The truth of this culture is not victims of racism or White privilege, but rather victims the liberal mindset.
This is what happens when kids are raised by the village instead of by the parents.
What I want to know is this: how long are we going to live in denial? ...and pretend that this type of activity does not exist in our “urban centers” (the politically correct term for black neighborhoods)?
Folks, what you see in this video is not the exception, it’s the norm.
This is why privileged White liberals won’t go anywhere near urban centers.
What privileged White liberals do, is that they will isolate themselves in insular White neighborhoods in the suburbs, segregated neighborhoods - they might have one or two token neighbors who are not White; so they isolate themselves in insular White neighborhoods, where they pretend that they care about “people of color.”
The fact of the matter is that they don’t care. If privileged White liberals really cared about these black kids, they would pack up the U-Hall, they would move to the housing projects and redistribute their White privilege. They would try to help these kids. They’re not doing that because they don’t care
So once again what we see in this video is an adult male, who is working for a living, contrasted by four (I counted four) urban savages who are trying to make their living by stealing.
The question comes to mind, at least to my mind, is where are their fathers? Where are their parents?
The answer to the question is that these kids weren’t raised by families. They were raised by the village…by the government.
The way it works is this: a 14, 15, maybe 16 year old kid will copulate with the females around; a female gets pregnant; and the male is just totally out of the picture. He’s a father but not a dad. He’s just not there. So the child is raised by the mother in a housing project. But the mother is not really that interested in her babies. So as soon as they’re old enough to run the neighborhood, they’ll open the door and let them out. It’s kind of like keeping a dog; you don’t keep a dog in the house you open the door and let the dog run the neighborhood. They literally treat their kids like pet animals, only they are not very good at taking care of their pets, they let them run wild. And they do what dogs do, they form packs. They call them gangs or crews or whatever - there’s not necessarily a hierarchy, they just get together; and they basically live a life of crime. They attack people, they beat up people, they rob from each other.
That’s what goes on in the urban centers. And we pretend it is not there. As you can see in this video, it definitely is there and it happens all the time.
At some point, we are going to have to escape our delusion.
We’re going to stop pretending that these people are victims of White privilege, that they are victims of White racism, that they are victims of anything other than the liberal mindset.
Posted by liberalism and cultural Marxism on Mon, 01 Aug 2016 09:22 | #
It’s funny, because “Marxism or cultural Marxism” in this case may have been more descriptively the culprit than liberalism per se - which is a mindset of Whites that is acted-upon by YKW advocates of non-Whites (in Marxist, cultural Marxist unions) against so called White “racism and privilege.” But liberalism, i.e., the non-unionization of our interests, openness and concern for plights outside of our (would-be) group is still right there at the core of the problem with what our union busting antagonists are trying to promote, so it is descriptive enough - and I do appreciate Kenn’s having impugned the anti-unionizing term of liberalism - as that is radically the culprit in terms of what we are most centrally in control of, for ourselves. I also note that he does not tend to deride the term “left” by itself - indicating that he senses something disadvantageous to Whites in doing that - and there is.
- DanielS