A small bloodbath at The Washington Post

Posted by Guessedworker on Monday, 21 January 2013 00:23.

Just a quick note to offer my compliments to a Whittaker Task Force that went into action over the last three days at The Washington Post.

Jonathan Capeheart, a black journalist writing for the WP, said he “couldn’t resist clicking” on a link to the Whittaker group’s White House petition to “stop white genocide”. The petition - one of three on this subject, apparently - is posted at the We The People site.

The petition has twenty more days to achieve its supposed goal of 25,000 signatories. The present number of signatories is 630. So, plainly, this is a publicity effort, and Capeheart’s unwitting help is no doubt greatly appreciated. The interesting thing for me, though, is to see in an American setting the exact same moral and intellectual ownership of the discourse that one observes routinely at the DT. Since political correctness and anti-racism are so dominant in the Establishment, and have been so ruthlessly and effectively applied to bludgeon the white instinct for racial survival, one would expect a generality of the non-activist public to express shock and distaste at the sight of white people fighting back. But there is none of that on the WP thread. Two or three anti-racist activists made attempts to belittle the pro-white advocates, but the quality of their argument was quite wretched. One even complained of bullying, which is exactly what these creatures have done for the last two decades or more.

Good job, guys.

Tags: Anti-racism, Thread Wars

Comments:

Posted by Dude on Mon, 21 Jan 2013 13:31 | #

To prevent unwelcome publicity the WH has recently decided to raise the numbers needed to 100k over 30 days! Making it near impossible for any petition to gain the required numbers if the mainstream media are not supporting it.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2013/01/15/why-we-re-raising-signature-threshold-we-people

Posted by Mick Lately on Mon, 21 Jan 2013 14:43 | #

Itchy gaming fingers to be exercised in new ways:

In response to…

Posted by James Bowery on Mon, 21 Jan 2013 17:38 | #

The petition should have, as its second sentence, stated the current and projected percent of the world population that is white.

Posted by Guessedworker on Mon, 21 Jan 2013 17:44 | #

A UK petition to “Stop mass immigration from Bulgarian and Romanians in 2014, when EU restrictions on immigration are relaxed”:

https://submissions.epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/41492

In 2014 EU restrictions are set be removed, allowing nationals of Bulgaria and Romania ‘free movement’ to the UK. The move is similar to the one that granted access to around 600,000 Polish immigrants to enter Britain over recent years.

Despite Bulgaria and Romania joining the EU in 2005, restrictions were put on the number who could move to Britain. However, those restrictions will be abolished in 2014.

Once the restrictions are lifted all new comers will entitled to claim benefits, housing, child, job seekers etc. There is currently an estimated 1.5 million people seeking work within the two countries

The impact will also put pressure on housing, infrastructure, schools, and heath care. All at a time the government are cutting pensions, jobs, public services and the armed forces.

I request the government suspends the easing on these restrictions for another 5 years.

Over 6,000 signatures so far.

Posted by James Bowery on Tue, 22 Jan 2013 03:49 | #

MSNBC derides the petition with the WP author.

Beyond the mere “Isn’t this crazy?” comments and misrepresentations of the content of the petition there is the assertion that the repeated failure of pro-white movements in the US is merely evidence that such demands have all been unjust and that justice will continue to prevail and if that means whites are gone, then that’s not genocide, that’s justice.

Posted by Lurker on Tue, 22 Jan 2013 04:05 | #

This is the WP thread in question.

I made a few comments and voted voted for a lot of our guys. However it seems Im now barred from doing either. No doubt part of the WP’s unswerving commitment to free speech.

Posted by Lurker on Tue, 22 Jan 2013 04:25 | #

Looks like Im OK again, sorry WP!

Posted by James Bowery on Tue, 22 Jan 2013 04:26 | #

My response to the WP oped:

jabowery
10:23 PM CST
I’m wondering if Mr. Capehart would have opposed native Americans using whatever force was necessary to keep Europeans, Africans and Asians out of the New World. If he would have opposed that, does he also oppose reserving lands for native Americans and native Americans only? If not, does he think that there should be no lands in Europe reserved for Europeans only? If not, does he think this double standard justice for “historic crimes” of Europeans? If so, then is this petition laughable because genocide against Europeans is justified?

Posted by Silver on Tue, 22 Jan 2013 06:00 | #

Despite Bulgaria and Romania joining the EU in 2005, restrictions were put on the number who could move to Britain. However, those restrictions will be abolished in 2014.

They joined in 2007, not 2005.

Posted by Pence on Wed, 23 Jan 2013 21:58 | #

In 2014 EU restrictions are set be removed, allowing nationals of Bulgaria and Romania ‘free movement’ to the UK. The move is similar to the one that granted access to around 600,000 Polish immigrants to enter Britain over recent years.

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2013/01/15/attack-on-sovereignty-paul-craig-roberts/

Last week the Obama regime warned the British government that it was a violation of US interests for the UK to pull out of the European Union or reduce its ties to the EU in any way.

In other words, the sovereignty of Great Britain is not a choice to be made by the British government or people. The decision is made by Washington in keeping with Washington’s interest.

The British are so accustomed to being Washington’s colony that deputy prime minister Nick Clegg and a group of UK business executives quickly lined up with Washington.

Posted by James Bowery on Wed, 23 Jan 2013 23:39 | #

The White House petition to stop white genocide has stalled at around 750 signatures.

This must provide much comfort to those committing genocide.

Posted by Dude on Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:08 | #

“Stalled”

If you want to get significant votes for a hopefully popular proposition, it is best to couch it in language that blends mainstream phraseology with our existential European concerns (unlike the preceding sentence I’ll grant you!)

Otherwise, who is going to provide the authorities in their country (where civil protests are considered to be low-level terrorism) with their names and details, when the petition is written in the language of niche (sorry mantra’ites!) internet activists?

After all the free publicity of the WP too..Too late now as the numbers required rise to 100k in a month.

Posted by Hymie in Afula on Thu, 24 Jan 2013 20:51 | #

with permission of Mr Bowery? I offer some “straw man” comments on how Mr Capehart might answer:

>> if Mr. Capehart would have opposed native Americans using whatever force was necessary to keep Europeans, Africans and Asians out of the New World

strawman: They tried, but it was too little and too late. We cannot say there was no resistance. And you can’t find any quote from me, saying that they didn’t have the right to try - or the right to succeed.

>> does he also oppose reserving lands for native Americans and native Americans only?

strawman: the Reservations didn’t arise from any moral considerations; they arose because the Europeans didn’t have the desire or the gumption to do a complete genocide.

>> does he think that there should be no lands in Europe reserved for Europeans only?

strawman: It is not my European voice which is calling for Bulgarian&Romanian; Europeans, to not be allowed further entry into a certain corner of Europe.

>> If not, does he think this double standard justice

strawman: Is Mr Guessedworker prepared for the possibility that, ultimately, it will be himself who seeks shelter in Romania (not many Pakistanis immigrating there!!), but he will be told to WAIT 5 years because the troublesome Englishmen are already too numerous?

Posted by James Bowery on Thu, 24 Jan 2013 23:11 | #

Dude, the wording of that petition has been shopped around for years as standard outreach rhetoric.

Clearly it is the wrong, dismally wrong, wording for outreach.

Posted by Wandrin on Sat, 26 Jan 2013 02:02 | #

BUGS is a very good example of…

pick a weak spot and kick it till it breaks.