Comments:2
Posted by Ryan on Sat, 18 Jun 2016 09:19 | # At this present time all they are going on is an alleged receipt from 20+ years ago from the National Alliance and that he supposely gave support to a South African patriot magazine in the late 80’s/early 90’s. In the case of the South African Patriot magazine the implicit message is that this is ‘Nazi’ when it’s position, then and now, is akin to the Monday Club position in the 1980’s. In the period which Thomas Mair allegedly supported the South African Patriot large numbers of patriotic-conservatives opposed the terroist ANC and supported the status quo government; which is the position of the magazine and now online newsletter. However no event is left alone when it comes to those who seek to impose further draconian laws against those who oppose the artificial mass immigration agenda. Where was the political pressure from the top in cases such as when Kriss Donald was tortured and murdered and the targetted rapes of young White girls? The same politicians, police top brass and media closed ranks. They have sensed an oppurtunity and our taking it by both hands. 3
Posted by NA denies SPLC association to Mair on Sun, 19 Jun 2016 17:56 | #
Post a comment:
Next entry: Massive Israeli border fence system between Israel & Syria (and other countries adjacent to Israel)
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA Nations
|
Posted by Roots of Mair's unhinged ideology on Fri, 17 Jun 2016 09:44 | #
People who know me and my political views know that I am not casting aspersions upon English Nationalism or any native nationalism by suggesting that this act was an expression of nationalism having lost patience; it is rather an indictment of how the right does not lend itself to a sufficiently tactful means of native nationalism, as it continually disrupts proper social organization and coordination - the result is a misguided frustration that leads to unhinged acts such as this. But that is one of the key functions of the right for opponents of our ethno-nationalism - to push our would-be activists to reaction as such and thereby make us look bad.
That is why the Jews want us to be “the right”, and to remain anti social and not be unionized as distinct peoples with an in-group and out-groups.
They can use the frustrated and anti-social acts of individuals who accept the altercasting as “far right” to try to scare people off of our eminently sane and moral goal of native nationalism.
In this case, we even know now that Mair was inspired by the American WN right wing of William Pierce. It seems many epistemological blunders of White Nationalism stem from and introduction of the world view of Pierce’s National Alliance.
Pierce was very intelligent and his criticism of society and the Jewish causes of its downfall were penetrating and compelling, even if incomplete. One can see why many would get on board with his program. The even greater problem than his incomplete critique is that his prescriptions were much too right wing, and just about every unhinged right wing Hitler fetishist giving White/European Nationalism a bad name is traceable to his epistemological blunders.
Personally, I feel no responsibility for the acts of Mair. What he did was foolish but a fool’s acts are a fool’s acts, and not a reflection on the eminently moral quest for native national sovereignty.