by David Hamilton

The UAF should be classed as a terrorist organisation. People who support them like David Cameron and Sir Teddy Taylor must be denounced as supporters of terrorism.  The UAF modus operandum is to frighten and intimidate people away from certain political parties and from holding certain views, these views being always spoken of negatively, not as protecting the interests of one’s own people but in a nightmare scenario of old-fashioned imagery and imagined violence.  The only reason UAF is not classified as a terrorist organisation is that it is used by the state to intimidate rival elites.

The Battle of Birmingham of 8th August 2009 has changed people’s understanding of race relations and how the elites manipulate the public’s perceptions, because although it became clear that in this Battle innocent “white” people were physically attacked just for being white yet, the Establishment media tried to slot it into their standard propaganda that the guilty parties were “far-right” thugs.  The guilty parties were, in fact, their pets Muslims and Blacks racially attacking “Whites.”

A letter in the Birmingham post from a protester who was appalled at UAF incited violence gives the inside story:

“Dear Editor, I would like to start by apologising to the people of Birmingham for the events of Saturday evening which I am highly ashamed to have been a part of. However, as a moderate who took part in the UAF protest I would like to set the record straight.

I, like the vast majority of people in Birmingham love the fact that our city is so diverse and vibrant. I felt that this was worth defending, especially from a bunch of trouble makers many of whom were from outside the city.

Unfortunately it turned out the UAF were no more interested in our community than the racists many of us turned out to oppose!

The young Muslims who rampaged through the city streets were incited to violence by UAF activists. I was near the front of the rally in Rotunda Square and I saw how they worked and I saw how it got out of hand.

The UAF should have switched rhetoric when they saw that the young Muslims were getting restless and angry. Instead what they did was get increasingly aggressive speakers to talk about ‘smashing the BNP’ (who not directly involved with the protest) whilst sending agitators into the crowd, with megaphones, to whip up anger there.

Only a few members of the Socialist Workers party, some trade unionists and a few moderate Muslim blokes who had been recruited as marshals on the day, remained to help the Police calm the riot.

I would like to commend the West Midlands Police Force for their sensitive handling of the protest and us protesters during what was a very difficult situation.

However, the ten or so members of the Muslim community who stayed with the protest whilst it was settled are the true unsung heroes of the sad event.

I never got to know their names, however, I am very proud to have worked with them in defusing the tensions that built up between rioters and Police. A true example of why our city is great.

As to the UAF well, I don’t mind announcing that I will never join one of their protests again. Once again I can only say how sorry I am that it all got so out of hand. If we had known how it would turn out then I’m sure a lot of protesters would have stayed home.
The UAF has achieved nothing except to create racial tensions were non existed before.
Yours in penance,

Josh Allen, Bournville

Some telling stuff  in the comments section too:

“Why didn’t you mention Salma Yaqoob’s aggressive speech in your post above? Saying things like: ‘Our streets! Our streets! Our streets!’ and ‘Get the BNP off our streets’ could hardly have helped the situation. Not when she was raising her fist and shouting aggresively.

“I think that Councillor Yaqoob should be prosecuted for inciting violence. The police disagrees with me. She is a councillor, after all.”
.....................................................................................................................................

“So this is the truth of why i was nearly beaten up last Saturday whilst shopping with my wife. I was confronted by a dozen or so asian youths who accused me of being BNP, and started to bear down on me, luckily my wife came around the corner and they dispersed.
[...]
“We were so disturbed I told one officer about the confrontation and was told “don’t be a part of the problem”! While walking back to the car we saw a young white youth apparently unconscious on the floor, police by his side, with a group of youths holding UAF banners sniggering and pointing at the young lads prediciment.”
.......................................................................................................................................

“It is also worth mentioning that the Muslims youths were recorded as saying, “Get whitey this is our town”.

To incite the crowd UAF told them the BNP had set fire to a mosque even though the BNP were not at the march at all.

The UAF should be classed as a terrorist organisation.  In the “riot” in Birmingham anyone white was attacked, including a Polish man pushing a pram.  Anyone who speaks out or has an opinion of which they do not approve, such as disapproving of Islamic extremism, has reasonable cause to fear for their life.  The group who was demonstrating was “linked” to the BNP by the UAF, even though there were non-white men among them.  I have also known of people being verbally abused and accused of being BNP supporters because they would not sign petitions, or put their names and addresses down for an organisation which uses political violence. (2)

How does the state encourage this terrorism?

Note the language used by the media. By calling these terrorists “Anti-fascist” protesters.  The Times gives them credibility by presenting as being noble and fighting an evil when in fact they are trying to impose our dispossession on to us.

I use Wikepedia because it is open to everyone but it shows clearly that the UAF is a terrorist organisation by the the Terrorism Act 2000 act which defines terrorism as:

(a) the action falls within subsection (2),
(b) the use or threat is designed to influence the government or to intimidate the public or a section of the public and the use or threat is made for the purpose of advancing a political, religious or ideological cause.
(2) Action falls within this subsection if it
(a) involves serious violence against a person,
(b) involves serious damage to property,
(c) endangers a person’s life, other than that of the person committing the action,
(d) creates a serious risk to the health or safety of the public or a section of the public or
(e) is designed seriously to interfere with or seriously to disrupt an electronic system.

If any of us were to try the slightest fraction of what the UAF has done we would all be hearing a knock on the door at 5 am.  So why are they allowed to get away with it?

To see how the very centre of the Establishment is oppressing their own people this little amendment was sneaked into the 2008 revision of the Act because the Establishment is trying to make Muslim extremists seem more normal to the general public:

Counter-Terrorism Act 2008 (c. 28)
75 Amendment of definition of “terrorism” etc

(1) In the provisions listed below (which define “terrorism”, or make similar provision, and require that the use or threat of action is made for the purpose of advancing a political, religious or ideological cause), after “religious” insert “, racial”.

(2) The provisions are:

(a) section 1(1)(c) of the Terrorism Act 2000 (c. 11),

(b) section 113A(2) of the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 (c. 24),

(c) paragraph 4(2)(c) of Schedule 21 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (c. 44),

(d) Article 2(3)(c) of the Terrorism (United Nations Measures) Order 2006 (S.I. 2006/2657),

(e) Article 4(1)(c) of the Anti-terrorism (Financial and Other Measures) (Overseas Territories) Order 2002 (S.I. 2002/1822),

(f) Article 2(1)(a)(iii) of the Terrorism (United Nations Measures) (Overseas Territories) Order 2001 (S.I. 2001/3366),

(g) Article 3(1) of the Terrorism (United Nations Measures) (Isle of Man) Order 2001 (S.I. 2001/3364),

(h) Article 3(1) of the Terrorism (United Nations Measures) (Channel Islands) Order 2001 (S.I. 2001/3363).

Meanwhile, the media portray UAF as a ‘public protest’ group.  But the reality that they are a tiny gang of extremist far-left communist party members, anti-white bigots and Muslim extremists is covered up.

In fact, the UAF organisation is so overrun with Islamist extremists that the Searchlight organisation, which was an original founding member of UAF, left that group because the Islamists were violently anti-Israel and anti-Jewish.

UAF is not really a ‘public protest’ group, but a uniting of the most extreme oddballs and fanatics on the fringes of British socialism.  They cannot stand for elected office because they have no popular support whatsoever.  They exist only to frighten and intimidate their political opponents. 

Recent examples of UAF political violence against the BNP and its members include the Tony War attack.  UAF placard-carrying activists attacked and smashed up a BNP loud-hailer vehicle in Leigh.  BNP activist Ward was attacked and struck on the head by a claw hammer wielded by a black male from UAF.  Ward suffered grievous injuries. The black was arrested by the police but the media played it down because it did not fit the image of the violent “far right” that they want to portray.

After the BNP’s Euro election victory, UAF thugs attacked a BNP press conference outside Parliament, pelting the media and party officials with eggs, placards and bottles. Several of the UAF thugs punched and kicked members of the BNP, including deputy leader Simon Darby who was repeatedly kicked in the back.

In their subsequent offerings several journalists then encouraged the general public to do the same.

There is a precedent for state-sponsored violence against legal political parties in state terror group the Anti-Nazi League who, with impunity, pelted National Front marchers and police with bricks and bottles in 1977.  This was encouraged by the Labour party anti-NF political broadcast of December 1977 by Joe Ashton which gave the green light to violently attack them.  Was it mere coincidence that the Anti-Nazi League was founded in the second half of 1977, with terrorist Peter Hain their most prominent original sponsor?

Hain remains a supporter of UAF.  Ken Livingstone, who supports terrorists in many recorded comments, is chairman.  Joint secretaryship is shared by Weyman Bennett, the black national organiser of the Anti-Nazi League and a member of the central committee of the Socialist Workers Party, and Sabby Dhalu, formerly of the National Assembly Against Racism (NAAR).  Treasurer is notorious white-hater Lee Jasper who has been suspected of misappropriating Greater London Assembly funds.

UAF was founded in late 2003 in response to electoral successes by the BNP.  It was part of a coalition between the Anti-Nazi League and the National Assembly Against Racism, the TUC and leading British unions such as T&G (now Unite) and UNISON.  They are the new incarnation of ANAL.  The Anti-Nazi League (ANL) was set up in 1977 by the Socialist Workers Party with some sponsorship small financial donations from some trade unions.  The initial sponsors included Peter Hain, lately Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, Ernie Roberts, deputy general secretary of the engineering union AUEW, and Paul Holborow, Socialist Workers Party.

In its first period, 1977-1982, the Anti-Nazi League was run by an elected committee nationally.  Many Trade Unions sponsored it, as did the Indian Workers Association, which was a large organisation then, many members of the Labour Party and MPs such as Neil Kinnock.
In 2007 the ANL National Organiser was Weyman Bennett, a member of the Central Committee of the Socialist Workers Party.  Its previous National Organiser was Julie Waterson who is also a member of the Socialist Workers Party and a former member of the National Executive of the Socialist Alliance.

Unite Against Fascism organises violent protests against the BNP such as outside the trial of BNP leader Nick Griffin and Mark Collett on race-hate charges at Leeds Crown Court. They organised the rally of over 1,000 people when Nick Griffin and David Irving spoke at the Oxford Union in November 2007.  They are the Stormtroopers of the corrupt and traitorous “Caste” who have only their own greedy needs in their sights.  The following links show the media encouraging political violence.

On 20/11/2008 Mirror columnist Brian Reade wrote, under a picture of Nick Griffin, to incite violence:

I’m worried about the 12,000 BNP members whose names and addresses have been leaked on the internet. I pray their details don’t fall into the hands of any of those black radical groups known to take a very dim view of white neo-Nazis. It would be truly awful if anything nasty happened to these nice people wouldn’t it?

How does the “Caste” finance their terror group?  This is murky but some facts are emerging. The trade unions receive money from the government and channel some to the UAF.  The government also gives a certain percentage of money to charities who then donate to Searchlight.  This is using tax-payers money to attack the people who pay the taxes.  The UAF proudly state they only get money from public donations but they receive money from Muslim Council of Britain who were not registered with the Charities Commission for a long time.  The MCB’s total cumulative income up to 31 March 2004 was only £57,209.  Now it has ballooned, leaving the suspicion that it is a major conduit of government funding to UAF – the Establishment’s own terror group.