Next Thursday and the Multi-Cult’s first prize

Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, 29 April 2005 23:12.

Nick Carter is everything the soon-to-be disappearing English majority of Leicester do not need in the editor of their local newspaper.  In his hands the Leicester Mercury is the messenger of multiculturalism and anti-racism.  Nick is profoundly dedicated to both and, as such, is the indefatigable enemy of majority interests.

He regards multiculturalism as the “basis on which our society is built” - a somewhat questionable claim, it must be said.  Perhaps he can plead in mitigation that he does not belong to that waning ethnic majority and doesn’t know any better.  Or perhaps he does and he does, but he is ideologically incapable of averring to the real foundations of England and the real people who built them.

He is no historian, in all fairness – and one should strive to retain one’s sense of fairness even with people like this, in fact especially with people like this.  He claims: “This country has been multi-cultural for a very long time.”  I am not absolutely sure when multiculturalism became our official religion.  I must admit, I thought it was rather recently.  But if Nick says it was long, long ago when Leicester’s housing estates emerged from the primordial mists and the first, of course, always vibrant immigrants drove out the neanderthals and built a mosque … well, he must be right.

So let’s indulge young Nick in his childish sense of time.  I am sure he harbours no animus towards English people with memories of, ooh, ten or twenty years ago.  Then again, perhaps he does but considers their memories falsified by the higher truth of multiculturalism.

Anyway, many an editor must wrestle with that age-old question, “Is it good for the … circulation.”  And if the answer is yes, then stuff the indigenes - and in double-quick time, actually.

After all, what can they do about it?  Nothing politically.  They’re delegitimised.  Even Leicester’s oppressed black persons can, if they put their thinking caps on those old column inches, get the Mercury’s message to pump up the electoral volume.  But the English?  It’s support the Multi-Cult or be excluded completely.  That’s the way Nick’s sandals fly.

So he can readily afford to upset, say, the housewives favourite’s new and unacceptably patriotic party, Veritas.  And he has.  He made the mighty Mercury’s election coverage of them dependent on a signature from each candidate to a red-hot progressive, new anti-racism declaration.  It’s all the rage in cutting-edge Leicester, you see.  The city is winging its way colour-blindly towards becoming the first majority non-white hell-hole in Britain.  Within the next decade, they say.  But since “they” really don’t know how many non-English are in the city it might all happen even faster than expected.

For some extraordinary reason not every native is breathlessly looking forward to this enriching and, of course, always vibrant experience.  Some, like Veritas, actually want to spoil the celebrations by ending diversity training and disbanding the Commission For Racial Equality.  Incredible.  So signing Nick’s declaration was obviously going to be too much for them.  I only hope they garner an appreciable number of votes next Thursday for this act of courage.

And I hope they will not be alone.  The United Kingdom Independence Party also refused to sign Nick’s declaration.  They were less courageous, it has to be said.  And, in a way, so were The British National Party, who had nothing to lose.  Multiculti Nick - the hero of La-La-Leicester and beyond – wasn’t going to give them anything but the barest attention anyway.  He cannot bring himself to support the right of free Englishmen to speak that with which he personally disagrees.  Well, journalists are not renowned for high principle even when they don’t advocate race replacement.

If there is anyone in Leicester who disagrees with him they’ll have an opportunity to register that disagreement next Thursday.  It will be interesting and, perhaps, instructive to see how many take it.

Tags: Journalism



Comments:


1

Posted by Andrew L on Sat, 30 Apr 2005 01:07 | #

With people like this GW, and there is more , what hope is there for the future, the only way is fix it your self, and if Criminal minds like they, then fix that,if you do not, it will be gone, and soon.Your Ass will point the opposit to Mecca or perish, You must now believe Leftism and Islam is a part of the same Psychological disorder based on the philosophical hegomony of control freaks, then realise this, you are dead or soon will be.The new Undevine God of Crime reigns supreme, “Allah”. Arab God of Exonoration of evil deed’s,You let it happen, and now you will pay dearly for it. So sad, sad indeed, Utopia is not that great after all ay, don’t seem so suprised.What was that American TV show many years ago, “You Asked For It”. You got it. Muhammad was an Arab , not a Jew. You Ride the horse of Jihad or you knock them off, that simple.


2

Posted by john rackell on Sat, 30 Apr 2005 01:49 | #

There’s a lot to feel optimistic about in what Nick Carter’s doing.

The multiculturalists would be better off letting sleeping dogs lie, not giving free publicity to the BNP and other parties. The fact that he’s given up any pretense of being an honest broker means something has seriously spooked him. Some alarm he can’t just choose to ignore.

Maybe the multicultural enterprise, ever so imperceptibly, is beginning to totter.

Hopefully his next reaction will be to advocate the summary hanging of every tenth white male in Leicestershire. That would work wonders to concentrate minds.


3

Posted by Effra on Sat, 30 Apr 2005 13:21 | #

There is something sweetly symmetrical about a declining medium—the regional evening press—refusing to report on the activities of a rising political movement. The old phrase about noses, faces and excision springs to mind. One doubts that the electoral performance of the refuseniks will be seriously impaired by Mr Carter’s vow of silence. Votes are not won that way any longer.


4

Posted by John S Bolton on Sat, 30 Apr 2005 22:54 | #

The actual issue is whether the left is fit to offer moral leadership in the political sphere. That is why they raise issues of multiculturalism in a racial way; using racial provocation against the majority. The debate is to be artificially set up as often as can be gotten away with, to allow the left to say that any objection to their program comes from racial considerations only. They have to do this, because the left is unfit to provide moral leadership. Their only hope is to smear the right or the majority on such equations as promajority=racism=nazism=mass murder. That is why the raising of issues of multiculturalism or racial sufferings of minorities, must be immediately met with the identification that leftism is mass murder in its fulfillment.  The question is whether the left can offer moral guidance to societies which they do all they can to divide and degrade. They have to smear the majority and the right, in order to deligitimize those who can maintain or advance civilization, relative to those who can’t. When the left raises its racial agenda, which they do frequently and brazenly, this is a confession that they have no moral leadership capabilities for the politics of today. If they had any such capability, racial provocation against the majority would not be their approach. Leftism fulfills itself through murder on a large scale; mention this, and the argument on their racial agenda has already been turned in your favor.



Post a comment:


Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Note: You should copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting it, so that it will not be lost if the session times out.

Remember me


Next entry: And how do you like your opinion “shaped”?
Previous entry: If at first you don’t succeed, reinterpret the law!

image of the day

Existential Issues

DNA Nations

Categories

Contributors

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Immigration

Islamist Threat

Anti-white Media Networks

Audio/Video

Crime

Economics

Education

General

Historical Re-Evaluation

Controlled Opposition

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Europeans in Africa

Of Note

Comments

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Sun, 22 Dec 2024 01:03. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'The Indian/Chinese IQ puzzle continued for comments after 1000' on Sat, 21 Dec 2024 16:14. (View)

anonymous commented in entry 'The Indian/Chinese IQ puzzle continued for comments after 1000' on Fri, 20 Dec 2024 21:12. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Thu, 19 Dec 2024 01:13. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Thu, 19 Dec 2024 01:11. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Sat, 14 Dec 2024 21:35. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Sat, 14 Dec 2024 20:51. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Sat, 14 Dec 2024 19:49. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Sat, 14 Dec 2024 18:47. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Thu, 12 Dec 2024 23:29. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'News of Daniel' on Thu, 12 Dec 2024 22:01. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'News of Daniel' on Thu, 12 Dec 2024 19:52. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Thu, 12 Dec 2024 18:17. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Thu, 12 Dec 2024 14:23. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Sun, 08 Dec 2024 14:19. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Fri, 06 Dec 2024 20:13. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Fri, 06 Dec 2024 01:08. (View)

James Marr commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Wed, 04 Dec 2024 19:00. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Mon, 02 Dec 2024 23:41. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'The journey to The Hague revisited, part 1' on Sat, 30 Nov 2024 21:20. (View)

James Bowery commented in entry 'The journey to The Hague revisited, part 1' on Sat, 30 Nov 2024 17:56. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Sat, 30 Nov 2024 13:34. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Sat, 30 Nov 2024 04:44. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Fri, 29 Nov 2024 01:45. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Thu, 28 Nov 2024 23:49. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Thu, 28 Nov 2024 01:33. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'News of Daniel' on Thu, 28 Nov 2024 00:02. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'News of Daniel' on Wed, 27 Nov 2024 17:12. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Wed, 27 Nov 2024 12:53. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Olukemi Olufunto Adegoke Badenoch wins Tory leadership election' on Wed, 27 Nov 2024 04:56. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Tue, 26 Nov 2024 02:10. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Mon, 25 Nov 2024 02:05. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:32. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Sat, 23 Nov 2024 01:32. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Fri, 22 Nov 2024 00:28. (View)

affection-tone