist.  So, they’re what again?  The “non-Arabic southwest-Asian Semites”?  I like that.  That’s good.  Let’s use it on them a while and see how they like a taste of their own medicine for a change.  So “anti-Semitic” then becomes “anti-non-Arabic-southwest-Asian-Semitic”?  That’s good.  That’ll do for a while.  Let’s use that.

Posted by Bo Sears on Thu, 23 Nov 2006 04:55 | #

Fred says, “Let’s use it on them a while and see how they like a taste of their own medicine for a change.”

Exactly right, Fred. It’s the meta-name game, and it’s fun.

Posted by allotmentkeeper on Thu, 23 Nov 2006 07:25 | #

Bo, I think I see a little clearer now what your aim is - not be a credible anti-defamation organisation, but to be a pain in the neck for as many anti-white racists as possible(?). That’s worthy indeed.

But doesn’t it matter at all that your corresponding complaints are invalidated by easily googled double standards? I’m thinking of your effectiveness, and what it does to all our interests if a reporter or official directs his audience to this thread (and others) after you’ve complained about his language.

(And if twice as many Jews are offended by being called non-Arabic Semites as are European Americans at being called non-Hispanic Whites, it won’t be many.)

Posted by Proofreader on Thu, 23 Nov 2006 23:25 | #

Talking about “chutzpah”, here´s Rabbi Lapin on the seats ( 10% of Congress) held by Jews.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52990

Posted by Bo Sears on Fri, 24 Nov 2006 00:06 | #

Allotmentkeeper says, “And if twice as many Jews are offended by being called non-Arabic Semites as are European Americans at being called non-Hispanic Whites, it won’t be many.”

Allotmentkeeper hit the nail on the head. In the USA, and in many media markets, our adversaries have gratuitously named us “non-Hispanic whites” for their publications. That it is intentionally negative and unwanted is spotlighted by their failure to use the matching set, “non-Hispanic blacks” and “non-Hispanic Asians.”

Nothing we could say or do made any difference at all until we hit on the device of using the negative naming tool ourselves, and it has reduced the negative naming of us.

I do want to quibble with Allotmentkeeper about his use of “offended” referring to European Americans. We are never offended, we use the slurs and smears against our children as a platform to explore the mind of the defamer. In this case, the defamers also get to explore their own minds by noticing how it feels to be on the receiving end of negative naming.

And Allotmentkeeper, at least we are trying to roll back the tide of sludge and hate pushed at our children in films, TV, and newspapers every day.

Let’s not try to find reasons not to act, let’s find ways to act on the real world around us.