The Telegraph censors refutation of Lewis Hamilton the hero

Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, 01 November 2008 15:36.

Today, in its campaign to present the negro Maclaren driver Lewis Hamilton as a national icon, the Telegraph finally came to the point.

... he is a hero to be emulated.

I demurred on the thread. However, my brief if somewhat uncompromising comment was removed by the Telegraph moderators.

There are three fundamental reasons for admiring sportsmen. One is that they reflect some glory on one’s own people.

Hamilton is not English. I am, and I would prefer any Englishman, and indeed anyone of European lineage, to win anything before a Bantu, half or full.

The next reason for admiring a sportsman is that he or she has such a peerless talent, one is bound to applaud.

Hamilton has been silver-spoon fed by his Dad’s friend, Ron Dennis, since he climbed into a kart. In F1 anyone can win in the best car - remember David Coulthard’s introduction to F1 in the all-conquering Williams. Further, uniquely in Hamilton’s case, his team-mate is subtly disadvantaged and, last year, was outrageously regarded by Dennis himself as someone “we are racing against”.

So for now the peerless talent issue remains moot.

The third reason for admiring a sportsman is his or her moral nature. All sport involves a tremendous struggle against the body, and it also offers a stage for the play of moral characteristics and the making of moral choices. Men such as Michael Johnson, Bobby Charlton and Bobby Moore, Don Bradman and Garfield Sobers brought dignity or modesty or a purity of sporting passion that elevated them to the status of the genuine hero.

Michael Schumaker, in contrast, was a very great driver but morally he failed the test, and he was unloved in consequence. The signs are that Hamilton will never be ranked among the heroic.

Finally, and unrelated to the admiration issue, I am very tired of the “Poster-Boy” element in the press’s treatment of Hamilton. There is something political in it which I am bound to reject outright. I don’t like having my views on race prescribed by the media, which is what most of the Hamilton kerfuffle is about.

Well, it was surely the second paragraph, and that too naked truth, “Bantu”, that did it. The view that Lewis Hamilton is a negro living in the wrong country, like all negroes living in Europe, is problematic for a Judaised mind. It cannot process the withholding of legitimacy from African populations in the ancient European homeland without experiencing a fit of the vapours. The resulting censorship is only the latter-day ammonium carbonate for a correct-thinking MSM moderator.

In fact, over the last twenty months or so I have posted the simple thought that “Lewis Hamilton is not English” on a wide variety of MSM threads and even on the Autosport forums, almost always in response to journalists’ casual description of him as an “Englishman”. Where my correction posted automatically it was almost always subsequently removed. On the rest it never made an appearance at all.

There is something here that needs bringing out. I know perfectly well that a claim that some rap artist in the news, or a black poet, is not actually one of the English people will sail through unremarked. A white mother won’t make any - or enough - difference. Nor should it. Genetically, the English are a northern European people. African admixture ends this.

But Hamilton is a media-created special case. We have to believe the media story. They want us to believe the story. It is as if the arising of a potential black hero is too rare and, by its rarity, too precious to them to have the stark and uncompromising truth of his inalienable alienness pointed out. And this, lest you failed to notice, is the racism of the Establishment. This is the untrammelled desire to meddle in our sense of self, to engineer in us “higher feelings” and an end to racist ones. The unspoken assumption that we are racist in this way, instead of merely human, and the sheer affrontery that these people have the right to alter us, is the endemic racism of the modern age.

I hope Hamilton fails to finish in tomorrow’s Brazilian GP. But I fear that his car will be too good, and he will be able to coast around to finish fifth or higher and pick up the point he needs to win the championship. Perhaps the boy can drive, I don’t know and don’t care. I do know that we will see more ... much more ... of this media lionisation, all of it pure culture politics.

And that I am, indeed, bound to reject.

Tags: Media

Comments:

Posted by Matra on Sat, 01 Nov 2008 16:42 | #

In fact, over the last twenty months or so I have posted the simple thought that “Lewis Hamilton is not English” on a wide variety of MSM threads and even on the Autosport forums

If you’ve been visiting such forums then you will know how polarised opinion is about the alleged boy wonder. You must also have noticed that virtually everybody outside of England hates him - except the small number of Americans who post at SPEED channel’s forum where opinion is split down the middle. Even the other drivers seem united in wanting Massa to win the championship. To many outside of England ITV’s sycophantic coverage of Hamilton seems to have put people off him as much as anything.

What I’m wondering is whether the English people - proper English that is - are buying into the hype. At F1 forums and the Guardian sports section it seems most English are pro-Hamilton but with a healthy number of antis. But at the Guardian there will always be readers who hate anyone perceived as popular in Middle England. At Caste Football there’s a general consensus that white American sports fans are easily manipulated by the media into worshiping the black athlete and that waking them up will be virtually impossible. Ditto Canada. I’d be surprised if any European nation would be as gullible as North American whites. The English, though, I’m not sure about.

Posted by Bo on Sat, 01 Nov 2008 16:50 | #

The way one makes the national-origin distinction without incurring censors’ wrath is with the hyphenated name.

In the USA we are confronted with a strange phenomenon that is insisting that the “real Americans” whose needs must be attended first are the newest immigrants. The old ranking scale of years in the USA providing a centricity has been turned on its head, and the new ranking scale for public discourse is the newness of the subject to living in the USA. This is a strange new meme that infests many media produced articles. An excellent example, although difficult and tricky to navigate may be found here:

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1008/14996.html

Like all other truths delivered to us by left-wing racialists, this one comes without argument and loaded with simple declarations. The USA has a different history from England, of course, so our discourse has to take respectful account of African Americans and American Indians, but this new party line even leaves them in the dust in the great contest for society’s wealth, fame, and privilege.

Posted by Diamed on Sat, 01 Nov 2008 20:04 | #

Take heart, the blacks performed miserably in the summer olympics and made a fool of themselves while white athletes became the heroes of the show. Michael Phelps, Nastia Liuken, and Shawn Johnson were all peerless, while blacks couldn’t even run a relay without dropping the baton or win a sprint without beating their chests like monkeys. Whites meanwhile have claimed virtually every boxing title, shattering the myth of blacks being better athletes yet again. it’s getting to the point that no matter where the media looks they will never find any black good at anything—or good for anything.

Posted by IIIIIIIIIIIIII on Sat, 01 Nov 2008 20:06 | #

Nothing sums up the immigration invasion of America better:

Barack Obama’s Kenyan aunt ‘living illegally’ in US

Barack Obama has been drawn into a row over the immigration status of a Kenyan aunt after she was reported to be living illegally in the US.

01 Nov 2008

Miss Onyango lives in a public housing scheme in Boston.

Zeituni Onyango, 56, a half-aunt who has made donations to Mr Obama’s campaign, was denied asylum and instructed to leave the US in 2004. But she has been quietly living in Boston ever since, the Associated Press reported, citing a federal law enforcement official.

A statement from Mr Obama’s campaign said: “Senator Obama has no knowledge of her status but obviously believes that any and all appropriate laws be followed.”

Miss Onyango’s refusal to leave the country would represent an administrative, non-criminal violation of US immigration law, meaning such cases are handled outside the criminal court system. Estimates vary, but many experts believe there are more than 10 million such immigrants in the United States.

The Associated Press could not reach Miss Onyango immediately for comment. But in an interview this week, she said that she was praying for Mr Obama, although she declined to answer other questions about the Democratic candidate.

“I can’t talk about it, I just pray for him, that’s all,” she said.

“After the 4th, I can talk to anyone.”

It remains unclear why her request for asylum was rejected in 2004. A spokesman for US Immigrations and Customs Enforcement said the government does not comment on an individual’s citizenship status or immigration case.

Miss Onyango is not a relative whom Mr Obama has discussed in campaign appearances. Unlike his Kenyan father and his grandmother in Hawaii, she is not someone who has been part of the public discussion about his personal life.

But a law enforcement official told the Associated Press that her case - coming to light just days before the presidential election - led to an unusual nationwide directive within Immigrations and Customs Enforcement requiring any deportations prior to Tuesday’s election to be approved at a senior level.

The unusual directive suggests that the Bush administration is sensitive to the political implications of Miss Onyango’s case coming to light so close to the election.

Miss Onyango lives in a public housing scheme in Boston. It is uncertain how she would have qualified for such housing with a standing deportation order.

- http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/uselection2008/barackobama/3362308/Barack-Obamas-Kenyan-aunt-living-illegally-in-US.html

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 02 Nov 2008 03:03 | #

That was one of the best log entries I’ve ever read anywhere on the internet, ever. Can’t be improved upon.

Posted by Fr. John on Sun, 02 Nov 2008 15:41 | #

Just as I cannot abide the ‘mewling’ [sic]] Tiger Woods, desecrating the noble Scottish invention of Golf.

Or those twin monkey sisters in Tennis.

Why should sport be miscegenated? What purpose does it serve? The point of sports is not money, bling, and your 15 seconds in the spotlight. It is the noble art of comradeship, pride in race (of own’s own, not another’s…) and that sense of nobility.

The only sport that ever fascinated me, was the fictional account of Eric Liddell in “Chariots of Fire.” But that was in the 1980’s, talking about the 1920’s, and Britain (and the rest of the White world) is no more.

Reqiescat in pace.

Posted by AunDoorback on Mon, 03 Nov 2008 01:04 | #

Lewis Hamilton and a couple of his chums hospitalised a white classmate in the latter part of his schooldays. The victim nearly died. Dig around for this information. It was hushed up due to his poster boy status.

Posted by Lurker on Mon, 03 Nov 2008 03:06 | #

A local (local to the Hamilton family) news article about Hamilton senior, this summer:

http://www.harlowstar.co.uk/hertfordshiremercury/displayarticle.asp?id=320258

Story is all over place actually.

Posted by Lurker on Mon, 03 Nov 2008 03:46 | #

Article alluding to AunDoorback’s post:

http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/news/article-462482/F1-ace-Hamilton-wrongly-expelled-school-breaking-pupils-fingers.html

Hushed up or just not true? Lets read on.

Even if not true btw, its interesting why was LH wrongly identified? The story can still tell us a thing or two about the school. Did he perhaps share something in common with the other attackers, perhaps with all of them, what an earth could it be, perhaps they were racing fans?

Another ex-pupil Sean Beahan said: “A lot of people had their names dragged into the attack incident and it was later found that Lewis and a few others had done nothing wrong.”

One wonders just how other names were dragged into the incident, did they also share something? And six were involved, thats quite a large number.

Ive had a look at Sebastian Webber’s page on http://www.friendsreunited.co.uk - you will need to login to see this.

On his ‘About me’ section he starts:

Hello. Some of you remember me, some of you don’t. but most of you do - for pretty much one reason, which is gay.

OK, there’s motive right there.

Then have a look at ‘My interests’, who could he mean? What could he mean by this:

how about my most used words over the last 2 months since a certain wizkid has been doing extremely well? No Comment

And that’s the game!

Posted by Lurker on Mon, 03 Nov 2008 03:49 | #

I didnt say, and I think its obvious, but in case you dont read the original article, Sebastian Webber is the victim.

Posted by Guessedworker on Mon, 03 Nov 2008 14:49 | #

Another MSM leader - this time the Independent’s - another dice with the mods.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:39 | #

“Lucy” in that Independent thread surely has got all the Jewish propaganda line down pat:

Being English isn’t about race - this country is probably one of the most invaded and mixed race countries in the world. Just because someone has darker skin than a Roman, a Saxon, a Viking or a Norman doesn’t make them any less English. The indigenous tribes of what we call England were killed off, chased away or cross-bred centuries ago. Or perhaps you think that to be English is to be Celtic and that all others are impostors - get real.

Try saying something analagous about the Jews in a number of European countries — that they don’t really exist, in other words — and you’ll be arrested on the spot, carted off to jail, and put on trial for “hate.”

Anyway, GW responds to this clueless, extremely malleable Englishwoman:

Lucy, His nationality is as his passport dictates. His nation, however, is the real question that irks you. It isn’t the English nation. The English are an ancient northern European people. Bantu admixture ends that.

Let us not pretend that Africans are English. That is extreme racism against the English, for it holds our distinctiveness as nothing ... a worthless commodity to be cast aside at will.

[...] Try to understand that Hamiton is promoted for political purposes, and those purposes are deeply racist.

Excellent riposte by GW, as always. But will it fall on deaf ears? As far as Lucy is concerned, of course it will. But just as I and every single participant in MR.com was once awakened by someone’s remarks that suddenly struck home in our brains, suddenly dispelled the mist between our ears (for me it was Steve Sailer), so shall GW’s remarks here in this Independent thread do for as yet unknown readership out there who will ultimately swell our side’s ranks.

Posted by John on Mon, 03 Nov 2008 18:27 | #

Wasn’t there some brouhaha awhile back about a white South African emigre to the US who wanted to join his high school’s African American club?

Posted by Armor on Mon, 03 Nov 2008 18:42 | #

Fred: “Excellent riposte by GW, as always.”

Yes, it goes to the crux of the matter in few words.

A remark about nation and nationality :
in my lexicon, passport = citizenship
ancestry = nation = nationality

Fred: ” every single participant in MR.com was once awakened by someone’s remarks…”

I think most of them have never been great fans of race replacement. Most people are naturally against immigration, but they are intimidated by the PC police. They don’t need to be awakened so much as they need to be encouraged.

Posted by A.H. on Mon, 03 Nov 2008 21:43 | #

Lucy says: “Indigenous Britons, like i said, are long gone.” A weird comment. And I doubt she’s English.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Mon, 03 Nov 2008 22:13 | #

Not necessarily so weird, AH — yes weird to us, but that’s what they’re being taught in the schools and colleges nowadays. White kids are being taught that — that there’s no such thing as race; that they, whites, don’t exist as a group, don’t deserve to exist as a group because they’re evil, the cancer of history, don’t deserve to have an identity and have none, in any case aren’t vibrant enough, are dull, mean, thin-lipped, and the future belongs to the vibrant, brown, thick-lipped non-whites, and they, the whites, have to hurry up and die, hurry up and go extinct, to clear the way for the non-whites who are the future. It’s all already been decided: whites are to be officially phased out and non-whites phased in in their place. The kids in schools and colleges come out thinking that stuff. The Jews and homos and clueless women have gotten their paws on education and are teaching white kids that stuff. And fellow-travelers, useful idiots, and fifth-columnists like David Cameron, Perry de Havilland, and yes, Prince Charles and the Queen, see strictly no problem with it, so it continues right under our noses. This is the kind of mentality it shapes: Lucy’s kind.

Posted by Salopian on Mon, 03 Nov 2008 22:30 | #

What is interesting is that powers that be definitely want to push the mixed-race to the fore in sport. Look at the England football team, which is now 50% half-caste but with fewer proper blacks.

Are the over-hyped Ferndinand, Cole and Walcott really all that? And is mediocre dross like James, Wes Brown, Lennon, Glyn Johnson really the best we have.

Posted by A.H. on Tue, 04 Nov 2008 08:22 | #

whites are to be officially phased out and non-whites phased in in their place

With her seemingly bizarre comment, Lucy’s saying there’s no point in us fighting. She’s trying to present our defeat as facts on the ground: We’re a thing of the past. Still she doesn’t sound like someone British. Unless she’s really young, a kid, in a mixed race relationship or something.

Posted by Guessedworker on Tue, 04 Nov 2008 16:31 | #

Quite a struggle to make the point of Hamilton’s non-Englishness at the Guardian. Probably a black moderator. They employ at least one.

Posted by Matra on Tue, 04 Nov 2008 18:41 | #

From Monday’s Globe & Mail readers comment section on “Hamilton: F1 champion” by TALES AZZONI:

The Habs from Toronto, Canada writes: Bravo to Hamilton. He deserved it last year also.

A great piece of racing in the end…..it must be tough when everyone who races against you hates you.

Next step is Tuesday night....can’t wait until Tiger gets back….at least only Jarome [black ice hockey player] has done well on the ice. You guys still have one sport to look forward too.

* Posted 02/11/08 at 5:00 PM EST |

Needless to say the post-race team photos with the championship trophy and the McLaren team - the men who actually designed the car - showed that every member of the team other than Hamilton was white as are virtually all the engineers and designers (with the exception of a few Japanese) who make F1 the most technically advanced sport in the world.

Actually the whole idea that blacks dominate the world of sport is North American media (who runs the media?) propaganda that would surprise a lot of Europeans and Australians. Even in Canada, where the most popular sport is almost entirely white, it is considered a given that blacks are superior athletes. Since watching sport is the most popular entertainment activity for white males, demoralisation and getting used to worshiping black men must be the goal the media have in mind.

Yet if one looks at the FIFA rankings of the world’s most popular sport - and thus the best sport for making comparisons - the top three football/soccer countries are Spain, Italy, and Germany, teams that between them rarely ever have one black player on the pitch at any given time. Mostly black Brazil is 4th whilst the Netherlands who are racially mixed are in 5th. Teams ranked 6 through 9 are all white and 10th, Portugal, is mostly white also.

Posted by Lurker on Tue, 04 Nov 2008 18:50 | #

This story popping up in the UK:

http://dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/69332/Storm-of-hate-shocks-Lewis-after-triumph

They dont quite get it though, clearly the fix was getting Hamilton into F1 in the first place, rather than fiddling the races themselves.

Posted by Desmond Jones on Tue, 04 Nov 2008 20:44 | #

Since watching sport is the most popular entertainment activity for white males, demoralisation and getting used to worshiping black men must be the goal the media have in mind.

The question is why? Is it the eternal search for the great white hope? Jess Willard’s final conquest of Jack Johnson? Schmeling’s 12th round knockout of Louis allowing Goebbels to proclaim, “Schmeling’s victory was not only sport. It was a question of prestige for our race.”

Or is it beauty, the aesthetic of great athleticism?

Posted by Nick Dean on Wed, 21 Sep 2011 17:14 | #

From his autobiography, Lewis Hamilton: My Story published by Harpersport, 2007:

I am very close to my roots—to my father’s family in Grenada, West Indies, where my real home is, and to the Grenadian people. (p.19)

My family, my roots, and our values are primarily Grenadian although we are British, having been born in the UK. My granddad came to England in the 1950s and then returned to Grenada in the seventies following the death of my grandmother. My dad has always expressed a wish to return and I plan to do the same at some stage in my life but not now. (p.20)

***

England, though it was his actual home for all his life unto adulthood, is merely a useful temporary multi-generational stopover point for the Black side of his family, the only side of the family he considers worth mentioning. Grenada is his real home, and Grenadians his people.