|
|
|
Does Doolittle and Mark’s “Propertarianism” have the Kosher seal of approval? Probably yes… Propertarianism is an idea for a system of government devised and promoted by Doolittle and Mark to secure the interests of peoples where the U.S. Constitution has left vagueries to be exploited by the parasitic. From what I’ve heard so far, most of it can be consonant with an ethnonational Left, White or otherwise. The platform claims that it will be able to gain the adherence of Whites who do not heavily identify as White, either don’t care much, or emphatically do not want to be identified as racist. They maintain that as the rules-based platform provides the only guarantee of their interests that it will follow that a large percentage of these Whites will fall into the same camp as Whites whose main interest is maintaining their genetic kind. More, that this program will facilitate a groundswell to allow for revolutionary victory for racialists as it forces the right identifying elements among the military, police and citizenry to stand down when called upon to take arms against their own kind; and rather join with them. Here is where the parasite may be rubbing its hands together unbeknownst to their “foolproof” anti-parasitism. 1) They insist on identifying as “The Right”, just as king parasite wants them to do at this point, now that it has vacuumed up all the money and assets that it possibly can. 2) With that, encourages misdefinitions of “Left/Right” as Mark promotes - “The Left is irrational, a creature that can’t be talked to.” Or is it that they don’t want you to talk to me? Try me. Try me. You won’t because your Jewish masters and fellow parasites told you not to. .. “it seeks social justice… how laughable! ... has compassion for marginals - how quaint and effeminate .. the left is trying to deny us our nature as assholes.” Who told you the Left is womanly and irrational? The same people who pander to White girl’s puerile predilection and incitement; who want your legacy to become Mulatto so you can be more “manly”, hyper-assertive, non-reflective and unreasonable like a black? How is it irrational to analogize national and group boundaries to unionization? Where does this unionization and accountability (of elites, marginals, rank and file) toward the end of social justice and group homeostasis need to say that “equality” is the goal and not symbiosis and homeostasis?; or that self interest is necessarily at odds if accountability to group interests exists as well? Does not accountability address the issue of “parasitism?” Who told you that the left represents parasitism whereas the right does not? Most people would say that capitalism, mega-wealth, investment beyond need, interest bearing loans, rent, etc, are right wing - no? Who told you that social constuctionism does not deal with reality? According to its tenets, you are free to come here in comments and help to construct our platform - help us deal with “reality” - in fact, that is the radical reality of how knowledge is generated. Who told you to stay away? To see the “Left” as such a word that would have you running like a cockroach from the light? Who supplied you with these stereotyped characterizations of an anthropmorphized “left” that is just so irrational that it can’t understand why Jews and these sociopathic Whites (that you want to get on your side on the sly), who’ve sold-out their race for their own selfish interests, are on top. Who prevented you from joining me in this moribund White Left ethnonational position - seeing it as an opportunity to define it for ourselves, not as your masters see fit? Such that it can provide for private property, wealth and a great deal of individual liberty, while maintaining accountability to our interests, bounds and borders? Who told you that social constructonism was phony baloney? I’m going to pretend for a moment that you will do the normal thing and join me as I watch this video; we’ll see what we can use, what may be off the mark - you will help in that corrective process, won’t you? Or will you refuse joint construction because your (((masters))) told you how to define what this left ethnonational platform is about and because those Whites who’ve bought their (((definitional package for right and left))) are too committed to their deal? You see, there are all kinds of solutions to bring about borders and systems to run once borders are instituted. I never claimed to have all details figured out and in fact, am given to the reality of social constructionism, that that is simply not how knowledge is generated and disseminated - if people think, as Bowery apparently does, that I should come up with a system of “operationalization” or be ignored, then that is not reasonable. Someone else, if not him, is welcome to propose adjustments. These libertarians say to me, “that may be what should happen, but what do people actually do? Well, I don’t know, what did the Jews tell you about how the right deals with reality, Stoicism, Jesus and all? That it provides the promise of perfect union with god after life…. Stoicism, it shows the way (doesn’t cause us to blunt our sensible interests) whereas Epicureanism’s “materialism’... oh, you don’t want that pursuit of pleasure, you don’t want that…there’s nothing after your material life, except maybe your children and kinfolk’s genetics… Pleasure?! Ha ha ha! Don’t you know that shit has a divine place in the universe? Makes us perfect shit eaters, while your Epicurean palate, it pretends that it will get off, find the highest pleasure in figuring out how life is best conducted….
In fact, Epicureanism promotes a hierarchicization of “pleasures” (contemplation being highest).... and our inextricable involvement in empirical reality which provides for accountability, e.g., to the materiality of our forebears and genetic legacy. Ok, so I’ll watch this in my material reality; maybe you’ll join me in reflection upon it, probably you won’t… your gawd told you not to. Comments:2
Posted by another problem with propertarianism on Sat, 26 Jan 2019 19:51 | # Scientism. It can impose a scientistic myopia of the present day in that it may not provide for accounts of historical thefts, murder and plundering of resource… ...whereas hermenetics can take these matters into account. Some “merit” may be funded by leisure pursuits of higher goals and selection that a parasitic community affords Some lack of “merit” may indeed result from the lack of community organization, primarily because it has been disrupted and obstructed by right wingers ... the truth of shared construction of our way of life, some social indebtedness for our knowledge and merit, right wingers disrupting our unionization as such and accountability to that truth, while they claim to be all about truth (the Soviet Union’s Katyn Massacre of Polish cadets amounts to a right wing proviso of the (((Red, internationalist Left))). How they allowed our co-evolutonary White women to be ripped from us with no more account than that is just how their “natural law functions in its truth.” ..for their narrow, heremeneutically impoverished time frame. Or the thefts of right wingers, for example, as they install Muslim compradors to impose feudalist exploitation over South East Asia, to disrupt their unionization and control over their ethnonational capacity for voluntary trade of resource… As it destroyed Vietnamese ethnnonationalism while the lives of patriotic Americans were deployed and destroyed in the right wing interest of tire rubber and other resource without a concern for fair trade, though Ho Chi Minh broached America for such negotiation… The “merit” of post war Germany having risen from the ashes, though it did gain significantly from the Marshall Plan, while Poland suffered under Soviet privation; and after Frederick the Great then Hitler had plundered and destroyed its resources for over a hundred years, as they expanded and sought to expand imperialistically, parasitically under the guise of natural law. 3
Posted by Illegal for public figures to lie on Sun, 27 Jan 2019 11:44 | # That would be a big problem for the Hitler/Nazi redemptionists. Lying is their primary mode of operation. They seem to be proud of their bald faced dishonesty and bad will. “Operation Reinhard? What’s that?” “You don’t want Polish people to be killed and their sovereign nation taken from them by Nazi imperialism? - You are a Polish chauvinist and you hate Germans!” These people are absurd. They better hope there are no more laws against lying. 4
Posted by Another potential problem. on Mon, 28 Jan 2019 08:26 | # Another potential problem. Over extension of the parasite metaphor as representing THE problem with YKW. Some antagonisms, including from YKW, are not expressions of parasitism. And defense against this antagonism may be met by including roles for our people who might otherwise be marginalized and not generating wealth beyond their personal need, perhaps not even enough for their personal needs in a propertarianims that defines “what people do” as necessarily highly competitive and selfish, ignoring that niche symbiosis abounds in nature and cooperation is more the norm than uncaring competition among humans. That is to say, people might be offered roles to earn their non-parasitic keep in the maintenance of group homeostasis prior to overbearing stress of some sort of post hoc forcing of niche performance which may, in fact, use up necessary systemic flexibility. 5
Posted by repudiate calls to violence on Wed, 06 Feb 2019 22:52 | # No White Guilt critiques Mark and Doolittle’s notion of propertarianism, issuing a stern warning: Any proposition that violence can lead to a positive outcome leaves you susceptible to prosecution.
First of all, that’s not going to happen in the US, against the world’s superpower.” That good advice aside.. Note that this is coming from the crew, Mark Colett and co. that hang out with David Duke, commend “The Greatest Story Never Told (with the entirely false claim that Poles killed 58,000 in Danzig)” and say you can’t change the popular language while No White guilt tells you not to use “anti-Whiteness” as if anyone has even considered the phrase. ...talk about stuck in a language game. Post a comment:
Next entry: ‘Complete, total surrender’: Trump waves white flag after sudden erosion of support from Senate
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA Nations
|
Posted by parasitic reaction on Sat, 26 Jan 2019 16:51 | #
First problem, they presume the oxymoronic definition of left as liberalism.
Again, unionization is the opposite of liberalsm. Its largest problem is being overly stable. Particularly a problem when the wrong things are unionized (as opposed to praxis), e.g., an obsolete industry and ineffective means of production, rather than a group of workers with more fundamental interests than merely the kind of work they’ve been trained in. ... or “the international (((union against))) so called White supremacy. .... or the ((((union of huWhite supremacy)))”, etc.
...its second major problem is over-administration of accountability, as I suspect would be symptomatic of parasitism or reaction thereof (Communism/Nazsim); e.g., the alien rule of the Stasi over East Germany. But with ethnonational praxis, unionization thereof (borders and commonly appreciated rules), accounts requested can be kept to a minimum.
Other groups may be organized against our borders and bounds, against our union, against our ethnonational bounds and borders, which would be an effort at liberalization of our borders (not leftism for us).
The persistent, outright phobia to the word left, to reject the best aspects of left organizatoin along with the gross distortions and abuses that have deceptively gone on under its term is symptomatic of parasitic reaction - i.e., a sickness and a dangerous state in which the host is highly susceptible to being directed into runaway, against homeostatic self correction, into self destruction, as the cricket infected with the worm is driven to suicide.. .... ironically, as they identify with the right and “anti left parasitism”, they have left ideological back doors (where a basis in left ethnonationalism, i.e., unionized praxis would not) thusly allowing in the parasite to provide directives in accordance with its metabolic programming.