Kievsky as guest blogger:
I’ve been waiting for a reason to use this as a blog post title, and this alternet article gave me a priceless quote illustrating exactly this truism.
Newsweek had another cover, “Thinking Man’s Guide to Populism,” and I remember this feeling around the country, that people were just furious. Somehow the right captured the sense of anger. They completely captured it. You could say they had no right to it, but they did. And one of the reasons they were able to do it was because the liberals were not interested in that anger.
I’m speaking here of the liberal culture in Washington, D.C. There was no Occupy Wall Street movement [at that time] and there was only people like me on the fringes talking about it. The liberals had their leader in Barack Obama … they had their various people in Congress. But these people are completely unfamiliar with populist anger. It’s an alien thing to them. They don’t trust it, and they have trouble speaking to it. I like Barack Obama, but at the end of the day he’s a very professorial kind of guy. The liberals totally missed the opportunity, and the right was able to grab it.
Looking back on it, I feel like people like myself were part of the problem. We sort of assumed with the Democrats in power, the system would correct itself.
One of the problems with liberalism in this country is that it’s headquartered in Washington and its leaders are a very comfortable class of people. Washington is one of the richest cities in the country, maybe the richest. It’s not a place that feels the crisis, that feels the economic downturn. By and large, the real estate market stayed OK. The city continued to boom. The contracts continued to flow. What we’re talking about here is the failure of modern liberalism. At one time it was a movement of working-class people. The idea that liberals wouldn’t feel economic pain was ridiculous. That’s who liberals were. No more.
In other words, liberals are made out of government cheez whiz, lots of it liberally slathered over them. These are the people who handed over convenience stores to Indians and Pakistanis, the cab driving to Africans and Middle Easterners, the graduate schools to the Chinese, and the racial destinies of many white family lines to non-white DNA. “Anybody but Whites” is the liberal battlecry. They want to diminish us, and elect a new people, while feathering their filthy rat nests.
And now it’s their end game. This is the year that the Ponzi fails.
Another juicy quote:
So [the right] is constantly talking about this infernal elite that controls government, controls corporations, and controls the academy, and that we have to wrench ourselves free.
So maybe it is true that the Obama technocracy is the infernal elite. Maybe not in the hellish way it is portrayed on the right, but in the sense that these are the defenders of bailouts, the defenders of the system
Exactly. Civil rights lawyers, affirmative action officers, Marxist tenured professors: these are the infernal elite, dogmatic anti-white moralizing busybodies: often employing cheap illegal labor even though they are financially comfortable. And they are terrible tippers.
These parasitic busybody niches will dry up. When these scum have to work for a living, we Whites will be FREE!
One last great quote:
The right has discovered the magic against relativism. They have long inveighed against relativism, but now they’ve discovered they can say anything. They can endlessly withdraw into this world of utopian fiction and everything can be explained away. It’s like some kid discovering a new video game. It’s so awesome.
This is just counter Mindweaponization against the utopian fiction of multiracial harmony and Jewish moral superiority. The Left has been explaining away black on white rape and violence and Jewish hypocritical chutzpah for decades. We can do some “explaining away” of our own.
Posted by Je le vois, mais je ne le crois pas! on Tue, 03 Jan 2012 20:05 | #
Of course liberalism isn’t something restricted to gay activists and Bill Clinton…liberal political theory and radical liberal values along with a fundamental belief in maximally understood ‘individual freedom’ have shaped America from the get-go.
Who really cares for secondary arguments between right-liberals and left-liberals?