Posted by John S Bolton on Tue, 04 Oct 2005 12:12 | #

Prodiversity goes out of its way to throw these provocations at the majority, then tries to tighten the screws of censorship, as if the goal where to get the maximum provocation for each policy initiative.  Meanwhile the subhuman cowardice of the moderate right whines, wheedles, begs and abjectly implores that assimilation and integration remain theoretically possible. They’re not racists, they plead, they believe in the possiblity of assimilation of all races. Officials and their professoriate want civil war, in order to get dictatorship, and will keep increasing the provocations until they get a response.

Posted by john rackell on Tue, 04 Oct 2005 12:34 | #

Seeing that picture of the pink piggy being arrested is gonna be the high point of my day - at least in the laughs department. Though it’s tragicomic, sums up the really whacky surreal environment we live in.

You really should be slyly encouraging the the fascist multiculturalists to force a ban on bacon and eggs. Maybe the average Englishman couldn’t care less about his right to free speech, and habeus corpus, or even his EGI, but he might care if he was deprived of his bacon and eggs and start getting political - poll tax like.

I really think the multiculturalists can be beaten by working with them, not against them.

Posted by Johan Van Vlaams on Tue, 04 Oct 2005 15:35 | #

Part 1

And what will bring the future? What will happen as soon as Muslims feel more powerful in England? Such as always: South Africa teaches us. Read the following story and shiver. Source: censorbugbear

CHRISTIANS THREATENED BY MUSLIM MOB AT PRETORIA UNIVERSITY

for confirmation of this story contact:
Dr. Peter Hammond, Frontline Fellowship, (+27 21) 689 4480, 480-968-4100 in U.S., .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

CAPE TOWN, South Africa, July 26 /Christian Wire Service/—On Monday, 18 July, American missionary, Timothy Keller, was surrounded by a mob of Muslim students at the University of Pretoria threatening him and demanding that his missions display be removed. Threats were also received against other Christians.
On the same day, the Frontline Fellowship mission in Cape Town also was targetted by racist, hostile phone calls.

Pretoria University is the only university in the country where Afrikaners - who often also are devout Christians - can still be taught classes in their own language. The University has always had a Christian character and more than 98% of the students attending this university are practicing Christians.
•Tim Keller had been officially invited by the “University Missions Committee” to take part in their “Go Love the Nations” Missions Week 2005.
•However within two hours of setting up the Frontline Fellowship missions display, Timothy was being threatened aggressively by the University’s 25-odd Muslim students,  who swore and cursed him, and threatened his life.
•Soon the Muslim students were mobbing and surrounding the mission display shouting and swearing at Tim. Some tore up or burned the missions literature.
•A Muslim member of the “Student Representative Council” then fetched the Dean of students to inform Tim that he had to dismantle the Frontline mission display. 
•Tim was offered no protection from university security staff in spite of the murder threats against him.
That afternoon, Tim was informed by the “Pretoria University Missions Committee” that they “could not allow the Christian mission display to be set up again” - claiming that “it was mentioned that the Frontline Fellowship newsletters, in what it reported on the activities and teachings of Muslims, were too offensive to Muslim students…”

On the same day, the Frontline Fellowship mission in Cape Town also was targetted by racist, hostile phone calls. Two of these phone calls were with people who identified themselves as Muslim students of the University of Pretoria.
•“These abusive phone calls, coming along with a death threat, received last week, and a Muslim mob intimidating a students Mission Committee to expel a mission to Muslims from the university Missions Week, has ominous implications.” said American missionary Dr. Peter Hammond, the author whose writings seem to have been the focus of the abusive calls.
The death threat informed him that as the Editor of Frontline Fellowship News, he was: “... worthy of death, not by stoning, but to be cut up piece by piece, and your remains given to dogs and hyenas…”

This dreadful letter, which came to the mission by fax, said that the Christians “should be eliminated from the face of this earth. You have the audacity to insult 2 billion adherents to this mighty and great religion, the perfect and final religion of the almighty. ... the last and final prophet of god, namely the holy prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) without retribution from just one person of the 2 billion plus Muslim men and women of the face of this earth, .... The Fatwa will definitely come for you, ... You are worthy of death…Go burn in hell…LONG LIVE ISLAM, AMANDLA ISLAM.”

Posted by Johan Van Vlaams on Tue, 04 Oct 2005 15:36 | #

Part 2

BURNING QUESTIONS:

• Isn’t Islam just the most peaceful, loving religion which makes you immediately want to convert because they are throwing bombs at us if we don’t ? 
•Those are the messages we are getting in the West, where we are being confronted with so-called ‘moderate Muslim clerics’ who keep telling us how peaceful and loving Islam is, but where their own kind are at the same time, also bombing us on buses, in schools, on trains and in office buildings.
•I am so confused!  For instance, why aren’t we all immediately converting to “peaceful Islam” —being confronted as we all are with this ‘loving, caring religion’ in which we can at any time,  be blown up on buses, in schools, in office buildings and trains— just for the unspeakable offence of living happily in a Western society…
•Could their holy book please let us know whether the Christian victims of Islam’s murderous attacks now have to go to a Muslim heaven, or are they still allowed into a Christian heaven?
•Reminds me ever so much of the bad old Middle Ages in Spain, when hundreds of thousands of Jews were being forced to “convert to Christianity”  after having endured extensive tortures and persecution, ranging from merely burning the soles of the feet if the family patriarchs didn’t convert at once, to a full-blown Auto da Fe for their relatives until they did convert - an Inquisition practice which actually is not all that dissimilar from being blown to pieces by a modern bomb.
•I see very little difference from those days to what Christians such as those in Pretoria, now have to endure from Muslims.
•http://www.frontline.org.za/mission reports_prayer/pr- death_threats_muslim_students.htm

Posted by Matra on Tue, 04 Oct 2005 20:25 | #

It was only a matter of time before the Cross of St George became controversial:

Chris Doyle, director of the Council for the Advancement of Arab-British Understanding, said Tuesday the red cross was an insensitive reminder of the Crusades.

http://edition.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/europe/10/04/britain.redcross/index.html

Posted by Guessedworker on Tue, 04 Oct 2005 21:11 | #

Thanks for the link, Matra.  There is a CNN Quick-Vote on the page ... “is it time for England to change its flag?”  The current score is YES 625; NO 4897.

Pig power! (with due respect and consideration for Søren who has a thing for mice).

Posted by Phil on Tue, 04 Oct 2005 22:03 | #

Not one to pass up this opportunity to reach a wider audience, Mark Steyn picks up this story as well in today’s column in the Daily Telegraph.

Posted by Desmond Jones on Wed, 05 Oct 2005 01:45 | #

It’s funny how it goes round and round. The Jewish directed Disney Corporation, who own Piglet et al, uses the pink piggy to promote their anti-white, anti-Christian, pro-homosexual agenda, that paves the way for and supports on going Muslim immigration. And then a Jewish writer, laughs at and demeans the English because of their servitude to Islam.

Slick!

Posted by John S Bolton on Wed, 05 Oct 2005 03:36 | #

Appeasement has two modalities, one might notice. There is appeasement from weakness, and there is appeasement which maliciously seeks to embolden an enemy, in order to bring on violence from which unwarranted power can be drawn. the British government appeases the moslem, not from being in an actually weak position, but from unspeakable malice and depraved power seeking. They need civil war, or their dream of absolute power and absolute corruption will be thwarted.

Posted by Mark on Wed, 05 Oct 2005 03:36 | #

Chris Doyle, director of the Council for the Advancement of Arab-British Understanding, said Tuesday the red cross was an insensitive reminder of the Crusades.

Hm. Isn’t Doyle an Irish name?

Posted by Freddy on Wed, 05 Oct 2005 03:37 | #

>>Doyle added that it was now time for England to find a new flag and a patron saint who is “not associated with our bloody past and one we can all identify with.”<<

Unbelievable stuff….perhaps they should canonize, & replace St George with, Princess Di, the “People’s Princess”, who certainly had a thing for fornicating with Muslim men - a perfect symbol of Arab-British “understanding”!

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Wed, 05 Oct 2005 04:38 | #

“Chris Doyle, director of the Council for the Advancement of Arab-British Understanding, said Tuesday the red cross was an insensitive reminder of the Crusades.”

The Crusades, one of the chapters of our history which European-derived peoples can justifiably be most proud of, didn’t happen out of the blue but were, initially at least, the self-defensive response of an alarmed, backward, weak Europe to intolerable Moslem depredations, incursions, and extremely serious threats of worse to come, including military attacks, aggressive expansionism that imposed Islam on the peoples of the Levant and Egypt—people who’d been mostly Christian theretofore—and threatened Europe with the same, the Moslem raiding at will into Europe for the taking of European slaves to be sold in Moslem slave markets, and so on.  The wholly-undeserved blackening of the reputation of the Crusades that’s taken place over the past three decades is, I believe, thanks primarily to the influence of Jewish academics merely expressing a JN (Jewish Nationalist) view of them.  There are a number of reasons Jews don’t like the Crusades.  These reasons don’t apply to Christian Euros, but are purely an ethnic Jewish point of view.  It’s entirely right for Euro Christians to be proud of the Crusades.  It is understandable that Crusades-disliking Jews will start sooner or later asserting their Crusades-vilifying view:  Jews are people like anyone else and if they get the chance are going to assert their own nationalism.  What’s wrong with this picture is not Jews acting in accord with JN interests, but ECs (Euro Christians) failing to act in accord with EC interests.  That’s the mind-boggler.  If the Turkish Cypriots, say, fought tooth-and-nail to hold onto their share of Cyprus and the Greek Cypriots, instead of fighting, were more than happy to give up their share of Cyprus to the Turks, no one who was an onlooker would question the behaviour of the Turks but would scratch his head in utter bewilderment at the bizarre suidical behaviour of the Greeks. 

Princess Di, the ‘People’s Princess,’ who certainly had a thing for [...] Muslim men”  (—Freddy)

How in the world did she who could have had virtually any wealthy white man on earth for a boyfriend end up with (wealthy) Egyptian Dodi el-Fayed (to the point of generating rumors she’d agreed to marry him)?  It’s one of those things you’ll never understand as long as you live.  How can aristocracy be so confused and have such bad upbringings, such abysmal educations!

Posted by Mark on Wed, 05 Oct 2005 05:44 | #

The whole point about Diana is that she was not aristocracy. Her family were commoners, making her an extremely unusual match for a crown prince

If she had been aristocracy, she would have been prepared from childhood for such a marriage, and it’s very unlikely she would have behaved in the bizarre and hysterical manner she did

Posted by Stuart Dickson on Wed, 05 Oct 2005 06:51 | #

Diana’s father was most certainly a member of the aristocracy. He was the 8th Earl Spencer and the male line held lesser titles prior to the creation of the earldom. Her mother was, however, a neurotic commoner so she would have learned her manners, not at her mother’s knee, but at other low joints.