Posted by James Bowery on Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:39 | #

Whoever takes up the gauntlet (or scimitar as the case may be) will earn a place in history if they hammer home the simple point that:

Sooner or later, a citizen’s dividend, replacing all government transfer programs with an equal monthly payment to all resident adult citizens will be pursued by one of the New Right parties in the European Union.  When that happens, the New Right will take all the lands of Europe back for its peoples.

Posted by James Bowery on Tue, 11 Aug 2009 01:37 | #

Aside from the financial problem there is the simple reality that I am from across the Pond.

PS:  I don’t believe Press TV is BBC.

Posted by e564 on Tue, 11 Aug 2009 02:14 | #

Not every day Big Brother comes knocking on your door for an interview, GW. No one could do it like you could. Sure you can’t do it?

Posted by Captainchaos on Tue, 11 Aug 2009 02:34 | #

Couldn’t Jonathan Bowden do it?

Posted by Al Ross on Tue, 11 Aug 2009 02:51 | #

GW, your dedication to ‘family duty’ is, of course, admirable but would your family readily forgive you if you spurned this unique opportunity to advance the worthy cause of its members’ posterity?

Posted by jamesUK on Tue, 11 Aug 2009 05:11 | #

When duscussing immigration as an example I think they should use the Kosovo precedent. Le Pen sometimes references this when talking about immigration into France.

Good example of Western countries supporting Muslim mass immigration into Kosovo from Albania until they become the majority and ethnic conflict and pogrom against the Serbs and other minorities which has become a den of organised crime. 

http://www.truthinmedia.org/Bulletins2008/Kosovo.html

Posted by Guessedworker on Tue, 11 Aug 2009 07:53 | #

Al,

I had a call from my Mum’s Lifeline at 1.15am on Monday morning, telling me she had reported feeling ill and the paramedics were called.  They took her in and she will be given a pacemaker tomorrow or Thursday.  But that means I have to care for my disabled and diabetic father for the duration - which will be all this week at least.  There is no way I can take off to London for several hours.  The Press TV invitation is impossible for me.

Posted by Guessedworker on Tue, 11 Aug 2009 08:46 | #

I have suggested to the interview producer that she contacts Jonathan Bowden and Troy Southgate.  If she knows anything at all about the radical right, which she probably doesn’t, she will already have tried both before coming to me.

Posted by Al Ross on Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:12 | #

I understand perfectly, GW. You certainly have your work cut out. I still feel pangs of guilt that my working overseas precluded me from assisting very much with similar parental crises.

Posted by gina on Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:31 | #

Press TV is an Iranian channel and Lauren Booth works for them.  I believe they are anti-Jewish.

Posted by Bill on Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:10 | #

GW.  A bit O/T I’m afraid but this mornings events conspired.

.... On Thursday 13th August, at 2.30pm in London they will be recording a programme titled “The spread of the far right in Europe and economic climate”.

How do we counter, combat, reject the labels so casually hung around our necks.  We are not far right, we are not far anything as far as I can tell, I admit to being patriotic and loving my country and if that means in the eyes of the lefty I’m far right - then so be it.

The labelling with which we are systematically and casually subjected to leads eventually to the slaughter of millions as witnessed in the Soviet Union.  Vicious repetitive casual labelling consigns the labelled to being subliminally perceived as sub human, and in the mindset of the politically correct, are deemed disposable.

I was prompted to write this as I have just read the headline of today’s Mail, where the heinous behaviour of a couple looking after a child, led to the unspeakable death of an innocent child.

I couldn’t bring myself to read the details in the body of the article, it was the headline that stirred other thoughts.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/index.html

The lover of the mother of the killed child is described by the author of this piece as a Neo-Nazi.

Now I do find this description of the killer as a Neo-Nazi most odd, what a strange thing to say.  Here we have (most admittedly) an indescribable death of a small child at the hands of what I can only describe as fiendish monster but to describe him as a Neo Nazi, Hmmm?

I can understand the media calling him evil or grotesque, or sadist or whatever, but I do find the term Neo-Nazi a most interesting choice.

Are we now seeing an enlargement to the catchment area of labelling?  Will any white man they, (liberal left media) perceive and label as Neo-Nazi now be seen in the eyes of our people as being capable of torturing a child to death and therefore sub-human?  Bogymen far right BNP members/supporters?

I seriously suspect it is, and it will irredeemably condemn that person, just as as equally (or more so) than the terms ‘far right’, or ‘extremist will.’

PS.

GW.  Don’t get participating in any debates that are enclosed within a politically correct wired fence.  I once received a government invitation to take part in a focus group discussion.  (for a not an inconsiderable days expenses.)  I did not reply.

Posted by Q on Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:20 | #

I recall a couple of years ago Jared Taylor was invited to, and appeared on, CNN’s Paula Zahn Show. The topic was Race in America. I was all pumped up and excited with anticipation to watch Mr. Taylor present our side, but the others there barely let him get in a word edgewise. The opposition drown him out almost completely. But he did manage to get this in:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ozvdRoW3l4

In contrast to JT’s genteel style, here’s Reverend Dr. Manning:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_aIvfFq3BA&feature=related

Posted by Q on Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:24 | #

Here in the America, “the land of the free…” the government has moved beyond calling us ‘far right’, they are classifying us as potential terrorists, seriously. Who qualifies as potential terrorists? Americans who:

Oppose abortion

Oppose same-sex marriage

Oppose restrictions on firearms

Oppose lax immigration laws

Oppose the policies of President Obama regarding immigration, citizenship, and the expansion of social programs

Oppose continuation of free trade agreements

Are suspect of foreign regimes

Fear Communist regimes

Oppose a “one world” government

Bemoan the decline of U.S. stature in the world

Are upset with loss of U.S. manufacturing jobs to China and India, and more

LIFE WITH BIG BROTHER
Why is National Guard recruiting for ‘internment’ cops?
Ad campaign seeks workers at ‘civilian resettlement facility’

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=106304

Posted by Bo on Wed, 12 Aug 2009 05:00 | #

Bill on August 11, 2009, 10:10 AM, says in part, “How do we counter, combat, reject the labels so casually hung around our necks.  We are not far right, we are not far anything as far as I can tell, I admit to being patriotic and loving my country and if that means in the eyes of the lefty I’m far right - then so be it.

“The labelling with which we are systematically and casually subjected to leads eventually to the slaughter of millions as witnessed in the Soviet Union.  Vicious repetitive casual labelling consigns the labelled to being subliminally perceived as sub human, and in the mindset of the politically correct, are deemed disposable.”

============

Truer words were never spoken.  We’ve been dealing with the issue of naming & labeling for 19 years, and have accumulated a good deal of information about rejecting name-calling.  It’s easy to do.  We have an entire syllabus online to teach Europeans & European Americans how to rebut this kind of stuff.

In fact, we just spanked the vicious Paul Krugman in our local San Jose Mercury News, and sent it around to different leadership elements including this web site.  We don’t send out everything that we do, but this was a great spanking because it marked our first hi-jacking of the word “racially-charged” and our first substitution of “urban-coastal types” in place of “elites” which is a code word anyway.  We’ve long since abandoned accusing our adversaries of “racism” in favor of denouncing them as “supremacists.”

We have discovered that fighting negative naming & labeling is also a vehicle for teaching our friends how to talk without sputtering.  We believe making a public fuss about this naming & labeling is a great way to let the diverse white American & European peoples know about themselves as a defensive white political identity.

Posted by Lurker on Wed, 12 Aug 2009 06:22 | #

The spread of the far right in Europe and economic climate

And what do unwelcome bacteria do? They spread.

The labelling is right there, implicit.

Bill - I noticed that neo-nazi reference in some of the baby P stories. I read through looking to see what they based this on. Only that he taught the child to give a nazi salute…and thats it. Funny, because these scumbags dont strike me as the type to really hold political convictions of any sort. Its just a typical throwaway slur.

Ironically the party these same MSM outlets also smear as being ‘neo-nazi’ is the only one advocating executing these pieces of filth. Which, if one reads the comment threads on this story in the British MSM, would be a policy meeting with majority approval.

Posted by Bill on Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:06 | #

On my recent travels (just now as a matter of fact) I came across this.

The Role of Hitler in the New World Order

When I first set off on my quest for answers a few years ago, I was at a loss as to why, after 60 years after the end of the Second World War was I increasingly being reminded by the media of the evils of Hitler.  I new it must be something to do with the holocaust but I never connected beyond that. 

The media never elaborated further other than to equate in one’s mind that Hitler was the personification of evil, usually accompanied by grainy grey images of piled high stick like bodies.

Well, people of my generation needed no reminder of this as we had been brainwashed by the media since our earliest memories.  It never occurred to me that these messages were targeted toward a younger audience, and even if I had - I’d have wondered why.

Needless to say I have since connected the dots, but even even after having read a mountain of information I have never actually read why Hitler figures so prominently in today’s political affairs.  So you can imagine my delight when I came across this.

In this scheme of things, one figure looms above all others: Adolf Hitler. Scarcely a fortnight goes by without some TV channel featuring a major documentary about him and his regime. An opponent of the NWO may not admire Hitler, or Stalin, or Mao or Tojo or Cortes or Pizarro, much less all of them. But the message of NWO propaganda is that any alternative to the NWO will develop along these lines. As the Chief Villain, Hitler stands for all of these. He is the Archetype of Evil, against which the NWO must look Good. In terms of George Orwell’s scenario in 1984, Hitler is the new Goldstein. Any opponent of the NWO is thus forced to take a stand on Hitler. The media message, through its constant focus on Hitler, is that opposing the NWO is tantamount to supporting Hitler. Conversely, to oppose Hitler is, by implication, to support the NWO.

http://www.mailstar.net/hitler.html

To those readers who are tut-tutting at my naivety, you must remember,  I had literally arrive here straight off the street to look for answers.

Posted by e564 on Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:23 | #

I have suggested to the interview producer that she contacts Jonathan Bowden and Troy Southgate.

LOL. See, that’d give Southgate a chance to promote Southgate, not “us”. Bowden, ok.

Posted by Thunder on Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:43 | #

Bill,

I thought you might enjoy this quote; rather ironic, given the truth of your comment:

“It is part of the genius of a great leader to make adversaries of different fields appear as always belonging to one category. As soon as the wavering masses find themselves confronting
too many enemies objectivity at once steps in and the question is raised whether actually all the others are wrong and their own cause or their own movement right…. Therefore a number of different internal enemies must always be regarded as one insuch a way that in the opinion of the mass of one’s own adherents the war is being waged against one enemy alone. This strengthens the belief in one’s own cause and increases one’s bitterness against the attackers.” Hitler in Mein Kampf