Measuring national suicide

Posted by Guessedworker on Monday, 15 October 2007 23:25.

The BBC has carried a report of research by something called Migration Integration Policy Index. MIPEX, as it is known, is:-

... a handy quick-reference guide to migrant integration policies in Europe. Using over 100 policy indicators it scores countries on six key dimensions of integration policy.

Policies are given a 1-3 score. A score of 3 signifies that a policy sets the most favourable conditions for migrant integration. Here best practice is defined by European Directives, Council of Europe Conventions and NGO proposals.

This, then, is a measure of government-sanctioned national suicide.

The six “key dimensions of integration policy are: long-term residence, nationality laws, discrimination laws, family reunion, labour market access, political rights. Taken together, they provide this snapshot of the “success” of the member countries of the European Union in changing their own people. Literally.

For the BBC, of course, the “success” of the British government - 9th place in the table - is not really good enough:-

Overall, researchers said that migrants living in the UK could face long delays to getting a permanent right to stay. But they added that once that wait was over, migrants did not face language tests or integration courses.

People seeking to take the final step and become a British citizen must pass a language course and take a test on British life.

The UK’s internationally-recognised policies to combat discrimination scored highly - but were also said to be weak because of poor enforcement.

The UK lost marks because of a specific law to strip nationality from immigrants - a measure used only once so far in relation to jailed radical cleric Abu Hamza.

The study found that settled migrants experienced mixed levels of political rights in the UK.

While they had recognisable political liberties, they had fewer rights to vote in national or local elections compared with other nations, despite being tax payers.

The UK was also criticised for not consulting specialist migrant bodies, unlike some other European nations.

To no one’s surprise, Sweden was out on its own, all very humanistic. Poland laboured in 20th. But the sensible Poles worry about a different form of national suicide. Donald Tusk, leader of the pro-business Civic Platform group, told a television audience in the run-up to the Polish general election:-

... only further liberal reforms could lure back millions of young Poles who took advantage of EU membership to work abroad.

“Two million Poles chose a liberal economy in the two years that you have been in power,” he said. “Unfortunately, in the UK, Ireland, Spain and the Netherlands.”

Perhaps, Donald. But grow too prosperous in this crazy world and you will have a different kind of migration problem.

Tags: Immigration

Comments:

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:31 | #

Here are Franco Frattini’s comments on the project, essentially an outline for the enforcement of race-replacement of all E.U. member countries. Thus do we see what’s forcing defenseless little Ireland to acquiesce in its own total racial annihilation: enormous E.U. pressures. To all E.U. countries: GET OUT NOW, BECAUSE YOU HAVE JOINED A RACIAL DEATH-TRAP WHOSE EFFECTS YOU WON’T BE PERMITTED TO ESCAPE AS LONG AS YOU REMAIN A MEMBER. THE ORGANIZATION YOU HAVE JOINED MEASURES ITS SUCCESS BY HOW MANY EUROPEAN RACES IT CAN EXTINGUISH, REPLACED BY NEGROES, MAGHREBIANS, SUBCONS, AND ORIENTALS. YOU ARE CRIMINALLY INSANE IF YOU STAY IN. GET OUT! GET OUT! GET OUT! NOW! IF YOU WANT TO LIVE. IF YOU WANT TO GO TO YOUR GRAVE AS A NATION, STAY RIGHT WHERE YOU ARE.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:32 | #

(You have to scroll to the bottom of that Frattini page, first link in my comment above, to see the speech.)

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:49 | #

From the look of that map, Latvia is set to emerge from this mess on top of the heap.

Posted by Al Ross on Tue, 16 Oct 2007 01:29 | #

God’s teeth, Switzerland and Norway arent even EU members but still they are subject to the ‘most efficient suicide methodology’ test. Yodelling cries will be replaced by the atonal abortion of the Muslim call to prayer.

Posted by 2R on Tue, 16 Oct 2007 03:38 | #

Perhaps my ancestral homeland of Latvia will be the guiding light for Europe’s fight against displacement? If only the other half of my bloodline (Germany) would take on some of these “worse practices.” Could this be a result of a late conversion to Christianity? (Baltic’s didn’t convert until the 11th century) Actually, it was my mothers side of the family (Germans) who forced Christianity on my fathers side (Latvians). I hope this doesn’t lead to modern Germans forcing race-replacement on the Baltics, as they did with Christianity.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Tue, 16 Oct 2007 04:36 | #

If I’m not mistaken Lithuania wasn’t completely converted from paganism to Christianity until the 1500s and in some remote places, the 1600s.

Posted by 2R on Tue, 16 Oct 2007 07:19 | #

There may have been some pockets in places but by the end of the 1300’s the last remnants of known paganism was stamped out. That would be an interesting subject to look into though. I’ve always wanted to see more archaeological study done in the Baltic region for that reason. After all, the Baltic’s was the last region to practice our ancestral religion and there may be some interesting finds there.

Posted by Johan Van Vlaams on Tue, 16 Oct 2007 08:23 | #

Don’t fall in the logical trap: indeed Belgium displays an “ideal” labour market access to immigrants… but this doesn’t mean that they are actually WORKING…

Posted by Guessedworker on Tue, 16 Oct 2007 08:35 | #

Good point. At best, MIPEX is a “handy quick-reference guide to migrant free-riding policies in Europe”, since the incidence of increase in national carrying capacity is so vanishingly small.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:45 | #

It’s never too early to start preparing, folks ... You never know when that crunch’ll come ... (From the looks of Finland on that map, something tells me we all may be meeting Finn and Kai Murros in Riga for a beer, in the not too distant future ...) (Hey, how is Latvian beer by the way? ... Just wondering ...)

Posted by 2R on Tue, 16 Oct 2007 16:06 | #

(Hey, how is Latvian beer by the way? ... Just wondering ...)

Excellent! One of the biggest secrets of Europe. While I was there it cost about $1.20 (American dollars) for a 16 oz beer. While there is wide variety of flavors and brands, my favorite is Lodina Striprais (Lodina Strong) which is comparable to an English Indian Pale Ale or I.P.A.

Riga is great city as well. Growing up in America I never had a positive outlook on cities. My time spent in Riga changed that, I now realize that cites do have potential to be enjoyable places.

Latvian women are also very classy and well read, they were a joy to spend time with. The country-side is mostly flat and features the very holy birch tree. If you’re lucky, you’ll see a stork, which since pagan times was a sign of good luck.

One of my life’s goals is to own property on the Baltic Sea. This, Lodina Striprais, a Latvian women, some books, and few cats, and I would be a happy man. The race replacers have their eye’s on Latvia too. I read an article that reported how the EU was demanding that Latvia allow in North Africans. This in my opinion, should be considered “speech that encourages genocide.”

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:12 | #

“I read an article that reported how the EU was demanding that Latvia allow in North Africans.” (—2R)

Latvia must stand firm against that. Never, never, never give in! Tell the E.U. to DROP DEAD. 2R is right that these son of a bitch bastards have to be tried on capital genocide charges. Better yet, doesn’t the neutron bomb destroy people and leave buildings intact? Can’t a few be found to lob into E.U. offices around Brussels? Just a thought ...

Posted by Johan Van Vlaams on Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:43 | #

Fred,

If in the coming years America supports Flanders against French territorial claims, than I promise you that “another solution” to stem the Arab invasion of Brussels can be found.

Posted by Lurker on Tue, 16 Oct 2007 18:16 | #

Finland is very low on the list but based on one (albeit very short) visit I would say things are not too bad there. Not as far gone as Norway for instance. They are obviously saying the things that EUnuchs like to hear but somehow thats not quite translating into much change on the ground.

There was an interesting thread on this subject at isteve.com

Posted by GvS on Tue, 16 Oct 2007 19:10 | #

Finland is very low on the list but based on one (albeit very short) visit I would say things are not too bad there. Not as far gone as Norway for instance. They are obviously saying the things that EUnuchs like to hear but somehow thats not quite translating into much change on the ground.

Where did you visit—try hanging out by the main train station in Helsinki—you’ll find a Somali 5th Column Brigade just waiting for the right time to pounce.

I can personally vounch that there we almost no negros in Prague in 1999 .... in 2007, there are hoards of them in the center (and the local news just ran an investigative report on how these ‘groids pay fat Czech women to marry them to get them visas to stay .... but, the Czechs are cracking down on this, and are only giving 1 year visas for anybody married to a Czech for the first 3 years .... and they’re investigating such marriages ... (ie… a bunch of ‘groids just got deported and women put on trial) ... hopefully, they can keep up the pace.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Tue, 16 Oct 2007 19:44 | #

Prague should tell all the Czech bimbos who want to marry ‘groids that there’s nothing stopping them ... in Africa. Go do it there. And don’t come back. Incidentally I’m not seeing enough Jewish women marrying ‘groids and I’m not seeing enough Somalis settling in Israel. That has to be rectified. Can’t have Jewish women missing out on all those great mulatto babies they could be bringing into the world instead of Jewish ones, or on all those fantastic orgasms Prof. Ziv assures us ‘groids give white women. Something’s definitely got to be done to help Jewish women hook up with more ‘groid men. This dearth of ‘groid men in the lives of Jewish women is an outrage. Isn’t it something Abe Foxman ought to be speaking up about?

Posted by GvS on Tue, 16 Oct 2007 22:12 | #

Fred, they’re not hooking up with the ‘groids—the “poor” ‘groids are giving them like 500 bucks to marry them ... and the fat cows do it just to get the ‘groids a visa (and probably a freebee to boot) ... but, they’re all getting caught now. Hopefully, the cops will keep up the pressure ...

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Tue, 16 Oct 2007 23:49 | #

“Fred,

If in the coming years America supports Flanders against French territorial claims, than I promise you that ‘another solution’ to stem the Arab invasion of Brussels can be found.” (—Johan)

Thanks for that reassurance, Johan — it’s a relief to learn there might be a way to sort Brussels out without using neutron bombs! LOL

But all kidding aside, it sent a chill down my spine to read the words of Johan’s, “If America supports Flanders against French territorial claims.” I certainly hope Flemish independence doesn’t depend in the slightest on what D.C. thinks of the idea — the U.S. federal bureaucracy that deals with foreign affairs is as fervently against the survival of European nations as is the E.U. bureaucracy! I certainly hope the Vlaams Belang understands that and never mistakes the U.S. government for a friend! Before I read those words of Johan’s it had never occurred to me that Jews in the U.S. State Department might pressure Flanders not to secede, for the reason that they hate to see any European nation escape the race-replacement which secession would give Flanders a chance to escape. My prayer is that Flanders will find a way to achieve independence regardless of whatever pro-race-replacement pressures D.C. may bring to bear on it.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Wed, 17 Oct 2007 01:38 | #

these ‘groids pay fat Czech women to marry them to get them visas to stay” (—GvS)

In other words, GvS, would you say we’re dealing here with an obesogenic problem?

Posted by Lurker on Wed, 17 Oct 2007 01:43 | #

GvS - like I said, it was only a few days. So I stand corrected. My gut feeling was things looked worse in Norway.

Posted by zusammen on Wed, 17 Oct 2007 03:17 | #

In other words, GvS, would you say we’re dealing here with an obesogenic problem?

No. We’re dealing with excessive individual liberty that is partly responsible for obesity and wholly responsible for fat Czech women marrying ‘groids.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Wed, 17 Oct 2007 04:28 | #

One professor’s view of why race-replacment in the U.S. is happening:

“I’ve watched the [race-replacement machine] roll through one institution after another largely because business-oriented conservatives and moderates: (1) didn’t understand sociology’s basic insight that systems, structures, and social movements obtain a life of their own; (2) thought they could eventually curb [race-replacement] and [race-replacement]-thought through court challenges and changes in administrative law; (3) became obsessed with the ‘anti-victim’ mentality that suppressed complaints of working-class white males [...]; (4) failed to connect [race-replacement] with sociological and cultural change.”

Posted by Red Baron on Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:49 | #

More Culture Enrichment… British Style:

http://podblanc.ath.cx/?q=node/9196

Posted by Hibernia Girl on Mon, 22 Oct 2007 08:37 | #

Check out MIPEX’s “Restriction of freedom of association, assembly and speech to combat racism permitted” league table:

http://hiberniagirl.blogspot.com/2007/10/restriction-of-freedoms-league-table.html

Insanity.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Tue, 15 Jan 2008 02:38 | #

Jim Kalb’s take on matters, here for instance:

1. It seems that particular events are more contingent than general conditions, and particular policies consciously chosen are more contingent than background understandings of what is rational that determine what policies are legitimately conceivable. Our current immigration “policy” seems to fall into the latter categories. It’s the result of a pervasive and unshakable sense among governing elites that there are no legitimate rational objections whatever to large-scale third-world immigration. Opposition is simply ignorance, xenophobia and hatred. For that reason particular decisions to limit immigration are reversed as opportunities offer themselves and in the meantime enforced as little as possible because nobody who counts takes them seriously as good law.

2. That attitude toward immigration is part of more general attitudes toward ties and distinctions like culture, religion, ethnicity and sex. Those ties and distinctions are fundamental to all known social order but irrelevant and therefore at odds with the smooth functioning of efficient neutral market and bureaucratic relationships. The latter are the only relationships officially recognized as legitimate and authoritative today. Our ruling elites are therefore absolutely convinced that ties like ethnicity are weird, irrational, threatening, evil, incipiently violent, and fit only for suppression by any means necessary. I don’t think that kind of pervasive outlook is the chance result of a particular historical event, and it makes immigration restrictions extremely difficult to establish and maintain.

3. As the linked discussion shows, it wasn’t the Kennedy assassination but its ridiculously contrary-to-fact interpretation as an expression of American bigotry and hatred that mattered politically and culturally. I’d say something similar about the Holocaust. If colossal atrocities have big political and social effects because people want to avoid whatever might lead to anything similar, why hasn’t that been true of communist atrocities? And why has the importance of the Holocaust grown and grown as it has become more distant historically? The answer, I think, is that it serves as a symbol for a movement that would have been able to attain its present overwhelming success equally well with the aid of other symbols. That degree of success must be based on something more solid and comprehensive than chance.

4. Bottom line: if people persistently do something insane and claim it’s an example of pure rationality, you don’t explain it by reference to something that happened 60 years ago that didn’t affect them much personally. You blame it on some malfunction in their heads or in their general way of going about doing things.

Rem tene, verba sequentur.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:50 | #

Must be seen to be believed: Go to Hibernia Girl’s comment a couple above, and click on the link there, which takes you here. In the page that comes up, browse the links a bit, to get a fuller idea what MIPEX is (as pointed out in the present log entry, it’s an EU organization created in 2004 for the purpose of forcing race-replacement on peoples). Now, at the link at MIPEX in Hibernia Girl’s log entry click on “mapping and charting function” on the page that comes up, then on Display type: Map, then Year: 2006 (then click “Show” if necessary), then “All countries,” then on the drop-down menu at “Strand: Select” at the bottom, click on “Anti-discrimination,” and then, on “Dimension” select “Equality Policies,” and finally on “Indicator” select “Restriction of freedom of association/assembly/speech [in order to] combat racism [is] permitted,” then “Show.” Maps will come up showing how EU countries are graded according to their willingness to “restrict freedom of association/assembly/speech in order to combat racism,” the “best” countries being those that restrict most (i.e., are totalitarian), and the “worst” the ones that restrict least (i.e., whose governments respect the people’s rights).

Digest the significance of the above a minute, then go back a step and select other “Indicators” on the drop-down menu to examine other maps. It’s an eyeopener. Here they’re telling you in plain language what they’re doing, folks. They’re hiding nothing. They’re telling you they’re in the process of coercing all EU countries to “restrict freedom of association, freedom of assembly, and freedom of speech in order to ‘combat racism.’ ” To “combat racism” means “to force race-replacement.” These individuals have no illusions about what they’re doing. They’re conscious, admitted, proud totalitarians.