The New Observer had previously run stories (such as this and this) more critical of Trump’s candidacy.

Such critical distance from support of (((Trump’s candidacy))) would be more in line with the position here. However, the truth is that both candidates suck from an ethno-nationalist perspective - that means that Hillary sucks too.

While it is likely that TNO is being maneuvered into a position of controlled opposition regarding the election, they have reason to believe that they are bucking the trend of other “newspaper” endorsements -

Whether it is bucking the system or being co-opted successfully as controlled opposition in regard to the election 2016, let’s give a hearing to TNO’s argument now, having drifted toward endorsement of Trump though it has.

- I present the article in full with the compensation of including their fund raising pitch at the end -

TNO, “Crooked Hillary’s Crimes: A Partial List”, 6 Nov 2016:

Hillary Clinton has now committed far more legal misdemeanors than even impeached President Richard Nixon, and would, under normal circumstances, be barred from running for office.

The controlled media, however, continues to protect and promote Clinton because they hate Donald Trump so much, and because they are as corrupt as she is.

The recent announcement by the FBI that emails linked to Clinton’s illegal email server had been found on disgraced former congressman Anthony Weiner’s laptop computer, showed once again that Clinton had clearly breached the law in this regard.

At the same time, the string of WikiLeaks revelations from the Clinton Foundation have shown without question that the Clinton-controlled State Department engaged in blatant “pay-for-play profiteering” and arms deals with all manner of states and companies.

The WikiLeaks-Podesta email revelations show that Clinton and her team are utterly ruthless and prepared to engage in the most corrupt, underhanded, and nasty manner.

Apart from smearing Latinos as “needy,” the emails reveal that the Clinton team think that Catholics are “stuck in medieval times” and show that Clinton aides bartered with plutocrats for Secretary of State Clinton’s face time on the basis of cash donations.

As revealed in the anti-corruption website’s video tapes, Clinton’s staff have bragged on film of provoking violence at Trump rallies and bringing in voters by bus to cast illegal ballots.

In addition, a Project Veritas Action investigator caught Molly Barker, the Director of Marketing for Hillary Clinton’s national campaign, knowingly breaking campaign finance law by accepting a straw donation from a foreign national. Contributions from foreign nationals are illegal under federal election law, and straw donations (contributions made in the name of another person) are also illegal.

Ibid: From other hacked emails, it is clear that Clinton’s positions on fracking, trade deals, the Keystone XL pipeline, immigration, and foreign policy hinged on whatever best served her political self-interest at the time—and the nature of the audience.

Huma Abedin, the wife of Anthony Wiener, wrote in an email to the chairman of the 2016 Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, John Podesta, and Clinton aide Robby Mook, that the idea of accepting $12 million to speak at an event held by a Moroccan government-owned mining company (which had received a $92 million loan guarantee from the U.S.-financed Export-Import Bank) was Clinton’s: “This was HRC’s idea, our office approached the Moroccans and they 100 percent believe they are doing this at her request.”

Also, thanks to the WikiLeaks email dumps and the FBI investigation, it is obvious that she lied about her email server, the Clinton Foundation’s pay-for-play schemes, and the catalysts for the Benghazi killings.

Clinton told FBI investigators 27 times that she could not remember key details about the email scandal.

Finally, the really serious part for which Clinton has not yet been called to account, is the fact of her support for the invasion of Iraq, and the ongoing warmongering of both Republican and Democratic party administrations in the Middle East since then.

These wars have collectively killed hundreds of thousands—a million in Iraq alone—and, together with the support given to Syrian “rebel”-terrorists, literally created the menace of ISIS.

A Clinton victory in the upcoming U.S. election would, therefore, be a victory for everything that is wrong with the political establishment. A great burden rests on the voters of America, because their choice on November 8 will have reverberations around the world.

As 2016 draws to a close, the staff at the New Observer wish to thank its readers for their faithful support. We have accomplished a tremendous amount, publishing nearly 1,200 unique, content-rich, and valuable articles over the previous year.

We don’t, as readers know, “cut and paste,” but provide unique analysis, insight, and new information, which has been appreciated by many notable people:

“The indispensable New Observer” —Professor Kevin MacDonald, editor of the Occidental Observer.

“A wonderful news source,”  “an indispensable resource,” “the invaluable webzine, the New Observer” —Patrick Cleburne, VDare.

Over the next few months, many critical world events are taking place. The New Observer is at the forefront of providing incisive reporting that is have an effect upon the media maelstrom—and even on the hostile controlled media.

The cracks in the controlled media’s establishment dykes have appeared, and, unlike the apocryphal little Dutch boy, they don’t have enough fingers to plug all the holes.

Now is the time to increase and redouble our efforts.

We want to get a faster server, more bandwidth, and start paying our writers.

To do this, we need to up our income stream significantly.

But, we can do this only with your help.

Any amount, now matter how small (or large) will help us reach our goal.

If you find the New Observer valuable, please consider making a donation to our efforts today!

Thank you

The [TNO] Editors