Posted by Jamaal on Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:57 | #

The fact is though immigrants love to live within their own kind, they do not like the fact when the number of them becomes too much. I rememeber my pakistani immigrant bros who first moved to Dundee, wanted to go to Edinburgh to live as it had few asians as compared to say Glasgow. however in Edinburgh, they would prefer living with other south asians (Indians, Bangladeshis and sri lankans would do) in their flats. Indeed many of them hated London for having too many subcons and wanted to go to places where there are more civilised whites. but once there they still prefer to live with thier own kind (other subcons are OK) and maintain a subcon lifestyle. They may hump a lot of local white chicks (or the ocational chinese, but humping white chicks was really really common) but marry a woman of their caste, ethnic group only.

Posted by James Bowery on Wed, 16 Aug 2006 16:58 | #

Andrew, how right you are!  Boogiemen here, boogiemen there, boogiemen boogiemen everywhere—everywhere but the Jews.  From “<a >Jewish Involvement in Shaping American Immigration Policy, 1881-1965: A Historical Review</a>” By Kevin MacDonald:

In addition to a periodic interest in fostering the immigration of co-religionists as a result of anti-Semitic movements, Jews have an interest in opposing the establishment of ethnically and culturally homogeneous societies in which they reside as minorities. Jews have been at the forefront in supporting movements aimed at altering the ethnic status quo in the United States in favor of immigration of non-European peoples. These activities have involved leadership in Congress, organizing and funding anti-restrictionist groups composed of Jews and gentiles, and originating intellectual movements opposed to evolutionary and biological perspectives in the social sciences….
The Jewish involvement in influencing immigration policy in the United States is especially noteworthy as an aspect of ethnic conflict. Jewish involvement has had certain unique qualities that have distinguished Jewish interests from the interests of other groups favoring liberal immigration policies. Throughout much of this period, one Jewish interest in liberal immigration policies stemmed from a desire to provide a sanctuary for Jews fleeing from anti-Semitic persecutions in Europe and elsewhere. Anti-Semitic persecutions have been a recurrent phenomenon in the modern world beginning with the Czarist persecutions in 1881, and continuing into the post-World War II era in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. As a result, liberal immigration has been a Jewish interest because ‘survival often dictated that Jews seek refuge in other lands’ (Cohen 1972, p. 341). For a similar reason, Jews have consistently advocated an internationalist foreign policy for the United States because ‘an internationally-minded America was likely to be more sensitive to the problems of foreign Jewries’ (Cohen 1972, p. 342).