|
|
|
Elite contests and contradictions: Part 1
I have been thinking about Iain Davis’s magisterial essay series on multipolarity – the prospective global power dispensation proposed by the WEF, the UN, and all the other internationalist bodies, and advanced via the BRICS nations in opposition to America’s current monopolarity. Unless a fifth appears, it is a four part series: I heartily recommend the series to one and all. Davis is a libertarian. So not every position he adopts is agreeable from our standpoint, or wholly free of the conventional liberal dictates and blindspots. He has no holistic identitarian or ethnological reading of our race and kind. He does not fully comprehend the Western elites’ long campaign against our life. He has no critique of the Jewish paradigm. There is no evidence that he even has an understanding of it. His is, therefore, a view of a single, completely political project conceived by past generations of Western elites, and adapting to various challenges along the way (such as the fall of the Soviet Union). But that simplification aside, to my mind his Multipolarity series is still a signal achievement in the dissenting analysis of power in this world, and unequivocally presents to us the Chinese, or Russo-Chinese, piece in the jigsaw. Accordingly, it explains the respective, perfectly consonant Chinese and Russian power strategies we witness today. These strategies are not solely the products of Russian or Chinese agency. To all intents and purposes, they are facilitated by a Western elite which has, for four decades or more, been pursuing the replacement of Western power - and thus the basis of the elites’ own power - with a radically general distribution of economic and geopolitical power. In the modern language of internationalism that means transitioning from leadership by America and the other G7 economies of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom to leadership by the G20 economies, ie, adding to those seven the five BRICS countries of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa and the other developing G20 economies of Argentina, Australia, Indonesia, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, South Korea, and Turkey. To a greater or lesser extent all of these last seven are there to make up the numbers and provide a semblance of global action. The real revolutionary change is being wrought by China and Russia, but ... only because the Western elites licenced it. This, then, is the background against which Donald Trump’s parochial and unfulfilled campaign to Make America Great Again figured as a grand heresy in the minds of the entire Western political, governmental, academic, cultural, corporate and banking class. It is the background against which Brexit has never been effectively pursued (beyond a formal, only partial separation) by any British government since the momentous vote of 23rd June 2016. Both of these developments stood as a popular rebuke to the ruling classes for the manner in which they had narrowed party and thus national politics to exclude the life-interests of the mass of white Americans and native British respectively. Supporters in both polities rightfully expected change, including to the elites’ migration agenda. I don’t need to detail the actual outcome, only the fact that the elites regard themselves as absolute rulers of our world, and no wants and desires but their own will ever be actioned even if what was a social contract in Rousseau’s time has to become a social dictate in ours, or what was the legitimacy of government in Locke’s time has to become a lie. Nationalists have performed incredibly poorly in analysing and strategising against this betrayal. Far too many are so captive to the emotions and so invested in the narrow certainties that arise from constant attention to the Jewish Question that the very idea of a regnant non-Jewish form of globalism seems simply preposterous. The best they can offer is that we attack “one enemy at a time”. They have little to no care or understanding that Technocracy is actively going about its business on its own rather pressing timescale, and is not waiting for the second coming of the Great Jew-Awareness among us. It is ironic that, just by dint of their learned distaste for any mention of Jews, libertarians like Davis have been free to travel so far ahead of us. We should, of course, welcome their progress. Our task now should be made easier by it. But for that to be the case, we have to accept both their verities and our past frailties. We have to move forward and urgently re-assess globalism’s newly revealed function and character so that our nationalism is fully relevant to the times. We have to learn how technocratic globalist policy issues from its beneficiaries but also how The Globality, as the final and unchanging outcome of those policies, needs must shape said beneficiaries no less than it must shape us. For it is in that shaping and in the divide between “them and us” that the Jewish Question finally resolves. To that end, I will offer some minor observations of my own. There are at least three pairs of conflicting approaches which characterise globalism today, and which open up to a logical and coherent, whole appreciation of the elitism we the ordinary, the low, the small actually face. This Part 1 essay will explore the first of these pairs which, as luck would have it, concerns our “elder brothers in faith”. The Jewish body versus the metaphysics of money The MR post Parsing the contest of elites, from June 2020, which belatedly kicked off my commentary on globalism, introduced the notion that a highly-programmatic and progressive, technocratic elitism had all but replaced the much older, over-arching form. One could trace the latter to Judaism’s central conceit that the god of Abraham promised the Israelites eternal power over the Other, whom He had created only to serve them. At the End-Time the Chosen would be anointed as priest-kings speaking directly to Him, and taking to themselves all the worldly riches tended by the servile but loving Other. From the viewpoint of evolutionary psychology, this (of course) man-made eschatology can be quite economically explained as a neurotic over-evaluation of fitness traits, normatised and generalised through a long and ancient passage of gravest existential stress. It emerges as a genetically-coded, adamantine survival mechanism whereby survival itself is achievable only through total control of the otherwise dominant Other. It is an aberration and, certainly in modern times, a tragedy for all concerned, Jews included. That said, one should not assume that this paradigm of supremacy is at all unique to Judaism. It seems to be the way of all totalistic elitism that the separation which the perfumed minority require can only be effected or justified or proven by an ethnic formlessness and a-causal existence among the lowly masses. In both the Judaic and the tech model it is a supremacy got not by position or wealth alone, nor by any particular moral or intellectual quality of the elite person, but by a manufactured reduction in the condition of the ordinary man. Obviously, such elitism is not a question of merely standing at the social apex, or of ruling over the people of the land, or even over whole empires. That rule must be absolute and despotic for such power to be realised and to know its ownmost self. Most of all, that rule must be deathless, forever beyond the reach of those who contemplate freedom and justice. So, how better to achieve this than by taking the people over a cliff edge in some way, be that in an End Time or in a Re-Set or a New World Order. Nature and ethnicity, identity and difference, all human cause itself must be voided forever from them. Only thus may their manufactured debility and debasement cut them off for all time from their past truth. They become abject and compliant attendants on Power, and that is then their truth. They can never be anything else. The more existentially-focussed means to that end which Europeans have suffered in the post-WW2 decades are, of course, replacement immigration and associated racial equalitarianism and anti-racism, speech repression, political exclusion, and media narrative control. Beyond the race attack the familiar culture war strategies of feminism and homosexualism follow the same pattern. All of it is culminating now in the pure racism that is CRT and the egregious relativism of trans activism. One should add that, all along, the Western political elites have pursued programmes of sovereign debtification and supranationalism. The latter was not principally a Jewish tribal stratagem. Rather, it was a strategic decision taken by the generation of European politicians – some of them probably world government utopians - who witnessed the two great 20th century conflagrations, and saw not their own ambitious elitism as the perpetual cause de guerre but the simple fact of European nationhood. Still, the dissolution of the Westphalian nation state and, thereby, the disempowerment of the ethnic principle in Europe was of a piece with the deconstructing rest. So what has led to the rise of Technocracy over what appears to remain a powerful set of established stratagems? It’s not that they have been failing as such, quite the contrary; and it’s not as though they don’t persist as centralities of the technocratically-driven Western polity. The failing is more fundamental. They carry too much of the imprimatur of the Jewish or, more specifically, Ashkenazic sociobiology, as it has evolved in the centuries of European exile. Ashkenazim are fitted to our sociobiology in the exact same evolutionary way that other human populations are typically fitted to their particular environment. In other words, Nature is environment to us but we are Nature to Ashkenazim. Just as the European Mind is evolved in its exact forms of intelligence and creativity to address Nature as a standing reserve to be abstracted as needed and re-engineered for the ever more secure transmission of our genes, so the Ashkenazic Mind is evolved in no small part to address us in the same general way and to the same end. When considering this pregnant truth one must be careful to parse the hyper-competitiveness of the Israelites, which materialized in the tribal crucible of the ancient Middle East, from the intelligence behind the aforementioned Ashkenazic psycho-political strategies and, of course, the strategies themselves. Jewish hyper-competitiveness is not impacted by the emergence of the technocratic project, and will continue as long as there are Jews in this world. Ashkenazic intelligence is likewise heritable, and strategising in pursuit of Olam Ha-ba will always be a factor in this world. The strategies themselves can be thought of as constituting the collective Ashkenazic performance of tikkun olam. But once conceived and initiated they rely, in the main, upon adoption by the most suggestible and psychologically conflicted elements of the host. In the technocratic case, these strategies have simply been subsumed into the political wing of the project, generally via quasi-legal instruments bearing on governments or via structured investment standards bearing on corporations. Both have institutionalised and vastly amplified their impact. For example the UN developed its Migration Compact following the UN Summit for Refugees and Migrants held in New York in September 2016. In a similar manner, every last global corporation and brand now seems to have internalised the investors’ progressive dicta of Environmental, Social, and Governance. We see its imprint in the ad breaks on TV every night. The question which hangs over this adoption is: does it still serve the Jewish tribal goal of collective permanent supremacy over humankind or has there been a structural change whereby that is negated and another supremacy is effected? The goals of Technocracy do not, in themselves, serve or include the goal of Judaism. The mass of Jews, their interests, their self-proclaimed destiny do not, indeed cannot, figure in the technocratic vision of the future. Technocratic elitism itself has no inhering ethnic or tribal focus. Quite the contrary, Technocracy looks to a post-human future: the much vaunted Singularity, supposedly to be realised through emerging technologies such as gene editing, brain interface technology, biotechnology and robotics, artificial intelligence and machine learning, quantum computing, and nanotechnology. The WEF anticipates that twenty years will be required from the Re-Set start-date of 2030 for technology to advance to the point where transhumanism is a practical possibility. In the near-term, however, the global population has to be brought under full, indeed totalitarian control, and all land, all hard assets, all wealth have to be appropriated. To some unspecified extent this is expected to be delivered in a compressed time-scale or Re-Set. We untermenschen will “gain” digital IDs, a programmable central bank digital currency, a universal basic income, and a social credit score. Farmland will pass into the hands of the elites, who will order vast tracts to be re-wilded in the name of sustainability. Consequently, meat will cease to be part of our diet. Instead, soya protein products from factories owned, of course, by our generous and considerate elites will be forced upon us. We will be continuously surveilled by the panopticon state, which will recognise our faces in the street. Our choices and opinions will be algorithmically assessed against multiple standards for social compliance, for example with having the required mRNA booster shots. In time, the logic of total control will lead to the creation of the “smart city” populated not by a gratefully servile humanity as in Judaism’s fantasy of the world to come, but by a parasitic one living off the hand-outs of the elites and granted life, or not granted life, by the blind workings of their all-too-real algorithms. Under the guise of Zero Covid, key elements of this dystopia are already being delivered in Xi’s China. It is, after all, the place where communist party control is unwavering but communism itself is tempered by the WEF’s corporate-financial model of public-private partnership. The Chinese component in Technocracy is the clearest demonstration of the latter’s regnancy over its Judaic predecessor and, therefore, the clearest answer to the question posed three paragraphs above. We might put it this way: the ancient struggle of the Jews, although it has its root cause in genetic continuity, and thus envisages a corporeal and visceral, determinedly this-world outcome, has proven to be glacially slow and uncertain in delivery, and – crucially - ineluctably limited to the European race and the European world which gave the Ashkenazic struggle its character. Technocracy, on the other hand, with its root cause in the destining of wealth free of any requirement for limit or morality - a 21st century metaphysics of Money - offers precise planning, relatively concrete, technologically-based methods, a seemingly definitive time-table, and – crucially - a truly inclusive global approach based on the climate agenda. The second and final part of this essay will address the other two pairs of conflicting approaches which we find in Technocracy, and which hold out some hope that the elites are not at all as united and singular in their methods as they wish us to believe. Comments:2
Posted by Al Ross on Thu, 24 Nov 2022 04:03 | # The West is lucky that Chairman Mao was stupid enough to follow Jewish Marxism and thereby strictly leashing human ( especially Chinese ) nature’s desire for self - interested economic behaviour , thus delaying today’s reality. Once China ditched Jewish Marxist economics and embraced Weberian Capitalism , China’s economy was unharnessed and the Chinese race’s thirst for individual economic achievement was given the opportunity of being slaked beyond expectation. Strange people the Chinese , they prioritise family prosperity and no mass immigration, over the Western Marxist concept of Universal ( conferred by whom ? ) Human Rights and Race Replacement. Also , no Jews. 3
Posted by Timothy Murray on Thu, 24 Nov 2022 18:45 | # Didn’t Xi just expel the globalists from China? However…that in no way negates this
But it does seem like a stretch. 4
Posted by Guessedworker on Thu, 24 Nov 2022 20:43 | # Try getting yourself some competent sources, Tim. Iain Davis would suffice. 5
Posted by Timothy Murray on Thu, 24 Nov 2022 21:30 | #
I look forward to giving it a read, I plan on asking to reduce from 5 days a week to 3 days a week on my trucking run to give time for coding and studying. Also, I am off until Sunday night, so maybe this weekend…..I have a small project and revilo p. oliver to finish first. This is very enjoyable stuff to read. Thanks for shouldering the burden. cordially,
6
Posted by Thorn on Fri, 25 Nov 2022 13:34 | # What’s to stop the developed countries’ elites from implementing a digital currency and digital social credit score system? Nothing, that’s what. The mechanisms for implementing such a system are becoming closer to fruition by the day. Our understanding of what’s taking place is one thing, but no one has come up with an implementable strategy to thwart those implementing a technocratic society. Why? Because the resistance doesn’t have the necessary power, authority, or means to make a meaningful difference. Moreover, the resistance to the looming technocratic society becomes less effective each and every passing day. Amazingly support for an authoritarian Technate system is becoming more popular. Both the educational system and the MSM functions as an indoctrination pipeline propagating the Technate mindset. For the masses, the hook is they’ve been made to believe it’s the only way to reverse “climate change” thus saving the planet. Good luck changing their brainwashed minds! 7
Posted by Thorn on Mon, 28 Nov 2022 12:53 | # @6 RTWT Manhattan pharma heiress says her mom had to hire $300-a-day DEPROGRAMMER to help her unlearn crazed woke views after she was brainwashed while attending elite Mount Holyoke college
By ALYSSA GUZMAN FOR DAILYMAIL.COM PUBLISHED: 14:15 EST, 26 November 2022 | UPDATED: 05:12 EST, 27 November 2022 8
Posted by macrobius on Tue, 29 Nov 2022 07:44 | # GW, I’m not sure if you’re familiar with another Davis, namely Joel Davis. He is a young alt-right intellectual and nationalist from Australia. I think he was banned from Twitter but he’s been active for a while with streaming and podcasting, often with other nationalists and alt-right figures: I think the following recent short post from him sums up the current situation well:
9
Posted by Guessedworker on Wed, 30 Nov 2022 01:43 | # One minor issue, Mac, with Joel Davis’s analysis. I think he is hitting the ideological incompatibility issue too hard. China is well and truly enmeshed in the technocratic project, and the Western technocrats are well and truly on-board with multipolarity. One cannot say, well, Xi just opposes American unipolarity. The American elites themselves oppose American unipolarity. Finding the balance seems to me a matter of parsing China’s engagement with the project from its hostility to the Western liberal tradition (which is also being sacrificed by the Western elites). Mark Carney is reported in the other Davis’s work as complaining that some national actors, and certainly Xi and Putin, Erdogan, and Modhi, are thinking geopolitically and not geo-economically. For the Western elites globalism is the means by which they may outgrow their domain and operate as true masters of the world, But they need the major non-Western players to bring their polities into the process; and thus they need those players to focus like them wholly on the global empire of Money. That means sacrificing all parochial thoughts of empire and the history of national greatness. Despite the fact that they are cooperating in the launch of a competitor to the dollar reserve, which the Western elites at least nominally welcome, Putin and Xi remain wedded to “outmoded” imperialist (ie, geopolitical) thinking. To the Western elites they look like cheats and opportunists, banking the collapse of the West thank you very much, but actually working towards their own unipolar outcome. That’s the knub of it, I think. 10
Posted by Thorn on Wed, 30 Nov 2022 15:12 | # The real name of the game is demographics ... and it’s lookin’ like sub-Sahara Africans are poised to gain the upper hand ... BIG TIME. Within fifty years the population of sub-Sahara Africa is projected to exceed that of China and India combined. Several years ago, the sagacious chaps over at westernspring.net said it right: ‘The Earth is destined to become a negro planet.’ The only way to stop what looks to be the inevitable would be to (fill in the blank) ____________. (Bill Gates et al. suggested birth control programs on a mass scale be implemented in Africa - stat; but in all likelihood such attempts - for a whole host of reasons - would meet fierce resistance thus have very limited effect.) At any rate, and of course, the rapidly emerging bumper crop of Bantus’ first choice of migratory destination will be Europe. Eventually, over the span of a few centuries, they’ll displace the Asians who’re currently displacing the native Europeans. Of course, the trend can be changed but the white-liberals, Jews and the fags in charge aren’t about to change course. Why? 11
Posted by Al Ross on Thu, 01 Dec 2022 02:58 | # Much as it pains me to say it , but Thorn is correct. Still, you will doubtless meet them all in your Celestial Penthouse , Thorn, and you will be able to proffer Eternal thanks . If you ever feel slighted by intelligent people who do not subscribe to the Jews’ truth that you totally believe , then please remember the words of St Justin Martyr : “You can kill us but you cannot do us any real harm” 12
Posted by Thorn on Sun, 11 Dec 2022 02:05 | # Roughly speaking: “The world is run by one million evil men, ten million stupid men, and one hundred million cowards.”—Gregory David Roberts. Sounds about right to me! 13
Posted by Thorn on Wed, 14 Dec 2022 23:27 | #
CrossTalking with Tom Luongo, Brad Blankenship, and Vassilis Fouskas. https://www.rt.com/shows/crosstalk/567906-europe-choice-us-dependency/ 14
Posted by Guessedworker on Thu, 15 Dec 2022 09:50 | # Luongo doesn’t understand that multipolarity is the word the Western elites use for trading up from the provincialism of post-Western hegemony to the globalism of a New World Order. Xi and Putin are appropriating the term for propaganda purposes without giving up on their own provincial goal of a Sino-Russian global hegemony. They want the Western elites to detach from their provincialism and to proceed with the sacrifice of the Western way of life. But they don’t want the multipolar New World Order. The Ukraine War is one of several, let us say, forceful strategies undertaken by Putin which very clearly spell this out. The Western elites on both sides of the Atlantic can see that perfectly well. Obviously Luongo isn’t one of them or he wouldn’t be making nice talk on RT. 15
Posted by Thorn on Thu, 15 Dec 2022 17:59 | # Multipolar, schmultipolar…... I think the more pressing issue is the fact the EU decided to cut ties with Russia which of course is going to result in a severe negative impact on its industrial output - especially in powerhouse countries like Germany. Moreover the EU has chosen to rely more-and-more in the USA for its energy and security needs etc. That especially puts the EU in a precarious position since the USA is fast undergoing a “fundamental transformation” itself. By that I mean a demographic transformation from a majority white population to a majority non-white population. Of course that’ll inevitably result in the shit-canning of the Constitution along with its Bill of Rights concomitant with a chronic decline in its GOP. Where does that leave the White race? Answer: at the whim and mercy of the world’s central government ruling elites. Take into consideration this sobering fact: a central goal of the “woke” western elites is to eradicate “white supremacy” ... and they are demonstrating they’ll use any means necessary to accomplish that particular goal. It’s happening right before our eyes; it’s snowballing. The frustrating part is the ideologically driven western elites* are succeeding at their stealth genocide (both cultural and biological), and it’s bleeping obvious there’s not a bleeping thing we can do to slow it down. Here’s the present day Western way of life for ya: *Welcome to Culture War 2.0: The Great Realignment 16
Posted by Thorn on Thu, 15 Dec 2022 18:03 | # Correction: “chronic decline in its GDP” (and I’ll add: A chronic decline in the standard of living for the vast majority of its citizens too.) 17
Posted by Racially aggravated public indecency on Mon, 16 Jan 2023 02:06 | # Libertarians are in fact right about evrything that matters 18
Posted by Al Ross on Thu, 19 Jan 2023 03:14 | # Libertarians are charming young Ivy League / Oxbridge educated men who believe that , if everyone adhered to an agreeably similar upper middle class lifestyle code , then all would be for the best in this , the best of all possible Panglossian worlds. As the Duke of Wellington said when his Grace was mistaken in a London Club for a Mr. Smith : If you believe that , Sir , you will believe anything.” Post a comment:
Next entry: Neil Oliver: The Re-Set has already happened
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News— CENTRAL— An Ancient Race In The Myths Of Time by James Bowery on Wednesday, 21 August 2024 15:26. (View) Slaying The Dragon by James Bowery on Monday, 05 August 2024 15:32. (View) The legacy of Southport by Guessedworker on Friday, 02 August 2024 07:34. (View) Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. (View) — NEWS — Farage only goes down on one knee. by Guessedworker on Saturday, 29 June 2024 06:55. (View) |
Posted by Thorn on Tue, 22 Nov 2022 19:03 | #
It’s been evident - to me at least - that the Western elites’ agenda is to blend the majority-white USA in with the rest of the world (IOWs, brown it up thus take it down several notches). The Simpson-Mazzoli Act and what came after that made it clear the direction the “anti-racist” elites were taking us. By design, whites are destined to become extinct. What’s astonishing is how fast whites are going extinct. What’s even more astonishing is whites - generally speaking - aren’t concerned about their seemingly inevitable path towards extinction. Instead, what whites are most concerned about is proving they are not racist. Changing that self-destructive mindset is proving to be next to impossible - especially given the apparent fact white elites derive power and pleasure (a sense of moral superiority) from being anti-white.