An educated Russian man in the street says his piece Alexey, a 47-year-old Russian and a teacher by profession, shares his perspective on Putin’s war in Ukraine. Among other things, he explains why he believes Ukraine should not cede territory, and questions whether the West is really the great enemy to Russia:
Video from HEADSHOT, who specialise in bringing the vox populi of that vast country to the internet. Comments:2
Posted by Thorn on Fri, 26 Jul 2024 16:06 | # Speaking of Jews, GW, I haven’t yet verified the aforementioned assertions but at first glance it seems to fit right into the larger J constructed picture. 3
Posted by Guessedworker on Mon, 29 Jul 2024 12:00 | # That seems to be perfectly solid information, Thorn. Probably a couple of decades back there was a piece posted here on (I think) a conference of influential Jews, or an exploratory meeting of some kind, on the subject of emergent China and what could be done to bring it within their project. I don’t recall much about it now. But it showed that the failure of the supranationalist/demographic project as it had been conceived from 1945 was already feared. I think, actually, that the situation is worse for it than just the emergence of China, or even that Beijing is quietly operating a competing supremacist Middle Kingdom approach based on the sheer concentration of power - military, economic, geopolitical and political - that is expected to fall into its hands with the collapse of the western model. The problem is technocratic China because, as I have tried to point out many times, technocracy obliterates (other) ethnicity and, hyper-ethnocentric though they are, there just aren’t enough Jews in this world to win out against it. China’s vast and also highly ethnocentric population (plus its 10.7 million-strong diaspora) is another matter, however; and would survive, say, the western model. But what do I know. I never meet anyone who thinks along these lines, let alone posits the Putin Effect within them. 4
Posted by Thorn on Mon, 29 Jul 2024 22:23 | # GW, In the future, China might emerge as a unipolar power globally. However, the duration of such dominance remains uncertain. My uncertainty stems from their notably low fertility rate, which currently stands at 1.2 births per woman. The most optimistic projection for China’s birth rate is an increase to 1.4 by the year 2100. With such demographic trends, China is on track to lose over half its population within the next 75 years. Considering the aging of the population—i.e., the average age of the pop is steadily increasing—ergo, the prospects for a perpetually dominant China seem less foreboding. 5
Posted by Al Ross on Fri, 02 Aug 2024 01:27 | # Big Trouble in Little China 6
Posted by Al Ross on Fri, 02 Aug 2024 02:10 | # #3 GW , the joker in the geopolitical pack is the vast wealth and incipient influence of the Overseas Chinese . The Thai PM is the third ethnic Chinese in that precarious post. They are atavistically loyal to Chinese culture , and their traditional abhorrence of historically recent Communism has abated as their motherland ditched that dreadful Jew invention and embraced Weberian Western industrial capitalism. It is tough to please both the death - dealing USA ( count the wars the American plebs entered sans any threat to that obsolete colonial construct ) and stability - loving China. Singapore does a yeoman’s job on this stuff because their British trained icon , Lee Kuan Yew , made sure his successors were up to scratch diplomacy wise. Post a comment:
Next entry: Farage only goes down on one knee.
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA Nations
|
Posted by Thorn on Fri, 26 Jul 2024 13:37 | #
China’s policy is that the whole world, that is, the globe, is China. And all those who think otherwise simply do not understand the magnitude of the imperial scheme of the Chinese and their emperor”
The problem for China is there are some real and growing obstacles in their way. Just to name a few: 1) The Muslim world. 2) India. 3) Those pesky Jews.
My hypothesis is China’s power will peak around 2060 then steadily decline from there.