Posted by DanielS on Fri, 01 Apr 2016 04:03 | #

Indeed, news (mostly bad) for the concern of Europeans is all so epoch and pervasive these days that we must maintain our balance of concern, looking after “our own” (if you can call traitors that), while “the big news” of Jack Sen will one day fade, and not be something that we’ll be thinking about on our death beds.

We will be nagged by the agony of those who betrayed us, however, to the death.

There will be more Jack Sens, enemies trying to infiltrate our cause but they will never be cause for dismay like our own traitors and treasonous elite will be.

Posted by Guessedworker on Fri, 01 Apr 2016 09:03 | #

The blatant mania for people-destroying exhibited by this man - literally no distinct people anywhere on the plant must escape being “diversified” into nothingness - immediately begs the question: How can anybody who doesn’t have the excuse of Jewish ethnicity not know this is terrible and wrong?

Posted by Atilio on Sat, 02 Apr 2016 01:48 | #

Maybe it is time to convert to Judaism ?  The only way ethnicity can be salvaged, protected and insured.  If the European genus is incapable of shedding its mantle of treacherous infections and escape the impending doom by resolute hard resistance, then the other choice is conversion. A sick specimen like Timmerman would not see the light of day were he to be a Jew and haranguing the Jews in Israel.someone would have cut him down by now.

Posted by Guessedworker on Sat, 02 Apr 2016 10:50 | #

I really don’t foresee long queues of newly god-fearing white men eager to have their junk mutilated, or white women ambivalently handing their 8-day old sons to some ringleted sadist with a rusty pair of scissors.  But the essence of your idea is good, and goes one step beyond the fourteen words.  Yes, we white men must secure the existence of our people and a white future for our children.  But even if the collective identity exists and, thereby, the collective intent, from where is the collective agency to be got?

Frans Timmermans is party to, or a part of, a collective agency.  He is a faithful servant and useful idiot not of the EU but of interests which certainly have this magical collective quality, whether we frame them as the Money Power or as Jewry or as the global elites, or as the corporatocracy.  They are one in seeking the mixing of all gentile humanity, so as to dissolve away boundaries, distinctiveness, identity, and the capacity for the exercise of power.

Timmermans is not a Jew.  But Judaism, in its pursuit of “peace” for Man (ie, a permanent, this-world Jewish suzerainty over what would inevitably be a de-nationed, deracinated, beige humanity with an average IQ of 90 or less), is the original model for globalists like Timmermans.  “Diversity” means to him what “shalom” means for Jews.  In both cases, our racial and ethnic life amounts to Susan Sontag’s famous dictum about the cancer of history.

The question is answered, anyway.  Collective identity, and the interests which attach thereto, and the fitting of those interests to one another to reflect intent are what open the way to agency.  Everything must come out of that force for life which is our ethnic identity.  We have to begin with that, and it has to be authentic.

Posted by Eikos on Sun, 03 Apr 2016 16:28 | #

Re the “convert to judaism” strategy

Youtuber ‘Self Hating Jew’ made a bunch of videos on the subject -

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCL-5MJy4uOfTmghk4gy32og/videos

Very smart and unusual guy.

Posted by al gore rhythms on Tue, 05 Apr 2016 19:58 | #

“And those politicians trying to sell to their electorates a society that is exclusively composed of people from one culture, are trying to portray a future based on a past that never existed, therefore that future will never be”

If this was true then the concept of ‘diversity’ would not exist. You cannot mix that which was never separate. For diversity to exist there has to have been pre-existing cultures from which the elements can be drawn to create a mixed society. As an ideology cultural diversity destroys that which makes its utopia (supposedly) possible.

Posted by Guessedworker on Wed, 06 Apr 2016 07:32 | #

Plainly, Timmermans is being super economical with the truth.  “Diversity” is the political elite’s go-to-sleep term for the gene-killing of all distinct human populations, commencing with those which developed shared distinctive genes on the continent of Europe.  There are several cover stories - fictions or lies - that the elites and their fellow-travellers put out to preserve the nature of the enterprise from exposure.  Just in those few words Timmermans quite shamelessly employs no less than four, namely:

(i) He appeals to inevitablism, as if there is some secret historicist hand guiding all men and women everywhere to panmixia.  This seems to be a variation on the oft-retailed theme of cheap air travel as the fundamental force in human destiny, as if the mere possibility of movement across large distances suddenly renders void all human evolutionary history, not to mention the wish for life of native peoples, and the institutions and laws they bring into being to give that wish effect.

There is also a good deal of the egoistic, self-deifying arrogance of the globalist about it.  In reality, Timmermans is saying, “We fucked over Europe’s peoples with blacks, Arabs, and Asians ... we did it ... it was us ... and now we are re-labelling it the destiny of Man!”

(ii) Next, as you say, Timmermans appeals to a human history which never existed in order to claim that, yes, human history never existed.  Very plainly, human distinctiveness itself, by its very existence, shrieks back, “Liar!”  But Timmermans is safe from contradiction from within his own political circles.  Nobody is ever going to point out that inconvenient fact.

(iii) The next little trick is to appeal to “our” values, meaning the usual self-serving, buzz-word, bien pensant soppiness about “decency”, “tolerance” and “openness”, as if any mere values whatsoever could justify this monstrous destruction of humanity’s natural and precious form.  Said values, of course, are convenient fictions.  It is the interests of Jewish tribal supremacy, international finance, global capital, political internationalism, Marxist utopianism, and global elitism itself which are the real values in play.  It’s just that Timmermans is too ashamed to speak honestly of these things, as are they all.

(iv) Finally, he appeals to peace and freedom, by which he means that European peoples cannot be allowed to live in peace and freedom, because their natural interests supposedly always end up generating war and totalitarianism.  Of course this is a travesty ... an intellectually false assertion possible only because, like all the latter-day, dishonest globalist peaceniks, Timmermans makes no effort at all to examine the causal factors behind prior conflagrations on the European continent.  He simply seizes upon them to justify The Globality and Olam Ha-ba, which is what his class want.  But that’s at least consonant with the ideology of European Union, which came into existence in the immediate post-war years ostensibly to prevent future wars on the continent.  It might have made sense, if people-destroying and nation-destroying totalitarianism is actually what was wanted by Europe’s peoples themselves, if they had set about it by importing east and south-east Asians.  Instead, they have imported Sub-Saharan Africans and Islam, which more or less guarantees that peace and freedom will be the last outcome anybody will see.

Timmermans and his class are frightened men.  They have power today.  They fear that we the people shall take it from them and end their hateful project.  They have good reason.  The dispossession, deracination, and genetic dissolution of distinct peoples by means of endless, politically generated racially and ethnically alien colonisation is the greatest crime in all human history.  What punishment befits its proponents?