Posted by snax on Sat, 21 Jun 2008 17:52 | #

“We believe that a slur-free society is possible”.

So why did you create the “non-Arab Semite” label, modeled after the “non-Hispanic White” ‘slur’?

If you really find what the ADL does objectionable, why model yourself ‘The White Abe Foxman’?

Posted by 2R on Sat, 21 Jun 2008 19:00 | #

I just want to thank you for doing your part to defend our peoples interests.

Posted by Bo on Sat, 21 Jun 2008 19:34 | #

Snax, a slur-free society is possible but sometimes one must fight fire with fire. Gentle explanations of why “non-Hispanic white” was unacceptable just weren’t working. When we served the concept up to them in terms those who were abusing “non-Hispanic white” could understand, the abusers quit. Case closed…one slur ended, another one put back on the weapons shelf.

If you look at our “Fighting Back” section (new), you’ll see some shock educational email messages to other abusers and 30 of their best friends that will really curl your hair. There’s a reason that 2x4 wooden boards are linked in folklore with donkeys. These shock educational email messages are about the only way to get through to hardened slur-addicts.

While we find many things that ADL does objectionable, we are in awe of the way they’ve had success in managing public discourse. We’ve managed to get only three people fired in the past 18 years, so we have a long way to go to catch up with ADL.

By the way, just for your information, ADL is in a crisis state. It appears that they do not understand that their strength depended on the adroit use of passive-aggressive psychology, and they have moved fully into the use of aggressive psychology. Unless they reverse course, watch for ADL to fade.

PS: “The White Abe Foxman” is just plain funny. And humor is always an excellent weapon.

Posted by silver on Sun, 22 Jun 2008 13:20 | #

It’s not a white Abe Foxman you need; it’s a white Moses.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 22 Jun 2008 15:02 | #

“By the way, just for your information, ADL is in a crisis state. It appears that they do not understand that their strength depended on the adroit use of passive-aggressive psychology, and they have moved fully into the use of aggressive psychology. Unless they reverse course, watch for ADL to fade.”  (—Bo)

That’s very interesting.  I had never thought of any of that, but the first part of the analysis is correct:  their strength certainly was enhanced by their adroit use of passive-aggressive techniques, and it’s true they have moved from passive-aggressive to a wholly aggressive approach under Foxman.  It remains to be seen if they’ll fade as a result, though.  I doubt it. 

Notice that the whole Jewish community has followed a path parallel to that of the ADL:  passive-aggressive to exclusively aggressive.  The neocons (a wholly Jewish movement with a few Euro fig leaves) are merely the most blatant manifestation of this:  every Jewish organization has undergone this transformation.  Why wouldn’t they?  This country has been under Jewish hegemony for forty years.  The Jews have achieved hegemony over the strongest country in the world.  They’re drunk with power.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 22 Jun 2008 15:24 | #

What you’d think would be scaring the Jews is the Eurosphere’s demographic extinction as a result of the open-borders policy they, the Jews, push more than anything else (more than anything else except Israel’s well-being of course).  I haven’t figured out how they see the extinction of every Euro-race man, woman, and child on earth, extinction to be brought about through government-enforced transformation into Negroes, Mexicans, Orientals, and Mystery Meat, as advantageous to them but that they do is clear:  you don’t push a policy as aggressively or as singlemindedly as they push that without wanting it so badly it almost qualifies as a tenet of your religion.  Maybe in their eyes that’s it:  it’s the equivalent of a tenet of their religion?  Maybe what Emmanuel Swedenborg (and others) wrote is true:  the Jewish dream is to be the world’s slave masters lording it over all other peoples as slaves, and Euros stand in the way of that, so must be exterminated?  The Jewish motivation would almost have to be something like that, because I don’t see what else it could be — unless we’re talking about sheer ethnonational group-insanity.  Which may also be the case:  in the Jews you have an entire group that qualifies as criminally insane on a groupwide basis.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 22 Jun 2008 15:41 | #

“you don’t push a policy as aggressively or as singlemindedly as they push that”  (—my comment)

When I put “push” I refer not to their pushing to open the borders — that they already achieved decades ago, as everyone knows (in alliance with the Irish Catholics and other societal degenerates but the Jews were far and away the ring-leaders).  I refer to their being currently THE biggest force opposing the closing of the borders and the repairing of the demographic damage already inflicted (again, in alliance with the Irish Catholics and other societal degenerates but the Jews are far and away the ring-leaders).

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 22 Jun 2008 15:53 | #

As for Eurosphere countries that haven’t yet fully and completely opened their borders to unlimited volumes of non-white Third-Worlder race-replacement, yes, the Jews — international Jewry — are presently pushing with every ounce of their strength to impose that on them without exception; to give them the 1965 treatment, in other words, exactly what Jewry gave the U.S.  In every Eurosphere country where immigration of the racially unlike is an issue will be found Jews heavily represented on the open-borders side, alongside plenty of non-whites, clueless women voters, homosexuals, communists, other kinds of Euro degenerate of various stripes, and so on — the usual Jewry-led anti-Euro alliance of degenerates, morons, communists, non-whites, and clueless women, financially backed of course by international Jewry’s billions — there’s nothing like a few billion here and a few billion there to grease the skids, as they say, really get things moving your way, getting any hold-outs to see things your way ...

Posted by the Narrator... on Sun, 22 Jun 2008 15:58 | #

...“redneck, hillbilly, cracker, white trash,....”

The usage of these terms of denigration has turned into a bit of a two edged sword for the multicultists though, as many Whites have actually embraced them and have thus begun to openly revel in sub-cultures that are (with, ironically, media approval) implicitly White.

The more the media goes out of their way to point towards, mock and ridicule White sub-cultures such as hillbillies or rednecks, the more Whites gain a sense of White self awareness.

I’m not saying that this (embracing the “White trash culture” by Whites) is necessarily a good thing, but it does serve to illustrate the age old law of unintended consequences…

Posted by Bo on Sun, 22 Jun 2008 20:35 | #

Fred, I think you will find an intellectually satisfying answer to your question if you take a good look at the concept of “tikkun olam.” It’s about a duty to perfect, reform, or repair the world and it’s a very good way to examine what appears to be an idea taught from birth to certain children. To really get the meaning, you’ll have to do what we call “drilling down” into the concept to get a pretty good idea of its meaning. Another and much simpler solution is the final commandment in the ordinary list of 613 commandments which will also give you some insight. For that list, go to:

http://www.jewfaq.org/613.htm

David Hamilton made a useful point about triple negatives, and I apologized to him privately.

The Narrator makes two good points, but the part of this conflict that is logocentric is well served by slapping back at those who are not us and who use slurs to demean us…not because we are offended, but because the slur gives us permission to explore the heart & mind of those using such slanders in the most graphic way possible. Responding to a slur is almost the only way our speaking in a Euro-centric way is possible, and it is very powerful. You can see examples at the “Fighting Back” section in our online syllabus.

His second point was about “Implicit Whiteness” which is a concept that will acquire more power in the future. The reasoning for my saying that is too lengthy to go into here, but the sheer quantity of “Implicit Whiteness” is amazing: most rock concerts, heavy metal concerts, ball room dance contests, 4-H clubs, tractor pulls, truck pulls, rodeos, historical re-enactments. patriotic organizations, conservative & libertarian groups, car races, horse races, conservation groups, immigration reform groups, dog shows, cat shows, zoo support groups, public gardens support groups, and so much more are loaded with “Implicit Whiteness.” Some day these folks will get over their embarrassment at not having done sufficient “outreach” to others, and just enjoy their hobbies and maybe even their whiteness together. I have pointed this out to some people in these situations and, to relieve their embarrassment, I have reminded them that they will always be who they are. Unfortunately, they usually don’t understand that until they are half way home.

Posted by Barry on Wed, 25 Jun 2008 09:20 | #

From a UK perspective, I’m in two minds about this. I think there are fewer anti-white slurs in common use over here - many of the slurs listed on the US website are certainly intended to cause maximum offence and probably have far more resonance.

I can’t help feeling, however, that white people should be above this sort of protest which, with Blacks, often sounds petty - particularly since, as The Narrator has pointed out, insults tend to give Whites a much-needed sense of self awareness. The use of ‘chav’ in the UK (referring to a particular kind of white, working class youth) has had this effect even though it wasn’t devised by a minority group as far as I’m aware.

Posted by GT on Thu, 26 Jun 2008 01:23 | #

“Implicit Whiteness” is amazing: most rock concerts, heavy metal concerts, ball room dance contests, 4-H clubs, tractor pulls, truck pulls, rodeos, historical re-enactments. patriotic organizations, conservative & libertarian groups, car races, horse races, conservation groups, immigration reform groups, dog shows, cat shows, zoo support groups, public gardens support groups, and so much more are loaded with “Implicit Whiteness.”

Implicit White behavior is a positive means of achieving exclusionary results.  Where it is feasible, historical authenticity should be used to maximize the effect.  I also think “egalitarians” can use the concept of free association to promote, in private organizations, the exclusion of non-Whites on the basis of “skin-color,” ancestry, and religion.  How?  If race is meaningless, then there is nothing to choose between homogenous and heterogeneous groupings.  One’s decision to offer membership or join a group on the basis of skin-color may then be a reflection of personal preference, which needn’t be justified any more than standards of beauty.  After all, we all know that beauty is relative and all in the eye of the beholder – right?  Right? 

I think Sear’s passive-aggressive approach has many applications in private life and politics.  However, there is also a need for hard-hitting, linguistically-correct counter-pejoratives.

Posted by GT on Thu, 26 Jun 2008 02:40 | #

This is a continuation of my preceding post.  Again, from an “egalitarian” perspective:

Free association in a private organization may be condemned or denied on the basis of white privilege and power.

If free association is condemned or denied by other Whites, then they are enabling or exercising the very power they condemn to create or perpetuate distinctions of power and privilege within the “white” group.  The motivation behind their “anti-racism” then becomes suspect.  We charge them with condescension toward non-Whites and of enabling or implementing the maltreatment of less powerful Whites who merely wish to freely associate on the basis of skin-color. A historical and moral examination of the hypocritical, incidentally-white H. Monetarus becomes useful at this point.

Thoughts?