Posted by Alex von Gold Farb and Pillbegotten on Sun, 18 Mar 2018 18:32 | #

On this Luke Ford podcast, “Pilleater” joins in with a few disclosures ....

The first revealing a lie. Pilleater had told us that he was disillusioned with Robert Stark because Stark was too friendly with the YKW. Now, in this podcast with Luke Ford, Pilleater says that he’s always been in the (((Robert Stark cultural sphere))).

Indeed, he’s part of Stark’s Jewish cohorts, shabbos goy, like Keith Preston, anything to obfuscate a stable White platform, with Brandon Adamson (Rabbit)‘s “Alt-Left”, if they can, they comply to muddle, obfuscate. associate and conflate Jewish leftism with liberalism, as opposed to allowing for the distinguishing of White Leftism - which would be distinct from liberalism and Jewish international leftism.

It isn’t really a surprise, as Pilleater has always been nothing more than an opportunistic career-girl: speaking of that, he’s come out of the closet as a bi-sexual, having been “openly gay for about three years” .as such, ready to promote liberalism (how liberating it would be for Asian woman to suck…)

(((Alex von Goldsein))) does not identify himself by name, but flaps his lips and therefore reveals himself and his lying (((motives))) on the podcast..

He pretends not to know Pilleater and only recently to have become acquainted with Stark.

He’s using the same logo as (((Frame Game)))..and I’ll check in a moment to see if they are one and the same.

Listening again and comparing the two, ((Frame Game))) probably is Von Goldstein, and the name of the game is (((getting control))) of the opposition - i.e., “the (((frame game)))”

..................

Correction: (((Frame Game))) is Jewish, I had his motive correct - controlled opposition, in the sense of joining right wing Jewish and White -  reaction - pretty much the same as Von Goldstein, but apparently not the same person.

Posted by Cofnas' Confabulation on Tue, 20 Mar 2018 06:53 | #

According to Jewish convert, Luke Ford, the first serious challenge has been made against Kevin MacDonald’s work, “so effective as to call its validity into question entirely.”

One does not have to have but a passing acquaintance with MacDonald’s work and his concern to know that to call its validity into question entirely or even in large part, simply is not possible. Nor do they have to look beyond the absurdity of Ford’s claim that Cofnas does such “irreparable damage” to MacDonald’s efforts to see immediately that Ford’s pro-Jewish bias is over-the-top; and examples cited of Nathan Cofnas’s supposedly detached analysis, indicate rather clearly a heavy pro-Jewish bias, motivated and prone to crude straw manning of MacDonald’s work.

Anyway, this is the first public defense by MacDonald of this “first serious academic critique of ‘The Culture of Critique.”

Me ne frego - episode 22, with Kevin MacDonald

Professor Kevin MacDonald joins the show to discuss Nathan Cofnas’s recent paper, ‘Judaism as a Group Evolutionary Strategy: A Critical Analysis of Kevin MacDonald’s Theory’, which is the first ever academic attempt to refute Professor MacDonald’s theory as presented in his 1998 book, The Culture of Critique. The first 45 minutes are in English; after the music break we wrap it up in Swedish.

Posted by Critiquing critique of Culture of Critique on Wed, 21 Mar 2018 13:56 | #

Age of Treason, “The Culture of Critique Cries Out in Pain as it Strikes MacDonald”, 19 March 2018:

Has anyone provided a more thorough, more reasonable critique of jewing than Kevin MacDonald? From what I’ve seen, the mild-mannered professor makes a meticulous case, constructed mainly by citing prominent jews.

Judge for yourself. MacDonald focuses on immigration in Chapter 7 of The Culture of Critique. The specific link I most often refer to is Jewish Involvement in Shaping American Immigration Policy, 1881-1965: A Historical Review, Population and Environment, 19, 295-355, 1998. These works and more are gathered at MacDonald’s Publications on Jews and Western Culture.

In Žižek, Group Selection, and the Western Culture of Guilt MacDonald notes the “few very articulate defenders of the basic ideas expressed in Culture of Critique” commenting on a post by Steve Sailer. Among the best is Ben Tillman, who distilled MacDonald’s trilogy like so:

Book 1 & Thesis 1: A Jewish group evolutionary strategy developed.

Book 2 & Thesis 2: In some historical instances, Europeans developed group evolutionary strategies to compete with the Jewish group.

Book 3 & Thesis 3: A number of Jewish intellectual movements of the 20th century were designed to prevent European-derived peoples from developing group strategies to compete with the Jewish group.

MacDonald himself summarizes the third volume this way:

A major theme of Culture of Critique is that Jewish intellectual movements developed theories which had a patina of science and according to which anti-Semitism had nothing to do with the behavior of Jews but was entirely an issue of the psychopathology of non-Jews. These theories were then promulgated by the elite media and Jewish activist organizations, and they came to pervade the academic world

Tanstaafl

20 March 2018 at 2:37 pm

KMac’s conclusion:

On the surface, Cofnas appeared to engage my work, but he didn’t really grasp the key arguments or how CofC fit into the framework of the other books in the trilogy or my other writing on evolution and culture. One suspects he had a foregone conclusion about its value—what psychologists term “motivated cognition” (which, as I attempt to demonstrate, was characteristic of the Jewish intellectuals I review in CofC). Like the hyper-purists discussed in several places in CofC, he was looking for ways to condemn research he didn’t like for deeper reasons. He understood perfectly well that a positive review would never be published. And he was deeply troubled by CofCs increasing acceptance outside academia and by the possible political ramifications of that acceptance. He was quite aware that the silent treatment that had surrounded the book for 20 years had failed.

Tanstaafl

This caps a 40-odd page response. Not to be too hard on him, but MacDonald is too charitable, too willing to play along with the jew charade. He has thoroughly documented the who, what, when, where, and how of jewing, yet I daresay he fails to fully accept the most important implications of his own work – that jews lie, that they are hyperconscious, that they hyperconsciously moralize and organize and see themselves as distinct from, superior to, and in opposition to Whites, and that Whites have as a rule failed to consciously recognize this jew hostility, much less reciprocate. If anyone is being self-deceptive about any of this it is relatively demoralized, disorganized, and self-concerned Whites.

The crux of Cofnas’ disingenuous argument is to paint jewry and their jewing as divided, even though every jew knows that their disagreements flow from and float atop a deeper consensus – whatever’s best for the jews. The watchword for this game is “monolith”, as in, “the jews are not a monolith!”. Notice the contradiction? “This CATEGORY is CATEGORICALLY not a CATEGORY!” Tellingly, the jews perceive any and all reactions to jewing as a monolithic “anti-semitism” which they monolithically characterize as a literal disease. Their game is to use this ineffably jewy never-ending screechy hair-splitting on every subject under the sun – two jews, three opinions about what’s best for the jews – as a distraction from what rightly should be the overriding concern for any non-jew vis-a-vis jews, namely jew virulence, the toxic impact jewing has on non-jews. Any interlocuter who tries to make “anti-semitism” the overriding concern is giving the game away.

Posted by ((((Stark Who?)))) on Sat, 24 Mar 2018 19:40 | #

The latest controversy on the Alt-Right is that ((((Stark’s)))) recent guest is promoting the Nathan Cofnas critique and (((Stark))) seems to agree that it is legit.

http://www.starktruthradio.com/?p=6321

Posted by (((Stark Who?))) on Sat, 24 Mar 2018 19:46 | #

https://twitter.com/icareviews/status/976951478756757504

Posted by DanielS on Sat, 24 Mar 2018 20:33 | #

Yes, I heard that one: he also said Hymiewood allowed Mel Gibson to make movies and therefore the Jews don’t control it.    ...even Jews themselves don’t deny their control of Hollywood.

There have been a lot of efforts lately between Stark and Luke Ford’s friends to run interference, to obfuscate in an effort to depict the YKW as a benign, allied people to Whites, if not actually huWhite   ...needless to say (((Savage Hippie))) is doing that but Alternative Right is still peddling (((John K. Press’s culturism))) among other ways-in, entryism for the YKW.

Toward that end the Cofnas critique was transparent in its Jewish motivated bullocks. The guy had a perfect score on his verbal GRE and yet he’s fucking retarded.

Posted by (((Stark Who?))) on Sat, 24 Mar 2018 20:41 | #

So what’s (((Stark’s))) deal then?

Posted by DanielS on Sat, 24 Mar 2018 20:46 | #

He has a small amount of Jewish ancestry - 1/16th - he said something about his Jewish ancestor having been notable; he came of age in a Los Angeles area where he befriended Jews; and says that so far, most women he’s dated have been Jews; but significantly, advocating Jews is a good career move for him as an aspiring media person - businesses controlled by Jews.

Posted by (((Stark Who?))) on Sat, 24 Mar 2018 20:48 | #

Then why does he associate with the Alt-Right and White Ethno-Centrism?

Posted by DanielS on Sat, 24 Mar 2018 20:55 | #

There is an overall strategy behind the conception of the Alt-Right, beginning with Paul Gottfried, Regnery and Spencer, to coordinate if not ally White and Jewish right wing interests as an “alt-right” against “the left” ..i.e., against ethnonational, social unionization.

P.S., I am playing along with you, but I don’t necessarily trust you - could be pilleater for all I know.

Posted by ((Stark Who?)) on Sat, 24 Mar 2018 20:58 | #

Does Stark have any connections to Spencer or Gottfried?

Posted by DanielS on Sat, 24 Mar 2018 21:01 | #

Regnery has something to do with Spencer and Gottfried and I believe Regnery was behind VOR which gave Stark a platform and nascent Alt Right contacts back in 2011

Posted by DanielS on Sat, 24 Mar 2018 21:04 | #

Oh, I see you are from Santa Barbara…  so, probably (((Stark himself))) or a close confidant of his. lol

Posted by JF, Frame Game, Halsey, Mclntyre on Wed, 25 Apr 2018 00:12 | #

JF, Frame Game, Halsey, Mclntyre

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fSQ4pUWqt8

Posted by Post Frame Game / JF discussion on Wed, 25 Apr 2018 08:17 | #

An indication of the shame of the Nazis and right wingers neglecting this platform is that our enemies continue to try to commandeer the narrative:

E.g., they try to co-opt my argument for pervasive ecology, and human biodiversity as an appealing frame for the negotiation.

At 12:50, “Norvin” says that he has a discussion arranged with Tanstaafl (which Scott Roberts may join into) that is coming-up.

Posted by Discussing Alt-jewing with TANSTAAFL on Mon, 30 Apr 2018 05:09 | #

Discussing Alt-jewing with TANSTAAFL