Trump Promises to End “ILLEGAL INTERNET CENSORSHIP” After Tweeting Michelle Malkin Clip
Posted by DanielS on Monday, 18 May 2020 13:07.
Trump Promises to End “ILLEGAL INTERNET CENSORSHIP” After Tweeting Malkin Clip
Good show by Vincent James and Michelle Malkin, though you’ve got a little Jesus sermon at the end…and of course he’s got to say that “THE left” controls the media near the end…
The Radical Left is in total command & control of Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and Google. The Administration is working to remedy this illegal situation. Stay tuned, and send names & events. Thank you Michelle! https://twitter.com/af_clips/status/1261331113102004226
This Tweet is unavailable.
It is a curiosity that some of the people banned from social media seem rather to be among those that WN would consider to be controlled opposition, for example
Lara Loomer: Though Loomer is obviously not on our side, she does point out some useful information, such as the vast over representation in Silicon Valley by immigrants and their undue negative impact on free speech as a result. Obviously her motivation bespeaks a grievance of Jewish power and influence being intersected by the power of non-Jews, but she popularizes some interesting facts and figures that WN can use and profit from for our ends.
Gavin McGinnis is another case where the controlled opposition is what is attacked. McGinnis is only interesting in illustrating some of the lame misdirection that our enemies might be up to.
Nick Fuentes I would put into the ranks of controlled opposition - controlled softly by encouragement that he continue to move through the Paleocon grooves. He should have known that his 6 million cookie joke wasn’t funny and liable to get him banned. Personally, I don’t miss him, never listened to him much anyway, though he could be a convenient stop for some political orientation.
Gemma O’Doherty is not really controlled opposition, but her Christianity (Catholic variant) and penchant to veer into some dubious conspiracy theory establish a commonality with controlled opposition for the popularity that perspective can generate - her popularity is more grass roots while controlled opposition is more AstroTurf variety. But with just a tinge of conspiracy theory, she was targeted right along with the big fish, Alex Jones. Despite those quirks, and unlike Alex Jones, Gemma is pretty good.
Michelle Malkin herself believes that she was one of the first ones to be shadow banned by Social Media, and there is little reason to doubt it. Too bad she married a Jewish guy and finds the paleocon route convenient as a result. Michelle and her children have experienced the consequences of intersectionality (cough, black hyper assertiveness). She is intelligent and provides some useful information being as honest as she can be in that situation.
Despite the fact that these people don’t represent us, their discussion of Social Media’s obstruction of their free speech, the litigation and the arguments being set out provide decent orientation.
2
Posted by Pedro Gonzalez on Jared Kushner on Sun, 24 May 2020 08:23 | #
Michelle interviews Texas privacy advocate/edtech investigator Lynn Davenport about the TX health department’s troubling $295 million contact tracing deal with “digital transformation services” company MTX. Find out more here: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/contac...
4
Posted by Inadequacy of Trump's executive order on Thu, 28 May 2020 20:18 | #
Michelle Malkin and Laura Loomer discuss the inadequacy of Trump’s executive order. For example, infringement goes beyond blocking free speech; banking, payment and other services such as Uber and Amizon are being denied people for their politics.
5
Posted by How to fix internet censorship by Bowery on Sat, 30 May 2020 11:50 | #
Michelle Malkin and others were attacked on-stage by antifa & BLM militants at a “Back the Blue” rally in Denver, Colo. on 19 July, 2020. A masked woman dressed in black bloc readies her collapsable baton. Video taken from a Malkin live stream.
Posted by mancinblack on Mon, 20 Jul 2020 20:52 | #
Kuhner obviously didn’t realize how terrifying loosing a shoe can be for a woman. Especially an Asian woman. They suddenly drop five inches on one side. Then there’s the amount of time they spend choosing the right pair. if it’s a favourite pair loosing one is like when a guy drops and smashes a bottle of single malt, then looses a cup final ticket while he’s crying over it. Tragic and traumatizing. I did wonder, though, if Michelle’s comments about men who stay at home was a dig at her “don’t go” husband.
Personally, I put the lack of pushback against the ‘revolution’ down to a belief in the upper echelons that the ‘revolution’ will burn itself out or that the ‘revolutionaries’ will eventually factionalize and turn against each other. I mean, abolish capitalism and defund the police? As if.
Posted by Michelle on Fri, 22 May 2020 16:31 | #
It is a curiosity that some of the people banned from social media seem rather to be among those that WN would consider to be controlled opposition, for example
Lara Loomer: Though Loomer is obviously not on our side, she does point out some useful information, such as the vast over representation in Silicon Valley by immigrants and their undue negative impact on free speech as a result. Obviously her motivation bespeaks a grievance of Jewish power and influence being intersected by the power of non-Jews, but she popularizes some interesting facts and figures that WN can use and profit from for our ends.
Gavin McGinnis is another case where the controlled opposition is what is attacked. McGinnis is only interesting in illustrating some of the lame misdirection that our enemies might be up to.
Nick Fuentes I would put into the ranks of controlled opposition - controlled softly by encouragement that he continue to move through the Paleocon grooves. He should have known that his 6 million cookie joke wasn’t funny and liable to get him banned. Personally, I don’t miss him, never listened to him much anyway, though he could be a convenient stop for some political orientation.
Gemma O’Doherty is not really controlled opposition, but her Christianity (Catholic variant) and penchant to veer into some dubious conspiracy theory establish a commonality with controlled opposition for the popularity that perspective can generate - her popularity is more grass roots while controlled opposition is more AstroTurf variety. But with just a tinge of conspiracy theory, she was targeted right along with the big fish, Alex Jones. Despite those quirks, and unlike Alex Jones, Gemma is pretty good.
Michelle Malkin herself believes that she was one of the first ones to be shadow banned by Social Media, and there is little reason to doubt it. Too bad she married a Jewish guy and finds the paleocon route convenient as a result. Michelle and her children have experienced the consequences of intersectionality (cough, black hyper assertiveness). She is intelligent and provides some useful information being as honest as she can be in that situation.
Despite the fact that these people don’t represent us, their discussion of Social Media’s obstruction of their free speech, the litigation and the arguments being set out provide decent orientation.