Posted by Daniel J on Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:25 | #

Wow, this is so strange on so many levels.

I find fertility clinics, freezing sperm, egg donors et cetera to be immoral in their own right-but throwing miscengenation into the mix?

I’m not opposed to voluntary integration so I suppose I can’t be mad at this. However, I didn’t know Freya was a Norse goddess of fertility and consider this woman’s choice of name very strange if not outright insulting.

Posted by James Bowery on Wed, 21 Feb 2007 21:24 | #

She’s obviously being insulting.  The take-home point, however, is that such hateful behavior toward her own ancestry would never arise if it weren’t for the takeover of her indoctrination by people hateful of those ancestors.

What has happened is worse than rape—it is rape of a woman’s mind as well as her body.

Her “choices” cannot be realistically seen as her own since her values are not legitimately her own.

Posted by James Bowery on Wed, 21 Feb 2007 22:09 | #

Added to Majority Report.

I agree, I’d like to see more good news.

Posted by Guessedworker on Wed, 21 Feb 2007 22:15 | #

James, they are the values of the free and unfettered will, the proving of which posivitely demands such conquests of the given or   “normal”.

It is important to realise that sometimes liberal individualism is enough to explain events, without the agency of other actors.

Let us NOT follow the Jewish tail around the corner and never re-emerge.  Liberalism and a traitorous elite also encumber us.

If I could get WM on MR Radio, I would certainly pin him on the political board game, and let the usual suspects stew.  In all the time we have jousted, albeit sporadically, still I do not know his political prescription.  Beyond Jewish exclusion, actually, I know very little of his thoughts and interests, save that as a cultured and intelligent, mature, moral man he must venture further than the subject of his postings.

If he will stay with us long enough this time perhaps we shall be able to explore that.

I do “owe him”, since he hauled me over the Jewish coals a long while back without returning me the favour viz-a-vis politics.

Posted by Daniel J on Thu, 22 Feb 2007 02:07 | #

My proposals for cultural reform are a precondition for politics, not a political system in themselves.

Truly culture is stronger than politics as that notorious hostile ethnic group has proved time and again. Leave politics to politicans, this is a culture war.

May I just say however, that the first part of your post evinces that very cult of victimology we deride the children of Abraham for wearing on their respective sleeves.

Blaming the Jews for Whites rolling over, capitulating and surrendering in every aspect of the Kulturkampf is strange.

It is like blaming the French for winning wars with the English.

I will grant you it is important to point out our enemies but you are bodering on whining about the omnipotent force that is Judaism.

The very principles of Christianity which you decree also bespeak to the philosophy from which you gathered you Nietzschean ideal of justice. (He who is able to repay in kind) This is just as much a Christian concept-id est the vengeful Christ returning to wade through the blood of his enemies waist high.

I think your analysis stems from an improper understanding of Christian justice, and you fall into the very same error you denounce so loudly-namely that of ‘feeling helpless’ in the face of overwhelming evil.

You rightly denounce one set of enemies, but the mindless white mass is responsible for their own actions and are rightly classified as enemies by their own right.

Posted by Daniel J on Thu, 22 Feb 2007 02:51 | #

No no… I just meant you seem to be overly emphasizing our “helpless position,” perhaps I misunderstood.

This is the place I want to be trust me.

Not trying to be a blow hard.

How is the Christian concept of justice at odds with “making men more just?” Are you implying that the Christian concept doesn’t include making men more just? I believe that corresponds with the “sanctification” process.

Do you believe in judgement for Jews or in improving them?

As far as the Othello reference, I haven’t read it. Sorry.
I am but a youth, and am furiously trying to catch up.

How am I defending Jews?
A thousand times no!
That is ridiculous. I stand fimly in the camp of defending western civilization at all costs.

Posted by Daniel J on Thu, 22 Feb 2007 02:54 | #

I think I undestand the Othello thing now.

No he isn’t wrong to defend himself against real injustices.
Sorry, I wasn’t implying we are wrong to defend ourselves.
You just seemed a little bit whiny, and you seemed to be defending ignorance. I am not denying that Jews were the aggressors. I guess my question is now that these liberal whites have become victimizers instead of victims why do we try to pass the blame to the Jews. I think guessedworker was trying to point out they are responsible at this point.

Posted by Desmond Jones on Thu, 22 Feb 2007 04:39 | #

Drs Anjali and Aniruddha Malpani, a husband and wife team, say that two-thirds of the patients attending their clinic in Bombay are from abroad. The Duncans were the first white couple to whom they gave an Indian embryo.

That’s a helluva indoctrination plan!

Now if only the Indians had taken Kahn’s advise (or China’s and Australia’s) the cost of the sub-cons embryos would have driven Ms. Duncan out of the market.

Posted by James Bowery on Thu, 22 Feb 2007 06:41 | #

GW, the problem is technology and our inability to understand its environmental impact on human ecologies.  Transportation and communication technologies allow replicators to run rampant over us.  Agricultural technology allows population densities to which we are unaccustomed as well as supporting inefficiencies imposed by the rampant replicators.  We can discuss why this results in the pathologies we observe if you want.  I don’t think that “The Deadly Embrace” between Jews and elites is all it is cracked up to be.  Whatever the history of court Jews as manipulative sycophants, modern communications and transportation technologies have dropped so much power in their laps it is virtually inevitable that they would destroy themselves and the world along with them in an orgy of self-indulgent ethic nepotism

Posted by Frank Mcguckin on Thu, 22 Feb 2007 17:38 | #

wintermute

I disagree with you that hindus are indifferent and just tagging along. They do have an agenda…and it doesn’t include our kind.

In America,  hindus are politically   organized around their ethnic/national interests. They are contributing in a significant way to the economic and racial annihilation of Euro-Americans.

If Jews are to be held accountable for their crimes against our people, so should the hindu thief.

Posted by Guessedworker on Thu, 22 Feb 2007 20:06 | #

Wintermute,

Here is a piece I wrote last September on neoliberalism, which I assume you mean by your use of the term “right-liberalism”.

Here is a longish piece I wrote in December on the elites.

Here is a short, general statement of what I consider Conservatism to be.  Here is a more forward-looking piece on Conservatism as revolution, written in Jan 05.  Here is a piece on the need for mutual discovery between Nationalists and regular Conservatives, written in September 05.  Here is a piece on realism in social conservativism.

Now I don’t expect you to read much if any of this.  But I do expect you to acknowledge that a complex worldview devoid of magic bullets (except, perhaps, this one) IS admissable, has purpose and, since it encompasses your own, is more hard-nosed than you appear to want to give it credit for.

Today, we sons of Europa are all liberals, even if we do not know it.  The cause of our inability to place our own ethnic interests uppermost or even high in our life-priorities is precisely our milieu of liberalism as the will to individualism.  I beg you to understand that my meaning here is very broad.  The liberalism of which I speak includes, for example, Christianity (which, like regular Conservatism, has shown itself to lack a fixed centre).  It includes all culture, and any and all replacements, material, philosophical and political, for our once and always true European natures.

It certainly includes both forms of Marxism.  If you are asking me whether liberalism has been Judaised my answer is why ask?  The attempt to prescribe our politics, including of the right, is hardly news.

Where we part company is that I am interested in ridding us of this pestilentialism by ridding us of the wider zeitgiest.  My proposed method is a certain act of return, not in any outward way of course, but in ways productive of a healthy, evolutionarily adaptive life.

Mine is Linder’s “light English model”.  It can properly be called conservative, though it is not obviously like the conservatism you think you know.  Of course it can never announce itself with torches and opera.  You might have to feel around in the dark a bit for it.  But it’s there, and I commend it to you.

Now, WM, if you mean to submit material for us, I will be honoured to post it.  But let’s not begin by telling one another that all hope and truth resides only in your struggle.  You are part - an important part, for sure - of something larger.

Posted by Marjorie Radcliffe on Sat, 24 Feb 2007 02:14 | #

I understand the commenter’s likely appreciation For William Gibson’s AI character; but there is already a well-known Wintermute out of Memphis, Tennessee, and I can see you’re not the same AI.

Posted by B.C. on Sat, 24 Feb 2007 12:47 | #

In Norse mythology, the dark-eyed/haired/skinned child that the god Heimdall begot with with a poor woman, became the progenitor of all slaves and serfs. At least in the accounts I read. I don’t think I’d of named the child after a Norse goddess.

Actually, some people have the mendacity to reconstruct Norse mythology to be anti-racist.

Liberals are telling us that something as basic as continuity of ancestry is no better than mud. Well, at least for Whites anyway. If that’s not sick and evil, what is?

Posted by Surrogacy India on Mon, 03 Sep 2012 06:52 | #

I think your analysis stems from an improper understanding of Christian justice, But Good.