|
|
|
“Driving While Black” & failure of objectivist rebut: analysis of YKW discourse  Bloomfield Ave. at Sunoco, focal point of a Seton Hall LS study showing it to be where most tickets are issued in a de facto border patrol between the races (it is also four blocks from where I was born).It is my responsibility to undertake a critical discourse analysis of a Seton Hall Law School study depicted by “Vice News” - as it purports to represent, but rather misrepresents to the world, the reality of an area that I know, having been born and raised there. I will examine this discourse as set out in the Vice News video called “Driving While Black in New Jersey.” This might prevent (((misrepresentation))) ergo misapprehension by people from other areas and nations as to the reality of black, “latino” and White interests as manifest in this area. Having experienced differences between demographics and towns in this area, having driven up and down Bloomfield Ave. countless times, I have some insight, as it is not only the hub of this Seton Hall Law study in traffic policing policy, it was an unavoidable artery constituting.. ..a connection to the place of my birth, my father’s birth and my grandmother’s house in an Italian enclave in the North Ward of Newark; also a connection to other Whites, as I’d pass through always White Bloomfield via Bloomfield Ave. on my way to and from the house where I grew up - in predominantly White Montclair, just over the line of Glen Ridge, a few blocks from the Western border of Bloomfield.  De facto border White/Black. Montclair is left of Glen RidgeBut Bloomfield Ave. also constituted a dividing line from surrounding black Newark and East Orange - a nightmare that pushed up against the White Bloomfield and North Ward of Newark, which was pushed up against the Bloomfield town-line along Bloomfield Ave. Though always having mixed racial and economic demographics, ranging from poor, to the middle classes and the fabulously wealthy, Montclair remains mostly White particularly because of its middle and upper class properties. Bloomfield, on the other hand, though all White, had always been more uniformly lower middle class. Therefore, to remain the White town that it has been would be more tricky; but somehow, despite black East Orange looming ominously just to its south, it always did stay all White, until recently. It was tricky for the Italian enclaves of Newark to stay White as well - traditionally they relied on a much less tolerant communal temperament that could extend to a somewhat exaggerated vigilantism and ethnocentrism; and thriving communities focused around a catholic church; but now only that vestigial Italian North Ward “community” remains. This all occurs in Essex County, New Jersey, which is a part of what is called “the megopolis” - a heavily populated extension of greater New York City. Along with its mixed demographics it is also mixed with splendid suburban opulence, post industrial and urban blight. Newark is the largest city in Essex County and in New Jersey. It is mostly black as a result of the kind of “urban renewal projects” that E. Michael Jones describes in “The Death of The Cities”, viz., clandestine projects to break-up ethnic Catholic communities. From this failed liberal social project to integrate blacks, the city went on to suffer riots from the blacks in 1967 and it never recovered. However, again, that vestigial Italian enclave, “The North Ward”, did survive, kind-of - there I was born, there we visited grandma’s on Sundays, there I returned to live twice, in 1988 and 1996 - just one block from Bloomfield Ave and the border of Bloomfield, New Jersey - always a lower middle class town and always all White, until fairly recently, when I began to see backs moving in. Then it became a cautionary tale that I would relate to people about the science fiction nightmare that can happen - what I’ve seen happen as blacks begin to move into a formerly all White town - and as such, what must not be let to happen: easier said than done with our YKW adversaries.
 Bloomfield Ave., Bloomfield, New JerseyWhy objectivist criteria will not suffice to create a border between nations and race. The film makers set the discourse frame through an academic declaration by Seton Hall Law Professor, Mark Denbeaux, who claims on the basis of a study of traffic ticketing by race, that it is an overwhelmingly objective fact that the Bloomfield, New Jersey police are persecuting blacks and latinos with traffic violations; and in effect making them pay disproportionately for Bloomfield’s municipal budget. His students go on to make additional objective claims on the basis of the study that this is a form of racial discrimination along a de facto border and discouragement of minorities from becoming ensconced in White Bloomfield by means of a de facto “taxation.” On a higher analytical frame, Seton Hall LS is building a case, accusing The Bloomfield P.D. of violating The U.S. Constitutional rule of non-discriminating objectivity, alleging that they are imposing a relativistic penalty for non-White transgression into Bloomfield. [Fast paced but hushed music sets the tone to be on clandestine alert among darting police cars and bustling courtrooms]
 Hurt feelings while awaiting imposition of a fineThe film makers continue to exploit objectivist criteria in the next sequence, as they focus on “the feelings” of blacks. “Feelings” are, after all, sensory “facts”, nothing socially constructed or any of that nonsense - a Lockeatine empirical basis has been enshrined as means for the pursuit of happiness and liberty; to live by one’s own senses is definitive of what it means to live in accordance with the U.S. Constitution: hence, these feelings must be important objective grounds, and are to be respected as a sensory means which people have to overcome the discriminatory fictions of racial classification. The film will invoke compensatory sympathy for how a black man must feel, their special feelings, as their rights are violated when they get pulled over by police - Whites might also feel uneasy when pulled-over by the police, but never mind.
At this point, the film-makers cut to Bloomfield’s White Police Director, Samuel Demaio, making an objectivist assertion of the rational blindness (color blindness, in this case) of the Bloomfield P.D., viz., that it does not racially profile: and with that he attempts to defend against Professor Denbeaux’s study -
Then to a Bloomfield Municipal Court Judge who asserts the objectivist penalties which the study maintains are crookedly imposed: [The fast paced music continues to assert the contextual tone of turgid and impersonal public bustle]
At this point he is talked-over by the next commentator [Rich Rivera], but before moving to that, I need to discuss the point of the talk-over as that is critical of itself, as it frames the judge and the system as merely imposing non-negotiable authority, as if there is little in the way of recourse for those he addresses in the courtroom. The White authority, the Municipal Court Judge, is imposing the alleged prejudicial enforcement of these fines. While the film makers do go on to mention [viz., Ostrovsky mentions] that these are not generally large sums, and may not seem like a lot to us, what they do not tell you, and keep out of the frame, is critical - when blacks and latinos are paying, the money from which they pay will often, if not most often, already have been given to them through some form of governmental assistance to begin with; and if a fine is a true hardship, there are a myriad of government programs to help them - especially because they are non-White. While there are no programs to help people because they are White. The film makers cut-off the judge’s statement as he begins to invoke options available to those subject to fines, which begins with his assertion that he will take under consideration individual cases and their ability to pay; considerations which would then move to the many social services at the disposal of non-Whites to help them financially and otherwise (if defendants are not already on the various governmental assistance available to them, again, which they usually are). The judge’s statement to the effect that a black or latino person might have to pay an $80 some odd fee from money that was given to them from the public to begin with or that they would be met with public assistance if they truly could not, is talked over at this point. Suddenly black and latino interests are blended back as one and the same with the rest of “the public” in an objectivist ideal of transparency in the next statement:
Ok, protecting innocent people by innocuous vigilance against those people who show a pattern of crime will have to wait.
[fast music stopped; slow, sad and sympathetic harp music starts to play instead now] While the sympathetic music plays, we’re shown a sad looking black male sitting in a car with some middle aged White male cuck. These are the only characters focused on whose identity is not given. We can surmise that he’s some sort of legal counsel to the kid whose got legal expenses and matters that are over his head. The White guy’s probably coming from the services available to blacks with problems, but the film makers don’t tell you that. Instead, the poor black youth is shown being given counsel by the White cuck demonstrating how Whites should be, confessing to the objective reality of the oppression and bad choices faced by the black kid in the rigged system.
He is doing “objectivism nice”, nice cuck, telling the black that his choices are bad - he can cop a plea, though the White cuck believes the black is innocent and that would only make “the police happy”, or he could take his case to a higher court, but in pure advice, he would not advise putting any faith in the system - the inference being that it is so corrupt by racial relativism as to be determinedly anti-black:
They might have advised the black kid to look still more sympathetic by removing his bling earrings before appearing before the judge, but society doesn’t understand the black man anyway. So, they have set out a narrative of general White systemic oppression while they begin to focus on personal sympathy for non-Whites and the bad choices that they are up against from authoritative imposition. The myriad of recourse available to blacks let alone any suggestion of their imposition on Whites, has not been mentioned. With that setting the background, the film-maker takes the stage. A Russian Jew, with duel U.S./Israeli citizenship, Simon Osrovsky, is being facilitated in making a name for himself in the anti-White media on a world stage. He has already done a Jewish number on Japan and Ukraine/Russia, doing his best to pry-open or divide ethnocentric strongholds. Now he takes aim at the line that Whites in New Jersey take against some of the most harrowing places that you can come across - the living science fiction nightmares of East Orange, Newark, Irvington and the other New Jersey towns that blacks have taken over. Ostrovsky takes for granted that when this film is placed on the world stage that it will invoke sympathy for the blacks it depicts and anger against Whites by those who don’t know the reality of these areas and the reality of just who the American system helps, discriminates against and how, as I have begun to set-out. But I do know, because I was born there in that Italian enclave in Newark’s North Ward, a block away from the border of Bloomfield, right near Boomfield Ave., where U.S. Army tanks had to travel to get the 1967 black riots under control. Where my grandmother’s house was and route to my father’s employment at Budweiser, Newark; my family traveled Bloomfield Ave. countless times after we moved to Montclair, just barely on the other side of the Bloomfield town-line. I know this area, these towns, sections, the demographic history and behavior. Before commenting further, let’s return to the film narrative.
We are taken into the court as the students and Professor file-in. The Judge addresses the room.
Here is where social services begin to kick-in, if they have not already - a fact which editing leaves-out to facilitate mis-perception among foreigners; but lets focus on how petty crime prevention which functions as a de facto border patrol and control technique against more serious crime and social catastrophe is taken issue-with in order to side track the issue of what the White people are up against: blacks commit more violent crime - a fact not reported-on in the Jewish media, Vice News or otherwise. They also have more sex partners (including what might have been your wife), younger, enormous rates of single parenthood, poverty and any other other malady that they might inflict upon other peoples, but you won’t hear that in the said media either.
See Ferguson officer Wilson interview; and discussion of how Soros’ et al. funded and contrived “Black Lives Matter.”
“That’s a huge problem” is a fallacious claim, discussed by former policeman, James Lancia
The film-makers found Bryan Nina, who is able to sufficiently act the Oreo part. He goes to show that the Oreos and Uncle Toms (or those acting the part) can be most dangerous as they function as a Trojan horse, opening the gates for the destructive pattern inevitably to come from blacks. Nina acquits himself sympathetically, despite tinted windows and a woman having called the police to complain about him harassing her - calling the police out of the blue that he was harassing her?...hmm. Never mind. Blacks don’t harass people and women always call the police to complain about harassment out of the blue. To Kill a Mockingbird, Paris Trout, A Time to Kill - these films tell foreign audiences the truth and all they need to know about blacks, Whites and discrimination - how ignorant that Whites are.
Maybe Nina isn’t so bad, maybe he is, but Jewish interests have a nefarious practice of advocating exceptions to the rule and thereby exposing the Majorityrights of Whites to the destructive pattern. He comes along with the destructive pattern no matter what. If he is a good one, let him ameliorate his own people. The only pattern that Ostrovsky observes is perhaps a desperate attempt by Whites to protect themselves and their habitats:
The assertion that the Bloomfield police are guilty of targeting groups: profiling, discriminating based on race. And well they should be for the imposition their pattern imposes upon fine, White cites, such as Newark was (but was no longer after blacks moved-in with their hyper-assertive destruction - for example in the 1967 Newark riots.
[all legal and technical aspects of the car check out OK (though they did find a switch blade left by a prior renter)].
[it is sufficient bate for police] [they start playing the sympathetic atmosphere music again, no rap or anything like that]
[camera indicates that this experiment was conducted January 21, 2016 at 9:29 P.M.]
So, they are baiting, fishing for a bad police reaction; this is not a neutral, “objective” experiment.
This is not a White way of speaking: “dat dere,” but it’s hard to tell if the officer is White because there is a convention among police to speak in a colloquial manner in order to make people feel comfortable: e.g., “how yuz doin’?”, that sort of thing.
Maybe because you were driving around wearing hoodies? and trying to bait the police into stopping you in an area that you know that they patrol for its higher crime rates?
If I were a police officer, and I suspected a study, I would think they were testing my competence to stop obvious criminal types. I.e., you would almost HAVE to stop people wearing hoodies. But we are supposed to empathize with Marquis Whitney’s declared feelings, and with him as black man in particular.
First of all, Bloomfield does not abut a black area of Newark. The particular part of Newark that borders on Bloomfield has been an Italian section, thus, far more in need of protection than prone to foster criminality. But the film makers would not tell you that. Nevertheless, it is not but a few blocks from parts of Newark that are the same black hell as East Orange, Irvington, etc. Note that if they are ticketing non-residents, that shows supplementary ticketing against Whites passing through. The figures bear it out. But, Ostrovsky goes on, mixing where and where from at the convenience of his narrative:
Gee, I wonder why they’d patrol at the border of Newark and East Orange; and try to prevent migration over the town line from East Orange - hell on earth, planet of the apes, science fiction nightmare come true - choose one, all accurate metaphors.
The crucial matter here is how Jewish interests and rhetoric - unabashedly relativistic in its bias for Jewish interests among themselves - will exploit objectivism and White objectivism - particularly as it manifests through the earnest, intoxicating and messianic academic quest for objective integrity in pure truth, innocent and unbiased by lowly interests of that which might not be best or not universally true.
Latisha Finkelstein is an interesting name. The question is whether she has Jewish parentage or is married to a Jewish man. At any rate, here she talks as if she has no such interests, but to be merely concerned for objective facts. White advocates are increasingly aware the race exists when it is being used conceptually against Whites. However, our criticism of this discourse should not go to a refinement of the objectivist criteria - where and how court fees are applied based on the innocence or income level of the defendant or to continue to deny racial prejudice, which is really necessary, discriminatory social classification of people for the sake of accountability, coherence, agency, warrant and human ecology. Rather, we should deal with the fact that a kind of relative discrimination is going on, based on the AREA, the people and their pattern of criminality and destruction to White patterns - specifying the reason for the bordering vigilance, warranting and cultivating rhetoric to properly frame the validity of that increased bordering and vigilance; as it discourages that demographic’s incursion. The aim should be on a relativistic meta level, that this discriminatory policing, boundary creation and vigilance is eminently valid based on the relative pattern of blacks in East Orange, Newark and their increased presence in Bloomfield along with its predictable corollary to crime - far worse injustices than the “de facto taxation”, which they more than deserve; that we are fully warranted to observe this pattern and not base our patterns on their exceptions - who tend to open the gates and bring along the destructive pattern. We need to counter the Jewish rhetoric of representing minority rights, by defending our majority rights against their majority pattern. Because Jewish interests, of course, will focus on violations of blacks to no end, highlighting their more benign exceptions - which there are, as surely as their pattern is a nightmare. Black patterns are a complicated matter, that has its nice ones, its strong, its compelling ones, its giftedly agile, its audaciously assertive - in a word, many who will prevail over Whites on the episodic basis of judgment that tends to be the fall-out of modernity; while Whites would more often prevail if broader patterns were recognized. It is not necessarily so easy to defend against their pattern, but especially when we are not allowed to speak about it, clearly destructive to Whites though it is. Jews know that too, and they also know that with our own unabashed assertion that we classify social groups and discriminate accordingly, that we are “racists”, that invocation of relativist criteria would allow Whites to defend themselves on the basis of patterns; while a sheer objectivist criteria leaves Whites defenseless in the long run (especially because the Jews are not going by that criteria). The prejudice against prejudice as expressed in the Enlightenment’s quest for objectivity, including notably, through Locke, as his notion of anti-social classificatory individual rights were written into the U.S. Constitution, is far from innocent. “Racism” is the social classfication of peoples for the purpose of making discriminatory judgements based on their patterns. This is necessary. Anti-racism is prejudice. It is not innocent. It is hurting and it is killing people. Another Seton Hall Law student adds to the anti-racist, anti-discrimination, objectivist narrative promoted by Vice News.
That is, no acknowledgement of a relatively positioned and accountable hermeneutic here. The frame is presumed: “Objective.” They have a compliant White law student to go along with this.
Are Whites not subject to court fees as well? The data has shown that most people pulled-over and given citations are not from the area, and thus would be disproportionately White, considering the area patrolled. Moreover, if the blacks in the area are more given to crime, should the social/legal system not want to have a look at them and evaluate them on a pre-emptive basis through a handling of minor infractions, perhaps as means to stave-off more serious crime? Next the film makers cut to the sympathetic latino, former New Jersey policeman and present Seton Hall Law student, Rich Rivera, who is participating in the Seton Hall Study and Vice News cop baiting experiment:
As Kumiko observes, yes, it’s a tax for their increased liability to the White town they are making incursions upon. In addition to unabashedly acknowledging that it is a kind of tax, or increased insurance premium for their greater liability to the town, I would suggest adding a pro-White/defense of Whites rhetoric for x, y and z reasons as to why that tax or increased premium should be imposed. And again, note the many social programs and funds that blacks and latino’s have at their disposal - because they are black or latino - to pay for these minor penalties; programs and funds that Whites do not have at their disposal because they are White.
“The report concludes” - it has reached THE objective truth. The Bloomfield police are targeting blacks and latinos for fines. Vice News provides a “meta-interpretation” that the Bloomfield police are guilty of prejudice and discrimination by focusing on an area that is predominantly black and latino.
This is a good example of where objectivism does not suffice, and will tend to work counter-to patterned White interests.
Ostrovsky and Vice News proceed to try to hoist the Bloomfield Police Director by the petard of the rational blindness and objectivism by which he would attempt to acquit himself:
Hermeneutics accounting for history, perspective and narrative comprehension is crucial to prevent abuse of the capacity to exploit objectivism’s sometimes thin view of facts and circumstances, its empirical myopia of the moment. It can, for example, discuss the broader truths that these areas, Bloomfield, parts of Newark, etc, were until recently White, low in crime and nice places for Whites to live; and that the blacks in East Orange and Newark have a history of violence and destruction The latinos have a history of crime, structural denigration and decrease in property value. Because it is non-Catesian, hermeneutics is also mandated to return to accountability of sheerer facts, where it should and must. Bowery makes the empirical case of voting with your feet - and it’s a good one, but not fool proof, because it lacks recognition of the heremeneutic rigor. He cited the example of “the Polish corridor conflict”, saying that would have been resolved justly and promptly by a referendum of what the people in those areas might have wanted, given the opportunity to vote with their feet. But it really would not have been fair, as it would not take into account the history, including fairly recent violent history, in which these populations had displaced those who they’d be voting against; whereas the Versailles committee could, by hermeneutic means, take these historical matters, as well as logistical and other considerations properly into accout: The necessity of hermeneutics is discussed here. Anti-racism, together with the prejudice against prejudice is Catesian, whether on the empirical end, through the Locketine civil, propositional rights of individuals against discriminatory group classifications or in pursuit of pure, abstract truths beyond nature - it is not innocent, it is prejudiced, it is hurting and it is killing people. Jews know this, defend their social groups against it, advocate other groups as anti-White unions (Marxism/Cultural Marxsm) when in their interest to do so - which is apparently always as a pattern, until Whites are effectively destroyed in their capacity to resist Jewish power and influence over Whites and their habitats.
These violations are all well known to be illegal. Moreover, driving is not treated as a “right” in America, but rather a privilege. The police can stop people to check for license, registration, intoxicated driving, car function, etc.
These are very contrived figures which indicate a quota oriented AGAINST WHITES in order to balance off the number of black driven vehicles they see as necessary to stop in order to facilitate crime prevention. In other words, Whites will be pulled-over and fined just to show a pretense of “fairness and objectivity,” though Whites do not have racially discriminatory programs and funding directed their way, as Whites, while as blacks and latinos do get government funding because they are black and latino and can thus pay the fines from the goverment’s prejudicial assistance that they are given.
30 years ago Bloomfield was very close to 100% White and did not have much crime. The adjacent town of East Orange was then, as it is now, predominantly black and rife with crime. The black population of The U.S. is about 14% and it is enormously disproportionate in the percentage of violent crime in America. Some figures estimate that if you could remove blacks, that the violent crime in America would be at a similar level to Switzerland (very low). Demaio answers basically the same question again:
Demaio continues the language game of rational blindness:
He maintains rational blindness but if the department can be accused of prejudice, such as racial profiling, he will go way out in front in a Cartesian quest ad infinitum to invoke objective purity and innocence. Ostrovsky goes for what he believes is the clincher with the petard of the objectivism that “driving while black in New Jersey” is subject to unfair discrimination and penalty:
The irony is, that if the police were to focus only on crime that blacks would be a much larger percentage of those appearing in court and being penalized. Whites would be penalized less. However, a means by which the police could invoke and patrol a de facacto border to protect Whites from crime and violence prone blacks and latinos would be hampered to the detriment of all.
It’s called crime prevention and it is a legitimate form of community pattern tax; which, in truth, is only a provisional border solution until such time as real borders between peoples as nations can be established because mere segregation under the same government does not suffice - particularly not inasmuch as Jews are involved - Conclusion: This has all been something of detour - on Bloomfield Ave. - from my thesis: why won’t “objectivism” suffice against Jewish tropes, such as “Driving White Black in New Jersey” or “Black Lives Matter”? Because they understand and misrepresent racial advocacy as praxis - which we need to recognize but fail to recognize for their misrepresentation and distortion of its premises; and they rely upon us to go on with our western tradition of pursuing objectivity - pure quest, “the prejudice against prejudice” - while they know that racial defense cannot be based on facts alone, and they hoist us by this petard as much as they can (a la Alinsky); they will just find another rhetorical angle where one fails to impugn our objectivity, and we are at a massive disadvantage (save perhaps for science) so long as we keep trying to play the objectivist game. Racial defense requires rhetorical advocacy and a recognition, contrary to the academic and media brainwashing that comes from Jews, that taking our own side is at least a tad speculative but essential for our coherence, accountability, agency, warrant and our human ecology. Addendum:
Simon Ostrovsky
Phoebe Barghouty: is apparently an Arab Muslim woman. Brittany Ross is likely to be Jewish. Will check on the others later, if necessary, but Ostrovsky and the Vice News’ gang’s hyperbolic liberal agenda in this and other “investigations” of theirs is more than indictment enough for now.
So what are the Bloomfield police trying to protect and what are the people they are protecting afraid of?
Well, first, in regard to what the kind of thing that they are trying to protect. Here is Newark in 1926. Vice News’ “Driving While Black in New Jersey” is inaccurate in its claim that Bloomfield abuts a black area of Newark. It actually borders what is still a mild, small Italian enclave of Newark, where I was born, called the North Ward - it straddles Bloomfield Ave and the border of Bloomfield, at 13th Street, extending down to 6th Ave. However, a few blocks down to the very bottom of Bloomfield Ave, around 1rst Ave, was Newark’s First Ward. Here was the onset of what happened, the affliction of Newark and what they are trying to prevent from happening to Bloomfield. The First Ward was apparently a very interesting Italian enclave which was demolished in order to make way for black housing projects. This was a complete disaster not only for the Italian enclave, but for Newark. To these projects blacks were invited from the south and they became incubators for the riots birthed in 1967. Newark never recovered. E. Michael Jones’, “Slaughter of cities urban renewal and ethnic cleansing”, doesn’t talk about Newark’s First Ward, but the exact same thing happened to that Italian catholic community as happened to other catholic city enclaves that he spoke about as having been deliberately broken up. The story of the destruction of this, the ethnic catholic enclave of Newark, is chronicled in “Michael Immerso’s, “Newark’s Little Italy: The Vanished First Ward.”
How about walking while White?
Learn the nature of the beast’s pattern. Exceptions are not the rule. Do not re-direct good resources after bad. Trillions of dollars and lives have already been wasted in the foolish effort to help blacks. Driving while black?
IMG]https://majorityrights.com/uploads/mapmontbloomnewark.png?r=1460857946[/IMG]
Comments:4
Posted by Are you sewious? on Thu, 21 Apr 2016 00:52 | # Colorful, friendly.. He has two kids too. What kind of female would have kids with him? Oh, that’s right, we cannot ask that or any other critical questions of females, that’s “beta.” We must only ask what they want, learn what they want by playing “game” and assimilating “alpha males” like this. 5
Posted by Nobody on Fri, 22 Apr 2016 03:06 | # Nice bit of work, DanielS. Typical BBB, just like everywhere else. Interesting, no research on what happens in those nice towns up RT. 17. Plenty of YKW lives there, so don’t even think about it. But Jersey City and even Harrison are gentrifying at a lightning speed, and so will Newark. Will take more time, but it’ll be Ironboundish eventually. And Rt. 3 shown on the map is a small section of that road that is a full of cops and county looking for green. 6
Posted by DanielS on Fri, 22 Apr 2016 06:24 | # Thanks Nobody. That gentrification of which you speak is undoubtedly a part of YKW plans too. The broad, pernicious cycle of scooping up foreclosed property for pennies on the dollar after their predatory loans are defaulted upon. As Bill Clinton once said, “for those who can live comfortably alongside others the reward for shall be great.”..until reality catches up with them and breaks through their denial. Then America and other Western nations will probably become something like Mexico or Brazil ... retaining some gated White and Asian communities; quite walled communities in the case of conservative Jews and Israel; while subjecting others, including White genetic treasures, to the brown hoards. But what many of these “elites” might be doing is making themselves into “technoslaves” and basically breeding cows (daughters) for the hoards and the Jews to prey upon and scoop up. From those hoards mulatto supremacisms will emerge to challenge Jewish and White hubris - thick, cowardly, narrow minded alphas pandering in denial of their girlfriends whims, as always, will say, hey, “those Mulattoes are us, ‘White but strong!” - an expression of denial for which his air-headed girlfriends will ogle and coo at him .. getting-off on the destruction of normal White men, while her ALPHA CUCK retains this stupid, right-wing denial - and by default, her mulatto supremacist ideal. And why should we not think mulatto supremacism is such a good thing? For one thing, because it always comes along with the rest of blacks who will be as restive, aggressive, hyper-assertive, violent, fecund and dissatisfied as ever - then the Mulattoes will become less like Oreos and Uncle Toms and more like the regular ones among their element. In the meantime, our losses are vast, in many respects we’ve lost all, written-off as “betas”, “losers” because we saw patterns and didn’t think it was “all nonsense.” Finally, there isn’t exactly a looming danger of black extinction; quite the opposite: 7
Posted by Evola, ontology project, misunderstandings on Fri, 22 Apr 2016 09:34 | # This essay by Julias Evola (translated by G. A. Malvicini and published by Counter-Currents), illustrates to me a model of the “ontology project” to which GW aspires. Because it is so very eloquent and thorough, it will also serve to locate those points exactly where there is a misunderstanding between GW and his ontology project and the conceptual tools that I have been proposing. GW should NOT have been reacting dismissively as he did in comments here, here, here and here. I believe his misunderstanding stems from a combination of three or four factors: 1) Being understandably enamored of this kind of account by Evola 2) Being put off by the distortions and misrepresentations of “the other side” and 3) not seeing that the “other side” does not have to be the other side when done properly - it is a complement; perhaps 4) he does not have confdence in me to believe that I am not hoodwinked as well, despite the fact that I say, time and again, that social constructionism proper does NOT deny genetics, their pre-condition, factual realty, etc., that the whole point of the project is to counter the Cartesian fallacy and its destruction - and there is nothing more Cartesian than denying genetics. etc. However, now I know why he is determined, for the compellingness of Evola’s essay or its kind. Nevertheless, this essay does not contradict social constructionism proper, what I am saying in critique and refinement of the kind of four part epoch that Dugin has in mind, nor what I am saying with the White Left or White Post Modernity. Again, I will come back to this tonight. For now, here is the article. There are only a few places where misunderstanding can take place in comparing what I’ve been saying to Evola here.
8
Posted by Guessedworker on Fri, 22 Apr 2016 10:36 | # Daniel, Evola is not writing ontologically. He is writing critically of both streams of enlightenment thinking, in much the same way that Tom Sunic wrote in Homo americanus. You referenced some comments I have made on other MR threads. They include this, which is ontological thinking in the most general and universal sense, ie, true of all organic life, and therefore true for all men at all times, and not merely something which becomes true in relation to some men at one time.
If you are going to criticise my writing, please do so on a positive basis for what it says, not because you suppose it conflicts with your own ideas (when its probable impact would be to swallow and re-process them). 9
Posted by Social construction of Prof. Denbeaux on Fri, 22 Apr 2016 17:23 | # More on Mark Denbeaux. He marched in the Selma, with the"Freedom Rides”, and considers that to be the most formidable experience of his life. Although he was brought-up in Wellesley, Massachusetts, the same place that radicalized and produced Hillary Clinton.
10
Posted by DanielS on Fri, 22 Apr 2016 18:46 | #
Well, this piece of Evola’s surprised me. I had been under the impression that he was talking a lot about “spirit” - i.e., a way of talking that does not interest me as I consider it to be too speculative. I do, however, consider this piece to be on the other end, and quite ontological in its pursuit. It reminded me of your project - and not in any insulting way, it is very good.
Hmm. Ok, I’ll try to be nicer; but you know, you could have extended a similar courtesy as you asked of me with these pieces - they contain important ideas for and of western peoples and I shouldn’t just let them be treated dismissively. I won’t itemize the comments and it doesn’t torture me but it is frustrating when you tend to see what I’m doing as adversarial. I try to do for your ontology project what you suggest that you try to do with the ideas that I bring forth, to integrate them. So lets try to believe that a little better of each other and move on. 11
Posted by J's & universal declaration to Japan on Fri, 22 Apr 2016 22:56 | #
* What tolerance it has is among its own EGI, not very bad and absolutely no business of f-ing Jews.
12
Posted by Captainchaos on Sat, 23 Apr 2016 01:01 | # This is not a moment to be butthurt, but for a brave synthesis! A moment to say, “Heil Britain, and fuck those Krauts (American)!” 13
Posted by Selfie Soldiers on Sat, 23 Apr 2016 11:59 | # “Selfie Soldiers: Russia Checks into Ukraine” Ostrovsky does implicate Putin in having sent clandestine Russian troops into Ukraine, but there is no mention Victoria Nuland and co., as having sent-in a Judaized plan of war to begin with, vast resources, if not troops in there, along with a liberalizing, Judaic plan for Urkaine as well. You can be sure the YKW are playing both sides. 14
Posted by War is... on Sat, 23 Apr 2016 12:37 | #
15
Posted by Dr Doom on Tue, 26 Apr 2016 00:23 | # I’ll tell you something and you might not believe it. The nigger is not just a biological weapon used against you, it’s also a smokescreen for a huge coverup. The Nose Goblin is intellectually inferior. Their claims of having a median IQ of 115 is a BIG LIE. Psychometric tests have several different dimensions to measure different faculties that make up g or general intelligence. That 115 IQ number they babble on about is from the Terman Test. Terman was a jew, but his test was somewhat accurate. That 115 is the VERBAL SCORE. There are two other scores. One is numerical which tests mathematical knowledge and spatial which measures mechanical insight and understanding machines. Here’s the thing, their verbal is extremely high, but their spatial score is retarded. Their math score is under a normal White population as well. Add them together and divide by three, and you get a number around 86, which is Mestizo Mexican gardener bad. These niggers and their poor grades are a smokescreen to generate false sympathy to keep people from using IQ Tests. If Americans knew that the jew was only about as smart as a Mexican, they would realize that there is collusion and conspiracy involved in all the jews in high positions. Their claims of intelligence are their BIGGEST LIE. 16
Posted by O*R*I*O*N on Tue, 26 Apr 2016 18:52 | # Great analysis.
This is exactly the effect jewish-american media has had on most lemmings in my native country, Denmark. Far into the reaches even of some anti-immigration groups, the venomously deceptive narrative presented over the many consecutive decades of jewish-american indoctrination (behavior modification) through movies and various other forms of junk-culture, has injected into the collective unconscious the deadly message which by now, unfortunately, has been so thoroughly internalized by most Whites throughout the West, namely the template: all negroes are apriori cool, sexy, friendly, rhythmically superior and/or charming, yet eternally poor and helpless victims of the evil White KKK. Jewish media control ever since 1945 has truly been (still is) an electronic, human societal equivalent of the parasitic mindcontrol known from the animal world. It has been a disaster ... still is. And as practically every other pathology in postmodernity it can be traced right back to 1945 and the deep political, economic and cultural zog infestation that followed. Death to zog! 17
Posted by DanielS on Fri, 29 Apr 2016 09:11 | #
The idea that hermeneutics (and social constructionism) is proposing (as opposed to Lockeatine empiricism or Archimedian Cartesianism), correctly, is that facts, sensations and feelings do not exist for us entirely independent but are connected to communication and language - narrative shaping, contextualization and social negotiation of how they count. While it is a loosening into the broader (especially social) connections from the attempted non-human standards for determination by mere, brute facts as to how facts count, absent communication, i.e. “facticity”, hermeneutics conducted as a proper inquiry and investigative method would not be a denial of factuality on the other hand either (as that would be Cartesian as well, and a violation of its raison de dete as a methodology), but rather a more accurate means of determining how facts are to be framed and how they are to count by human standards. In this methodology, Whites will find proper historical orientation, means and agency to defend and advance themselves as a people, and that is the primary reason why Jewish academics distort it beyond reason and place it as an abusively distorted ideology in the hands of antagonistic anti-White coalitions. Spinning psuedo hermeneutic (really still Cartesian) yarns of nonsense and “critique” also serves their big academic business of selling talk to paying undergraduates. 19
Posted by Santoculto on Mon, 02 May 2016 20:05 | # Black thugs are like urbanized primitive vikings, in permanent barbarian pre-psychotic state. 20
Posted by O*R*I*O*N on Wed, 04 May 2016 05:37 | # You don’t know much about germanic culture do you? 21
Posted by DanielS on Wed, 04 May 2016 05:56 | # Nor have black invaders left behind European characteristics and landmarks like this: 22
Posted by Newark Condos on Sat, 07 May 2016 10:59 | #
23
Posted by New plan to smash White suburbs on Tue, 10 May 2016 22:46 | #
24
Posted by Policeman James Lancia interviewed on Sun, 15 May 2016 17:20 | # Former policeman James Lancia interviewed 25
Posted by E. Michael Jones: "Shaft", The Pimp on Mon, 16 May 2016 19:53 | # E. Michael Jones discusses C.I.A. reshaping of black identity from “activist” to placate it with sex as “the pimp,” as well as Jewish cultural subversion, such as collaboration with White elites in “the death of the cities.” 29
Posted by O.J. Simpson, TBB & TJB on Wed, 15 Jun 2016 18:01 | # O.J. Simpson, typical black behavior and typical Jewish behavior: NPR series: there is no doubt that OJ Simpson committed the murders. There were signs from the very fist date he had with the 18 year old Nicole Brown that OJ Simpson was violent. ..he had ripped open her pants. ... The series reveals many other facts not usually known about the case: Another 9-11 call from Nicole has a policeman arrive, whom she tells emphatically that Simpson is going to kill her. Brown has a bruise on her face and Simpson says he doesn’t care, he doesn’t want her in his bed, he has two other women. The policeman tells Simpson that he is under arrest for domestic violence. Simpson goes into his house, ostensibly to get dressed but races away in his car via a rear exit. The police pursue, but don’t catch him. This is one of the surprising elements of the series: The L.A. Police Department was not eager to prosecute Simpson. They treated him with kid gloves. The detective who interviewed Simpson after the murder did not ask him to provide a time line of his day, which would have caught him in several lies - basically, because he was following The L.A. P.D.‘s tendency to treat Simpson and his celebrity with too much respect. In fact, Mark Fuhrman, being racial, was an outlier to this culture. He actually had sued the L.A. Police Department for early retirement, claiming psychological disability because he could not stand having to deal with blacks. L.A. P.D. did not accept Fuhrman’s claim and told him to get back to work. Unfortunately for the case against Simpson, Fuhrman was the detective on the scene who found Simpson’s glove left at the scene of the murder. Simpson was advised to stop taking his arthritis medicine so that his hands would swell up. When the glove didn’t fit Simpson’s hand in a demonstration before the jury, it added to the suggestion that Fuhrman’s racism was playing a part in persecuting Simpson - a Negro man in an interracial relationship which Fuhrman was known to not like - prosecuting him unjustly by planting fake evidence. Allowing Simpson to try-on the glove was black prosecuting attorney, Christopher Darden’s blunder. “If it doesn’t fit you must acquit” was Simpson’s black defense attorney, Johnny Cochoran’s famous line, but what was most important in the acquittal was the way he successfully pandered to a majority black jury, Jewish legal system and zeitgeist, by distracting its pursuit of “justice” from the obvious evidence against O.J. Simpson; and instead presenting the case as an indictment of Furhman and the L.A. Police Department’s early stage Hitleresque wish to genocide; racism and cover-up of its racism - a particularly effective argument with in L.A. following the Rodney King incident:
30
Posted by OJ Simpson's daughter at age 30 on Sun, 19 Jun 2016 20:19 | #
32
Posted by Luton looks heavenly compared to American cities on Tue, 13 Jun 2017 09:56 | # Tommy Robinson shows you Luton, England from his car: From what you can see, anyway, it’s like heaven compared to cities like Newark, Paterson and Camden, New Jersey, USA. 33
Posted by Newark, New Jersey, Raw Hood on Wed, 20 Dec 2017 21:35 | # Newark, New Jersey, Raw Hood Footage part 1; and part 2.: It used to be the place to be, “beautiful city”
It is, in fact, the city where I was born as well…. 34
Posted by Hating while in New Jersey on Thu, 28 Feb 2019 15:04 | #
35
Posted by ATM withdrawal on Wed, 20 Mar 2019 07:14 | # ...meanwhile in New Jersey, a colored guy wants to take an ATM machine with him onto a public bus. 36
Posted by Uncle Floyd's New Jersey: Bloomfield on Thu, 23 May 2019 22:18 | # 37
Posted by John Lennon didn't avoid... on Thu, 23 May 2019 23:52 | # What do Nixon, Frank Rizzo, John Lennon, David Bowie, Robbin Williams and Iggie Pop have in common? Post a comment:
Next entry: Can Cosa Nostra Re-Organize on its Racial Roots in True Honor to Defend Italy and Europe?
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News— CENTRAL— An Ancient Race In The Myths Of Time by James Bowery on Wednesday, 21 August 2024 15:26. (View) Slaying The Dragon by James Bowery on Monday, 05 August 2024 15:32. (View) The legacy of Southport by Guessedworker on Friday, 02 August 2024 07:34. (View) Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. (View) — NEWS — Farage only goes down on one knee. by Guessedworker on Saturday, 29 June 2024 06:55. (View) |
Posted by Shield Maiden on "The Nice Ones" on Wed, 20 Apr 2016 21:45 | #
Though it is a hokey network, not functioning at a high level of integrity despite its claim to pursue truth, some good information does manage to pass through Renegade’s right-wing transom. Their commitment to A.H., the reich and other right wing foibles as well as some of the destructive contemporary fools that circulate there are unacceptable. I really cannot apologize for the fights that I had in comments there with a German guy named Markus or Blut und Boden - or with Kyle Hunt for defending them. They were wrong. However, there is some intelligence that passes through among the epistemological blunders of that site which can be sifted out.
I thought that this piece, apparently by a young lady calling herself “Shield Maiden”, complimented very well this story about Driving While black in New Jersey. She calls it, the “nice ones.” Though I did not need to include this story, having also written about this Trojan horse phenomenon of the Oreo and the Uncle Tom, i.e., “the nice ones”, I found that she makes a very eloquent statement; and it adds compellingness in that it comes from a White woman: