Posted by Nick Tamiroff on Wed, 09 Aug 2006 03:33 | #

I don’t know,but it sure seems like a good way to cut down the prison population,and get rid of the useless.If you don’t contribute,you’re a parasite,and the rest of us owe you shit!I may,to some extent,be my brother’s keeper,but that only extends to immediate family members-I never recall signing up for a “save the incorrigable"program,using my money.So what’s your point?

Posted by Al Ross on Wed, 09 Aug 2006 04:02 | #

Reading Nick Tamiroff’s attempt to make sense of James Bowery’s interesting post is somewhat disconcerting.

Nick resembles a soldier who’s been parachuted into the middle of a battlefield and instructed to make weapons out of whatever materials are at hand.

Posted by Desmond Jones on Wed, 09 Aug 2006 04:18 | #

Both US and British soldiers froze sperm before embarking to the Gulf.

BRITISH soldiers are having their semenÊfrozenÊinÊspermÊbanks before being sent to fight in a poss ible war against Iraq, the Sunday Herald has learned.

http://www.sundayherald.com/31343

SAN DIEGO — Terry Turner and Patrick Atwell are soldiers who live on opposite sides of the country. Both are in their 30s and intend to have children some day. Both are on their way to the Middle East. And both banked their sperm before shipping out.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2003-01-26-sperm-inside_x.htm

Posted by Nick Tamiroff on Wed, 09 Aug 2006 05:05 | #

O.K.,Al ,I’ll take your rebuke with some humor-I Have jumped into shit ,and lost my swag-bag.Panic city,until you realize you still have your K-bar and 9MM.Survival is what counts-not rhetoric. Semper Fi !

Posted by James Bowery on Wed, 09 Aug 2006 05:42 | #

Desmond Jones, yes USrael is an entity that has subsumed Great Britain, no arguing that point.

Just let the US try to assert the its own interests and watch what happens.

Posted by Nick Tamiroff on Wed, 09 Aug 2006 05:47 | #

Gw,as an aside,I wonder how many of your posters would be willing to elucidate on their military experience.I know that a few are life-long academics,others egalitarians,and a few hiding behind the bushes.
My point is this=if you haven’t seen combat,killed another,or been hit,need not castigate we who served.FUCK YOU VERY MUCH !  CHEERS!!!

Posted by Laugh Out Loud on Wed, 09 Aug 2006 05:52 | #

Ever share a bunk with this guy, Nick? Ever had any military experience with him?

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1154525834949&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull

Tell me Nick, when you see Isreali tanks mow down Lebs does that get you hard? Do you jack-off to fox news?

Posted by John S Bolton on Wed, 09 Aug 2006 06:12 | #

For some reason, discussion of reproduction gets taken as license for all sorts of sordid expressions.
There is a serious consideration here, though.
Here are some suggestions:
It could be that the sperm of a younger teenager which impregnated an older woman would be many times more likely to result in a soldier type.
My evolutionary logic for this is that when two tribes fought wars to the point that say 13 year-olds dominated the reproduction for a time, natural selection would very much favor the ability of the germline cells to register this condition and make greatly disproportionate fractions of soldier types, so far as they can.
Secondly, the military could do testing to find paternity markers of a sperm donor who has had both large numbers of children, and through genetic influence, sent them to service academies in greatly disproportionate degree.
Call this military eugenics, or do it in Israel and call it jewish military eugenics, but it should be done.
It is unpatriotic and anti-science not to investigate this.

Posted by Nick Tamiroff on Wed, 09 Aug 2006 06:14 | #

LOL,are you back again[or are you June Gordon in drag]And yes,I have served with the IDF,which is one of the premiere military organizations in the world.They just do the job they were paid to do-=something you probably don’t understand.God,please save us from the self-righteous,pontificating,assholes who continue to fornicate and breed more assholes.

Posted by Calvin on Wed, 09 Aug 2006 10:24 | #

Laugh Out Loud

Your post might have been funny, we’ll never know because you are too thick to post a functional link. Your insinuation that masturbatorial pleasure is the single motivating factor for all mankind indicates to me that you are just another bedsit wanking student, judging mature adults through the infantile haze of your own genital obsession. Shouldn’t you be getting dressed in time to miss your lecture on “lesbian bee-keeping and its implications for turd-world hermaphrodites” right now? I thought that your type were too busy turning your duvets into Jackson Pollock repos to post at this time of the day. What’s the matter did you shit the bed or something?
If you’re going to be abusive could you try to be, A. Original and, B. Funny.

Posted by On Holliday on Wed, 09 Aug 2006 10:29 | #

“And yes,I have served with the IDF,which is one of the premiere military organizations in the world.”

Nick, in what way did you seve with the IDF?

Posted by Nick Tamiroff on Wed, 09 Aug 2006 13:50 | #

On holliday-In the late 50’s,when the Marines were in Beruit the first time and Force Recon was reinstituted,a few of us were selected as “liason”,and unofficially attached to the IDF.That experience was worth more than survival training in Panama.Those fuckers know how to take care of business.

Posted by On Holliday on Wed, 09 Aug 2006 13:54 | #

Nick, how about when the Marines were in Beirut during the Raygun administration, and it was suggested that the Israelis knew in advance about the Marines barracks truck bombing, but did nothing to stop it - presumably to draw the US into the conflict?

Posted by On Holliday on Wed, 09 Aug 2006 14:00 | #

Do pitbulls sometimes bite their owners:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/742371/posts

Or, is the pitbull itself really the owner?

Posted by h-man on Wed, 09 Aug 2006 14:09 | #

“but did nothing to stop it - presumably to draw the US into the conflict?”

Proves Nick point. They know how to take care of business.

Posted by Nick Tamiroff on Wed, 09 Aug 2006 14:09 | #

Calvin-you certainly know how to turn a phrase-I could use some lessons in genteel invective,but it’s probably too late.Anyway,I appreciate your assesment of LOL,even if he didn’t.He-HE!

Posted by Nick Tamiroff on Wed, 09 Aug 2006 14:24 | #

On Holliday-during that period,I was in Nigeria,trying to get a project completed,so know very little of the actual details.I was not even informed of my mother’s death,until the day of her funeral.But yes,I agree that they would and will do what they see as necessary for survival-what’s your point? I would hope that the rest of the White race has the same sense of self-preservation.

Posted by On Holliday on Wed, 09 Aug 2006 17:42 | #

“Proves Nick point. They know how to take care of business.”

A ghetto Negro out to mug whitey may well know “how to take care of business” as well.

But I would suspect that few here would lend their approval or support for that endeavor.

Certainly, the Israelis know how to take care of themselves, but that’s not the point, is it?

Posted by Guessedworker on Wed, 09 Aug 2006 20:19 | #

I think James’ theory has legs.  If I can relate it back to WW2, it was well understood that the RAF, which was a 100% volunteer service trading off the shining glory of The Few, soaked up much of the very best of military potential.  In Bomber Command, which was the really heavy consumer of manpower, about half were officers.  Of those who served in bomber operations 55,000 - about 50% - were killed, and one in seven became POWs.

If one considers the quite amazingly resourceful and determined escape efforts mounted in the officer’s prison camps it is immediately clear that these were indeed fine young men.  By contrast, after the D-Day landings the British Army struggled to match the performance of its Allies in the push across Northern France.  Historians since have ascribed this in no small measure to a lack of leadership resulting from the sweep-up of the officer class by the RAF.

OK, so here we have a generation of young men of whom the best are being weeded out.  What effect has that had in the long, civilian battle against the Marxian left - a battle in which the political right was a “no show”?  Not insubstantial, I would say.

If our best, bravest and most loyal had survived to enter the post-war ideological battle and fight the invader in our institutions, perhaps we would not now be standing where we are, gazing at our own racial dissolution.

Posted by just wondering on Wed, 09 Aug 2006 20:41 | #

Is Laugh Out Loud Geoff Beck? I suspect he might be.

Posted by Guessedworker on Wed, 09 Aug 2006 22:35 | #

Geoff doesn’t have need of such a pseudonym.  If he has something to say he will just come right out and say it.