Posted by Doh on Mon, 14 Sep 2015 21:53 | #

It’s usual to include the link.

Posted by DanielS on Mon, 14 Sep 2015 23:10 | #

Done. The link had already been on the radio page but it is now added to this announcement post as well.

Posted by jawake on Tue, 15 Sep 2015 02:02 | #

If you support EU 2020, then why do you even call yourselves Nationalists?

EU 2020 emanates not from the wise counsels of Brussels, but is required by all signatories to the UN Framework on Climate Change, the terms of which will be re-negotiated in Paris in December 2015.

I am surprised that it has to be reiterated on a “Nationalist” webzine that globalized “carbon trading” and “green economies” are in large part designed to be a feel good way for “developed” nations to transfer their wealth to “developing” nations. That is to say, it is masochistic, post-colonial, white guilt on steroids.

One of the new animals in this long-running scam of white dispossession is a scheme called the Green Climate Fund, whereby “developed” nations are expected to contribute $100 billion/year to an environmental fund meant to be used in “the developing world,” while countries like India and Brazil contribute nothing at all. (until 2021…maybe.)

You can defend globalizing and dispossession schemes like this all you want, and perhaps even make the argument that giving all kinds of money constantly to “the most vulnerable” i.e.Africa, is the “Nationalist” thing to do, but I would disagree.

And there’s the rub: Because schemes like this are globalist and instituted by non-democratic regional bodies like the EU, it doesn’t matter what I think about my country or ethnicity being ripped off, because I couldn’t do anything about it; even if all the MEPs to the European Parliament were from the National Front.

How does supporting schemes like this further the Imperium Europa and help y’all take over Brussels? I can’t figure that out either.

Posted by jawake on Tue, 15 Sep 2015 02:26 | #

Please read this article: It says it all.

Juncker: Migrant Quotas Compulsory

It also prompts me to make this comment: The pro-EU “Nationalists” always seem to make the same argument about the fact that since the EU is in place it is ridiculous to talk about destroying it. They will then say, “Yes, the Jacobins are in control, but all that means is that we have to take it over and then it will be an effective tool for our people.”

The retort is that “destroy”  is a synonym to “transform” in the context of the EU, or if you will, six one way and half a dozen the other.

This is because “transforming” the EU to a non-globalist, merely European and democratic institution would require so much work, it will look for all intents and purposes like “destruction”...or should.

If you gut a very old house and totally remodel the inside, have you “destroyed” or “transformed” the inside house? And what would really be the difference? 

Posted by DanielS on Tue, 15 Sep 2015 06:00 | #

Juncker: Migrant quotas must be ‘compulsory’

By Eszter Zalan
BRUSSELS, 9. Sep, 12:01
https://euobserver.com/migration/130181

The European Commission is proposing the emergency relocation of 120,000 migrants across Europe from Greece, Italy and Hungary, the EU executive’s president Jean-Claude Juncker announced in a speech in Strasbourg on Wednesday (9 September), adding it “has to be done in a compulsory way.”

In his first State of the Union address to the European Parliament, Juncker said: “Addressing the refugee crisis is a matter of humanity and human dignity, for Europe [it is] also a matter of historical fairness.”

“Action is what is needed,” he noted, citing historical examples from Hungarians, Czechs, Slovaks, and Spanish fleeing for their lives in previous crises.

He called on EU ministers of justice and home affairs to adopt the proposal on September 14 for the relocation of a total of 160,000 migrants.

Juncker said he hoped that everyone would be on board this time.

A relocation plan, presented by the Commission for 40,000 migrants in May, was only agreed upon on a voluntary basis. The plan subsequently fell far short of the target.

“Italy, Greece, and Hungary cannot be left alone to cope with the enormous challenge,” Juncker added.

He recalled that 500,000 people have made their way into Europe so far this year, and pointed out that this number represents only 0.11 percent of the total EU population.

“Winter is approaching. Do we really want families sleeping in railway stations?”, Juncker asked.

Besides the emergency relocation measure, Juncker announced that the European Commission is proposing a permanent relocation mechanism, which “will allow Europe to deal with crisis more swiftly in the future”.

The Luxembourgish politician also announced that the Commission wants to turn Frontex, its border control agency in Warsaw, into a proper external border control and coast guard force.

He said the passport-free travel zone, Schengen, must be protected.

“Schengen will not be abolished under the mandate of this commission,” Juncker said.

He said the Commission plans to set up a Trust Fund of €1.8 billion to help Africa tackle the root causes of migration, and called on all EU members to pitch in.

Other measures include the review of the so-called Dublin system, which stipulates that people must claim asylum in the state in which they first enter the EU, and lays out a common list of safe countries of origin to process economic migrants more swiftly.

Juncker said Europe needs to open legal channels of migration.

“We are an ageing continent, migration must change from a problem, to a well managed resource,” he said, adding that asylum-seekers should be allowed to work while awaiting the completion of their asylum process.

Juncker announced that the Commission will present a common refugee and asylum policy in early 2016, and reiterated that member states need to adhere to existing common asylum mechanisms.

“It is a matter of credibility,” he said, adding that, before the summer, the Commission launched 32 proceedings to force EU members to uphold European standards and that more investigations are under way.

Jawake, MR is ethno-nationalist; I have always been against the EU, for its corruption and control by our enemies.

However, since something like The EU would be ideal and there are likely to be structures, forces, friendly forces allied and people within The EU that will be on our side and can potentially be wrested in alliance of our coordinated ethno-nationalist interests, we are willing to entertain what is an admittedly novel position - an optimistic position, suspending disbelief that some of its elements, structures and people may be brought into service of our ethno-nationalist interests - ideally, an EU type coordinating structure in its entirety, which did not interfere with nativist national maintenance and would facilitate our coordination against non-European antagonists.

It does make logical sense as European ethnonationalists have common interests, are operating on the basis of natural self interests, are therefore aligned with the normal interests of even some of those with power, would have regional interests (region = EU region) that are interrelated with geo-political interests that are being interfered with by middle-Easterners (interfering there and here), African bio-power and population explosion, and that our national and regional interests could have symbiotic, allied interests with Asian nationalists and regions as well, that could be coordinated through an EU type structure’s regional management.

Posted by EU relocation plan stalled on Tue, 15 Sep 2015 14:59 | #

By Nikolaj Nielsen
BRUSSELS, Today, 02:20

Ministers in Brussels on Monday (14 September) failed to reach a unanimous decision on whether to back a European Commission plan to relocate 120,000 asylum seekers.

Instead they opted for a weakened political agreement following stern opposition from Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Romania.