Sorry, but we’ll never understand women So science has pronounced. The final, seemingly unanswerable question has apparently been answered. Woman and her mystique lies bared beneath the detached, indeed pitilessly disinterested gaze of, to all intents and purposes, androgenous scientific enquiry.
But do we believe him? Well for one thing, and though I speak as a man of little experience in these matters, I don’t see why it would benefit a lady to play Russian roulette with five bullets in the chamber. If Man A, B, C, D and E all prove to be brief and inadequately attentive lovers Nature has still visited upon the unfortunate and clearly somewhat footloose femme fatale the probability of impregnation by an unsuitable paramour. Doh! No, I think these scientific chappies will have to go away and try again. Should they be looking at the male of the species instead? Why is evolution so rotten? Why hasn’t this supposed female selection pressure slowed us down? Do we want to get it all over and done with in a jiffy, after all? I mean, two and half minutes! Hardly the time it takes to boil the kettle for a nice cup of tea afterwards. That, of course, would be before one selfishly falls asleep. Comments:2
Posted by Charles Copeland on Wed, 08 Jun 2005 19:24 | # The expert on all these matters relating to beast with two backs is my good friend Chris Brand: http://www.crispian.demon.co.uk/ His site is a bit messy, though (the new stuff isn’t at the top, and isn’t at the bottom, but somewhere in between). However, John Ray has obliged us by tidying him up at: More later ... 3
Posted by Stuka on Thu, 09 Jun 2005 01:55 | # Sorry, but we’ll never understand women Maybe not, but I certainly enjoy trying. 4
Posted by who on Thu, 09 Jun 2005 15:44 | # J. Ray may know a lot about getting women, but he doesn’t seem to be as wise in keeping them. Post a comment:
Next entry: Site down again
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & NewsCommentsThorn commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Sat, 11 Jan 2025 00:26. (View) Manc commented in entry 'Charles crowned king of anywhere' on Thu, 09 Jan 2025 20:31. (View) Manc commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Tue, 07 Jan 2025 21:54. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:42. (View) |
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Wed, 08 Jun 2005 17:33 | #
I for one am way too inexperienced in these matters to comment but I think we ought to bring John Ray into the thread, he being such a ... such a ... How to put it? ... such a ... “man of the world,” shall we say? ... (OK, let’s be quite blunt—he’s known to all and sundry here as MR.com’s resident Don Juan) and therefore by far the likeliest to shed light on the subject for the benefit of all.