|
|
|
If you are able to articulate public relations manipulation so well, how did you wind up altercast?  The Absolute State of Britain, on Mike Enoch’s TRS network.If you are able to articulate public relations manipulation so well, how did you wind up altercast?
Now, “The Absolute State of Britain” airs over at Mike Enoch’s TRS Network - which I have long recognized as the main distribution outlet for the kosher marketing campaign devised to take White reaction against neo-conservatism, PC and increasing Jewish power and influence circa 2008, and to direct (nudge) it into a revised (((paleoconservatism))) 2.0 called the Alt-Right (now dissident right/ or neither left nor right as “increasingly meaningless terms” or third positionism) against a characterology of the left. That is, they were nudging the reaction to stay on the right (anti social, stigmatic, disruptive and divisive of organizational power) and providing voice to White reaction, alt-right tents among the tentosphere (Christians, Nazis, the scientistic, the nutty conspiracy theorists and yet another tent for right wing Jews as proposed allies) if they went along and manifested some anti-social stigma, maintained identity as right wing reaction against hyperbolic inernationalist/anti-nationalist Marxist and Cultural Marxist (anti-White) organization/ coalitions characterized as “THE” Left, characterized as didactically repulsive and absurd so that Whites didn’t get the idea of White Left Ethnonationalism and its concept of broad unionization to delimit and protect the bounds of White people - because then they’d begin to organize their power and set sights on the pervasive pattern of kosher folks who naturally advocated for liberal scabbing of their borders and bounds as a rule; and then they’d look up and see who was on top, fucking them over: Kosher folks in 7-9 power niches in tandem with White right wing elitist sell outs, purity spiralists and Liberals taking the license, licentiousness offered them in the disordered circumstance of their borders and bounds having been flung wide open. I have elaborated in many places about how and what it means to be right wing and liberal (objectivism at its base as an excuse with ever narrowing, “more pure” warrant as its source of power; minimizing accountability to borders and bounds of one’s people, indebtedness and responsibility thereof) and why the kosher folks want Whites to maintain that identity. Also, a characterology of “The Left” with all the absurdities of the exaggerated abuses of group organization, individual agency and activism, associated even at its base, organizational essence, as something only for anti-Whites. ...a dozen memes perhaps (red pills, normies, optics cucking, social justice warriors, etc) provided by some NY PR firm and placed in the portfolio of a Mike Enoch to deliver to the goyim with an instruction, “Be as anti-Semitic and pro-Hitler as you need.” ...“call your show the ‘Daily Shoah’ and make ‘oven’ jokes… you’ll establish the ‘vanguard’ and tell people that the ‘normies’ don’t understand like we do, nor do the ‘optics cucks’, so for the most part we’ll have to wink and nod, knowing that “our Uncle” (Enoch literally refers to Hitler that way in the show below) had it all right, but they won’t understand, so keep it cool, “See Kyle!” (lol) until enough of them are ‘red pilled’, especially given the ‘lefties’ out there, who might not want us to deny ‘the holahoax’....you know how unreasonable and anti free speech THE LEFT is.” The Absolute State Of Britain #61: Black Riots Matter (With MIKE ENOCH) Meanwhile we’ve got other tents working the other right wing reactionary angles to direct them against our characterology of “The Left”. We’ve got the Christian tents to keep the goyim yoked under Noahide law. We’ve got Keith Preston to help them, e.g., Todd Lewis and Right Ruminations to maintain the left as the demon. Where audience turns for something else, we’ve got a tent for people who say “neither left nor right” so that Whites don’t get any idea of the organizational power of White Left Ethnonationalism.  And if they begin to get the idea, we can subvert it with another tent to appeal to newbies with “Third Positionism”..served up by useful idiots Keith Woods (with Cultured Thug, who was singing the virtues of third positionism, Hitler and Mussolini with Richard Spencer et al, the day before Spencer’s channel got taken down), Thamster, Jefferson Lee and Eric Striker (Mike Enoch there to help, of course), promoting it to provide a back door and means to maneuver our people by exploiting its no account, non socially corrective rigid reaction against our social systemic homeostasis/ self corrective, self governing autonomy (specifically subverted by introducing to this left cover, an option for Christianity, or the rational blindness of scientism and objectivism, which dovetails with Hitler adulation).  To shore up this reactionary position against the left, cooler heads will be directed from that horror show back to the home base Gottfried tent where it all started for good old fashioned paleoconservatism; and now that Richard Spencer took the nudge a bit too far at Mike Enoch’s prompting, we have the still edgy, but not too edgy new paleocon, Nick Fuentes, to retain the Christian, Noahide jurisdictional yoke. ....yielding the paleocon torch to the cookie monster, Nick Fuentes..
Comments:2
Posted by mancinblack on Sun, 02 Aug 2020 14:29 | # Hardly sensible of Patriotic Alternative, who are looking more and more like the Poor Alternative. Am I to take it that Brutus isn’t liked because, unlike Collett and others, he doesn’t have a Hitler fetish? Brutus is correct when saying they didn’t deal with the Enochian magic. In fact, long time Morgoth’s Reviewer Tony Hayers, best known for his interminable, tedious lists of Jews on British television, said of Enoch ‘I don’t care if he’s Jewish, I like what he says’. He actually posted that. 3
Posted by English/14 on Mon, 03 Aug 2020 06:36 | # ...and so it seems that we’ve had some positive influence on Brutus and co. ...still don’t agree with him about anti-Christian being anti English Nationalist… ...he’s a bit too accepting of warring and supremacism as a natural fact. ...too simplistic in his view on gender relations. ...maybe should add a few more words to his catch-all go-to - “kick the foreigners out”. Maybe While I disagree with him and his colleagues about some things, in regard to episode - Banter Nationalism 93 - I want to deal with a nuance of agreement and disagreement. As they are English Nationalists, I absolutely agree with them in critiquing “Patriotic” Alternative and other British Nationalists where they might place their cause under the rubric of “White” and where they might rally by the Fourteen Words (let alone by German American WN’s Hitler redemptionism - 88). Brutus’ concern to make and emphatically maintain the distinction between English ethonationalism and White Nationalism is very important and well taken. However, while Brutus and co. can be forgiven as being in an initial stage, tad over-corrective break-out into appropriate concentration on English ethnonationaism, they do over-correct a bit. You see, “White” merely represents the genus, European. The term is not only necessary to avoid confusions as to who is being advocated when speaking of European diaspora, but it is also the case that we are under attack as a race - i.e., All White people, meaning the American sense of the term, all people of European descent, and therefore we are all in the same boat and have a common cause in having to defend ourselves for our race - wherever we are. Now, again, White is the genus, European. And it should not be mutually exclusive to the species - e.g. English - defending their national kinds and borders as well. I agree absolutely with Brutus and co. in emphasizing the distinction between genus and species. Where I disagree with them is in making the concerns mutually exclusive, antagonistic, even. And regarding the 14 Words, while David Lane made a mistake in killing the Jewish radio shock jock and David Lane paid the price for it, the 14 Words are, nevertheless, a beautifully composed, inspiring rallying cry for many. However, it is true that the 14 Words are not unproblematic when our enemies and doltish true believers try to re-attach them to the “88”. That again, was a mistake by David Lane, i.e., to make that association in the first place. However, TT and his admirers were always clear to say the 14 Words without the Even so, it is true that “White” and The 14 Words speak of the genus and do not distinguish the important species difference such as the English. Again, Brutus’ concern to make and emphatically maintain that distinction is important and well taken. I hope that he’ll steer clear of some supremacist way of marking the difference - from what I hear of “37 words” I’m not sure if it’s in their personality to manage that… But obviously we can defend ourselves better if we are not fighting each other - The coordination of genus (race) and species (national kinds) of European peoples is not too difficult an intellectual task for Brutus and others to manage. Perhaps something like English/14 German/14 French/14 and so on… ...to mark the species divisions of the genus.
I will not insist on people using the 14 words, but they work quite well for some, especially diaspora when separated from the 88 - 14/ Post a comment:
Next entry: Dr Kevin MacDonald: Evolutionary Psychology, Jews, Europeans and Christianity
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA Nations
|
Posted by Let's talk about creepy Ralph on Sun, 02 Aug 2020 11:47 | #
Let’s talk about creepy Ralph