What if Sweden were to be criticised from the left? What would that look like?

Posted by Kumiko Oumae on Sunday, 25 October 2015 11:55.

Vietnamese police taskforce woman
Oh, hey, has anyone in Europe noticed that Sweden is not Vietnam?

I’m going to do something interesting which might be new to some readers, but which I think is a necessary part of cornering liberals so that they cannot continue to wear the masks of various other political groupings. I’m going to criticise the situation in Sweden, but I’m going to do it in a polemical form and it will be done from the left. It will be done so that people can see what that might look like.

Sometimes people talk about how a country is destroyed ‘in slow motion’, and you have to watch trends develop over a very long period of time in order to find out what the tricks of the reactionaries look like. Other times, you can find the template by just watching for a matter of a few weeks, as the pattern of behaviour exhibited by the reactionaries is just a sped-up version of the long-term template that they have been using all along.

As Sweden backslides into becoming one of the most reactionary and frankly dangerous European countries to live in, we can see a microcosm of how that disaster is fomented in a single snapshot of just the past eight weeks.

Here’s Step One:

Yahoo News, ‘EU needs more legal ways in for refugees: Swedish PM’, 07 Sep 2015:

STOCKHOLM (Reuters) - Sweden will propose that the European Union set up more legal ways for refugees to arrive in the country, Prime Minister Stefan Lofven said on Monday, announcing a push to make the Nordic country more welcoming for asylum seekers.

Lofven said the EU must introduce a permanent and obligatory redistribution mechanism for when disasters trigger drastically higher numbers of refugees seeking entry into the bloc, and that the EU should increase its number of quota refugees to about 100,000 from the 22,000 that the EU had earlier agreed.

Sweden has received more asylum seekers per capita than any other nation in Europe, giving weight to its voice over the crisis, which has intensified in recent days as thousands of migrants, many refugees from Syria, arrive mostly in Germany.

“Sweden, Germany and a few other countries have for a long time been alone, taken their responsibility. That’s not good enough,” Lofven told a news conference. “All countries in the EU must stand up for human values and do their duty.”

On Tuesday, Lofven will travel to Berlin to meet German chancellor Angela Merkel to discuss the European migration crisis. He will also meet the Austrian chancellor Werner Faymann.

[...]

The reactionary bourgeoisie calls for even more migrants to enter the country because of their desire to knock down organised labour by using a reserve army of labour. They are completely out of control because the broad mass of the population has failed to establish institutional structures that would keep them in check. The labour unions have been totally co-opted by liberal-capitalists and the union bosses are on their payroll and can no longer be trusted. Clearly, someone needs to establish new labour unions that are independent from the control of the Swedish political establishment.

The reactionary bourgeoisie are even now passing laws that ‘allow the migrants to integrate into the labour market’, by which they mean setting up a multi-tier labour arrangement. What does that mean? It means that the migrants and low-skilled Swedish workers alike all will find themselves thrown into a semi-feudalist mode of production despite living territorially inside of a so-called ‘advanced’ economy. It will be a subordinated mode which the reactionary bourgeoisie would maintain by implementing enforced stagnation.

If that is allowed to continue, automation and mechanisation of the economy would be stalled, and in fact would go backwards, because there would be no incentive to develop productive forces further. Automation and mechanisation is usually spurred by a shortage of cheap labour, not a glut of it.

Here’s Step Two:

Yahoo News, ‘Sweden to increase spending on helping immigrants by $214 million’, 10 Sep 2015:

STOCKHOLM (Reuters) - Sweden will increase spending on better integrating immigrants into the labor market and increase compensation for municipalities where refugees settle, the government said on Thursday.

Next year, the added spending measures will total 1.8 billion Swedish crowns ($214 million).

Earlier this week, Prime Minister Stefan Lofven said the government would oblige all municipalities to accept refugees. The new spending includes a roughly 50 percent increase of the yearly compensation from the central government to 125,000 crowns per person up to the age of 65, it said in a statement.

Labor market measures include more money to validate foreign exams taken by immigrants and to the Swedish Public Employment Service for finding jobs quicker.

In its latest forecast, in July, the Swedish Migration Agency expected 74,000 asylum seekers this year, but an official told daily Dagens Nyheter on Thursday the figure would likely be revised upwards to above 80,000.

That money to ‘increase spending’ is not going to come from the pockets of the haute-bourgeoisie and their banking associates. Instead, it will come from the income taxes and regressive sales taxes that are imposed by the liberal-capitalist state against the broad mass of the people.

In other words, the taxes to pay for that ‘increase in spending’ will be collected from the proletariat and the petty-bourgeoisie. They will be asked to pay for their own enslavement, and pay for their own harassment by clerical-reactionaries in Muslim dress, and pay for their own impoverishment, and pay for the rising crime as Muslims rape their children. They’ll be told to accept this, because otherwise, someone might call them ‘racist’. And everyone knows how people are afraid of social ostracism like how cats are afraid of water. Probably.

Here’s Step Three, just twelve days later:

Yahoo News, ‘Sweden needs to borrow more, cut costs to meet refugee numbers: finance minister’, 22 Oct 2015:

STOCKHOLM (Reuters) - Sweden will need to borrow more money and cut costs across the board to meet the expense of record numbers of asylum seekers arriving in the country, Finance Minister Magdalena Andersson said on Thursday.

“It is going to take longer for us to get back to balanced public finances,” Andersson told reporters. “It also going to mean that we are going to need to borrow money.”

Earlier in the day, the Migration Agency said it expected up to 190,000 asylum seekers to arrive in Sweden this year.

The Swedish haute-bourgeoisie would like to thank you for accepting 10,000 migrants. Oh, sorry, they mean 22,000. No wait, they meant 74,000. Or was that 80,000? No, they really meant 190,000. But it might be even more later.

The cuts enacted by the state onto itself will not be a cut in the amount of money being funnelled toward servicing debts and bailing out banks, but rather will be a cut to the quality of social services, hospitals, and schools for the broad mass of ethnic Swedish people.

The haute-bourgeoisie who run the Swedish government should no longer be permitted to call themselves ‘progressive’, nor should they be allowed to call themselves ‘leftists’.

For maximum irony and maximum punishment, the Swedish haute-bourgeoisie should instead be forced to experience an actual left-nationalist revolution right in their face which will utterly dispossess them of everything that they purport to own, so that they can see what actual leftism looks like.

And now before you readers start asking me if I’m trafficking in pure heroin in this post, just stay with me for a moment and actually engage in this thought experiment. It’s just a thought experiment, but I’m doing this so that you understand a particular point here.

Kumiko’s left-nationalist thought experiment for Sweden:

It is precisely at the very time when the haute-bourgeoisie are frenziedly accommodating terrorism and facilitating economic privations the likes of which have never before been seen in a European country, that Swedish progressives, socialists, and nationalists, formerly working separately, have united into a single party, the Socialist Workers Party of Sweden, to lead the revolutionary struggle of the entire people.

The Socialist Workers Party of Sweden is now founded. It is the party of the working class. By correctly formulating a mass line based on a mass perspective, it will help the proletariat lead the revolution waged for the sake of all oppressed and exploited people. From now on, you should join the party, and assist the vanguard in implementing the following goals:

1. To overthrow the Swedish liberal-capitalist government and to overthrow the ideological state apparatuses of the haute-bourgeoisie;

2. To abolish the Swedish monarchy;

3. To establish a Swedish worker-peasant-soldier government which caters to the needs of the broad mass of the people, facilitating the development of productive forces and the maintenance of an advanced and progressive culture;

4. To confiscate the assets of all banks and all other enterprises belonging to the reactionaries and put them under the actual control of the worker-peasant-soldier government;

5. To confiscate all the land in the northern zone of the country belonging to the reactionaries and re-distribute it back to the poor Sami peasants;

6. To implement a 6-hour working day and guaranteed annual income (GAI);

7. To abolish the forced buying of government bonds, abolish all taxes that are used for maintaining mass migration, and abolish all unjust taxes hitting the poor;

8. To deport all clerical-reactionaries from the country, and to shut down all ecclesiastical authorities, turning all Churches, Mosques, and Synagogues into secular community centres;

9. To dispense education to all the Swedish people, and maintain it at the highest quality, ensuring that it is laicist so that no religion may be taught;

10. To maintain equality between man and woman, with absolutely no exceptions;

11. To commit to the responsible maintenance of a market economy until its historical necessity is exhausted. The market economy would undergo an extended period of transition with several steps of development utilising mixed social and economic structures in which socialist factors are gradually strengthened and made dominant, so as to lay the groundwork for the transformation away from the market economy and into socialism.

Obviously, the following groups will not be able to accept even the thought of such a programme, as it effectively confiscates all of their property and outlaws them:

  • Swedish reactionaries.
  • Arab and African migrants.
  • Jews.

That would be fortuitous, given that all three of those subversive miscreant groups could then be hunted down and arrested by the military or secret police, and then they could be sent to a detention facility and subsequently deported from the country.

Now, what is the point of this thought experiment? Well, I invite any of the Swedish readers of Majorityrights, to find some Swedish so-called ‘leftists’ in your neighbourhood. Propose my thought experiment programme goals to them with a straight face and with a seeming seriousness of intent, and then see how they react to it.

If the so-called ‘leftists’ react to the programme with horror and loathing because it harms the pro-immigration agenda, then you can say to them, “Oh, I see, you aren’t really leftists at all, you’re actually just a bunch of liberals who love getting cucked by black and Arab men”.

And you yourself will have also learned an interesting political lesson at the same time, from that whole experience.

Kumiko Oumae works in the defence and security sector in the UK. Her opinions here are entirely her own.


Comments:


1

Posted by DanielS on Mon, 26 Oct 2015 01:30 | #

What is wrong with Monarchy? Don’t they represent the quintessential DNA family of the Nation? It seems like a Jewy, “Red Leftist” kind of thing to want the most emblematic family of a native nation to be taken down as some sort of knee-jerk requirement.


2

Posted by Kumiko Oumae on Mon, 26 Oct 2015 02:41 | #

Well, item number 2 on the list, ‘Abolish the Swedish monarchy’, is there for three reasons.

The first reason is because in a consistent leftist platform, particularly one which is designed to bait social democrats into backpedalling, I’d want to make sure to press them on that contradiction. Almost half the population of Sweden claims to have ‘republican sympathies’, yet at the same time the social democratic coalition—essentially the faux-left—never ever tables the issue of abolishing the monarchy because they incomprehensibly claim that ‘it is not a vote-winner’.

Of course, it actually would be a vote-winner to a great extent if someone were to start a campaign about it, but I suspect that the real reason that liberals and faux-left won’t do that is because they are economically intertwined with them to such a degree that it would be disadvantageous for themselves economically if they did that. So the question itself of whether to abolish the monarchy, would act here as a kind of ‘troll move’, which can only produce shameful responses from them.

The second reason for it being on the list is because the Swedish royal family literally supports the multicultural agenda and has no care for the Swedish people whatsoever. Any royal family that could deliberately support what is happening in Sweden, cannot possibly be characterised as ‘the quintessential DNA family of the nation’. Monarchy sometimes has that connection, but in the case of the Swedish royal family that connection clearly is non-existent.

The third reason for it being on the list, is because the Swedish crown is literally just an ornament that has been passed onto the head of the descendants of a dubious marshal from the Napoleonic war. And let me be clear, I’m not playing the tired old card of saying that ‘they are not from country X, therefore they are illegitimate’. No, my argument on this point is much different from that. The Swedish royal family are the descendants of Jean-Baptiste Bernadotte, Prince de Ponte Corvo, who was actually a commoner. Jean-Baptiste Bernadotte served as one of Napoleon Bonaparte’s marshals, and spent his entire career being a self-serving weasel who never held a value or a political position that he wasn’t able to betray.

Bernadotte was a republican at first, yet he himself later became King of Sweden. Bernadotte professed support for Napoleon’s idea of a united and liberal European continent, yet ended his career calling himself the King of Sweden, enacting some of the most conservative policies of the era and standing with the Sixth Coalition by the year 1813. He actually added Swedish soldiers to the Battle of Leipzig on the side of the Sixth Coalition against Napoleon and all his former comrades in the French army.

But the signs that he was that kind of unreliable person emerged a lot earlier than that. At the battle of Jena and at the battle of Auerstadt back in 1806, Marshals Lannes, Bertrand, and Davout pretty much had to save the day themselves, and Marshal Bernadotte was nearby but did essentially nothing to assist them in any way. At Auerstadt in particular, the day was only saved for the French because Davout was able to carry out one of his typical genius plans, but had that not occurred, it would have a been a disaster.

In 1809 at the Battle of Wagram, Marshall Bernadotte again proved himself to be unreliable. He ended up somehow losing almost a third of his soldiers and got pushed back at Aderklaa, and Napoleon was so angry with him that he fired him immediately and dismissed him from the French army.

The rest is not complex. A jobless Bernadotte happened to be in the right place at the right time, as Gustav IV of Sweden had just been overthrown as a result of infighting within the Swedish ruling class, and they happened to be in the market for a new person to place the Swedish crown onto the head of. Why? Because the person they had replaced Gustav IV with was Charles XIII, who was both sickly and childless. This meant that the Swedish ruling class had just manoeuvred themselves into one of the most ridiculous possible situations, as they soon would not have a royal family at all. Scrambling, to find an answer, Carl Otto Mörner decided to reach out to Bernadotte, who accepted the appeal and became the adopted son of Charles XIII.

Bernadotte now became ‘Prince Charles John of Sweden’. By 1818, Charles XIII had died, and Bernadotte became King Charles XIV of Sweden and Norway. And that is a short overview of how a revolutionary republican French general was able to betray everything that he stood for so that he could become a deeply conservative monarch who barely survived the Rabulist riots of the 1830s when the Swedish people started calling for him to be deposed.

General Lasalle—one of the true advocates of the soldier’s approach to life and who died at the Battle of Wagram back in 1809 at age 34—is said to have spoken the words that “Any Hussar who survives his thirties should be held in contempt”.

Marshall Bernadotte lived until the cowardly age of 81 and ended up as ‘King Charles XIV of Sweden and Norway’. The presently-existing Swedish royal family is the House of Bernadotte. Make of that what you will. I have no love for them. Those reasons are the reasons why item number 2 is not just on the list to frustrate the faux-left, but also because Sweden’s monarchy genuinely is a disgusting thing and it needs to abolished.


3

Posted by DanielS on Mon, 26 Oct 2015 04:00 | #

Very well said. I initially recoiled because it does come across as a Jewy thing to express in wholesale inclination, a wish to overthrow not only the particular manifestation of (what should be) the emblematic native family of a European nation, but the institution of that native representation altogether. However, you have convinced me that not only is this particular family not appropriately native for the throne of Sweden, but quite the opposite, representing the utmost in cuckoldry of the native peoples - with a cowardly defector from another nation’s revolutionary army. A would-be representative but in fact a defector from a native people’s revolution - who would not only go AWOL, runaway and fail to cooperate in deposing treacherous royal elite, but would in fact impose himself as a wholly inappropriate alien on the throne of yet another nation, in faux representation of its best interests - is exactly one, quintessentially one, who a Swedish left should despise and depose. These people certainly do not belong on the throne representing the central-most Swedish family.

However, while I am not aware offhand of any salient examples of a monarchy which is completely loyal, consistent and accountable to the native people’s interests, logically there could be personified royalty who would be consistent with the class, the social union, that is the native people - the institution could be consistent with the left, the union of native, in this case native Swedish, peoples. However, that is not to say that it should necessarily be maintained as an institution or that abolishing the institution is inconsistent with White leftism either - it is probably more consistent to abolish it from that perspective. It is optional and perhaps should not be maintained, even with a native family of truly loyal nativist disposition.


4

Posted by Kumiko Oumae on Mon, 26 Oct 2015 04:26 | #

Of course, there are monarchies that are relatively inoffensive, or are even in fact strong and vibrant expressions of national spiritual power. And so that would be a totally different situation, one which would be okay.

It’s just that House of Bernadotte of course is not one of those and is not okay.

The story of Jean-Baptiste Bernadotte also is like a kind of archetype of the overall regression of liberalism after the mid-1800s, where after it ascended to power as an ideology and had completely triumphed, it turned and found itself joining hands with old established landed gentry and ecclesiastical powers, because its architects failed to articulate any criticism of the untrammelled fencing off of private property. Since economic power precedes political power, the outcome would not be difficult to foresee.

They are unable to part ways with these institutions because they are unable to make any exceptions to one of the core tenets of liberalism, its untrammelled defence of all private property claims.

Rather than doing ‘political economy’ based on the interests of a particular ethnic group trying to maintain its own mastery over its civic space, liberals instead are like hired prize fighters for landowners and big capitalists no matter who they might be. When determining economic policy, they will always tend to do the things which those who butter their bread ask them to do, and in an economy in which landowners and big capitalists are dominant and are not challenged, it creates a positive feedback loop of wealth accumulation into the hands of those same people. For that reason, they find themselves always defending an ever-more retrograde economic order. Particularly on the level of political party figures, they all live in nice white gated communities, they are deeply implicated with the most entrenched and ossified elements of Sweden’s economy, and so have neither the ability nor the motive to offer any solution to Sweden’s economic crisis—of which the migration crisis is a subset.

There’s a phrase that goes ‘situation dictates response’. The solution to all problems is not a cookie cutter solution that can be applied everywhere. But what I think that the Swedish people need to understand is that the people who are killing their country are perfectly happy to hide behind the establishment structures insofar as those structures serve their interests. They need to realise that basically all Swedish institutions are constructs, and that all constructs can be created or destroyed by anyone, and so being able to think of all of Sweden’s institutions as ‘fake’ and ‘expendable’, is another part of what my article is getting at. There is no otherworldly force out there which would care to stop anyone from basically razing all Swedish institutions to the ground and starting the country over as a republic based on actually defending the ethnic genetic interests (EGI) of Swedes.

I would hope that no one in Sweden would avoid doing their duty to their people out of fear that they might be ‘betraying’ the House of Bernadotte, and that ‘betraying’ it is ‘a bad thing to do’. There is nothing there of value to betray, no one owes that family an allegiance at this stage, they are beyond useless even in the most cynical of political calculations. No matter what emblems they are cowering behind while the country collapses around them, those emblems are meaningless if there is no country left for them to fight for.

Within the next generation or so, Sweden will probably collapse politically if the migration situation presently unfolding there happens to continue to unfold, so I think that the Swedish people—particularly those in its military—really need to start the mental process of letting go of those attachments so that they would be psychologically prepared to do what must be done, without hesitating, and showing no mercy when the time comes to put an end to the presently-existing Swedish society.


5

Posted by Leicester Speech on Tue, 22 Dec 2015 13:42 | #

           

Top heavy on the Nietzsche and anti-social angle though he may be, as one who sets a bar of right-wing thinking that those of fuller social, racial consciousness must surpass, Greg Johnson is correct to highlight Jonathan Bowden’s speeches as exemplary.

Bowden was brilliant. He was particularly uncanny in his understanding of the pernicious mindset from and of Marxist ideology.


6

Posted by Radio Free Skyrim on Sat, 05 Mar 2016 07:30 | #

Radio Free Skyrim - a round table of Danish, Norwegian and Swedish nationalist/tribalists who have intelligent laughs focusing on the absurd politics of White Nationalism, Sweden, the rest of Scandinavia, etc. In this episode they have some additional laughs at Sevitri Devi’s expense: https://soundcloud.com/radio-free-skyrim/episode-16-queen-of-the-cat-ladies

They don’t get the social constructionism thing, but it’s forgivable.


7

Posted by Sweden, the gift that keeps on giving on Wed, 18 May 2016 12:18 | #


8

Posted by DanielS on Sat, 26 May 2018 19:55 | #

....tossing-off the example that he might not be entitled to just go ahead and marry the queen of Sweden (who isn’t pure Swedish, but never mind, I’m not trying to do the Jewish, “it’s all so relative” thing because it isn’t quite that relative, generally speaking)



Post a comment:


Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Note: You should copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting it, so that it will not be lost if the session times out.

Remember me


Next entry: On The Eve of Ethnic Genetic Interest’s Most Important Day
Previous entry: Notes for an MR Radio interview with Matt Parrott

image of the day

Existential Issues

DNA Nations

Categories

Contributors

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Immigration

Islamist Threat

Anti-white Media Networks

Audio/Video

Crime

Economics

Education

General

Historical Re-Evaluation

Controlled Opposition

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Europeans in Africa

Of Note

Comments

Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Fri, 29 Mar 2024 12:32. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 23:47. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 23:15. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 22:48. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 22:02. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 16:55. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 16:38. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:36. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 12:50. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:37. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Tue, 26 Mar 2024 15:07. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Tue, 26 Mar 2024 11:00. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Tue, 26 Mar 2024 05:02. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Mon, 25 Mar 2024 11:39. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Mon, 25 Mar 2024 09:56. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Mon, 25 Mar 2024 07:51. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Mon, 25 Mar 2024 07:46. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Mon, 25 Mar 2024 07:41. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sun, 24 Mar 2024 12:25. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sun, 24 Mar 2024 00:42. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 22:01. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 21:20. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 20:51. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 20:45. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 17:26. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 15:56. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 14:55. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 14:07. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 13:12. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 12:51. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 12:38. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 10:01. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 05:13. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Fri, 22 Mar 2024 23:51. (View)

affection-tone