Posted by Serg on Sun, 07 May 2017 03:49 | #

She was not White/sweden ,but mixed.look her mongolized face Her father was chilean.

Posted by Kumiko Oumae on Sun, 07 May 2017 05:07 | #

And? Everyone already knows that. Of course, the fact that she’s actually Hispanic and a Mestizo, did not prevent virtually every White Nationalist site from running articles in which implicit stances were taken against feminism (“How dare she be a feminist” while she is getting shot in the back, I guess?), so as to make reactionary political hay out of her death.

Literally no one among WNs has chosen to actually write articles in which the black Congolese perpetrators of these crimes are discussed, or that any solutions should be brought forward to deal with them. Ironically, the only people who have chosen to place the blame directly on the black Congolese perpetrators, have been mainstream centre-left and centre-right media, and the United Nations itself.

WN news sources have chosen to blame her for her own death, denigrate her, and even this article itself in a way denigrates her insofar as it simply reproduces via quotation, the narrative of implied denigration that exists within the WN sphere.

There is however nothing I can do about that, anyway.

I know also, that you probably believe that her life matters less because she is not White, Serg, which I guess is another layer of ridiculousness atop the already ridiculous existing narrative. I guess in your view, black criminals and warlords can just kill whoever they like, as long as their guns are in that moment not pointed at a White person. Like if they would have held their fire for your White ass anyway. The reality is that they’d have shot you just as easily as they shot her.

Posted by Captainchaos on Sun, 07 May 2017 05:21 | #

Kumiko i fail to see what your allegedly great point is why should wn care if muds kill muds

Posted by Kumiko Oumae on Sun, 07 May 2017 05:39 | #

My allegedly great point is: Why should I render any form of assistance to people who feel as you do? Logically speaking, what, in your view, is the advantage that I gain from trying to find any commonalities with your position at all for example, versus say, directing my words more toward civic nationalists?

That’s the question which a reasonable person would ask. After all, a civic nationalist would actually give a response which is completely opposite to what you just wrote. Logically, it would not be ‘wrong’ for me to prefer a civic nationalist perspective over yours. Perhaps you even agree with that!

Posted by Captainchaos on Sun, 07 May 2017 05:44 | #

Here,s a logical reason don’t let the door hit you on the way out bitch lulz

Posted by Kumiko Oumae on Sun, 07 May 2017 06:01 | #

You may be right.

Posted by DanielS on Sun, 07 May 2017 06:16 | #

First of all Serg, a warning to you:

Posted by Serg on Sat, 06 May 2017 22:49 | #

She was not White/sweden ,but mixed.look her mongolized face Her father was chilean.

If I had seen this comment first, I would have taken it down. In fact, you had made this stupid comment before and I took it down.

Now I’m going look upon you as a pernicious troll.

Posted by Captainchaos on Sun, 07 May 2017 06:19 | #

Serg is my nigga he is flippityfloppoity wop from san diego he cool bitch

Posted by Kumiko Oumae on Sun, 07 May 2017 06:22 | #

How is Serg even trolling? He simply stated a fact. The implication is what’s important.

Posted by DanielS on Sun, 07 May 2017 06:27 | #

Captainchaos, the kind of antagonism that you’d evoke from what would be our most helpful allies world wide, turning them into another group of all too capable enemies, illustrates perfectly why White Nationalists should not take the kind of position that you do.

Posted by Captainchaos on Sun, 07 May 2017 06:31 | #

Daniel, GW want u 2 be navel gazing moralizing pussy be nazi with balls instead word

Posted by Anonymous on Mon, 08 May 2017 14:48 | #

@Kumiko Oumae

You do not actually know if she is a Mestizo, there are plenty of whites in South America. Someone from Chile does not necessarily mean someone who is not white. She has light blue/gray eyes, white skin, her mother is swedish and she was raised in Sweden. I also woudn’t call her a hispanic, there are very few “hispanics” in Europe and they assimilate, unlike some in the US, probably because their number is very, very small. No such thing as “hispanic minority area” in Europe, or “bilingual hispanic speaking district”, etc.

Posted by Anonymous on Mon, 08 May 2017 14:58 | #

“implicit stances were taken against feminism (“How dare she be a feminist” while she is getting shot in the back, I guess?), so as to make reactionary political hay out of her death.”

Feminist organisations all over the West support open borders and the importation of savages so now they are increasingly getting what they are looking for. Love savages, help savages, die by savages.

Posted by Kumiko Oumae on Tue, 09 May 2017 00:50 | #

You do not actually know if she is a Mestizo,

I have eyes, and I can look into her face and see it. Your entire post consists of the argument “don’t believe your lying eyes”.

Feminist organisations all over the West support open borders and the importation of savages so now they are increasingly getting what they are looking for.

I think the anti-feminism that White Nationalists engage in is basically retarded. You also validated my point, you don’t care about what happens to these people anyway.

Feminist organisations are not the ones who created the structure that has imported Arabs and Africans into Europe. Rather, it is centre-right and centre-left parties in concert with investment bankers and the boards of large domestic European manufacturers. The demography in that cohort is almost 100% male. I have not seen anyone explain how the failings of a structure that is overwhelmingly shaped by males, are somehow the fault of feminist organisations who were locked out of direct power during the time in the 1970s when these crucial decisions were made.

Feminist organisations did in fact—in Sweden for example—support the preservation of the Swedish tripartite structure in which labour and capital had to engage in social bargaining, because that what social democracy there was really all about. That system had the structural effect of empowering workers to resist their mostly male bosses if or when the bosses called for mass migration. It was know-it-all reformist men who hollowed out the whole system explicitly so that they could turn it into a conveyor belt for mass migration, while engaging in crypto-protectionist policies to keep jobs inside Sweden so that they could tell their male demography that they ‘did not outsource’.

The only ways to avert mass migration structurally would have been:

1. Maintain the tripartite system of social bargaining within the country,
AND/OR
2. Export all Swedish overcapacity and outsource jobs to the developing world (Latin America, South and South East Asia, and Africa), and retrain those Europeans who lose their jobs as a result.

The whole thing could’ve been branded as ‘very progressive’, and no one would’ve had to even had a conversation or a campaign about race, for the same reason that South Korea does not have to have that conversation.

But no. European men and their Levantine financier associates didn’t like option 1 because supposedly “wahh this is corporatism which is not freedom okay”, and men also didn’t like option 2 because “wahh but we have to protect jobs that are obsolete for aesthetic reasons”.

After all that, you have the result. What makes it even more absurd, is that after that, they did eventually engage in outsourcing, but they didn’t outsource the manufacturing. They outsourced mostly IT jobs, and retained a lot of jobs that are more suited to low-skilled migrants. Which is pants-on-head the exact wrong thing to do.

All of these decisions were made mostly by men, proposed by men, and lobbied for by men with economic power.

It’s a male system and a male framework, most women are just having to live in that garbage. Even if feminists in Sweden had come out and screamed, “No migrants please”, they would have been force-fed with migrants anyway, because bourgeois men desired it. That’s the reality.

Posted by Kumiko Oumae on Tue, 09 May 2017 01:19 | #

Learned helplessness

Also, I want to add with regards to the Democratic Republic of the Congo, a simple reminder. Who precisely was it that decided that the Congo was going to be left to stew in its own self-obliteration after the 1990s despite the fact that there was both the material incentive (natural resources aplenty which needed to be secured by the international community, note that almost all electronic devices have materials in them that were mined in the Congo) and the ‘human rights’ incentive (generally deplorable behaviour by all local combatants)?

Intervention into the Congo would have probably been the easiest war to sell ever. Why did it never happen? Because some analysts arrived at the conclusion that European men who would need to fight that war, would not assent to it. Because of that, it’s just managing chaos instead, and so that’s why people like Zaida Catalan get sent there to do pointless weapons investigations, which always carry the risk of getting separated from the escorts and kidnapped.

If you kill the enemy then the enemy is dead

Out of all the White Nationalist articles on this incident that have been put up, I have not seen one single person call for intervention of any sort. There are only two solutions to the Congo, and both of them require intervention:

1. Massive and overwhelming NATO intervention into the entire territory alongside Private Military Contractors, dividing it into about 10 or 15 zones of occupation, and ruthlessly killing any local militias who object to this. Anyone who won’t genuflect to the NATO logo dies.
OR
2. One or more Asian powers who have a global manufacturing stake in the resource mines (in other words, China, Vietnam, Japan and Korea) sponsoring the cultivation of a local left-nationalist movement to replicate something like what was done by the left in Mozambique in 1975 using the kind of insurgent tactics and strategies previously seen in Vietnam or China. That left insurgency could then be covertly supported by NATO powers (an ideologically unexpected move, yes, but it’s 2017 so whatever), via satellite data, intelligence support, and later, even close air support from existing regional bases. Any locals who refuse to genuflect to whatever super-progressive Red Flag with Gold Star design that the national liberation insurgency is using, is sent to a detention camp which will not be called ‘a Gulag’ but will totally be an actual Gulag.

Problem solved.

Option two is the more sexy of the two operations, by the way. Just in case you were wondering about my opinion. Option two could be pure elegance. They’d never even see it coming. I would actually want to participate in option two with joy if someone were to ever find a way to sell the European voters on a plan like that.

If Subsaharan Africans profess to love progressivism so much, they shouldn’t have to migrate anywhere to experience it. We should export the progress to them so that they can experience it in their own lands as hard as possible. Thus you would be able to witness the death of toxic black masculinity.

But European bourgeois men will not vote for anyone who wheels those kind of war ideas out. “Wah, I don’t wanna intervene in Africa, no more foreign wars okay? I prefer to import all of Africa into Europe and make it a local war instead”, why? Because, well because they haven’t thought this through! And so the ridiculousness continues.

Posted by SERG on Tue, 09 May 2017 12:00 | #

Posted by Kumiko Oumae on Sun, 07 May 2017 00:07 |

I know also, that you probably believe that her life matters less because she is not White, Serg, which I guess is another layer of ridiculousness atop the already ridiculous existing narrative.

Wrong! All lives matter!

Whatever small percentage of their makeup is White, is completely irrelevant to their lived experience and to highlight it as though it has a meaning, would only open the gate to assimilationist narratives that are highly corrosive to the   Racial preservation

People need to stop trying to find ‘Whiteness’ in everything.
Otherwise the term becomes meaningless and simply would become a weapon in the hands of assimilationist civic nationalists.