|
|
|
My Prescription for Your Depression About half-way through Obama’s acceptance speech, my wife had to stop watching. I asked her what was wrong and she said she found it too depressing. I stopped the streaming video and put my copy of Idiocracy in the DVD drive. She emerged from her funk presently. I don’t have a link to the full movie but this scene may be sufficient for most cases of post-acceptance speech depression: Comments:2
Posted by Lurker on Wed, 05 Nov 2008 12:03 | # The BBC is appalling. Back in 2004 they earnestly qualified every exit poll that showed Bush ahead, quite rightly, with the margin of error for said poll, ie Bush might not be ahead, of course thats what those, impartial broadcasters were praying for. This year they forgot to mention the margin of error with anything like the same degree of rigor. Gave yourselves away chaps. 4
Posted by the Narrator.. on Wed, 05 Nov 2008 13:59 | #
Of course we can only wonder who’s writing the speeches and working the teleprompter. Some of us probably have a theory on that… Voxday (Christian author and columnist at WND), who is, (how shall I put this) not completely un-sympathetic to White Nationalism’s general theme (he wrote at his blog in regards to Powell’s endorsement of Obama, “For obvious reasons, blacks don’t fear being called racist. They even have a cadre of sympathetic white academics who will argue that they can’t possibly be racist by definition. Therefore, they can always be expected to engage in normal human tribal behavior without fear of retribution or even criticism.”), wrote today, ...these events are precisely what I unsuccessfully attempted to warn conservatives and Republicans would be the logical outcome of their political pragmatism since 2003… ....conservatism, government restraint, national sovereignty, liberty and self-support weren’t just lacking in this election, but more importantly, were completely absent from the Republican governance of the last eight years. All of these things were rejected at the advice of the more influential part of the conservative commentariat in the name of the Iraqi occupation and political pragmatism. How practical is a “pragmatism” that manages to turn a Republican White House, House, and Senate into a Democratic White House, House, and Senate? Leadership requires principle; pragmatism and pandering are simply followership. The “reformed conservatism” of a David Frum or a Russ Douthat that many Republicans will be tempted to embrace will be a fatal strategic mistake; the further that the newly empowered Democrats overreach to the left, the more important it will be for Republicans to offer a genuinely libertarian alternative. There is no reason whatsoever to mourn a McCain loss. None. Just as George Bush ensured the appearance of a Barack Obama, four years of John McCain presiding over the current economy would have not only moved the country in the same direction that Obama will take it, but ensured that his inevitable Democratic successor would be even worse than Obama. So, what now? Obviously, the latter is the correct strategy and one that will be positioned to take advantage of the problems caused by Democratic dalliance with overt socialism. But, I would not put it past the GOP elite to embrace what killed them while rejecting what would have permitted them to maintain their hold on the reins of power. However, keep in mind that all of this may well be irrelevant anyhow, as the untrammeled migration of the next four years may well lay the foundation for Karl Rove’s permanent majority party, albeit not the precise party he was contemplating.” I may be wrong, but I believe it is probably best that our adversaries go ahead and unmask themselves now while we are still in a demographic position to resist, rather than put all this off for another 8 years under the sleep inducing spell of another GOP “Uncle Juan”, watching our percentages drop. And the Whites out there that come around (though their numbers be small or large) are going to be seeking out, and will respond positively towards, an un-repentant pro-Western Civilizational ideology, not some watered down (read, pragmatic) version of what the anti-Western Left is already serving up. ... 5
Posted by skeptical on Wed, 05 Nov 2008 15:28 | # All European nationalists reading this blog should take note, if you fail to achieve political power and/or awaken the White masses in your own respective countries then this is what will happen. 6
Posted by john on Wed, 05 Nov 2008 16:10 | # In the video James posted I,m not so sure it’s Obama, his hair is different and his skin darker. It could be the lighting of course. 7
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Wed, 05 Nov 2008 17:56 | # Or, try this on your depression: it’s what a good immigration report card looks like: http://grades.betterimmigration.com/testgrades.php3?District=AL&VIPID=6 Everyone’ll be happy to learn this senator was just re-elected. (That’s gotta be worth at least a couple of Prozacs.) 8
Posted by Red Mercury on Wed, 05 Nov 2008 18:25 | # Forget Prozac, I’m taking G&Ts;today. I’ll recover, come up with a few ideas, and then go back to posting bitter screeds on the internet. Change, indeed. If anyone has a better idea, let me know. 9
Posted by Dave Johns on Wed, 05 Nov 2008 18:26 | # Modest Expectations From An Obama Supporter. (Typical Negro mentality.) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=381gFG4Crr8 Contrary to popular belief .. racial prejudice of blacks is not based on fear and ignorance; rather, it is justifiably based upon fear of blacks’ frightening stupidity and violent unpredictability. 10
Posted by the Narrator.. on Wed, 05 Nov 2008 19:08 | # Potential book titles to watch out for over the next four years, ‘Black Man, White House’ ‘Uncle Tom’s Revenge’ ‘I Never Promised That’ ‘Black Out: The End Of The White-Devil’s Tyranny In America’ ‘Red, White And Black: A New Flag For A New America!’ ‘Chicago, An American Mecca’ ‘Right Black At Ya!’ The possibilities are endless… 11
Posted by Old Guy on Wed, 05 Nov 2008 19:50 | # James—THANKS! That video clip made the sun come out again on the California coast. The fog is clearing, and I get the feeling the “fun” is only beginning. 13
Posted by obrien aka birch barlow on Wed, 05 Nov 2008 21:35 | # Well, this is what happens when the Republicans keep putting up Turd Sandwiches (eg Bush and McCain) against Big Douches (Dems). Until the Republicans put up a serious candidate who actually stands for something, rather than a combination of “new tone” politics and a few bones to the religious and soft racialist*/“implicitly white” right (just enough to turn off the upper middle class who would otherwise be in favor of conservative economic policies), then the Dems will keep winning, probably by bigger and bigger margins with more and more left-wing candidates. I mean at least the left wing clearly stands for something, even if most of it is really bad. *By “soft racialist” right, I mean the type of individual who vaguely dislikes all nonwhites (no matter how successful) and who might vote for a ban on interracial marriage but at the same time is stupid and/or desperate enough to support pro-Amnesty Republicans. On a related note, I saw JW Holliday’s (Western Biopolitics) post on “implicit whiteness.” Unfortunately for WN’s, I think the real trade-off is not between “implicit whiteness” and “explicit whiteness,” but between implicit whiteness and realism (ie The Bell Curve and all that). Realism+implicit whiteness=explicit whiteness, and explicit whiteness is a clear loser, something that should be obvious to anyone not blinded by anti-minority ferver[1]. The only way effectively “pro-white” policies, ie immigration restriction, fiscal restraint, etc, will ever go through is if the Republicans throw implicit whiteness overboard, at least on the national level and anywhere outside the Bible Belt (it may be politically worthwhile to throw some bones to implicit whiteness within the Bible Belt, a la Nixon’s Southern Strategy[2]). Anglo-Saxonism, unlike 40-50+ years ago, is no longer a viable basis for conservatism. [1] The only way JW Holliday seems to be able to “argue” against high-IQ nonwhites is in a similar way to the way left-wing minority advocates “argue” that white-on-black crime is a major problem compared to black-on-black or black-on-white crime. That is, he cites isolated cases (such as heinous crimes by East/South Asians which by any measure are committed at the lowest rate by East Asians) or by pointing to an industrializing country like China. Bashing East Asians by pointing to China makes about as much sense as bashing whites by pointing to Soviet Russia or Nazi Germany, or pointing to America in the eighteenth or nineteenth centuries. [2] This would largely involve getting “independent” political groups to bash the Dems as anti-Christain, play to racial fears, etc while national, west coast and east coast Republicans condemn or claim to know nothing about such political groups or their (indirect) association with the Republican Party. This probably sounds like something right out of The 48 Laws of Power or Goebbel’s playbook[3], but I believe it is the only way for the Republicans (and really America itself) to survive…neither working class religious righties nor upper middle class economic righties (who largely and increasingly don’t like each other very well) alone will keep the Republicans in power. The left-wingism of Jews and Asians is only an extreme example of the broader upper middle class mistrust/hatred of the religious right. And of course the religious righties alone will not be terribly useful in promoting fiscal restraint, or even necessarily in opposing loose/open borders(but this is where playing to racial fears comes in…) [3] I do not believe any civilized society, unless people could somehow be genetically engineered to all have 120+ IQs, can exist without massive dishonesty towards the masses. Though maybe I have been reading too much of Machiavelli’s modern disciples. 14
Posted by Bo on Wed, 05 Nov 2008 22:22 | # The stress on Obama will come from the left-wing racialists and from the so-called minority groups. Dozens of promises were made to these persons, and they may not be as easily reconciled to deception in campaign promises as the diverse, if jaded, white American peoples seem to be. And expectations are horrendously high among the left-wing racialists and the so-called minority groups. When they discover their expectations can never be met, there will be serious discontent. I suspect the book titles will be more like: Obama: Uncle Thomas v. 2 Still A “White” House? Obama Success Story: Throwing His Supporters Under The Bus As He Rises Obama: The Betrayal of the 21st Century 15
Posted by Captainchaos on Wed, 05 Nov 2008 23:25 | # Title: “Obongo: Examination of a Half-Blooded Tribal Demi-God from an Anthropological Perspective.” Author: “The Iceman” 16
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Wed, 05 Nov 2008 23:40 | #
That’s like saying excessive incompatible immigration is what happens when guys like Carl Pope keep failing to question it. Whose money is behind sealing Pope’s lips on immigration? Whose is behind sealing McCain’s (on immigration and other stuff)? I was listening to Rush Limbaugh in my car today at lunch: he kept talking as though McCain actually thinks for himself and isn’t bought by his big contributors. McCain no more thinks for himself than Tony Blair did, and is every bit as bought. The big contributors and organizers give both men their marching orders. The only issue is who the big contributors and organizers are.
Right, the upper-middle class are all moving into Negro and racially-mixed neighborhoods. They get seriously turned off by any implicit bad-mouthing of their choice of where to purchase homes or rent apartments. Inner-City Detroit, for example, is really big among the upper-middle-class whites right now.
Wait, are the policies favored by McCain and Bush supposed to be other than left-wing? Both McCain’s and Bush’s policies are way out there on the hyper-extreme radical-left wacko-looneytoons nutjob fringe. David Cameron’s as well. A certain ethnicity now calls the shots politically, and that ethnicity positions all politicians it owns, “left” and “right” alike, on the way-out-there looneybin left.
What about a guy who doesn’t “vaguely dislike non-whites” and opposes only the deliberately-engineered demographic demise of the white race itself? (which, make no mistake, Birch, is exactly what the nucleus of activist-minded planners at the other side’s central core are after though they don’t go around advertising their plans in so many words)
Explicit whiteness for white countries, like explicit Jewishness for Israel, explicit Japaneseness for Japan, explicit Indianness for India, and so forth, is going to have to become a winner for whites to survive, and whites have to start working on that right now. Web-sites such as this one, Jobling’s, to an extent Vdare.com for example, are a bellwether in that. Sites like BrusselsJournal.com, and minds like Fjordman’s, are going to get strictly nowhere in their refusal to grasp the racial nettle. If the Jews can pull off explicit Jewishness for Israel so can we make the analagous demand for Euro countries. If we can’t, then Israel certainly cannot. (I throw that last bit in because diaspora Jews fully intend to try and have it both ways: nationalism, endogamy, and group survival for Jews, none of the above for Euros.)
Who wants to keep the Republicans in power? This isn’t FreeRepublic, Birch, it’s MR.com. We don’t like Republicans around here. Republicans are just as much the party of forced race-replacement as the Dimbulbocrats are. Who the hell wants that??? Bush and McCain are both excrement. So’s Bush Sr.
The leftwingism of Jews, Orientals, and Subcons is for each simply a reflection of the particular group’s own ethnoracial nationalist feeling, a group counter-reaction to any hint of ethnoracial nationalist feeling among the white matrix of the country in which said Jews, Orientals, and Subcons are living. They don’t want to be swamped by or subordinate to Euros, so they counterattack with leftism. Jewish leftism, for example, is in most cases not genuine leftism but JN. Leftism harms what’s normal, so a group wishing to counterattack a rival group can find leftism a potent weapon to use for the purpose. The ones wielding leftism don’t necessarily believe in it, they just want to damage their rival with it.
The best chance of this existing, and the degree to which it will exist most, is with racially/ethnoculturally homogeneous communities and nation-states. As for JWH and “high-IQ non-whites”: what he wants is for race-replacement of Euros to end and the damage already done to be humanely reversed. Give him that and he’ll stop citing examples of the group defects of the Oriental and Subcon constituent races. 17
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Wed, 05 Nov 2008 23:56 | #
make that “and the setting in which it will exist most” 18
Posted by Celtic Queen on Thu, 06 Nov 2008 00:29 | # Alright, I just gotta post this comment that was posted by Andy in reply to Bo 2 years ago here on this very same website on the book review thread for Breeding Between the Lines;
19
Posted by Bo on Thu, 06 Nov 2008 02:09 | # Celtic Queen asks where are Andy and Bo now. I don’t know about Andy, but I had my moment of cognitive dissonance when B. Obama trounced H. Clinton in the primaries. The good side of all this is we no longer have to defend a president who has nothing in common with us but an empty skin. 20
Posted by Lurker on Thu, 06 Nov 2008 02:44 | # I assumed that Hillary was the ‘official’ candidate back then. Once they had tried her out in front of real people it wasn’t a success so the Mk2 version was wheeled out, he got the crucial support, she was left to founder. Obviously it helps to make sure you’ve got the other side sewn up as well, come on down Mr McCain! 21
Posted by Fr. John on Thu, 06 Nov 2008 05:33 | # James- Thank you. Though I was very depressed today, http://thewhitechrist.wordpress.com/2008/11/05/the-death-of-a-nation/ I am feeling a lot better NOW, after seeing that, and KNOWING that’s all it really is. I also feel better, knowing that there are those out there who see clearly, think sanely, and are willing to inject humor into an INSUFFERABLY “Uppity” member of that race, just to show him for the Obamugabe that he really is.. 22
Posted by the Narrator.. on Thu, 06 Nov 2008 09:50 | # Of course if Obama wins re-election in 2012, we all know what the theme song will be. ....a certain AC/DC tune…
Besides, let us not forget that we still have two and half months of El Presidenté Jorge Bush II to go. He may decide to say goodbye by extending a full Presidential pardon to the 30 million+ illegals in the country before the half-blood prince ascends the cherry blossom throne… 23
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Thu, 06 Nov 2008 12:08 | #
My back-of-the-envelope figures are at the very least 48 million, very possibly more. This business about “8 to 12 million” is of course pure crap generated by the usual suspects. And by the way, I definitely wouldn’t put “pardoning them” past Jorge: that’s exactly the sort of thing he’d do, if only to stick it to “the right-wingers,” sticking it to right-wingers being one of his dominant compulsions as it was with his father and as it is with McCain (obviously, otherwise none of the three would have gotten one dime of Jewish money or one word of Jewish media coverage: they were all carefully vetted for years for exactly that characteristic plus open-borders fanaticism prior to their being launched as national politicians — having zero closed-border advocates and zero guys who aren’t covert radical leftists among your national politicians doesn’t happen by accident, I’m sorry: they’ve all, every single one, been carefully vetted for years for exactly those characteristics). Incidentally, is there one single politician in the United States today who doesn’t have among his chief advisers a dual Israeli-American citizen? Just one? I keep looking. That they’ve all got Jewish chief advisors and handlers is a given nowadays, as goes completely without saying, but there’s this added phenomenon lately of the Jew with dual citizenship who’s fought as a combat soldier in the IDF — every politician in the U.S. suddenly has one of those on his staff too, it’s the latest thing, absolutely de rigueur these days it seems. Look for that to start popping up in Britain soon as well — you’re going to read one day soon about David Cameron’s chief advisor being a dual Israeli-British citizen who was an IDF combat soldier during the Israeli invasion of Lebanon, as if it’s the most natural thing in the world, and nobody will question it. 24
Posted by the Narrator.. on Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:10 | #
Well with Chain Migration pretty much everybody in Latin America is a potential American citizen. But then, the term citizen is such an “exclusivist and discriminatory term”, I wouldn’t be at all surprised to see it dropped from the political lexicon shortly. After all our elites view America as an -ism not a nation. Of course if Obama has a sense of humor we can expect him to “reach out” to the GOP by selecting John McCain to be the Border Security Czar… 25
Posted by Celtic Queen (not a lizard) on Thu, 06 Nov 2008 22:24 | # This nation was founded on the principle of immigration, nothing will change. Sounds like you guys are one step away from following the David Icke tour. If nothing else, Obama is good for international PR. People might start liking Americans again. Friends are good. 26
Posted by Celtic Prez on Fri, 07 Nov 2008 03:31 | # How much you wanna bet that in 2012 the Republican party nominee will be either ; ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 27
Posted by danielj on Fri, 07 Nov 2008 04:01 | #
Read a book. Colonization and immigration are two entirely different concepts. 28
Posted by Celtic Wiccan on Fri, 07 Nov 2008 04:11 | # Actually I was being generous when I said that. I didn’t want to say what this nation was REALLY built upon, so I glossed over colonization (different from colonialism, which isn’t that bad), genocide and slavery, and instead I made nice and said “immigration”, thinking about my great-parents migration and naturalization processes. It’s a good day, a good era and I’m implementing the LoA in my life. Thus, glossing over and making nice. Enjoy it while it lasts. 29
Posted by Lurker on Fri, 07 Nov 2008 04:20 | #
No nation has ever been founded on the ‘principle’ of immigration. How could it be?
Im sure we are all well aware what a rotten corpse the GOP is, so no, none of those would be a surprise. 30
Posted by danielj on Fri, 07 Nov 2008 04:21 | #
I was being generous. The country was built by White colonists and anybody that tells you different is a liar. You were simply perpetuating the lye or being disingenuous which is even worse than being stupid. Genocide is a bit more than a stretch since it ne’er even came close to that and the purported “genocide” contributing nothing to the founding of the country’s infrastructure. Please realize you aren’t engaging in civil and mutual beneficial discourse and change your tactic or leave. 32
Posted by danielj on Fri, 07 Nov 2008 04:23 | # Please forgive my atrocious spelling/grammar. lye = lie purported “genocide” contributing nothing = purported “genocide” contributed nothing civil and mutual beneficial = civil and mutually beneficial 33
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 07 Nov 2008 04:25 | # I think Celtic has called it right: those are exactly the four possibilities for GOP nominee in 2012. Main reason: Jewish money skewing the process. 34
Posted by Celtic Wiccan on Fri, 07 Nov 2008 04:35 | # Some nice colonialists aside, if you think for one minute this nation could have grown and progressed as fast as it did without FREE SLAVE LABOR, think again. There’s a reason why they didn’t want to PAY people cash for their time and energy, like they should have. Let me get back to reading the e-books by Savitri Devi I just discovered…... 35
Posted by danielj on Fri, 07 Nov 2008 05:01 | # Slave labor isn’t free. Neither thermodynamically, or fiscally. 36
Posted by Celtic massa wife on Fri, 07 Nov 2008 07:24 | # The labor certainly wasn’t “free” now was it? 37
Posted by the Narrator.. on Fri, 07 Nov 2008 09:01 | #
The Principle of Immigration, lol… Lefty argument #1: ‘America was founded as a racist, xenophobic and imperialistic machine by a bunch of bigoted “Old White Men” who were hellbent on enslaving the entire world.’ Lefty argument #2: ‘America has always had a heart for change and been a light unto the worlds peoples, so no need to worry about the largest mass migration of human beings known to history, because America remains the bastion of progress and tolerance that our progressive and enlightened Founding Fathers envisioned.’
This nation was REALLY built upon the shoulders of Western Civilization, of which its founders and people were naturally a part of. This is why you will not run across names like Jamal, Ping-Chow or Abdullah in any of our founding documents.
Yeah, yeah we know, “America was founded through war and conquest!” As opposed to all the other nations of the world who just got together and drew numbers from a hat, right.
This nation is an extension of Western Civilization which has been around for thousands of years. And no, free slave labor has zero to do with a nations good fortunes, or as you say “growth and progress”. If it did then Africa should be a continent of Super Powers as Africans have been in the slavery business for thousands of years (and still are to this day). And since the vast majority of slaves brought out of Africa were taken to Latin America, and were in use there for more than a century before Jamestown was founded, we can, in accordance with your theory, expect to find such socially stable-economic Super Powers there today as Mexico, Haiti, Columbia, Brazil etc…..right? 38
Posted by jonathan on Fri, 07 Nov 2008 13:54 | # James - I’ve literally identified with the title of your post. Is it possible to get a transcript of the new science article about neural pathways. It requires subscription, but if anyone already has access…? Thanks. 39
Posted by Fr. John on Fri, 07 Nov 2008 15:28 | # Lefty argument #1: ‘America was founded as a racist, xenophobic and imperialistic machine by a bunch of bigoted “Old White Men” who were hellbent on enslaving the entire world.’ Yeah. Isn’t it marvelous!? God bless ‘em. Oh, wait, HE DID! (Answer a fool according to his folly… Proverbs) 41
Posted by Celtic Righty on Fri, 07 Nov 2008 20:52 | # You guys are probably WAY more “lefty” than I am when it comes to ethics and morals. Have you conducted your lives on the principles of celibacy, chastity and lifelong marriage with no divorce? Have you abstained from mind and behaviour altering chemicals or herbs? Mmm Hmm… 42
Posted by Henry on Sat, 08 Nov 2008 18:04 | # Have you conducted your lives on the principles of celibacy, chastity and lifelong marriage with no divorce? Have you abstained from mind and behaviour altering chemicals or herbs? Absolutely. I was extremely lucky in choosing a wife, for even in the early 70’s women and men employed a dual meaning for the word, “dating.” I’ve lost count of the number of married and unmarried women who made themselves available to me when I was single. Was I a fool for turning them down? No, but perhaps I can afford to say that. Most men, not as lucky as I, would understandably say yes – or at least think it. After all, a healthy woman could be laid by a new man daily. That not all women do so – especially nowadays – has more to do with discriminating behavior than moral principle. You’re in competition with an overwhelming majority of white women who are less scrupulous. What you need is a white man who will transform you into his princess. That you haven’t found him can be attributed to the pill, selfish materialism, and the legal repercussions of feminism on the male psyche. Nobody can have their cake and eat it. You have three choices: 1. Drop the feminism. 43
Posted by Captainchaos on Sat, 08 Nov 2008 19:13 | # “3. Lower your racial standards.” - Henry I think she should go with “3”. There is such a thing as dysgenics, we don’t want her contaminating our future gene-pool. Just kidding. BTW, I have succeeded in going ashore and establishing a beachhead at Takimag where others have failed. Now the support troops are coming in behind. I did everything plus hit those fence-sitters over the head with the kitchen sink. I know for a fact that I succeeded in ‘waking up’ at least two people one of which comments here now. Maybe there is something to ‘Internet activism’ after all? Anyways, I’ll enjoy it while it lasts, if indeed it will be taken away. 44
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sat, 08 Nov 2008 19:32 | #
CC, good luck if you’re succeeding, and more power to you. That was what Amalek/Effra/Matt O’Halloran kept encouraging us all to do, leave here and “wade ashore and try to establish a beachhead,” as you put it, at other sites (Amalek wanted us to join in attempting it at Harry’s Place). I’ve always found that unpleasant and unproductive — getting your comments deleted, getting banned, ending up convincing no one, just making lots of enemies. (In another thread I just finished telling Leon Haller not to post at Taki’s any more.) Maybe I didn’t keep at it long enough? But why can’t the like-minded simply find their way here, so we could “see them in the office” rather than having to “make housecalls”? 45
Posted by Captainchaos on Sat, 08 Nov 2008 21:11 | # “CC, good luck if you’re succeeding, and more power to you.” - Fred Thanks Fred. It takes a special kind of man to fight his way through to brainwashing and find his way here as we all have done. Only the strong. If they will not come to us I will go to them. They delete many of my comments but I will not be deterred. My persistence gains their grudging respect and they let me up the ante. The commenters are vulnerable there because they are fence-sitters. I am going to keep kicking each and every one of them in the ass until they fall on one side of the fence or the other. 46
Posted by Henry on Sat, 08 Nov 2008 21:53 | #
Celtic girl is a typical female when it comes to manipulation - sexual or otherwise. Feminism is politicized female selfishness. On a personal level it’s about having one’s cake and eating it. All take, instantaneous gratification and replenishment, blaming men unjustly, no give, and “if you don’t like it then I’ll demonstrate I can be a real bitch (by availing myself of legal options and services not available to you).” Its political objective was to reduce white men to sex organs. It succeeded. White males, for the most part, have responded accordingly. Yet lonely white feminists blame white men for adjusting to changed realities. This is another attempt to manipulate, however. No male involved in “a relationship” with a feminist – regardless of moral attributes like celibacy and chasteness - is worthy of being called a “man.” He’s nothing but cock and balls. Celtic lady sees the effects of this, but is unwilling to face reality and adjust accordingly. She wants to have her cake and eat it, and if white men can’t provide the magic she’ll take her goodies to Habib. In this she reveals several aspects of herself, the most important of which is that her dignity is entirely located between her legs. Celtic’s defensive use of feminism handicaps her search for a white man. Any single men reading this? Assuming she’s not been tainted by third world scum, I suspect there is potential in her. Really. 47
Posted by Captainchaos on Sat, 08 Nov 2008 22:20 | # “All take, instantaneous gratification and replenishment, blaming men unjustly, no give, and “if you don’t like it then I’ll demonstrate I can be a real bitch (by availing myself of legal options and services not available to you).” Its political objective was to reduce white men to sex organs.” - Henry For an ‘amateur psychologist’ you are fuckin’-A on the ball. Who says the Jews are smarter than us? “Assuming she’s not been tainted by third world scum, I suspect there is potential in her.” Good luck to her. She and “Tired of Idiots” seem suspiciously like they are looking for something and they keep looking here. Keep truckin’ White man. 48
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sat, 08 Nov 2008 22:32 | #
Whaaaaaaaa?????!!!!!!! I strongly recommend no white man touch this “Celtic” specimen with a ten-foot pole. The man foolish enough to go near her will rue the day he was born soon enough, once she’s got him securely ensnared then turns on him with a viciousness he can’t even imagine. You’d actually better off taking your chances with a random Bangkok pole-dancer or one of these East-European mail-order brides with the secret Albanian or Bulgarian mafia-type boyfriend on the side who tries to bump you off the minute you’ve tied the knot and signed everything over to her. Either of those would be a better bet. Celtic has made her bed, now let her sleep in it ... alongside her sixteen cats. Celtic, if you’re hanging around: drop the “women’s lib” (what you call “feminism”) if you want any chance at all of getting yourself a decent quality Euro-race husband. As you come across now, you’re strictly an untouchable in the mind of any white man worth a damn. Right, I know that’s a shocker, the lesbians never told you that in college. Well, it’s never too late to learn. Uhhhh .... wait ..... actually, I take that back: where finding a husband and starting a family are concerned, yes there is such a thing as “too late to learn” — as so many white women duped by women’s lib are tragically finding out. It’s dictated by the ticking of the biological clock, honey, as you are doubtless only too well aware, so I won’t rub it in (it’s probably your biggest nightmare already as it is). 49
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sat, 08 Nov 2008 22:57 | #
Whipping “feminism” up and inflaming it is also used as a potent tribal warfare weapon, for obvious reasons: gets white women to hate white men, forces white birth rates down by separating white men from white women, disrupts the white family which in turn weakens a big part of white society’s foundational bedrock, gets white women more open to looking for sex and love with non-white men and with Jews since Euro men have now in their minds been “ruled out for the purpose — their college teachers told them so,” places Euro men on the defensive in their own societies, clearly an extremely important advantage for any attacker of Euro society since men are the component you want to weaken first in toppling that society and extinguishing that race, plus a plethora of additional advantages. Whipping up college-age Euro females into a women’s-lib frenzy has been a major part of the Jewish frontal assault on white society and on the white race since the sixties. 50
Posted by B on Sun, 09 Nov 2008 01:14 | # Da Prez appointed his economic transition council ‘n shit. They’re a playable substitute for the Board of Directors of Brawndo. No evidence that 16 of the 17 know anything about making anything more complicated than that. If that. Most of them are lawyers like Frito. 51
Posted by Guessedworker on Sun, 09 Nov 2008 01:31 | # The team is:-
53
Posted by B on Sun, 09 Nov 2008 02:13 | # One engineer. Eric Schmidt of Google. Eight of the seventeen have various amounts of personal responsibility for the Crisis from having served before in the Fed, the SEC or the Executive Branch in high financial positions. If we add the other banksters the guilty % increases. Clear “Wall Streeters” weigh in at eight. Anne Mulcahy of Xerox is the only one with a distant relationship to manufacturing. And she came up on the sales side of the force. Her tenure at Xerox was accompanied with a 30% reduction in employees and major outsourcing of engineering and manufacturing. Buffett is just a good stock picker who focused on finance and consumer services his entire career. No one would think to ask his advice about any economic matter except for the fact he has a lot of paper market gains accumulated during an era of paper values expansion. If numbers on paper is the test then King Abdullah and Hugo Chavez are clearly far wiser than him on these matters. It’s unclear what Granholm and Bonior can offer other than a two-vote bloc for Soviet style subsidies to GM and Ford. More serious is what doesn’t appear in that “team”. No one with real expertise in hard sciences, manufacturing, fuel and energy production, research and development, transportation, civil engineering and infrastructure, agriculture or medicine. Based on the advisory team, Obamanomics clearly consists of: law, political pork distribution, paper finance, paper support services (Google and Xerox) and consumer service businesses. The only economic transition that gang is qualified to manage is the USA’s continuing transition into a 3d World country. 54
Posted by Captainchaos on Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:05 | # “Antonio Villaraigosa (Mayor, City of Los Angeles)” So, the Apocalypse is finally come. 55
Posted by Eman on Sun, 09 Nov 2008 19:43 | # “The night we waved goodbye to America… our last best hope on Earth Anyone would think we had just elected a hip, skinny and youthful replacement for God, with a plan to modernise Heaven and Hell – or that at the very least John Lennon had come back from the dead. The swooning frenzy over the choice of Barack Obama as President of the United States must be one of the most absurd waves of self-deception and swirling fantasy ever to sweep through an advanced civilisation. At least Mandela-worship – its nearest equivalent – is focused on a man who actually did something. I really don’t see how the Obama devotees can ever in future mock the Moonies, the Scientologists or people who claim to have been abducted in flying saucers. This is a cult like the one which grew up around Princess Diana, bereft of reason and hostile to facts. ObamaIt already has all the signs of such a thing. The newspapers which recorded Obama’s victory have become valuable relics. You may buy Obama picture books and Obama calendars and if there isn’t yet a children’s picture version of his story, there soon will be. Proper books, recording his sordid associates, his cowardly voting record, his astonishingly militant commitment to unrestricted abortion and his blundering trip to Africa, are little-read and hard to find. If you can believe that this undistinguished and conventionally Left-wing machine politician is a sort of secular saviour, then you can believe anything. He plainly doesn’t believe it himself. His cliche-stuffed, PC clunker of an acceptance speech suffered badly from nerves. It was what you would expect from someone who knew he’d promised too much and that from now on the easy bit was over. He needn’t worry too much. From now on, the rough boys and girls of America’s Democratic Party apparatus, many recycled from Bill Clinton’s stained and crumpled entourage, will crowd round him, to collect the rich spoils of his victory and also tell him what to do, which is what he is used to. Just look at his sermon by the shores of Lake Michigan. He really did talk about a ‘new dawn’, and a ‘timeless creed’ (which was ‘yes, we can’). He proclaimed that ‘change has come’. He revealed that, despite having edited the Harvard Law Review, he doesn’t know what ‘enormity’ means. He reached depths of oratorical drivel never even plumbed by our own Mr Blair, burbling about putting our hands on the arc of history (or was it the ark of history?) and bending it once more toward the hope of a better day (Don’t try this at home). I am not making this up. No wonder that awful old hack Jesse Jackson sobbed as he watched. How he must wish he, too, could get away with this sort of stuff. And it was interesting how the President-elect failed to lift his admiring audience by repeated – but rather hesitant – invocations of the brainless slogan he was forced by his minders to adopt against his will – ‘Yes, we can’. They were supposed to thunder ‘Yes, we can!’ back at him, but they just wouldn’t join in. No wonder. Yes we can what exactly? Go home and keep a close eye on the tax rate, is my advice. He’d have been better off bursting into ‘I’d like to teach the world to sing in perfect harmony’ which contains roughly the same message and might have attracted some valuable commercial sponsorship. Perhaps, being a Chicago crowd, they knew some of the things that 52.5 per cent of America prefers not to know. They know Obama is the obedient servant of one of the most squalid and unshakeable political machines in America. They know that one of his alarmingly close associates, a state-subsidised slum landlord called Tony Rezko, has been convicted on fraud and corruption charges. They also know the US is just as segregated as it was before Martin Luther King – in schools, streets, neighbourhoods, holidays, even in its TV-watching habits and its choice of fast-food joint. The difference is that it is now done by unspoken agreement rather than by law. If Mr Obama’s election had threatened any of that, his feel-good white supporters would have scuttled off and voted for John McCain, or practically anyone. But it doesn’t. Mr Obama, thanks mainly to the now-departed grandmother he alternately praised as a saint and denounced as a racial bigot, has the huge advantages of an expensive private education. He did not have to grow up in the badlands of useless schools, shattered families and gangs which are the lot of so many young black men of his generation. If the nonsensical claims made for this election were true, then every positive discrimination programme aimed at helping black people into jobs they otherwise wouldn’t get should be abandoned forthwith. Nothing of the kind will happen. On the contrary, there will probably be more of them. And if those who voted for Obama were all proving their anti-racist nobility, that presumably means that those many millions who didn’t vote for him were proving themselves to be hopeless bigots. This is obviously untrue. I was in Washington DC the night of the election. America’s beautiful capital has a sad secret. It is perhaps the most racially divided city in the world, with 15th Street – which runs due north from the White House – the unofficial frontier between black and white. But, like so much of America, it also now has a new division, and one which is in many ways much more important. I had attended an election-night party in a smart and liberal white area, but was staying the night less than a mile away on the edge of a suburb where Spanish is spoken as much as English, plus a smattering of tongues from such places as Ethiopia, Somalia and Afghanistan. As I walked, I crossed another of Washington’s secret frontiers. There had been a few white people blowing car horns and shouting, as the result became clear. But among the Mexicans, Salvadorans and the other Third World nationalities, there was something like ecstasy. They grasped the real significance of this moment. They knew it meant that America had finally switched sides in a global cultural war. Forget the Cold War, or even the Iraq War. The United States, having for the most part a deeply conservative people, had until now just about stood out against many of the mistakes which have ruined so much of the rest of the world. Suspicious of welfare addiction, feeble justice and high taxes, totally committed to preserving its own national sovereignty, unabashedly Christian in a world part secular and part Muslim, suspicious of the Great Global Warming panic, it was unique. These strengths had been fading for some time, mainly due to poorly controlled mass immigration and to the march of political correctness. They had also been weakened by the failure of America’s conservative party – the Republicans – to fight on the cultural and moral fronts. They preferred to posture on the world stage. Scared of confronting Left-wing teachers and sexual revolutionaries at home, they could order soldiers to be brave on their behalf in far-off deserts. And now the US, like Britain before it, has begun the long slow descent into the Third World. How sad. Where now is our last best hope on Earth? - http://hitchensblog.mailonsunday.co.uk/2008/11/the-night-we-wa.html 56
Posted by Guessedworker on Sun, 09 Nov 2008 20:19 | # Eman, Thanks. One of the comments beneath Peter’s article reads:-
The only thing that baffles me is why Peter allowed that one to be posted. He’ll be running security at the RWB next. 57
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 09 Nov 2008 21:10 | #
But he hasn’t put his finger on the problem. He hasn’t identified that problem as race. (The problem is actually twofold, race and the Jews, but hey I’m not greedy; I’ll take whatever I can get.) Yes he talks about “racial” this and racial that, and refers to non-Euro races and immigration and bad neighborhoods (made bad by race) and de facto segregation and white hypocrisy, but hasn’t said plainly that race is the problem. I don’t think he ever will. He’s had enough time by now to figure it out and to decide whether or not he’ll be honest in regard to it. There are people who are intelligent and are mentally trending in the right general direction who nevertheless can’t figure it out — Paul Belien and Fjordman for instance. They just can’t see it, can’t understand the crux of what’s going on. (Of course there are also people who are intelligent and mentally trending in the wrong general direction and always have been who can’t figure it out, Hitchens’ younger brother for example. Peter isn’t one of those.) 58
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Mon, 10 Nov 2008 03:06 | # I can’t imagine what justification BrusselsJournal.com had in mind for publishing the photo of a white woman with the name “OBAMA” scrawled across her bare chest, in one of its pieces on his election victory. This is the first time I’ve ever had occasion to question that blog’s taste. I would have expected to see a photo like that in a different type of blog, not that one. 59
Posted by Lurker on Mon, 10 Nov 2008 03:25 | # The Hitchins post still seems a whole lot better than most other MSM offerings. Glass half-full rather than half-empty. 60
Posted by n/a on Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:15 | # “Celtic” clearly is not a native speaker of American English. Those of you responding to “her” as though she is what she claims to be are wasting your time. The only real question in my mind is if it’s a mustached she-desi who has been rejected by white men or a biologically male desi . . . who’s been rejected by white men. I don’t care enough about making that determination to read more of its posts. Post a comment:
Next entry: The Great British Tradition of Conserving Homogeneity
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News— CENTRAL— Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. (View) Patriotic Alternative given the black spot by Guessedworker on Thursday, 14 March 2024 17:14. (View) On Spengler and the inevitable by Guessedworker on Wednesday, 21 February 2024 17:33. (View) Twilight for the gods of complacency? by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 02 January 2024 10:22. (View) — NEWS — Moscow’s Bataclan by Guessedworker on Friday, 22 March 2024 22:22. (View) Soren Renner Is Dead by James Bowery on Thursday, 21 March 2024 13:50. (View) Collett sets the record straight by Guessedworker on Thursday, 14 March 2024 17:41. (View) CommentsThorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 25 Apr 2024 15:19. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 25 Apr 2024 11:53. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Wed, 24 Apr 2024 22:36. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Wed, 24 Apr 2024 14:20. (View) weremight commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Tue, 23 Apr 2024 04:24. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Mon, 22 Apr 2024 22:54. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Mon, 22 Apr 2024 16:12. (View) |
Posted by A.H. on Wed, 05 Nov 2008 09:15 | #
Brilliant. Thanks for that.
What a tiresome night - excruciating obummer worship. Best bit was John Bolton ripping apart the beeb for bias.