Mueller now untouchable, signals powerful case, indictment can squeeze Manafort to turn witness

Posted by DanielS on Tuesday, 31 October 2017 01:07.

CNBC, “Mueller Is Now ‘Untouchable’ After The Manafort Indictment: Former US Attorney”, 30 Oct 2017:

John Lauro, former U.S. Attorney on the scope of the indictment:

“It’s very aggressive.” While it doesn’t have anything to do with the campaign yet, it is a historical indictment that includes money laundering, failure to register as a foreign agent and conspiracy against the United States.

“And they threw in something at the end there which was very significant - at the very end an item about his son-in-law. They are going to press him to no end. They are going to pressure Paul Manafort to flip or cooperate [like the prisoner’s dilemma?]. Absolutely”

“The significance of this indictment is that it gives Mueller cover going forward, nobody’s going to touch him because Paul Manafort is under indictment. And this gives him opportunity to press Manefort for information.”

[When you say nobody’s going to touch him, what do you mean?]

“He can’t be fired by the president of the United States, there’s no way, this indictment is significant because going forward nobody is going to even suggest that the investigation should stop or that Meuller should be relieved of his duties.”

“Because Paul Manafort is under indictment now, the investigation is moving forward, Trump would be impeached the next day [for obstruction of justice] if he tried to remove Mueller.”

“Mueller is now untouchable as a result of this indictment. That’s the significance of it.”

[You’ve actually got two guys under indictment, Manafort and Gates, setting up another prisoner’s dilemma as they could turn on one another]

“Right, right.”

“And here’s how the conversation goes: Mr. Manefort, you’re facing a long time in jail. Your son-in-law could be implicated, we’re ready to indict your son-in-law as well, what are you going to give us in return? What are you going to talk about? Whether its the Trump administration, other business deals or the campaign itself?”

[and they’re saying the same thing to Rick Gates as well?]

“Absolutely, that’s going on right now.”

“It’s very specific: they call it a ‘speaking indictment’, and prosecutors do that in order to signal to the defense that we have a powerful case against you.”

“This is actually a long standing case against Manafort that Meuller picked up because it allows him to squeeze Manafort and Gates.”

“The government acts slowly, but when they do, they’ve made sure to button-down every hatch.”

“The indictment sends a message to everybody that ‘we’re serious.’ There’s going to be a lot of pressure on Manafort. I suspect that there’s going to be other indictments as well; anybody who is the subject of a federal investigation, with dozens of FBI agents and sixteen of the most skilled prosecutors, good luck to you.”



Posted by 5 weird things about Paul Manafort on Tue, 31 Oct 2017 10:53 | #

Here are five weird things that you need to know about Paul Manafort

1) It’s actually pretty weird that he was running a campaign for a US Presidential candidate.

He’s really more of a third world dictator guy; and Trump knew this when he hired him.

Manafort had worked for Filipino dictator Ferdinando Marcos,

Angola’s Jonas Sevimbi,

and Zaire’s Mobutu Sese Seko.

But one of his longest gigs was working for the Putin backed Ukrainian strongman Viktor Yanukovych,

whose positions were pro-Russia and anti-NATO (NATO and Russia’s role in Ukraine will come up again later).

2) While Manafort was working for Yanukovych in 2006, he used a shell company to buy an apartment in Trump Tower. Flat out. No mortgage.

3) While working as chairman of the Trump campaign, Manafort declined to take a salary. This is weird for a top campaign official, and especially when you consider that he was 17 million dollars in debt to Russian-tied backers at the time.

..and if he wasn’t being paid for by Donald Trump, it invites the question, was he being paid to run the campaign by someone else?

4) After Manafort took over the campaign, Trump started parroting exact Russian talking points on NATO and Ukraine, saying things like this:

“I think NATO might be obsolete.”

and this:

“You know the people of Crimea, from what I’ve heard, would rather be with Russia”..

5) About the Republican platform.

Presidential candidates typically have really strong feelings about their party’s platform.

But under Manafort, the Trump campaign wanted only one thing from the Republican platform:

Taking away support for arms for Ukraine to defend against invading Russians.

A very strange thing to be the sole concern for a party platform in a US election.

All five of these things are weird.

Now that Manafort has been indicted for conspiracy against the United States, more information will come out.

And maybe some of these weird things will become a little easier to understand


George Papadopolous was indicted as well:

The Papadopolous indictment could actually be even more significant since it bears on actions during the campaign. He was actively engaged in trying to connect the Russians to the Trump campaign.

Business Insider, “New details about an early Trump adviser completely change the timeline of Russia’s election interference”, 31 Oct 2017:

  George Papadopoulos, an early Trump campaign adviser, was told that Moscow had potentially damning information on Hillary Clinton in April 2016.

  The revelation — from an FBI document — changes the timeline of Russia’s election interference.

  Papadopoulos pleaded guilty earlier this month to making false statements to federal investigators.

George Papadopoulos, an early foreign-policy adviser and aide to President Donald Trump’s campaign team, was told that Moscow had dirt on Hillary Clinton in April 2016, newly unsealed court documents show.

The revelation changes the timeline of Russia’s efforts to interfere in the US presidential election. The offering on Clinton, in this case, was in the form of “thousands of emails,” disclosed to Papadopoulos by a person identified as an “overseas professor.”

The professor was later identified by The Washington Post as Joseph Mifsud, director of the London Academy of Diplomacy.

The court document was filed by special counsel Robert Mueller’s office in early October. It alleges that Papadopoulos lied to the FBI about the nature and extent of his contacts with foreign nationals and says he knew they had ties to senior Russian government officials.

On October 5, Papadopoulos pleaded guilty to making false statements to federal agents. He now appears to be a cooperating witness in Mueller’s investigation of potential collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. But the revelation that a foreign national tied to Russia offered the campaign dirt on Clinton in the form of emails in April 2016 seems to move up the known timeline of Moscow’s election interference.

“On or about April 26, 2016, defendant Papadopoulos met the professor for breakfast at a London hotel,” says the special counsel’s court filing.

“During this meeting, the Professor told defendant that he had just returned from a trip to Moscow where he had met with high-level Russian government officials. The professor told defendant that on that trip he (the professor) learned that the Russians had obtained “dirt” on then-candidate Clinton. The professor told defendant Papadopoulos, as Papadopoulos later described to the FBI, that ‘they [the Russians] have dirt on her’; ‘the Russians had emails on Clinton’; ‘they have thousands of emails.’”

The document suggests Papadopoulos had known that Russia was actively trying to undermine Clinton before virtually anyone else.

Hackers, believed to be Russian, breached Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta’s email server in March, but those emails were not published by WikiLeaks until October. News that the Democratic National Committee had been breached by Russia-linked hackers in late 2015 did not break until June 14, 2016.
‘Putin wants to host the Trump team when the time is right’

george papadopoulos twitter George Papadopoulos. LinkedIn

The revelation sheds new light on claims made by both the campaign and WikiLeaks, which published the stolen DNC emails on July 22, in the weeks and months leading up to the election.

According to the special counsel’s office, Papadopoulos kept trying to organize a meeting between the campaign and Russian government officials even after learning from the professor that Russia was trying to compromise Clinton. He thanked the professor for his “critical help,” according to the filing, saying that it would be “history making” if a meeting took place.

Papadopoulos emailed top Trump advisers several times after learning of the emails, but he never said exactly — not in emails, anyway — what the Russian officials wanted to discuss with the campaign.

In an April email to then campaign manager Corey Lewandowski, Papadopoulos said he had gotten “a lot of calls over the past month” about how “Putin wants to host the Trump team when the time is right,” according to The Washington Post.

On May 4, he told Lewandowski and campaign cochairman Sam Clovis that Ivan Timofeev, a senior official at the Russian International Affairs Council, wanted them to know that Russian officials were open to Trump visiting Moscow.

Clovis replied that “there are legal issues we need to mitigate, meeting with foreign officials as a private citizen.”

But Papadopoulos was not deterred: He sent the same email to Paul Manafort — listed as a “high-ranking campaign official” in the government filing but identified previously in a Washington Post report — on May 21, just after Manafort was named campaign chairman, telling him that “Russia has been eager to meet with Mr. Trump for some time and have been reaching out to me to discuss.”

The special counsel’s filing indicates that the official forwarded Papadopoulos’ email to another campaign official and wrote: “Let’s discuss. We need someone to communicate that DT is not doing these trips. It should be someone low level in the campaign so as not to send any signal.”

Carter Page, then a low-level foreign policy adviser like Papadapoulos, traveled to Moscow in early July. His trip was reportedly approved by Lewandowski. Page took a “leave of absence” in September after news broke of his July trip, and the campaign later denied that he had ever worked with it.

It is unclear whether Papadopoulos had told anyone in the campaign, at this point, about the Russian “dirt” on Hillary Clinton. On June 1, 2016, Papadopoulos again emailed an unidentified “high-ranking campaign official” and asked about Russia, according to the special counsel’s office.

The official referred Papadopoulos to the “campaign supervisor,” who Papadopoulos emailed with the subject line “Re: Messages from Russia.”

“I have the Russian MFA asking me if Mr. Trump is interested in visiting Russia at some point. Wanted to pass this info along to you for you to decide what’s best to do with it and what message I should sent (or to ignore),” he wrote.

On June 3, 2016, music publicist Rob Goldstone emailed Donald Trump Jr. and said, “The Crown prosecutor of Russia … offered to provide the Trump campaign with some official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia and would be very useful to your father.”

The information, Goldstone said, was “part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.”

“If it’s what you say I love it especially later in the summer,” Trump Jr. replied.

Six days later, Trump Jr., Paul Manafort, and Trump’s son-in-law and top campaign adviser Jared Kushner met with Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya — identified as a “Russian government attorney” in Goldstone’s emails — on the promise of dirt on Clinton.

The Washington Post reported on June 14 that Russia-linked hackers had breached the DNC. Five days later, Papadopoulos again emailed the unidentified “high-ranking” Trump campaign official telling him that he would be willing to travel to Moscow to meet with Russian government officials “if it’s in the interest of Mr. Trump and the campaign to meet specific people.”

That month, the CEO of the data firm that would soon be hired by Trump’s campaign, Cambridge Analytica, reached out to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange offering to help release the 33,000 emails Clinton said she deleted from her private email server.

It is unclear why the CEO, Alexander Nix, thought that Assange had those emails at the time; there is still no evidence that anyone had obtained them, and WikiLeaks did not publish the first batch of stolen DNC emails until late July.

The trip to Moscow that Papadopoulos was planning, meanwhile, never took place. But Russian sources cited in a dossier compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele say that by late July 2016, there was “a well-developed conspiracy of co-operation between [the campaign] and the Russian leadership,” both of which had an interest in defeating Clinton.

On July 7, Manafort offered to exchange briefings about the campaign for debt repayment or cancellation from his contacts in Ukraine and Russia, according to emails reviewed by The Washington Post. Manafort had been a top adviser to Ukraine’s pro-Russia Party of Regions from 2004 to 2014.

Asked by ABC’s George Stephanopoulos on July 24 whether there were any connections between the Trump campaign and Russia, Manafort replied: “No, there are not. And you know, there’s no basis to it.”

Julian Assange has insisted that Russia was not the source of the DNC emails it published on July 22, between the end of the Republican National Convention and the beginning of the Democratic National Convention.

By that point, however, Russia-linked entities had already offered the campaign “dirt” on Clinton twice, once explicitly in the form of “thousands of emails.” On July 27, Trump said: “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 [Clinton] emails that are missing.”

The Steele dossier also said that the campaign agreed to sideline the issue of Russia’s invasion of Crimea and interference in eastern Ukraine in exchange for WikiLeaks releasing the stolen emails.

The Trump campaign’s national-security policy representative for the Republican National Convention acknowledged in an interview with Business Insider in September that he had given his campaign colleagues the opportunity to “intervene” when an amendment to the GOP’s draft policy on Ukraine was introduced in Cleveland last July.

The original amendment, which proposed that the GOP commit to sending “lethal weapons” to the Ukrainian army to fend off Russian aggression, was ultimately altered to say “provide appropriate assistance” before it was included in the party’s official platform.

Papadopoulos was still pursuing a Trump campaign-Russia meeting as late as August 15, 2016, when a campaign supervisor told him that he would “encourage” him and another foreign policy adviser “to make the trip” to Moscow “if feasible.”

Post a comment:

Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Note: You should copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting it, so that it will not be lost if the session times out.

Remember me

Next entry: Bill Baillie Purveying it Right Back: Critical Reflections on Democracy & Capitalism
Previous entry: Poland is correct to denounce Richard Spencer

image of the day

Existential Issues

DNA Nations

Establishment Problem



Endorsement not implied.


Islamist Threat

Anti-white Media Networks






Historical Re-Evaluation

Controlled Opposition

Nationalist Political Parties


Europeans in Africa

Of Note


Ahed Tamimi interviewed commented in entry '“Gaza: An Inquest into Its Martyrdom”: Norman Finkelstein on the Many Lies Perpetuated About Gaza' on Fri, 19 Jan 2018 11:12. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Euro-DNA Nation' on Fri, 19 Jan 2018 10:11. (View)

Putinism commented in entry 'Putin's Revenge' on Fri, 19 Jan 2018 08:12. (View)

Jewish occupy, demonstrate for open borders USA commented in entry 'Africans Deported from Israel “Appear” in Rome' on Fri, 19 Jan 2018 02:08. (View)

question commented in entry 'Euro-DNA Nation' on Thu, 18 Jan 2018 23:15. (View)

mancinblack commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Thu, 18 Jan 2018 17:43. (View)

Crazy Over You commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Thu, 18 Jan 2018 14:22. (View)

mancinblack commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Thu, 18 Jan 2018 13:24. (View)

I'm a Man commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Thu, 18 Jan 2018 12:41. (View)

mancinblack commented in entry 'Carolyn Emerick talks pagan folk culture and ethnonationalism with Tara's alt-right panel' on Thu, 18 Jan 2018 08:15. (View)

uh commented in entry 'Spencer: My conception of the ethnostate is imperialist - true ethno nationalism is a zero sum game.' on Thu, 18 Jan 2018 08:07. (View)

mancinblack commented in entry 'Carolyn Emerick talks pagan folk culture and ethnonationalism with Tara's alt-right panel' on Thu, 18 Jan 2018 07:18. (View)

100% European commented in entry 'Euro-DNA Nation' on Thu, 18 Jan 2018 06:39. (View)

The ancient is the modern commented in entry 'Snyder's lessons applied to reality now: universalized liberalism tyrannizing over ethnonationalism' on Thu, 18 Jan 2018 02:19. (View)

100% European but you might not guess commented in entry 'Euro-DNA Nation' on Thu, 18 Jan 2018 00:45. (View)

Near 100% European commented in entry 'Euro-DNA Nation' on Thu, 18 Jan 2018 00:18. (View)

95% Native American (Central) commented in entry 'Euro-DNA Nation' on Wed, 17 Jan 2018 11:11. (View)

20% sub-Saharan commented in entry 'Euro-DNA Nation' on Wed, 17 Jan 2018 09:53. (View)

We knew these things commented in entry 'Hermeneutic construction of Putin and Trump's character, positions and relation:' on Wed, 17 Jan 2018 04:13. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Wed, 17 Jan 2018 01:18. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'MR Radio: Greg Johnson talks to GW and Daniel' on Wed, 17 Jan 2018 01:09. (View)

henry m commented in entry 'MR Radio: Greg Johnson talks to GW and Daniel' on Tue, 16 Jan 2018 18:29. (View)

mancinblack commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Tue, 16 Jan 2018 16:51. (View)

This is the Day commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Tue, 16 Jan 2018 16:17. (View)

Emerald City commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Tue, 16 Jan 2018 15:46. (View)

mancinblack commented in entry 'America: Making The World Safe for Hypocrisy' on Tue, 16 Jan 2018 15:41. (View)

Anything, Anything commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Tue, 16 Jan 2018 15:26. (View)

The Allman Brothers commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Tue, 16 Jan 2018 15:04. (View)

Nobody to Depend on commented in entry 'America: Making The World Safe for Hypocrisy' on Tue, 16 Jan 2018 14:56. (View)

Pearl Jam commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Tue, 16 Jan 2018 14:09. (View)

John McLaughlin commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Tue, 16 Jan 2018 13:55. (View)

Hatfield & the North: Mumps commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Tue, 16 Jan 2018 13:29. (View)

My Love is Alive commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Tue, 16 Jan 2018 13:23. (View)

Wild Swans Love Will Tear Us Apart commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Tue, 16 Jan 2018 12:39. (View)

Happy commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Tue, 16 Jan 2018 12:18. (View)