The Jew and the gypsies

Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 27 September 2011 00:48.

I know, a boring and predictable post. But no matter how often I encounter the sheer brazen audacity of these repellent, racist creatures who, time and again, interfere against the interests our people, I still experience one of those lost-for-words, head-shaking moments. Of course ... a Jew. It has to be a Jew.

For the uninitiated, in England there is a practise among mainly Irish travellers (or gypsies) of buying up a few acres of agricultural land and invading it very quickly and en masse, laying concrete, putting in drainage and power, and occupying the site without planning consent.

Naturally enough, this causes much anguish among the local community, as they find their way of life infected by theft, filth and hostility from the newcomers. It becomes impossible to move home. It becomes unbearable to remain. The local authority, having embarked upon the battle to evict the gypsies and reclaim the site, finds itself confronted by a cynical, human rights-savvy opponent accessing public funds to fight the public interest. Years sometimes pass this way. At Dale Farm, it’s been ten! And now, Dr Jonathan Oppenheim - “one of the worlds leading physicists” - is doing his very best to prolong the agony for the real victims of the Dale Farm affair.

... his greatest contribution has been at the High Court where he has been pouring over planning law books and papers to help advise on the case. Yesterday the travellers successfully extended an injunction which prevents them from being evicted until next week.

“The eviction of Dale Farm is becoming increasingly untenable,” he said. “We are proving that the residents had a reasonable expectation that they would get planning permission because everybody around them was getting it.

“We say that the prime reason they are not being allowed to stay is because of fear against them.”

Of course, the “unfounded” and “irrational” European “fear” of the “other”. Every Jew who has used that stratagem is projecting. They can’t help it. They must trespass against the host. It’s their sociobiology. As it’s ours, eventually, to see the pattern and call a halt to it.

Tags: That Question Again

Comments:

Posted by Lurker on Tue, 27 Sep 2011 02:16 | #

In the ideal world a homeland would be found for the travellers, as this guy loves them so much perhaps it could arranged that jews and gypsies could live together.

Posted by Lurker on Tue, 27 Sep 2011 02:23 | #

I went to their wordpress blog to leave a challenging comment, some might say uncongenial, but like all fearless speakers-of-truth-to-power they have it set up so you have log in to comment. I cant think why? Lol!

Posted by Leon Haller on Tue, 27 Sep 2011 02:57 | #

As I’ve been saying since the 80s, immigration + coercive integration is really a new form of imperialism, perhaps the characteristic form in the modern world.

Alas, we will never be free until we are racially sovereign. The White Republic(s).

But getting there is obviously the problem. I am ever more convinced of what I only intuited more than 30 years ago: that allowing nonwhites to settle in our midst (so much easier to have prevented for the Europeans), was the greatest and certainly most avoidable tragedy in the whole history of our race and civilization. Once done, it seems to be the only thing that cannot be undone.

(PS-GW: some comments you might want to look at over on the nationalist economics thread which you started, but seem to have abandoned).

Posted by anon / uh on Tue, 27 Sep 2011 03:18 | #

Radical idea.

We all tattoo this down our faces:

Pluralism is a weapon.
Pluralism is a weapon.
Pluralism is a weapon.
Pluralism is a weapon.
Pluralism is a weapon.
Pluralism is a weapon.

Bonus with skinheads — more space.

No? Ok.

Of course, the “unfounded” and “irrational” European “fear” of the “other”. Every Jew who has used that stratagem is projecting. They can’t help it. They must trespass against the host. It’s their sociobiology. As it’s ours, eventually, to see the pattern and call a halt to it.

??????!!

Posted by anon / uh on Tue, 27 Sep 2011 03:33 | #

Priceless AJC link. Mark the side menu under “AJC Speaks Your Language”.

“American Jews have consistently maintained a deep interest in United States immigration and refugee policy. According to Jewish tradition, “strangers” are to be welcomed and valued, as we were once “strangers in the land of Egypt.

“Understanding the significance of these events, AJC recently reaffirmed its commitment to fair and generous immigration policies, as fundamentally good for the United States and consistent with Jewish values.”

which, being done into englisc, were,

“GOYIM: WE ARE GOING TO REPLACE YOU”.

Posted by FB on Tue, 27 Sep 2011 04:38 | #

I’m sure the Jew is also virulent anti-Zionist.

Posted by Graham_Lister on Tue, 27 Sep 2011 09:58 | #

GW they are not even Roma just mainly (99%) Irish tinkers.

Of course it is a typical example of hypocrisy and double-standards - multi-culturalism to the max for the goyim and hardline uber-ethnocentric policies for Israel.

What is much more of a problem is why we Euros ‘fall’ for these rhetorical strategies? To use an analogy why is our ‘cultural’ immune system so weak? It seems to be suffering form a pernicious form of an auto-immune syndrome. There are plenty of Euros willingly acting as ‘shabbos goys’ - we understand the basics premises of how Jews operate (and there is probably no changing them on mass) but how can we promote a cultural environment in which Euros simply, on mass, reject these ‘ideas’ as the foolishness they are. Boosting the our ‘cultural’ immune system is the key so that people (particularly the educated middle-classes) refuse to take this nonsense seriously.

Basically the job is to break the dominant liberal paradigm which presently enjoys ‘full spectrum dominance’ - even at a site like MR unfortunately and regularly ‘enjoys’ sub-libertarian ‘circle-jerks’ in the comment sections. It’s a real issue, seemingly for people to actually understand what liberal ideas are (e.g. the ‘free-market’ is a profoundly liberal concept) and how the plasticity of the ideology is one of the key features that makes it so hard to effectively counter-act it.

BTW was there not a recent Dutch survey that had the interesting result that a large % of people openly answered that mass immigration had been the worst mistake in Dutch history? Anyone have a reference? Hope I didn’t imagine it LOL.

Posted by Leon Haller on Tue, 27 Sep 2011 10:52 | #

“on mass”? (en masse?)

Posted by Graham_Lister on Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:11 | #

Leon well done for engaging with the substantive and important issues.

Posted by MOB on Tue, 27 Sep 2011 22:01 | #

Yes, always the ugly Jew in back,

And always the handsome Gentile in front:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/aug/30/vanessa-redgrave-dale-farm-travellers

Posted by Lurker on Wed, 28 Sep 2011 01:48 | #

Where are the black residents at Dale Farm? Where are the Muslim residents, the gay residents? In fact, where are the Roma, the newly arrived enriching Roma? We have to house them somewhere…

How about they can stay at Dale Farm but they must accomodate a certain number of newly arrived Roma, Muslims, blacks, gays etc.

Posted by Matt Parrott on Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:12 | #

My sentiments are with the Irish Travellers. Traveller settlements, FLDS compounds, and Amish communities represent improvements and innovations upon the default GES—or should I say anti-GES—of the communities they’re displacing. The rebirth of authentic tribalism among our people has to begin somewhere, and it will almost certainly be perceived in its early stages as an unwelcome intrusion upon the way of life of the deracinated individualist suburbanites.

The irony here—a familiar irony—is that the Jewish activist is drawn by his myths and sentiments into siding against the people who tolerate him and in favor of the invasive population which would not be so inviting.

Posted by anon / uh on Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:00 | #

“GES”?

If I had a big house, I’d be more than happy to take in a few of those pasty pot-bellied goblinesses. What do they eat, cigarettes and beer? No problem.

Posted by Graham_Lister on Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:59 | #

@ Matt Parrott

So your ‘vision’ is for the UK population to live as Irish tinkers, gippo scum, and uneducated low-level criminals? In a word - RISIBLE.

Posted by lewis on Wed, 28 Sep 2011 22:45 | #

My sentiments are with the Irish Travellers. Traveller settlements, FLDS compounds, and Amish communities represent improvements and innovations

It’s unfair to the FLDS and Amish, who are independent, resourceful, and non-intrusive, to make this comparison.

The irony here—a familiar irony—is that the Jewish activist is drawn by his myths and sentiments into siding against the people who tolerate him and in favor of the invasive population which would not be so inviting.

The invasive population may not be so inviting but it’s not a serious competitor for the niches that Jews compete for, occupy, depend upon for survival. Unlike the people who presently tolerate the Jews.

Posted by anon / uh on Thu, 29 Sep 2011 02:24 | #