Posted by Guessedworker on Tue, 12 Jul 2016 05:55 | #

May is said to be loyal to her friends.  Three names to watch in her ministerial appointments: the tactless texter and homosexual activist Nick Bowles, the (genuinely vile-mouthed) Amber Rudd, and the anti-white racist Anna Soubry.  She doesn’t need to promote people of this kind.  If any of them win a senior appointment that’s a sign that May approves of the worst in people if it serves her cause.

Posted by Ryan on Tue, 12 Jul 2016 22:16 | #

I agree with the above sentiment.

She is all soundbites, giving even more ‘robust’ ones than Cameron but has been no action. In her 6 years as Home Secretary she has done nothing to undo the behidn the scenes work done by the past labour government.

The issue she grandstands on is the ‘European Convention of Human Rights’ which is implicitly framed as this major hurdle on immigration when it is completely meaningless. However it works well for the rootless left as it gives them something to rally around, makes it look like there is a difference between Labour vs Tories and projects that [supposely] patriotic parties lead to tyranny.

The only thing she is prepared to do is furthering ‘anti-extremism’ laws which is sold as combatting islamism but in reality is just to shut down anti-rootless, patriotic individuals and groups opposing the ongoing mass infiltration of Mother Europe; espically those who speak negatively of the actions of Solomon’s tribe past and present.

The tory members left who have any degree of anti-immigration viewpoings lap up her dog whistiling without questioning “have we not heard this all before?”. Macmillan, Heath, Thatcher, Cameron…May.

Posted by Theresa May is now Prime Minister on Wed, 13 Jul 2016 18:35 | #

Theresa May is now Prime Minister

Posted by Guessedworker on Wed, 13 Jul 2016 22:03 | #

Now we know why Liam Fox and David Davis rushed to support Theresa May’s candidacy in the leadership contest.  Fox has been made Secretary of State for International Trade In May’s cabinet, which means that he will be in charge of negotiations on new trade treaties with the world outside the EU.  Davis, meanwhile, is appointed Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, which is a big, big job.  He will have Boris Johnson backing him as the new Foreign Secretary.

Davis, the leading Tory in the Leave.eu faction during the pre-Referendum period, is no lover of free movement:

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/may/26/immigration-could-fall-to-almost-zero-if-uk-leaves-eu-says-david-davis

Davis went even further in a speech on Thursday, saying he thought the level should be below 100,000 but some years it could be near-zero.

He argued that the Treasury used the level of free movement within the EU as an excuse “not to do a proper job” of controlling borders overall.

“We will not be going to zero immigration. I think somewhere between nought and 100,000 is where it will be. Some years it will be near 100,000 and some years it will be nearly nought, depending on the economy. If the economy is growing gangbusters it will be going up. We will have a points-type scheme. But we cannot possibly deliver on the manifesto promise as it now stands,” Davis said.

All three appointments are serious indications that May actually means Brexit means Brexit.

Posted by Bill on Wed, 03 Aug 2016 11:06 | #

An Englishman’s Home is his Castle.

Headline news this last 48 hours is the ongoing crisis of insufficient homes being available or affordable to Britain’s aspiring home buyers, mainly young adults struggling to get on the property ladder.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-3720912/STEPHEN-GLOVER-Mass-migration-betrayal-generation-solve-housing-crisis.html

Over the years I have commented immigration will impact home ownership to the point of crisis - which has indeed come to pass, the rulers at Westminster have suddenly awakened to the reality of uncontrolled immigration and its consequences.  What is also in the pipeline is the consequence of the lack of foresight regarding the parallel infrastructure of a burgeoning population.  This too is only beginning to dawn on the politicians and the populace.

I remember participating in a BBC thread where I hammered home the naivety of liberal thinking in not seeing the inevitable consequences of what was taking place.  This was at a time when discussing immigration was taboo.  I ended one comment by saying the time will come when the only topic under discussion will be immigration! Immigration! Immigration!  A parody of the time of Blair’s (or was it Tony Benn’s ?) educashun!-educashun!-educashun!

Britain’s flagship National Health Service is beginning to teeter.  The NHS is the bellwether indicating where all else is destined.  Demand on public services is outstripping supply in so many areas.

Be these circumstances all too apparent to those who have eyes to see, it is not my intention here to dwell on such hapless circumstances.  Suffice to say mass migration is achieving its raison d’etre in destroying Britain.

I once asked here at MR, if the intention of the world’s elite is to destroy western civilisation what was to be the end game?  What was to replace it, what was plan ‘B’?  To my utmost surprise, the reply by some was, there is to be no plan ‘B’, whatever the Phoenix arose from the debris would determine ‘where to now’?

I have never forgotten those words and over the years have held them in mind.  The article linked above (and much more) seems to be substantiating the no plan ‘B’ scenario.  By the lack of action by successive governments not to build sufficient homes and allied infrastructure.  They really do, have no other goal other than to destroy what is.