Posted by skeptical on Sun, 02 Dec 2007 09:41 | #

Augh!

In a more civilized era these despotic judges (and their twisted logic) could be [forcibly] removed from their positions of authority by irate citizens.

Not in these United States.  We must do what our Harvard, Princeton, and Yale law school graduates tell us and marvel at their pretzel logic used to curtail our freedoms.

If I saw any of these leftist, despotic Supreme Court justices walking the street I’d be awfully tempted to ape Michael Douglas’ character in “Falling Down”.

Posted by daveg on Sun, 02 Dec 2007 11:09 | #

This will be interesting.

I have a hard time thinking the court will take this head on, as it is in weakened state as is and does not need to put itself further in the crosshairs.

That is, any ohio Reagan democrats/independents finally thinking of voting democrat again will be pushed back into the Republican camp with an anti-gun ruling. I don’t think even the liberals on the supreme court will want that.

Posted by bone on Sun, 02 Dec 2007 17:14 | #

As an Ohio Reagan Democrat, I feel that this is an opportunity to restore a much-eroded essential constitutional right. Remember that the court is as far to the right as it has been for decades. In nearly every other aspect, I view the newly conservative court with a degree of suspicion & revulsion, but this is the first court in a long time (and likely the last one we will have for some time to come) which would be likely to rule on gun laws in a way that restores some degree of our 2nd amendment protections. I hope I am right about that.

Posted by Obbop on Sun, 02 Dec 2007 17:18 | #

The elite’s government FEARS you!!!!!!

Their fear is manifested in the laws they pass. Here is a law banning what MANY of the Founders wrote is a RIGHT of citizens when a government no longer represents them:

Section 2385. Advocating overthrow of Government

Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or
teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of
overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or
the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession
thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein, by
force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any
such government; or
Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any
such government, prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates,
sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed
matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity,
desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any
government in the United States by force or violence, or attempts
to do so; or
Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society,
group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the
overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or
violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any
such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes
thereof -
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than
twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by
the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five
years next following his conviction.
If two or more persons conspire to commit any offense named in
this section, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned
not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for
employment by the United States or any department or agency
thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.
As used in this section, the terms ‘‘organizes’’ and
‘‘organize’‘, with respect to any society, group, or assembly of
persons, include the recruiting of new members, the forming of new
units, and the regrouping or expansion of existing clubs, classes,
and other units of such society, group, or assembly of persons.

The federal government is allowing MILLIONS of illegals to invade our country. Corporate America is becoming increasingly more powerful and influential. Yet, according to the government of for and by the elites YOU, a citizen, have to accept whatever the government does with NO recourse other than voting…... and there is sufficient proof that shows to me voting is worthless since the entrenched power structure ensures that the emplaced elite class can not be removed.

Several Founders specifically wrote of the people’s right to abolish a government when it no longer represents them.

We are forced to live under an elite’s TYRANNY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by Duncan Tyyne on Sun, 02 Dec 2007 18:22 | #

If I saw any of these leftist, despotic Supreme Court justices walking the street I’d be awfully tempted to ape Michael Douglas’ character in “Falling Down”.

One of my all-time favorite films.  I think every person of a mind to post at a site like this could identify with Falling Down on some level.  A virtual documentary on the plight of the displaced, disaffected white Middle American male.  The overblown Nazi caricature, inserted as a counterbalance to the pro-white overtones in the beginning of the film, is so ridiculous that most true nationalists would probably rejoice in his destruction.

We are forced to live under an elite’s TYRANNY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Calm down, sir or madam.  Isn’t there a game on?  Hasn’t a new Wal-Mart opened up on Main Street?  Isn’t Grey’s Anatomy a fascinating show?  Aren’t you glad those humble, virtuous Mexicans are working so hard on our lawns and dirty dishes?

Posted by James Bowery on Sun, 02 Dec 2007 18:50 | #

And don’t forget the happy pills, Duncan.

Posted by Duncan Tyyne on Sun, 02 Dec 2007 23:17 | #

And don’t forget the happy pills, Duncan.

Ah, how could I forget?  The great nepenthe.  Opiate of our masses.

A highly entertaining film which shows the medication of society’s logical conclusion is Equilibrium, starring Christian Bale of Batman Begins fame.  This film shows psychiatric drugs turning people into near-zombies, associates hate crime laws with violent totalitarianism, belittles polygraphy (another field of fraudulent junk science given a position of prestige mainly because of television), and features a very Aryan-looking hero battling a Negro nemesis.  The method with which he dispatches said nemesis is worth the price of admission alone.

Equilibrium was released quite quietly in the United States - I’m not even sure it had a theatrical run.  It’s not hard to see why.

Posted by Robert Reis on Mon, 03 Dec 2007 06:20 | #

http://www.tightrope.cc/news/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=90
Guns don’t kill people, n*****s kill people.

I heard some twit on the radio a while ago trying to convince the listening audience that guns are the cause of all of the murder in America. Her opponent was arguing that violence in the media was the real cause of violence. I find this type of thing fascinating, because it is all pure and utter bullshit, and the American public falls for it every time. Two people who appear to be at opposite ends of the political spectrum (“left” versus “right”) put up a ‘fight” replete with interruptions, raised voices, name calling, etc…..The listeners get all riled up and call in vehemently supporting one side or the other. Of course, both of the debaters were intentionally misleading the audience by using “straw men,” which are fake targets set up for people to expend their energy knocking down in order to prevent them from seeing the true picture. Guns cause shootings like airplanes cause hijackings. And while the media is a destructive influence, it cannot explain the crime rate. For example: One of the women on the radio debate I heard was using 2 cities (Windsor, Canada and Detroit, Michigan) to prove that guns cause crime. Her theory was that Detroit and Windsor are only a few miles apart and so the inhabitants of both cities had access to the exact same TV and radio shows, as well as the same cinema, and yet in 1999 there were 396 murders in Detroit while Windsor, being in Canada where there are no guns allowed, only had 8 homicides. Well, I decided to do a little research, and I found out that Detroit has a n****r population of 82% while Windsor is only 2% black. Wow, that is simply f**king amazing. I thought it was the guns that caused all of that murder. Well, let’s not be hasty. Let’s check out the theory scientifically. If it is guns that are the real cause of people getting shot and the only reason more people get shot in Detroit than in Windsor is because guns are legal and available in the U.S. but not in Canada, then we should assume that if guns were legal in Canada the same levels of shootings would occur. And we would also assume that if guns were outlawed in America, there would be almost no shootings here. So what about arson? I mean, they have matches in Canada don’t they? Cigarette lighters are legal there? So there should be about the same number of intentionally set fires in both cities right? Nope. In Detroit (82% black) in 1999 there were 2,121 arsons. In Windsor (2% black) there were about 120. Hmmmm, that’s odd. Well, what about automobile theft? They may not have guns up there but they have cars, so we can compare those numbers. In Detroit (82% black) in 1999 there were 25, 892 car thefts, while in Windsor (2% black) there were 53. Son of a bitch! Not only do guns cause shootings, but cars cause carjackings! You can look at the table below to see for yourself. Included is the rate per 100,000 population to account for the fact that Detroit is a bigger city than Windsor.

WINDSOR (2% Black)
1999

Type of Crime   Total # of Incidents   Rate per 100,000 Population
Murder     8         4
Robbery     143         72
Aggravated Assault   1,710     865
Car Theft   53         27
Arson     120         60
Rape     162         82

DETROIT (81.6% Black)

Type of Crime   Total # of Incidents   Rate per 100,000 Population
Murder     396         42
Robbery     7,868         827
Aggravated
Assault     13,037         1,371
Car Theft   25,892         2,722
Arson     2,121         219
**Rape**  811         85

**It’s actually much worse. The Detroit police have been caught falsifying rape (and other) statistics. To see an article from the Detroit media about the ongoing scandal, click here.
Not to bore you with statistics, but this one is interesting. There is a thing called the Relocation Crime Lab Index. It measures the crime of a city using 100 as the national average baseline. So if your city has an index of 50, then your city has half the crime of the national average. If a city has an index of 200 then it has twice the crime of the national average. The table below shows the 10 Whitest and blackest cities in America (with a population of at least 100,000) along with their respective indexes. You can look this stuff up yourself by going to Homefair.com and clicking on the “crime index” section. You type in the city and it tells you what the crime index is, unemployment rate, etc….good way to find a nice town to live in.
Anyway, this table is pretty self explanatory.

10 Whitest Cities     10 Blackest Cities
City   % White   Index   City   % Black   Index
Livonia, MI.  95.5   35   Gary, IN.  84   538
Cape Coral, FL.  93   30   Detroit, MI.  81.6   556
Boise City, ID.  92.2   56   Birmingham, AL.  73.5   367
Independence, MO.  91.9   107   Jackson, MS.  70.6   368
Cedar Rapids, IA.  91.9   53   New Orleans, LA.  67.3   405
Sioux Falls, SD.  91.9   76   Baltimore, MD.  64.3   601
Warren, MI.  91.3   87   Atlanta, GA.  61.4   532
Manchester, NH.  91.7   65   Memphis, TN.  61.4   321
Springfield, MO.  91.7   79   Washington, DC   60   436
Scottsdale, AZ.  96.2   70   Richmond, VA.  57.2   386
Of course, when you point out the facts, you hear all kinds of bullshit excuses. My favorite one is, “Crime is caused by rampant poverty.” Right. Poor Leroy is starving on the streets of America and just has no choice but to turn to a life of crime. How come when they break into your house at night they don’t steal your groceries? I’m just not sure how the murder and assault rates can be explained by poverty. Or rape. How does sexual assault and battery improve a person’s economic situation? What about arson? Look at the first table above and tell me, what the f**k does “being poor” have to do with arson? Is there good money in burning shit down or something? I mean, I know the kikes used to get rich by burning down their own warehouses for the insurance money. That was called “jewish lightning” in the old days. Maybe the n*****s heard about that and got jealous so they set everything on fire and sat back and waited for their check. Somebody had to explain to them that not only did they not have insurance, but that they have to actually own the building that they burn down in order to get paid. Torching other people’s buildings doesn’t count. I just fail to see the connection. You know why? Because there is no connection. Wait, yes there is. You want to know the connection between poverty and crime? You spend all day and night looking for people to beat, rape, rob and kill. Then you look for stuff to break, steal or set on fire. You don’t have time to work. Now you are poor. That’s the connection. Poverty causes crime my ass. Was O.J. broke? Hell, Rodney King got like 50 million dollars for a well deserved beat-down, and he still can’t act right. He has been arrested for drugs, hookers, assault, drunk driving, you name it. You remember that jogger in Central Park years ago that was beaten half to death and gang raped? They hit her in the head with a brick so hard her eyeball exploded. Those n**lets that did that weren’t even from the ‘hood, they were upper middle class blacks with well to do, well employed parents. Their parents worked in big office buildings with White people who probably referred to them as the “good blacks.” Great, we put all that time and trouble and effort to tame and educate a few of them and put them in suits and ties and teach them to act White and speak proper English, but look at their kids, out “wilding” on the Humans. You can teach a dog to shake hands but I have never seen a dog teach it’s puppies to shake hands.

Posted by JR on Mon, 03 Dec 2007 22:59 | #

Rob R.,

Did you know in Canada, many prime ministers have had 7 letters in their name?  It’s a prime number. Also, by mathematical standards, a unique number.  However, in America, the president has 4 letters in his last name.  the word Nazi also has four letters in it.  It can be squared, rooted, multiplied by 2; in other words, easily manipulated.  Also, the four letters comes before 5 which is the number of letters in the name Adolf (excluding Adolph) and preceding the 6 letters in the name Hitler, same as the first name of George Bush.  Now it makes so much sense that the country is oppressing it’s people and murdering other citizens of this planet.

See how much sense this makes?

By the way, using Michael Moore math and statistics is like learning how to read from hooked on phonics played backwards. 

In my opinion.