Posted by gongstar on Wed, 06 Jun 2007 19:36 | #

Psychologically speaking, whites are islanders. Jews are continentals, their psychology honed by competition with outsiders over millennia. For what happens, and will happen, now that jews are loose in white nations, see the recent ecological history of Australia, New Zealand, etc. We’re now at the stage where hugely wealthy and influential jewish organizations shriek down as “hate” any attempt by tiny white organizations to serve white interests.

Posted by john rackell on Wed, 06 Jun 2007 20:33 | #

We’re now at the stage where hugely wealthy and influential jewish organizations shriek down as “hate” any attempt by tiny white organizations to serve white interests.

And Mel Gibson is crying all the way to the bank. Maybe they are more paper tigers.

Posted by Guessedworker on Wed, 06 Jun 2007 21:50 | #

That Tucker article might be the most despicable piece of journalism I have ever read.

Posted by Amalek on Wed, 06 Jun 2007 23:06 | #

Heid Beirich of the Slimy Poverty Leeches Center is Morris ‘Kiddyfiddler’ Dees’s head witch smeller:

https://www.vdare.com/macdonald/061114_splc.htm

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Wed, 06 Jun 2007 23:20 | #

This article is simply the Jews lashing out at what they hate most, Euros.  Until more Euro wealthy start fighting back and putting the Jews in their place the Jews will continue winning by default.  There’s no mystery here:  it’s Jews seething with hatred toward Europeans and doing everything they possibly can to bring about their destruction.  Let all this be a lesson to future generations of Euros:  you let Jews live among you at your communal and national mortal peril.  They hate you and want you exterminated.  Jews ought not to be permitted to settle in significant numbers in Euro-majority countries because, as two thousand years of experience have shown, every single time they so settle — literally without one exception in two millennia — they get to work trying to destroy the host nation.  You’d think after being kicked out of so many countries since antiquity they’d learn their lesson and stop frenetically trying to destroy the host nation the moment their numbers permit.  You’d think wrong.  I happen to like the Jews and I like many aspects of the influence their presence has on places where they live.  It’s a shame they and Euros can’t live together but they can’t, and no matter what favorable influences Jews may have on Euro communities and nations among whom they dwell, their constant attempts to murder those societies are not tolerable and they should be asked to go live elsewhere.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Wed, 06 Jun 2007 23:39 | #

Needless to add, the SPLC and the ACLU are properly viewed as Jewish groups, not “liberal” groups.

Posted by john rackell on Thu, 07 Jun 2007 00:15 | #

There is a very interesting article in The American Conservative by Philip Weiss, describing the amazing hyperethnicity of certain Jews in mainstream media. It dredges up a number of facts about slate.com (I always thought they had a certain Jewish slant, only because all/most of the writer’s surnames seemed Jewish), and the New York Observer. I guess for me Slate.com, which I used to read regularly, doesn’t on its surface appear very Jewish but then underneath it all is this pervading Jewish tribalism. Now reading this site I’ve been forewarned and forearmed about Jewish influence hidden in plain sight, but again, having a Jewish self-hater - I suppose - matter-of-factedly state it brings it home in a way that your regular WN observer of Jews can’t. It’s not the tribalism, so apparent here and acknowledged, it’s that it comprises so much of the woof and warp of our society. Or is it their society? They really seem an occupying force - from this article at least.

http://www.amconmag.com/2007/2007_06_04/feature.html

Posted by Amalek on Fri, 08 Jun 2007 11:30 | #

I don’t think MR has cottoned on yet to the extraordinary fissures in American ‘right wing’ Single Party politics precipitated by the failure of the war of choice in Iraq, combined with the ‘Scamnesty’ bill to open the floodgates for brown Mexican and oriental immigration.

The manifest failure of Presidente Jorge’s last throw in Iraq, the so-called Surge, was already giving some red state loyalists pause. Many more dupes of neoconservatism who were prepared for Our Boys to die in the last ditch in Baghdad (‘stay the course’) have finally turned, worm-like, after Bush abused their kind for being un-American in opposing his plan to give 12-20m illegals permanent residence and the welfare welcome wagon.

Even before Bush’s finally admitting that he’s a One Worlder, the GOP is said to have suffered a 40pc drop, year on year, in individual donations (chance for the you-know-whos to wade in and sew up its financial side as tight as the Democrats). Republicans are now faced with a ‘choice’ of the MSM-processed Rudy McFromney, RINO times four, for the ‘08 race. A lot of conservative republicans are exploring the chances of a third party run or are resigned to staying at home—while the netroots are gung-ho for Rep. Ron Paul, the anti-interventionist, anti-open-borders libertarian.

And blimey, look who’s just woken up to the bipartisan Washington scheme for race replacement:

In 1960, whites were 90 percent of the country. The Census Bureau recently estimated that whites already account for less than two-thirds of the population and will be a minority by 2050. Other estimates put that day much sooner.

We needed to have “more discussion” about Iraq for nearly two years before finally invading. When will we be allowed to begin discussion of a government policy enacted by stealth 40 years ago specifically intended to decimate one particular ethnic group in our own country?

http://tinyurl.com/2gbd44

The MSM in Britain are still a lot more interested in Paris Hilton’s jail time than the immigration rumpus, but in the USA the times they are a-changin’ pretty damn fast.

Posted by ben tillman on Fri, 08 Jun 2007 13:09 | #

Yeah, the Ann Coulter piece was a shocker.  Wonder what’s goimg on with the Kool-Aid drinkers at Free Republic?

Posted by Al Ross on Fri, 08 Jun 2007 13:27 | #

Amalek is correct. The USA will be the first country to commit genetic suicide since Portugal’s Governor of Brazil, the Marquis of Pombol, incentivised miscegenation by granting land to Whites who married native women.

Posted by Scimitar on Fri, 08 Jun 2007 13:38 | #

Shamnesty died in the Senate last night. It should be back in a few months, though.

http://blog.occidentaldissent.com/2007/06/08/amnesty-defeated-for-now/

Posted by Scimitar on Fri, 08 Jun 2007 14:09 | #

This is the third or fourth time it has been defeated in the last four years. It will be back. Count on it.

Posted by Scimitar on Fri, 08 Jun 2007 14:13 | #

Interesting though that it passed the Senate under Republican control only to fail under the Democrats. From what I gather, Webb, Tester, and McCaskill voted against cloture. I did see Webb on C-SPAN yesterday advocating a “path to citizenship” for illegal aliens.

Posted by Scimitar on Fri, 08 Jun 2007 15:11 | #

Webb has an Asian wife.

Richmond Times-Dispatch

Sen. Jim Webb wants to narrow the scope of the bipartisan immigration-overhaul bill, but it was uncertain whether his proposal would be voted upon. Webb, D-Va., introduced an amendment yesterday that would allow perhaps 4 million or 5 million illegal immigrants to be offered a path to citizenship under the bill . . .

Posted by Scimitar on Fri, 08 Jun 2007 15:23 | #

Roll Call of Votes on Immigration Bill

Democrats voting “nay” on cloture:

Baucus (D-MT), Bingaman (D-NM), Boxer (D-CA), Byrd (D-WV), Dorgan (D-ND), Landrieu (D-LA), McCaskill (D-MO), Pryor (D-AR), Rockefeller (D-WV), Tester (D-MT), Webb (D-VA)

Republicans voting “yea” on cloture:

Graham (R-SC), Hagel (R-NE), Lugar (R-IN), Martinez (R-FL), McCain (R-AZ), Specter (R-PA), Voinovich (R-OH)

^^ It should not be forgotten that Kyl (R-AZ) was a major architect of this bill and that Chambliss (R-GA), Isakson (R-GA), and Lott (R-MS) amongst others came out in support of “comphrensive immigration reform.” They only voted against cloture because other Republicans like DeMint and Sessions were complaining about not being able to offer amendments. The final vote was 45-50. If Kyl, Lott, Chambliss, and Isakson had swung the other way, chances are amnesty would be on its way to the House.

Posted by jlh on Fri, 08 Jun 2007 15:24 | #

re: Webb and Asian wife: follow this link to see photo:

http://www.realcities.com/multimedia/nationalchannel/archive/mcw/freedomtomarry.pdf

courtesy of http://spiritwaterblood.com/

Posted by Amalek on Fri, 08 Jun 2007 15:39 | #

The temporary setback to Scamnesty gives anti-open-borders advocates a window to create a much more unified and louder opposition. El Presidente is entering his twilight times, but a lot of Republican Congressmen facing electoral races in ‘08 now understand that this is THE hot-button issue: the one that makes talk radio switchboards burn up and campaign contributions dry up.

Some years after Stephen Steinlight first broke with the Jewish ‘huddled masses’ consensus and argued that mob-handed coloured immigration was no longer Good for the Jews, some surprising names have bolted from the serried open-borders ranks of the Chosen, e.g. Charles ‘Strangelove’ Krauthammer:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1843173/posts

The poor little Freepers are horribly confused. Big Clever Jew wants clampdown on immigrants- does not compute! Why, he isn’t even a converso like that nice Mr Auster.

Then there’s the blowhard military historian Victor Davis Hanson, a reliable warhawk on foreign policy but also a farmer who has seen his native southern California overrun. VDH does not appreciate the joys of diversity as ardently as he should to satisfy the Wall Street Journal:

http://www.city-journal.org/html/17_1_mexifornia.html

In short, we are seeing a crackup of the big-state, big-spend, big-debt, Bushite consensus which Steve Sailer summarised as ‘Invade the World, Invite the World, In Hock to the World’.

Mouthwatering possibilities for shaking the kaleidoscope, confounding the left/right Big Lie of MSM political reportage and dragging a certain group of miscreant plotters into the light of day await the bold American constitutionalist. Will he answer the call, or turn over to the big game?

Posted by Scimitar on Fri, 08 Jun 2007 16:53 | #

I’m afraid the defeat of Bush’s amnesty will embolden conservatives and encourage them to stick with the GOP through 2008.

Posted by Amalek on Fri, 08 Jun 2007 17:02 | #

Not if the bill’s coming lurching back at them like a crazy golem in the next few months.

The anger of grassroots conservatives (who have a majority of Americans behind them) is now far too red-hot to be cooled so easily.

Posted by Red Baron on Sat, 09 Jun 2007 01:15 | #

“Cultural Enrichment”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zf2YacZ12KY&NR=1

Posted by ben tillman on Sat, 09 Jun 2007 02:10 | #

Graham (R-SC)

Nowknown as “Grahamnesty”.

Posted by Amalek on Sat, 09 Jun 2007 09:59 | #

Another worried right wing opinion-masseuse ‘gets it’, as Mad Melanie Phillips would put it:

... to anyone beset by bilingualism, in both business and the business of daily life, the Hispanization of America is currently a fact. But that doesn’t mean there isn’t an almost-tangible gut check, say, in reading about the extent to which 2008 American presidential candidates, Republicans and Democrats alike, are gearing up Spanish-speaking drives within their English-speaking campaigns to vie for Spanish-speaking voters.

Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., is the principled exception, believing, as he has said, that where a bilingual individual gains an advantage, a bilingual country suffers from irreparable fragmentation because the disappearance of a common language leads to the end of a common culture. If the U.S. Senate effectively legalizes 12 million to 20 million mostly Spanish-speaking illegal aliens—a mainly Mexican bloc which, ironically, is anything but “diverse”—the common language (English) and common culture (American) slip that much farther away.

It’s inevitable. This Spanish-speaking demographic is simply too massive to assimilate—even assuming the multicultural states of America were still in the assimilation business, which we’re emphatically not.

And that’s shocking, too. But more than shocking, this whole issue is depressing and distressing—although I know I’m not supposed to say so.

Whenever anyone has the bad taste to point out markers of cultural transformation, the rest of us are supposed to play it very cool, expressing only the most noncommittal reaction, if any at all. We’re not supposed to flinch, and we’re certainly not supposed to lament such changes, or mourn what is being lost, or, heaven help us, do anything to stop or reverse them, such as demanding the enforcement of existing immigration laws that would both encourage the repatriation of illegal aliens and discourage more from coming.

The socially acceptable position, the one that qualifies as politically correct wisdom suitable to be shouted from rooftops (or written in The Wall Street Journal editorial page), is to accept phenomena such as the Islamization of Britain and the Hispanization of the United States as givens, as progress, as proof of one’s own moral goodness. Anything less than regarding these wholly optional changes, ours to make or not, as national destiny—international destiny?—is denounced as malicious bigotry…

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/column.aspx?UrlTitle=the_pc_end_of_the_english-speaking_peoples&ns=DianaWest&dt=06/09/2007&page=full&comments=true

Well, ‘gets it’ up to a point, Lord Copper. The unease always has to be presented as being about culture, not race. There are some things you just can’t talk about in polite circles in the Land of the Free—yet. But the muttering behind hands is growing into a roar.

Posted by Scimitar on Sat, 09 Jun 2007 13:58 | #

Dirty Harry is using amnesty as a wedge issue against Republicans. He wants the issue, not the bill. This is the second time he has sabotaged it.

Posted by anon on Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:03 | #

http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0724,tucker,76913,2.html
Maria Luisa Tucker’s latest article is little better than her last.