Posted by PeterSweden on Mon, 10 Sep 2018 06:15 | #

Peter From Sweden discusses the disappointing results, which he suspects mainstream media will talk about as an ‘end of populism in Europe.’

From what I understand this is likely to be very similar to how the results are going to be because we have more than half of the votes counted now (and the cities, which vote liberal, and are therefore only going to make the results worse are all that remain to be counted): Socialists twenty eight percent, Moderates nineteen and Swedish Democrats only third place with seventeen, which is actually, all things considered, catastrophically bad for the Swedish Democrats - not at all good.

If this is true, you’re going to see loads of articles from the media saying the populist debate has died….because this result from the Swedish Democrats is very anti climatic.

I think I have to question, with all the things going on in Sweden, how on earth! does the Socialist Democrats still get twenty-eight percent of the vote? I mean, are people completely brain-washed or what?

I don’t understand.

I don’t understand.

How can people still vote for the ...

I don’t understand, really.

If anyone has any explanation please feel free to tell me.

I don’t really understand how it is possible.

(sigh) It’s been a bad week.

Posted by Nya Dagbladet on Mon, 10 Sep 2018 09:44 | #

Nya Dagbladet, “Something does not match Sunday’s election results”, Posted today 11:25

         

After the migration issue has been consolidated for several years as the second most important political issue in Swedish politics, support for the Swedish Democrats has been pushed to the fore. After the debate has been topped with recent car brands around the country, even the most well-known political analysts in Sweden, such as SVT’s Mats Knutson and TV4’s Marcus Oscarsson, talk about the Swedish Democrats as the party likely to be the biggest party in Sweden after the parliamentary elections.

In polls from institutions such as Yougov and Metro, which were the most accurate in terms of the Swedish Democrats’ results in previous elections, the party has become the largest party in several measurements. In June, the party reached 28.5 in Yougov / Metros measurement.

In the latest Sentio measurement with just days left for the election, SD reached 24.0 percent and was therefore the largest party. However, according to Arve Östgaard, who runs the Sentio survey institute, the council said that SD could get as much as 29 percent in the election.

The traditional open opinion polls have historically always underestimated parties such as SD and the election results have been counted wrong by several percentage points. Even in the polls that tend to underestimate the party, the figures have been around 20%.

When the bill of votes was closed last night, SVT presented a final result for the Swedish Democrats, which ranged from 5-10 percentage points to virtually all measurements. According to SVT, the party only received 17.6% and does not even reach the level of the second largest party.

According to SVT’s own large polling survey, which was presented last night when the ballrooms closed, the party received 19.2 percent. The Vallokals investigations tend to give the same misleading results just for the Swedish Democrats, as there is still a taboo about openly showing sympathies for the party. Nevertheless, the final election results are far below these figures.

During the day of the election, it began to pour tips on electoral fraud around the country to the editors. Electors who visited the ballrooms found that ballot papers were missing in several places in the country, especially for the Swedish Democrats. Even the party Alternatives for Sweden and the Nordic resistance movement were subjected to this type of electoral fraud, albeit to a lesser extent.

In some ballrooms, the Swedish Democrats’ rolls had not even been packed up. Elsewhere, the rollers had obviously been stolen. The fact that the ballot papers were disguised by other parties’ ballot papers were, according to reports, also common.

Other serious infringements were that voters in ballrooms were asked not to seal their envelopes with ballot papers before submitting them. Images from readers showed that these instructions lay open behind the selection screens where you put their rollers in the envelopes.

Other notifications were also reported. For example, electoral prosecutors have been tickled by ticking the arrows with pencils, although this should be done with ink pen according to the rules.

Many in this election have also complained about how to openly compel to collect ballot papers for both electoral officers and other electorate members, which violated the principle of the confidentiality we have in Sweden, and consequently imply that others see which party they intend to vote for.

The Swedish election was overseen for the first time by international election observers from the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, the OSCE. Michael Aastrup Jensen from the Danish OSCE delegation, who previously watched elections in Russia and a number of other Eastern European countries, was amazed at the underhanded as the Swedish voting system.

“During all the election observations I have been on, I have never seen a choice as undemocratic as the Swedish one. It is far from European standards, he says to TT.

Although the scope of clear cases was indicated by whistleblowers, such as rolling stamps, stolen and picked up or never even picked up is hard to review for the editors, though the extensive reporting gives a thumbnail of the extent of the problem.

The uncertain extent of this kind of electoral fraud, despite the fact, does not explain the discrepancy between five to ten percentage points that the Swedish Democrats lost compared to expectations and opinion polls in just overnight.

The loss is so great that there is reason to look at another type of manipulation.

During the night, the County Administrative Board’s website was suddenly closed. The county boards are responsible for the election report and are thus the authority your election district reports in their voting results. Even the Swedish electoral authority’s website was down during the night.

The County Administrative Board’s website was closed by the Authority for “safety reasons”. No further explanation was given, and despite this serious incident, it is not commented that this central government website should be closed down either by the County Administrative Board itself or by the Civil Protection and Emergency Agency, MSB. Nor does the crisis information site from the Swedish authorities krisinformation.se inform you about the closure of the County Administrative Board.

Without making far-reaching speculation at this stage, there is reason to suspect that one or more things were not honest in the Swedish election. In addition to the fusks that voters could have experienced when they passed and voted around the country, digital manipulation of election results could be the most serious thing that occurred.

It has been widely spoken of the risk of foreign influence on the Swedish election with a blatant side to favor “xenophobic forces” such as the Swedish Democrats. The focus has been on how this could disadvantage the old established parties and suspicions have been directed against Russian hackers. In the US election, there has been talk of similar impact where the US voting system could have been hacked, in the case of Hillary Clinton’s disadvantage.

That digital systems can be manipulated will start to become more widely known. The fact that there are powerful forces not only within the borders of the country but also outside that would look very worriedly on a party like the Swedish Democrats becoming the largest party in Swedish politics, adding to their popular opinion and legitimacy that would bring about, is quite unsettling to the powers that be.

Data manipulation can be very sophisticated. It shows, in particular, Google and Twitter’s own algorithms that allow users to foolishly believe that they can freely share material while in practice they are reached by an extremely limited number of recipients.

In addition to the need for a lively debate, if there was electoral fraud as reported from the early voting around the country, then as as well the results from the election day itself are dubious. Moreover, that some sort of more sophisticated cyber attacks on the Swedish voting system also occurred, in this situation, cannot be ruled out and should be investigated further.

Markus Andersson
.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Posted by Simon Harris on Mon, 10 Sep 2018 11:47 | #

Simon Harris on the Swedish elections

“Alternative For Sweden, the true nationalist party, only got 1.4% of the vote.”

That isn’t enough for parliamentary representation, but it is enough for programs that give the party a life line for the future; in addition to its being a platform to disseminate the honest word.

Posted by Guessedworker on Mon, 10 Sep 2018 15:13 | #

John Piggott spent this morning posting commentary around the net, trying to put the result in a historical context for nationalism in Europe.  The gist of it is in the following comment at Spiked:

The SD, like all of nationalist Europeans, are engaged on a process of bringing honesty to the public discourse. At present, the mainstream parties in Sweden say what they like and sometimes what think they have to when what they like is obviously unpopular with the Swedish people. Meanwhile the nationalists have to say stuff about “integration” and culture, and talk only of race in terms of immigration. Of course, as the reality is colonisation and replacement, the absolute requirement is for mass repatriation - but nothing like that can be said. There is a long way to go before the whole subject is open to proper consideration by the electorate.

The electoral bottom line with SD and all these parties of dissent is that the native voters must understand the life and death nature of the times in which they are living. The decisions they take today decide whether and how their own people survive beyond this century or not. The many elections where it has seemed that something, finally, might be getting through to people, only for disappointment to result on election night, prove how much fear and cowardice and confusion has been created through the media and the politics of the mainstream.

Personally, I don’t think votes from any Europeans effectively for continuation of the multiracialisation of their land and, therefore, the replacement and genetic dissolution of their people, are legitimate. They are produced, and only demonstrate how difficult the dictate makes it for European peoples to think ethnically and racially, as they must to survive.

Can it change? Yes, but probably something even more shocking than the dire present is required; and definitely something more than the power of alternative media to speak honestly about it. It is also very necessary that the parties of dissent are not seen as one-man bands. They must attract intellectually able and attractive people who can present not only a scarifying vision of the future, as things stand, but a full-spectrum, totally relevant political programme.

Most of all, though, the public discourse has to be rid of official lies. Those who advocate, work for, and/or defend the destruction of our peoples must be forced to defend their actions.

Posted by The Golden One on Mon, 10 Sep 2018 16:22 | #

I apologize to coming generations and to my ancestors for not working harder to get the message out. And to the majority of Swedes who voted for any of the mainstream parties, there will be no forgiveness for this - for your incredible treachery to your people; this is absolutely disgusting what you’ve done and I hope you feel truly ashamed of yourselves. To all patriots, keep your head up high, we continue on with the struggle.

Posted by Non-Whites swung election for Social Democrats on Tue, 11 Sep 2018 01:56 | #

New Observer:

At least ten percent of all votes cast in the recent Swedish election came from nonwhites—and without this bloc vote, the Social Democrats would have polled the same number of votes as the populist Sweden Democrats, an analysis of the election results have revealed.

       

Posted by Gustav Kasselstrand on Tue, 11 Sep 2018 11:58 | #

Born Gustav Mattias Anton Kasselstrand
27 June 1987 (age 31)
Valdemarsvik, Östergötland, Sweden

Political party

Alternative for Sweden
Sweden Democrats (until 2015)
Education University of Gothenburg
Aalto University

He studied economics and German at the business school at the University of Gothenburg.

The real nationalist party in Sweden is Alternative for Sweden. This is what Wikipedia has to say about them.

Alternative for Sweden (Swedish: Alternativ för Sverige) is a political party in Sweden. The party was founded in 2017 by members of the Sweden Democrat Youth, who were collectively expelled from the Sweden Democrats in 2015. It advocates repatriation of immigrants, non-interventionism, Swedish withdrawal from the European Union, a flat tax system, opposition to NATO, and improved animal rights, among other things. It is led by Gustav Kasselstrand and, according to him, draws inspiration from Alternative for Germany, the Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ) and the French National Rally

You might say that Alternative for Sweden failed to gain any representation so they are a spent force. I beg to differ.

There are many reasons why the garnered so few votes, the principle one being that most Ethno-Nationalists are likely to vote tactically for the milk toast Civic Nationalism of the Sweden Democrats. The important thing is that Alternative for Sweden exists and that means that the issue of ethnic integrity is now on the table.

Posted by Henrik on Swedish election influence & tampering on Tue, 11 Sep 2018 12:47 | #

Posted by Swedish Parliament Votes to Oust PM Stefan Löfven on Fri, 28 Sep 2018 08:52 | #

WSJ, “Swedish Parliament Votes to Oust Prime Minister Stefan Löfven”, 25 Sept 2018:

Sweden’s parliament voted to oust Prime Minister Stefan Löfven in a vote of confidence Tuesday, deepening the nation’s political uncertainty in the aftermath of an inconclusive election.

Of parliament’s 349 members, 204 voted against Mr. Löfven remaining in his position. He will lead a transitional government until a new one can be formed, but that process could take months.

The vote was a direct consequence of the Sept. 9 election, in which no single party secured a clear majority and Mr. Löfven’s Social Democrats lost support amid a surge in popularity for the nationalist Sweden Democrats.

That rise is the latest example of how the growing prominence of anti-immigration groups has shaken up the region’s political order in recent years. Parties long considered on the political fringes have joined the government in Austria, toppled the old establishment in Italy, and become the largest opposition force in Germany.

Europe’s political landscape is now more fractured than ever, with many countries having struggled to form stable governments able to make bold policy choices.

Sweden—an affluent and politically stable nation, known for its consensual politics and generous welfare state—is now entering uncharted territory.

The Sweden Democrats’ swell in support—securing 62 seats in the election—means it will play a pivotal role in the nation’s political outlook, but all of the other parties have refused to collaborate with it.

Unless an unlikely grand coalition of the left and right is forged, support from the Sweden Democrats would be needed to form a government.

The Center Party and Liberals, two of the four parties that comprise the center-right Alliance, have said they would quit the group if the Moderates and Christian Democrats soften their stances and negotiate a deal with the Sweden Democrats to garner their support.

Following Tuesday’s vote, newly elected parliamentary speaker Andreas Norlén, a lawmaker from the Moderate Party, will explore options toward forming a new government. Initial talks are due to begin Thursday.

But that could take weeks or even months, said Torbjörn Isaksson, chief analyst at Nordea Markets.

“It is still open how the new government will look,” he said. “But with Norlén as speaker the probability increases that the new PM will be Ulf Kristersson, the leader of the Moderates, as the speaker has a key role in the process electing a PM.”

Under Swedish rules, talks over forming a government can last for four rounds. Should the talks fail, a fresh election would be held.

But there is no time limit for when the speaker must propose a new prime minister so although an extra election can’t be ruled out completely, it seems unlikely, Mr. Isaksson said.