Declaration of Freedom When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. We hold these truths to be self-evident. —That freedom is the right to territory sufficient to support life, shared exclusively with those of like mind. —That the denial of others’ freedom entails the loss of one’s own. —That defense of freedom, even at the cost of life, is the greatest good. —That to secure freedom, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the mind of the governed,—That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their freedom. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to deny freedom to the governed, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future freedom.—Such has been the patient sufferance of the Posterity of the Founders of the United States; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present United States government is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the denial of freedom. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world. It has denied the right of people to secede even when they have not denied freedom to others. It has, in the name of “Civil Rights” imposed private relationships on people to which they did not consent. It has taxed those who do not possess sufficient territory to support their lives, in order to support the lives of others. It has refused to defend US territory from invasion. It has, against the manifest will of the people, passed laws legalizing immigration that replaced the Posterity of the Founders of the United States. It has drawn ever more power to itself from the States rendering the Laboratory of the States impotent to discover natural laws of Statecraft and the people impotent to alter their conditions by either changing their State governments or by changing their State of residence. It has waged wars on foreign soil in the name of defending freedom while it assaults freedom on US territory. It has deprived our inventors of the riches they need to continue to enrich us—favoring instead the transfer of technology ownership to others who, in turn, transfer technology to foreign nations, leaving our own inventors jobless, frequently impoverished and in any event incapable of further enriching us. In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A government, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people. Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our United States government. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of its own Constitution and establishment on this land. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends. We, therefore, the Representatives of Freedom, in Cyber Space, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good Posterity of the Founders, solemnly publish and declare, That this land is, and of Right ought to be Free, that the Posterity of the Founders are Absolved from all Allegiance to the United States government, and that all political connection between them and the United States government, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free people, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor. Comments:3
Posted by torgrim on Sat, 05 Jul 2008 08:19 | # “That this Land is, and of Right ought to be Free,” Signed, torgrim 4
Posted by Thomas on Sat, 05 Jul 2008 17:12 | # Such highflown rhetoric! And all to disguise an objection to lawful and moderate taxes! No wonder civil war started despite the majority being against it. Time and again the gift of the gab will produce death and destruction when true objectives have to be hidden from the view of the ordinary people by eloquence. Just ask the IRA or Hisbollah. And old WSC was a dab hand at it. 5
Posted by MB on Sat, 05 Jul 2008 21:38 | # There’ve been several of these updated versions of the colonial declaration, but this is probably the best. Still, I wish the word “Jew” was contained therein. 6
Posted by James Bowery on Sat, 05 Jul 2008 22:29 | # Thomas, first of all, it should be obvious that there are several earth-shaking indictments involved and the one involving taxation refers only to the transfer of subsistence via taxation—not to taxation per se. Secondly, it cannot be reasonably argued that the original intent of the 16th Amendment was to place a substantial tax or legal burden on ordinary citizens. It is clear from the debates surrounding its ratification, as well as the initial rates of taxation, that it was to have little impact on the incomes of those even in the upper 99th percentile. The departure from that original intent represented by today’s tax system, where people who have trouble supporting even 2 children on two incomes are paying substantial tax and legal fees, is so great as to represent lawlessness. 7
Posted by torgrim on Sat, 05 Jul 2008 22:44 | # Thomas says, “And all to disguise an objection to lawful and moderate taxes.” This is about more than taxes, which btw, using the word lawful is a stretch. No sir, this is about the complete overturning of our population with third world peoples, WITHOUT, one word of public input! Much happened after November 1963 in the United States that begs the question, are we a Republic or an Oligarchy? The immigration Reform Act of 1965, might have well of been an Imperial Edict of Rome, and not from the Republic of the Founders, Posterity. 9
Posted by James Bowery on Sat, 05 Jul 2008 23:04 | # MB, Jewish virulence is dealt with adequately by the exclusive territoriality of freedom itself. Jewish virulence expresses primarily in the elimination of exclusion. Moreover, if it is Zionism one is concerned with, the negative aspects of it are dealt with in the indictment of foreign wars while Freedom is denied at home. It is important to admit the legitimacy of a Jewish state and of Jewish national identity under the condition that the Jews so respected have shown such respect. “Enemies in War, in Peace Friends” If a State of War is to exist between a Free People and Jews, then let it be via a Declaration of War rather than in a Declaration of Freedom. 10
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Tue, 08 Jul 2008 01:39 | # “Nationalist activism” in Romania in the 1920s and ‘30s. I put the first two words in quotes there, because I refuse to call normalness by some special name. I would call these so-called “nationalist activists” utterly normal people acting utterly normally. The way I would describe these events would be “decent folk taking a stand against degenerateness,” the same as if ordinary decent apolitical people organized to stop the opening of a whorehouse on their street or to stop a child pornography ring: there’s no difference. The forces that have brought us to the pass we’re in are forces that want degenerateness to prevail in our society because they want our society’s sickness and destruction. To oppose such forces one does not have to be a thing called “a nationalist activist,” one merely has to be a decent human being possessed of a social conscience. So I put “nationalist activism” in quotes as a term I find beside the point and unnecessary. (Hat tip.) Post a comment:
Next entry: Taylor, Takimag, WN and the reason for being
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News— CENTRAL— An Ancient Race In The Myths Of Time by James Bowery on Wednesday, 21 August 2024 15:26. (View) Slaying The Dragon by James Bowery on Monday, 05 August 2024 15:32. (View) The legacy of Southport by Guessedworker on Friday, 02 August 2024 07:34. (View) Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. (View) — NEWS — Farage only goes down on one knee. by Guessedworker on Saturday, 29 June 2024 06:55. (View) |
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sat, 05 Jul 2008 03:48 | #
As we are assembled in cyber space we may, I presume, sign this sacred document using our cyber space pen names:
Fred Scrooby