Posted by David Mamet on "conservatism" on Thu, 23 Nov 2017 06:02 | #

I have no interest in going back to liberal arts colleges, unless they are truly liberal in the classical sense, which is to say conservative.

I’m sure that I would not have arrived at this point without that commitment [to Judaism and Israel]; and there is two portions to it, one is a commitment to Israel - when I noticed inescapably that the left had turned against the state of Israel, and that the Israelis were now being treated basically as subhumans, that we Jews, that the Israelis and we Jews by extension, were being treated as subhumans by the left, that is to say to whom the international law and traditional considerations of right and wrong, traditional considerations of mutual responsibility to allies did not apply, that all this could be abrogated by the left because the people involved were Jews, and somehow grasping and criminals…

The left the left the left…poor Israel, poor Jews

To turn our backs on Israel is heart-breaking. And it’s time for the Jews to wake up.

Israel has been fighting the battles of the west for 60 years.

The men and women in Israeli, in the armed forces and in the civilians, have been fighting and dying to preserve the Judeo-Christian ethic.

As it says in the bible, those who bless Israel will be blessed by me and those who curse Israel will be cursed by me.

Posted by Alexander Baron on Thu, 23 Nov 2017 17:23 | #

Prison rape is largely a myth. Most perverted sexual encounters behind bars are consensual. The Weinstein hysteria is a media-driven frenzy which is being exploited by feminists. The true extent of rape and sexual abuse is greatly exaggerated, the hoax of the Twenty-First Century:

https://www.infotextmanuscripts.org/falserape/a-false-rape-timeline.html

Posted by DanielS on Thu, 23 Nov 2017 19:21 | #

It isn’t a myth that these Mamet screenplays are attacks on White men. It is there for all to see.

The “Weinstein hysteria” (which is not the emotion here) is as much, if not more, a strategy to bury Jewish transgressions in a sudden deluge of stories about powerful male perpetrators as it is an opportunity for feminists to do their thing.

It is also not a myth that blacks are more aggressive and violent (in the interpersonal day to day sense - not talking about capacity for the grand violence in war) including more prone to rape.

Posted by National-Satanist on Thu, 23 Nov 2017 21:06 | #

“Prison rape is largely a myth. Most perverted sexual encounters behind bars are consensual.”

Sexual molestation is absolutely rampant in jails and prisons in the U.S. Also, when you’re incarcerated, nothing is really voluntary. I get the impression that you’ve never been incarcerated - either that or you work FOR a prison and just want to clear your conscience.

Posted by Alexander Baron on Fri, 24 Nov 2017 15:51 | #

Wrong, I’ve spent over two years of my life in HM Prisons. They are controlled environments, assaults happen in prison, I’ve both seen and been on the receiving end of them, but prison rape is largely a myth. It was started by feminists to garner male support, and many MRAs have fallen for it.  See here: https://www.infotextmanuscripts.org/falserape/false-rape-1348.html

Posted by DanielS on Fri, 24 Nov 2017 19:06 | #

If it is indeed the case that prison rape is largely a myth, that’s good to know; and correction of theses, such as Cassiel’s, is integral to a discussion site such as this. I’ve heard at least one guy (ghost wolf radio man) who’s been in prison and says that it never got close to any one trying to rape him. Even the movie Edmund does not exactly portray a rape, but rather a submission to homosexuality with a black. On the other hand, another guy I knew - strong, healthy White guy, an electrician by trade, who went to jail for armed robbery - tells a different story: he said the first thing that the blacks tried to do was fuck his ass. I don’t think they succeeded, but they tried.

And Robert Stark’s interview of T. J. Parsell also tells another story:

T.J. Parsell, who claims to have been raped in prison, has made it his cause to end sexual violence in prison, observing that race is central to the matter.

In any event, we should not let Cassiel’s thesis distract from the meta-thesis of this post, which is that furor over sexual harassment by men (generic) in power is typical in running roughshod over issues that the Jewish controlled mainstream media has tried to cover up for decades now: namely their own abuse of power, such as covering up the fact that blacks are more sexually aggressive and violent - a cover up that has handicapped White men’s defense, a loss of defense to our vast detriment - covering up that fact while lambasting White men for our “privilege” and celebrating our being taken down, our “deserved” come uppance from a coalition of White women and blacks, our altercast deserved submission to cuckolded betrayal as such.

The overload/jamming strategy, of ‘see how terrible that men are’, would occur with a wink and a nod through (((tribesman))), and specifically through Weinstein, who literally hired former Mossad agents for his case.

Finally, its worth consideration that one sided amplification of feminist issues, preoccupied as they usually are, with men on the top of the heirarchy of motives, and not for the lot of most and more ordinary men, tends to expose the bourgeois liberalism of modernist feminism, a lack of concern for the full class, to cover up their own lack of concern for a fair and balanced paradigm:

The interest in these men might be unconsciously disconcerting to feminists as it reveals their traditional side, showing its concerns inadvertently, whereas if they integrated that side, viz. men as complementary, not symmetrical antagonists for power, they would have a better means to negotiate fair gender relations.

If they could honestly acknowledge that not all men are privileged and that some men achieve largely and probably all men achieve to some extent as a result of deprivation on basic levels, they would have grounds to understand where men have the beginnings of legitimate grievance - where deprivation is too much the motive as opposed to fulfillment on lower levels - and head off pseudo justifications of sociopathology from men in power, or looking for power, by creating the institutions to protect sufficient means of fulfillment of more basic needs for men; while institutionalizing protection of positions of achievement when their authentic meandering would legitimately wind up placing them there for the good of all.

Conversely, boundaries of human ecology would help to head off pandering and importunate vying for women and power; they could enjoy the comfort of the traditional protection of their gender (acknowledging that they have had a traditional advantage on the basic levels of the hierarchy and that traditionally, a few places atop have been reserved for men in compensation for being better than average, for having to be better than average) and accept at their discretion, more legitimate challenges to show their merit in pursuit of broader societal achievement where they want to pursue the top of the hierarchy. If they don’t achieve through pandering, but have made it despite similar rigors confronted by men, and men are not subject to quite such brutal deprivation (e.g. draft into Vietnam) that would remove “legitimate” grievances. There would still be problems, for evolutionary lag and other reasons, but the legitimate theoretical beef would be removed for both genders and they could be shown recourse if they are corrigible.

Posted by Captainchaos on Sat, 25 Nov 2017 06:12 | #

I have two questions for Alexander Baron:

1.  Was he a young pretty boy at the time of his incarceration?

2.  Was he surrounded by nig nogs?

If his answer to either of these questions is “no” I doubt his personal experience can be granted much weight as a refutation to the general proposition of rampant nog-on-human prison rape.

Posted by Captainchaos on Sat, 25 Nov 2017 06:15 | #

Btw, I saw that Mamet movie “Edmond” on cable once.  I thought it was funny as hell.  Pure black comedy.

Posted by Funk Fish on Sat, 25 Nov 2017 07:32 | #

You have to be careful, CC. If you get too used to swimming in that funk water you might evolve to become like some kind of dirty, smelly, bottom dwelling funk-fish; you may become adapted to the funk water, while coral reefs and the many splendor angel fish die all around you; but no other species save the blackest funk fish will be primitive enough to thrive in its toxins and share your DNA, your kiss.

Posted by Alexander Baron on Sat, 25 Nov 2017 16:14 | #

Only two women have ever called me attractive, and only one of them meant it. There were quite a lot of blacks in Brixton when I was on remand in 1996-7. Generally blacks hate faggots - one of their few strong points.

Posted by Nat on Sat, 25 Nov 2017 17:56 | #

Hails from the US. I appreciate your website. There are very few outlets for good critical analysis on issues affecting white people.

Posted by (((Matt Lauer et al.))) on Thu, 30 Nov 2017 03:04 | #

Breitbart, “Katie Couric on Matt Lauer in 2012: He ‘Pinched Me on the Ass a Lot”, 29 Nov 2017:

       
AP/Richard Drew

As NBC is reeling over the news of Matt Lauer’s firing for alleged sexual misconduct, an interview from 2012 has surfaced of Katie Couric claiming that her former Today show coworker, Matt Lauer, “pinched” her rear.

Couric, who served as Lauer’s Today show co-host for nine years, sat down with Andy Cohen on Watch What Happens Live in 2012 and made the comments in a segment called “Plead the Fifth,” according to a video posted by TMZ Wednesday.

During the segment, Cohen asked the news anchor about Lauer’s “most annoying habit.”

Couric briefly paused before responding, “He pinches me on the ass a lot,” according to Fox News.

The Conservative Tree House, “Super-Creepy Expanded Predatory Sexual Assault Claims Against Matt Lauer”, 29 Nov 2017:

Good grief, when does this get accurately labeled as super-creepy, villain-level, ‘work-place rape‘?

According to updates reports in Variety and The New York Times, NBC Today Show creep, Matt Lauer, actually had a button installed on his desk to auto-lock his office door, and forcibly sexually assaulted a married woman in his office.

  VARIETY – […]  These accounts of Lauer’s behavior at NBC are the result of a two-month investigation by Variety, with dozens of interviews with current and former staffers. Variety has talked to three women who identified themselves as victims of sexual harassment by Lauer, and their stories have been corroborated by friends or colleagues that they told at the time. They have asked for now to remain unnamed, fearing professional repercussions.

  Several women told Variety they complained to executives at the network about Lauer’s behavior, which fell on deaf ears given the lucrative advertising surrounding “Today.” NBC declined to comment. For most of Lauer’s tenure at “Today,” the morning news show was No. 1 in the ratings, and executives were eager to keep him happy.

  […]  His office was in a secluded space, and he had a button under his desk that allowed him to lock his door from the inside without getting up. This afforded him the assurance of privacy. It allowed him to welcome female employees and initiate inappropriate contact while knowing nobody could walk in on him, according to two women who were sexually harassed by Lauer.  (read more)

  New York Times: […]  One complaint came from a former employee who said Mr. Lauer had summoned her to his office in 2001 and then had sex with her. She provided her account to The New York Times but declined to let her name be used.

  She told the Times that she felt helpless because she didn’t want to lose her job, and that she didn’t report the encounter at the time because she felt ashamed.  (read more)

These latest reports are way beyond “inappropriate sexual conduct”; way beyond.

I mean – how does a person, working in a modern corporate setting, get a button on their desk to lock their office doors and nobody questions the HR risk therein?

Either there’s an entirely different set of common HR rules in the workplace over the past several years, with a complete disconnect from all well-known historic HR practices and procedures….  or there’s an entirely different cultural world that I never even knew existed.

Anyone who is well versed in HR compliance standards, and/or who has ever attended a post-1970’s HR seminar on corporate behavior and personal risk mgmt avoidance, can see the basic level of HR-101 missing here is jaw-dropping.

Perhaps it’s just a different set of HR standards in liberal corporations as opposed to conservative ones?  Dunno, but this crap -as described- is way outside the boundaries.

♦Harvey Weinstein – Hollywood Film Producer; ♦Mark Halperin – MSNBC Senior Political Analyst; ♦Matt Lauer – NBC television journalist and co-host of “The Today Show”; ♦Matt Zimmerman – NBC Senior Vice President of Booking, News, and Entertainment; ♦Charlie Rose – CBS television journalist; ♦Mike Oreskes – NPR News Executive; ♦David Sweeney – NPR Chief News Editor;  ♦Louis C.K. – Comedian who lost his ties to HBO and FX, has had his new movie canceled Netflix special; ♦Kevin Spacey – Actor who is being cut from an upcoming film and was fired from the House of Cards Netflix series; ♦Garrison Keillor – Minnesota Public Radio….

Occidental Dissent, “Are We Supposed To Be Surprised That (((Matt Lauer))) Turned Out To Be A Greasy Yid Pervert?”, 29 Nov 2017:

I’m loving these busts more than I can coherently describe – it only seems to be escalating at an uncontrollable pace at this point.

And to those who are claiming that all of this is going to hit us normal White Men somehow, I’d like to remind you that so far the vast majority of those caught have been literal blood Jews, Blacks, homosexual pederasts, or Whites who are essentially Jews in spirit.

We would have long ago been fired, investigated, and potentially crucified (without broken legs) for even one-tenth of what we’re seeing many of these creeps are falling for – their status as elites and protected citizens has given them a set of rules far different than those reserved for us.

[...]

Variety:

  As the co-host of NBC’s “Today,” Matt Lauer once gave a colleague a sex toy as a present. It included an explicit note about how he wanted to use it on her, which left her mortified.

  On another day, he summoned a different female employee to his office, and then dropped his pants, showing her his penis. After the employee declined to do anything, visibly shaken, he reprimanded her for not engaging in a sexual act.

  He would sometimes quiz female producers about who they’d slept with, offering to trade names. And he loved to engage in a crass quiz game with men and women in the office: “f—, marry, or kill,” in which he would identify the female co-hosts that he’d most like to sleep with.

But was there masturbation into potted plants?

Since that has featured in more than one complaint against those of Jewish ancestry, I would have to assume it’s part of some Talmudic ritual.

  These accounts of Lauer’s behavior at NBC are the result of a two-month investigation by Variety, with dozens of interviews with current and former staffers. Variety has talked to three women who identified themselves as victims of sexual harassment by Lauer, and their stories have been corroborated by friends or colleagues that they told at the time. They have asked for now to remain unnamed, fearing professional repercussions.

  On Wednesday, NBC announced that Lauer was fired from “Today.” It was a stunning move for a co-host who was widely considered the crown jewel of the network’s news division, with a $25 million annual salary. The cause of his dismissal, according to sources, was a detailed complaint from another current NBC employee about inappropriate sexual conduct from Lauer that started on a trip at the Sochi Olympics in 2014 and continued for several months.

He must have gotten a bit too confident, arrogant, and careless, and picked on a girl that was easily believable – predators will usually take advantage of those who have baggage, personal issues, and/or sketchy histories.

  The employee met with human resources at NBC on Monday night. In a statement, NBC News Chairman Andy Lack called this the first complaint about his behavior in over 20 years and acknowledged that it may not be the last: “We were also presented with reason to believe that this may not have been an isolated incident,” Lack said.

  Several women told Variety they complained to executives at the network about Lauer’s behavior, which fell on deaf ears given the lucrative advertising surrounding “Today.” NBC declined to comment. For most of Lauer’s tenure at “Today,” the morning news show was No. 1 in the ratings, and executives were eager to keep him happy.

It’s also because Jews have long enjoyed a virtual immunity, and especially in their fortified media strongholds.

Nepotism runs deeper than anything else, and one seeking justice would quickly come across those of the Tribe who would bury your story deeper than Jimmy Hoffa’s body.

  Despite being married, Lauer was fixated on women, especially their bodies and looks, according to more than 10 accounts from current and former employees. He was known for making lewd comments verbally or over text messages. He once made a suggestive reference to a colleague’s performance in bed and compared it to how she was able to complete her job, according to witnesses to the exchange. For Lauer, work and sex were intertwined.

  …

  Lauer, who was paranoid about being followed by tabloid reporters, grew more emboldened at 30 Rockefeller Center as his profile rose following Katie Couric’s departure from “Today” in 2006. His office was in a secluded space, and he had a button under his desk that allowed him to lock his door from the inside without getting up. This afforded him the assurance of privacy. It allowed him to welcome female employees and initiate inappropriate contact while knowing nobody could walk in on him, according to two women who were sexually harassed by Lauer.

Again, this follows the predator pattern that many of his Tribesmen have followed since time immemorial – notice how much of this could have been printed in Der Sturmer back in the 20’s or 30’s (the Weimar Era was filled with Jewish perverts in high places).

  …The spotlight on Lauer intensified earlier this month, when his longtime booker Matt Zimmerman was fired over sexual harassment complaints. The two were very close, and Lauer had promoted Zimmerman to a high executive position and offered him a powerful perch.

No confirmation that he’s Jew from a quick glance, but enough circumstantial evidence exists to make it a distinct possibility that we were dealing with a tag-team striking down Shiksas like there was no tomorrow.

We’re really going to have to turn these sex exposures into a sort of game if everything continues at the same breakneck pace.

Imagine something like the “death pools” that many morning radio shows do with celebrities, except with this contest we can make guesses as to which powerful Jewish, media degenerate, or corrupt treasonous politician will get busted for various perversions against the Goyim.

My personal guess is that we’ll see another notable media figure or member of (((global finance))) come crashing down next.

Zero Hedge, “FLASHBACK: Matt Lauer Chastises Bill O’Reilly Over Sexual Harassment Charges”, 29 Nov 2017.

       

Posted by Tim Wise stop watch/ grandfather clock, tick tock on Thu, 30 Nov 2017 14:22 | #

Occidental Dissent, “Tim Wise: If Roy Moore Wins, It’s Time To Destroy White Alabama”, 29 Nov 2017:

Uncle Tim, who has a verified Twitter account, probably had a few and is letting it all hang out tonight. He has been known to get animated about politics from time to time:

Maybe you were under the impression that Tim Wise is an “anti-racist activist.” No, he is simply a vile Jew who hates White people. In his own words, he wants to “destroy white Alabama.” Not “hate groups.” Every White person who supports Roy Moore in Alabama.

Note: Is Uncle Tim coming to your state? Take a look.

AlterNet, “The Last Gasp of Aging White Power: But Time Is Not on Your Side—Tim Wise

The “Leave It To Beaver” days that Tea Party voters yearn for are about to be swept into the dustbin of history.

By Tim Wise / AlterNet

November 5, 2010, 3:00 PM GMT

For all y’all rich folks, enjoy that champagne, or whatever fancy ass Scotch you drink.

And for y’all a bit lower on the economic scale, enjoy your Pabst Blue Ribbon, or whatever shitty ass beer you favor.
Whatever the case, and whatever your economic station, know this…
You need to drink up.
And quickly.
And heavily.
Because your time is limited.
Real damned limited.
So party while you can, but mind the increasingly loud clock ticking away in the corners of your consciousness.
The clock that reminds you how little time you and yours have left.
Not much more now.
Tick, tock.
Tick, tock.
Tick.
Tock.
I know, you think you’ve taken “your country back” with this election — and of course you have always thought it was yours for the taking, cuz that’s what we white folks are bred to believe, that it’s ours, and how dare anyone else say otherwise — but you are wrong.
You have won a small battle in a larger war the meaning of which you do not remotely understand.
‘Cuz there is nothing even slightly original about you.
There have always been those who wanted to take the country back.
There were those who, in past years, wanted to take the country back to a time of enslavement and indentured servitude.
But they lost.
There were those who wanted to take us back to a time when children could be made to work in mines and factories, when workers had no legal rights to speak of, when the skies in every major city were heavy with industrial soot that would gather on sidewalks and windowsills like volcanic ash.
But they lost.
There were those who wanted to take us back to a time when women could not vote, or attend any but a few colleges, or get loans in their own names, or start their own businesses.
But they lost.
There were those who wanted to take us back to a time when blacks “had no rights that the white man was bound to respect,” – this being the official opinion of the Supreme Court before those awful days of judicial activism, now decried by the likes of you – and when people of color could legally be kept from voting solely because of race, or holding certain jobs, or living in certain neighborhoods, or run out of other towns altogether when the sun would go down, or be strung up from trees.
But they lost.
And you will lose.
So make a note of it.
Tweet it to yourself.
Put it on your Facebook wall and leave it there so you’ll remember that I told you so.
It is coming, and soon.
This isn’t hubris. It isn’t ideology. It is not wishful thinking.
It is math.
Not even advanced math. Just simple, basic, like 3rd grade math.
The kind of math that proves how your kind — mostly older white folks beholden to an absurd, inaccurate, nostalgic fantasy of what America used to be like — are dying.
You’re like the bad guy in every horror movie ever made, who gets shot five times, or stabbed ten, or blown up twice, and who will eventually pass — even if it takes four sequels to make it happen — but who in the meantime keeps coming back around, grabbing at our ankles as we walk by, we having been mistakenly convinced that you were finally dead this time.
Fair enough, and have at it. But remember how this movie ends.
Our ankles survive.
You do not.
Michael Meyers, Freddie Kreuger, Jason, and that asshole husband in that movie with Julia Roberts who tracks her down after she runs away and changes her identity–they are all done. Even that crazy fucker in Saw is about to be finished off for good. Granted, he’s gonna be popping out in some 3-D shit to scare the kiddies, so he isn’t going quietly. But he’s going, as all bad guys eventually do.
And in the pantheon of American history, old white people have pretty much always been the bad guys, the keepers of the hegemonic and reactionary flame, the folks unwilling to share the category of American with others on equal terms.
Fine, keep it up. It doesn’t matter.
Because you’re on the endangered list.
And unlike, say, the bald eagle or some exotic species of muskrat, you are not worth saving.
In forty years or so, maybe fewer, there won’t be any more white people around who actually remember that Leave it to Beaver, Father Knows Best, Opie-Taylor-Down-at-the-Fishing Hole cornpone bullshit that you hold so near and dear to your heart.
There won’t be any more white folks around who think the 1950s were the good old days, because there won’t be any more white folks around who actually remember them, and so therefore, we’ll be able to teach about them accurately and honestly, without hurting your precious feelings, or those of the so-called “greatest generation” — a bunch whose white members were by and large a gaggle of miscreants who helped save the world from fascism only to return home and oppose the ending of it here, by doing nothing to lift a finger on behalf of the civil rights struggle.
So to hell with you and all who revere you.
By then, half the country will be black or brown. And there is nothing you can do about it.
Nothing, Senõr Tancredo.
Nothing, Senõra Angle, or Senõra Brewer, or Senõr Beck.
Loy tiene muy mal, hijo de Puta.
And by then you will have gone all in as a white nationalist movement — hell you’ve all but done that now — thus guaranteeing that the folks of color, and even a decent size minority of us white folks will be able to crush you, election after election, from the Presidency on down to the 8th grade student council.
Like I said, this shit is math, baby. And numbers don’t lie.
Bottom line, this too shall pass.
So enjoy your tax cuts a while longer.
Go buy whatever you people buy when your taxes get cut: a new car or two, a bigger house, an island. Whatever.
Go back to trading your derivatives, engaging in rampant financial speculation that produces nothing of value, that turns the whole world into your personal casino. Whatever.
Play your hand, and for the love of God play it big. Real big. As in, shoot for the moon big. As in, try to privatize Social Security, and health care, and everything else. Whatever.
At least that way everyone will be able to see what you’re really about.
We’ve been trying to tell them, but nothing beats seeing it with your own eyes, so “Go big or go home,” Bubba.
“Git ‘er Done.”
“Cowboy up,” or whatever other stupid-ass catch phrase strikes your fancy.
Just promise you’ll do more than talk this time.
Please, or as one of your celluloid heroes might put it, “make my day.”
Do whatever you gotta do, but remember that those who are the victims of your greed and indifference take the long view.
They know, but you do not, that justice is not for the sprinters, but rather for the long distance runners who will be hitting their second wind, right about the time that you collapse from exhaustion.
They are like the tortoise to your hare.
They are like the San Francisco Giants, to your New York Yankees: a bunch that loses year after year after year, until they finally win.
You have had this confidence before, remember?
You thought you had secured your position permanently after the overthrow of reconstruction in the wake of the civil war, after the elimination of the New Deal, after the Reagan revolution, after the Republican electoral victory of 1994. And yet, they who refuse to die are still here.
Because those who have lived on the margins, who have been abused, maligned, targeted by austerity measures and budget cuts, subjected to racism, classism, sexism, straight supremacy and every other form of oppression always know more about their abusers than the abusers know about their victims.
They have to study you, to pay careful attention, to adjust their body armor accordingly, and to memorize your sleep patterns.
You, on the other hand, need know nothing whatsoever about them. And this, will surely prove fatal to you in the end. For it means you will not know their resolve. Will not fear it, as you should.
It means you will take their greatest strength — perseverance — and make of it a weakness, called losing.
But what you forget, or more to the point never knew, is that those who lose know how to lose, which is to say they know how to lose with dignity.
And those who suffer know how to suffer, which is to say they know how to survive: a skill that is in short supply amid the likes of you.
You, who could not survive the thought of minimal health care reform, or financial regulation, or a marginal tax rate equal to that which you paid just 10 years earlier, perhaps are under the illusion that everyone is as weak as you, as soft as you, as akin to petulant children as you are, as unable to cope with the smallest setback, the slightest challenge to the way you think your country should look and feel, and operate.
But, surprise…they are not.
And they know how to regroup, and plot, and plan, and they are planning even now — we are — your destruction.
And I do not mean by that your physical destruction. We don’t play those games. We’re not into the whole “Second Amendment remedies, militia, armed resistance” bullshit that your side fetishizes, cuz, see, we don’t have to be. We don’t need guns.
We just have to be patient.
And wait for your hearts to stop beating.
And stop they will.
And for some of you, real damned soon, truth be told.
Do you hear it?
The sound of your empire dying? Your nation, as you knew it, ending, permanently?
Because I do, and the sound of its demise is beautiful.
So know this.
If you thought this election was payback for 2008, remember…
Payback, thy name is…
Temporary.

    - Tim Wise

And then there is Ramzpaul’s Classic Response.

Posted by Why is NPR so Jewish? on Fri, 01 Dec 2017 18:08 | #

Posted by Ben Shapiro, "me too" on Thu, 21 Dec 2017 07:17 | #

Ben Shapiro discusses one of the problems with “left wing ideology” - “the me too movement.”

Posted by Lysette Anthony on Sat, 25 Jan 2020 15:25 | #

Lysette Anthony alleges she was raped on two occasions by the Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein

Harvey Weinstein: The fall of the king of Hollywood

Posted by Addie Zinone on Sat, 25 Jan 2020 15:39 | #

Posted by Harvey Weinstein verdict on Tue, 25 Feb 2020 07:43 | #

EXCLUSIVE: Inside the Harvey Weinstein trial and his guilty verdict | 60 Minutes Australia